Go Back   Alternate History Discussion Board > Discussion > Alternate History Discussion: After 1900

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 1st, 2011, 10:33 PM
Fooldartz Fooldartz is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 26
What if Hitler hadn't been hit on the head?

Yes, I realise that Hitler wasn't actually hit on the head. But think about it. He makes all of these smart descisions, then BAM! the guy can't do anything right. So, here Hitler honors his treaty with Russia during the late thirties and forties. Also, he ignores Japan and doesn't declare war on the United States, so the US focuses on Japan, while Germany takes all of non-Russian Europe, including Britain. Where do we go from here, or is this completely wrong?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old August 1st, 2011, 10:36 PM
The Red The Red is offline
A virulent, ignorant bigot
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Occupied Scotland
Posts: 1000 or more
This is completely wrong. Hitler didn't suddenly go mad, he was always making rash decisions, however as the war progressed Germany didn't have the ability to achieve them any more. Granted he began to lose focus with reality as the situation got increasingly worse.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whanztastic View Post
No one has been beaten with a cane on the floor of Congress in a suspiciously long time in my opinion.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old August 1st, 2011, 10:39 PM
Fooldartz Fooldartz is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 26
But everything he did was strategically sound until he invaded Russian Europe. Or am I just an idiot?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old August 1st, 2011, 10:46 PM
Alex Richards Alex Richards is offline
Alexander I of Nova Elysium
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Imperial Palace, City of Alexandria in the Valley, Kingdom of Plinthos, Empire of Nova Elysium
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fooldartz View Post
But everything he did was strategically sound until he invaded Russian Europe. Or am I just an idiot?
Basically, ideaologically speaking Hitler had spent the entire time since 1923 preaching about how the 'true Aryan race' was under threat from the 'Judeo-Marxist threat' including Bolshevism and the Soviets. Simply put, the Molentov-Ribbentrop Pact was something of an abberation and couldn't be sustained politically for long within the party as it went against the grain. And Hitler was planning to invade the Soviet Union all along, so it can't really be taken out the equation.
__________________
Imperium Resurgam- Last Update: May 28th 2013
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old August 1st, 2011, 10:48 PM
The Red The Red is offline
A virulent, ignorant bigot
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Occupied Scotland
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Richards View Post
Basically, ideaologically speaking Hitler had spent the entire time since 1923 preaching about how the 'true Aryan race' was under threat from the 'Judeo-Marxist threat' including Bolshevism and the Soviets. Simply put, the Molentov-Ribbentrop Pact was something of an abberation and couldn't be sustained politically for long within the party as it went against the grain. And Hitler was planning to invade the Soviet Union all along, so it can't really be taken out the equation.
Also, he had got to the point that invading the Soviet Union in 1941 was the best option on the table. Leaving Stalin alone or invading a year or two would only have entailed a quicker defeat down the line.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whanztastic View Post
No one has been beaten with a cane on the floor of Congress in a suspiciously long time in my opinion.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old August 1st, 2011, 10:55 PM
Elfwine Elfwine is online now
Byzantophilic Brony
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: West of Constantinople
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fooldartz View Post
But everything he did was strategically sound until he invaded Russian Europe. Or am I just an idiot?
He got away with it (earlier), but he increasing bit off more than he could chew - Russia is just more obviously that than say, Norway.
__________________
Author of The Eagle of the Bosporus - a timeline inspired by Isaac's Empire
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old August 1st, 2011, 10:55 PM
Fooldartz Fooldartz is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 26
Okay, you're right, I'm an idiot.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old August 1st, 2011, 10:56 PM
Elfwine Elfwine is online now
Byzantophilic Brony
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: West of Constantinople
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fooldartz View Post
Okay, you're right, I'm an idiot.
Everyone makes mistakes. Making mistakes is not the same as being an idiot.

Not recognizing that one makes mistakes, on the other hand...
__________________
Author of The Eagle of the Bosporus - a timeline inspired by Isaac's Empire
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old August 1st, 2011, 11:27 PM
Tangerine Tangerine is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 278
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fooldartz View Post
But everything he did was strategically sound until he invaded Russian Europe. Or am I just an idiot?
Hitler's strategies had nothing to do with early German successes - all the actual work was done by his generals. Besides, the German armed forces outmatched those of Britain and France at the start of the war (if not in actual material strength then in doctrine, morale and tactics). Germany was fighting at an advantage at the start of the war because their opponents were either unprepared for war (Britain and France) or simply didn't have the resources to match Germany's war machine (Poland).

So, Germany was more than capable of conquering continental western and central Europe. This was the zenith of Germany's success not because Hitler suddenly started making stupid decisions, but because the next round of fighting would be with enemies Germany had no realistic hope of defeating: the USSR and the USA. To be fair, if Germany had played its cards better the USSR might have folded in 1941, but it was a long shot. The sheer logistical strain of invading the USSR had broken the back of the German armed forces by 1942, and the resulting war of attrition was unwinnable for the Nazis given that the USA was now pouring nearly limitless resources into the war effort of both Britain and the USSR.

People often cite the opening of hostilities between Germany and the USSR as Hitler's "big mistake", but from their viewpoint it would have been an even bigger mistake not to invade the USSR. By the 1940s the USSR was knee-deep in militarization and the officer corps of the Red Army was being quickly rebuilt after being eviscerated in the 1930s. Hitler and the generals knew that the chance of victory over the USSR became slimmer every year the invasion was delayed.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old August 1st, 2011, 11:45 PM
V-J V-J is offline
Acceptable in the 80s
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Norşanhymbra
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Red View Post
Also, he had got to the point that invading the Soviet Union in 1941 was the best option on the table.
I should think that history proves that it wasn't. Hitler's best option after 1940 would probably have been to mostly sit tight and wait for developments. Of course, that swam against his mentality.
__________________
I have finished
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old August 1st, 2011, 11:50 PM
Germaniac Germaniac is offline
Live from a Library Cubicle
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Atheocracy of New Jersey
Posts: 801
Quote:
Originally Posted by V-J View Post
I should think that history proves that it wasn't. Hitler's best option after 1940 would probably have been to mostly sit tight and wait for developments. Of course, that swam against his mentality.
But once again it was completely and utterly against everything the party believed in NOT to invade the USSR and to "sit tight" would only provide the USSR with more or a chance of beating the Germans. While Germany might have beat the USSR in 1941 (There could have been a chance at a negotiated peace had some stars fallen align at the right times), It would already have become impossible to defeat them even one year later.
__________________
Dear Brother, I do not spread rumors, I create them.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old August 2nd, 2011, 12:10 AM
The Red The Red is offline
A virulent, ignorant bigot
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Occupied Scotland
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by V-J View Post
I should think that history proves that it wasn't. Hitler's best option after 1940 would probably have been to mostly sit tight and wait for developments. Of course, that swam against his mentality.
He still lost, but he would have lost harder if he tried in 1942 or 1943 as the Red Army reformed and modernised. The Red Army may have been the one invading in 1943 in fact.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whanztastic View Post
No one has been beaten with a cane on the floor of Congress in a suspiciously long time in my opinion.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old August 2nd, 2011, 07:01 AM
Bob the Great Bob the Great is offline
The One True Bob
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Somewhere in the war-torn lands of balkanized North America
Posts: 105
Hitler's "Genius" plan for invading France was just stolen from Manstein.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old August 2nd, 2011, 07:23 AM
Bob the Great Bob the Great is offline
The One True Bob
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Somewhere in the war-torn lands of balkanized North America
Posts: 105
Hitler's "Genius" plan for invading France was just stolen from Manstein.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.