|
#861
|
|||
|
|||
|
An infobox to follow up my earlier ideas for "Greater Berkshire".
The only thing I'm not too sure on are the MPs, all the rest I'm pretty happy with.
__________________
I now have one of these -> http://martin23230.deviantart.com (Well, I haven't used it in months. Feel free to take a look though) |
|
#862
|
|||
|
|||
|
President Robert De Niro.
|
|
#863
|
|||
|
|||
|
He looks more of a polotician that Borris Johnson
|
|
#864
|
|||
|
|||
|
Here's the eleventh in my attempt at a serious series of AltHist Wikipedia InfoBoxs:
![]() |
|
#865
|
|||
|
|||
|
Here's a few infoboxes I did for the American Commonwealth thread.
These are for ABS (American Broadcasting System), the public broadcaster of the American Commonwealth. ![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________
We are Nya Moderaterna. You will be assimilated. Resistance is futile.
|
|
#866
|
|||
|
|||
|
I thought this would be an interesting idea, what if companies still existed today...
Basically, Lyons in a timeline where it becomes the British Apple or more likely IBM and where BSB beat Sky |
|
#867
|
|||
|
|||
|
Someone made a couple of infoboxes involving an American monarchy, and someone else said that they found that idea objectionable. So I put it to you: which do you find more objectionable? An American monarchy, or the British monarchy ruling over all or part of America in a personal union?
__________________
|
|
#868
|
|||
|
|||
|
This seems to be a fairly one-sided conflict
__________________
"be ashamed to die until you have won some victory for humanity" -- Horace Mann |
|
#869
|
|||
|
|||
|
Here's a little snippet from my timeline, which is linked in my signature.
__________________
Bolívar dead? War of 1812 averted? President Henry Clay? Check out my TL: ¡Por la Patria, Viva México Fuerte!: UPDATED 1/3/13 |
|
#870
|
|||
|
|||
|
An odd ATL I thought of where the United States has a different constitutional setup agreed to from the beginning, with a monarchy:
__________________
Quote:
|
|
#871
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sydney, Jennifer, Kimberley? Who chose those royals?!
__________________
|
|
#872
|
|||
|
|||
|
They're American royalty. There's a conscious attempt to avoid being too British - for example, I had the idea that the monarch may only be a natural-born American married to a natural-born American, so they're consciously separate from European royalty. The King's father was a du Pont, and, as his middle name "Cornelius" betrays, his ancestors include Vanderbilts. "Sydney" was also a fairly common name in certain wealthy Southern families, particularly the Lees, in the 19th century, so "Sydney" would never have developed into a generally female name in this TL, because it was held by a King of the United States.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
#873
|
|||
|
|||
|
Behold. The Glorious Worker's State that is America, behold her beauty!
and just so you know, the Orman Rovelle Brussells mentioned is suppose to be a Lenin analouge, may make a infobox for Brussells here soon. |
|
#874
|
|||
|
|||
|
Why would the capitol of the UASR be called Brusselsgrad????
|
|
#875
|
|||
|
|||
|
Oops. I meant Brussellsville, but that's OTL Philadelphia so you know, and it's not the capital. Washington still is. |
|
#876
|
|||
|
|||
|
How did Philadelphia climb back up to largest city? What happened to New York?
__________________
Quote:
|
|
#877
|
|||
|
|||
|
Okay and then my next question is how is the population so high?
|
|
#878
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
New York was heavily damaged during WW2, Forcing alot of NY's buisness to move to Brussellsville. |
|
#879
|
|||
|
|||
|
The UASR invaded and annexed Canada during WW2. |
|
#880
|
|||
|
|||
|
How did NY get heavily damaged during WW2?
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|