|
#7961
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Mainly looking at the Americas, Europe, Asia and Africa here.
__________________
|
|
#7962
|
|||
|
|||
|
here is a standerd napoleon win map of 1806
|
|
#7964
|
|||
|
|||
|
How can Napoleon get Australia? It was being heavily colonised by the British then. The most he could get was land in the West
|
|
#7965
|
|||
|
|||
|
Danish Scania, half of Halland and Blekinge, and Finnveden?
We are not amused.
__________________
The Story of a Party- Fremont wins in '56! Updated May 9
A Dance in Aetherium Ceci n'est pas une signature. |
|
#7966
|
|||
|
|||
|
What in the world happened to Finland that made it join the Eurasian Union? Are the Russkies good guys now, or what?
__________________
|
|
#7967
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I get that they wouldn't be able to grab New South Wales, but Western Australia was any man's game. In fact, in 1806, Britain didn't even claim it themselves.
__________________
|
|
#7968
|
|||
|
|||
|
Finland got independence from Russia peacefully after talks were held with the Russian authorities. The two nations continue to share close ties and Russia is Finland's largest export market.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
#7969
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
If Finland never left Russia, they should have the same borders as the Grand Duchy of Finland. Those borders are the ones forged only because of the Winter War. It's a good map, btw.
__________________
|
|
#7970
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
That's true. I'll fix the map ![]() Thank you.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
#7971
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
My issue is simply that that border, unless otherwise decided via treaty, war, or whatever, would not be straight as an arrow. Your argument that straight lines are used all over the USA is entirely different as that has to do with internal divisions of a nation in a huge wilderness and lats & longs were the easiest to use. For two nations agreeing to the same sort of border, I call bollucks, especially considering the potential history there. Now, straight lines in the desert is something else entirely. You want to do that, go right ahead, but again, diagonals are gonna make for screwy issues - hence why people did use lats & longs. Just saying. Those are internal divisions, though, so whatever. Algeria has a funny shape OTL due to such issues. But yeah, the Space-Filling is a bit of a concern. Yup. Well... that's what you get when you just right in and invent your own world and history as you go.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
#7972
|
|||
|
|||
|
I didn't know that about the Japanese ITTL, sorry.
I still disagree with Algeria though. If it can have such a shape in OTL, no reason why the same cant occur in an ATL.
__________________
|
|
#7973
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Look, your criticism about the 1945 part is fine. the war is a very near thing. But the drought in 1947 was truly catastrophic in any scale. even without the war this would have been a devastating drought. And russian agriculture would still be suffering from collectivisation anyway. oh, and on the topic of the australia-india-ROC alliance: the USA is very far away and isnt as powerful as it could be. The Indians actually have a hostile border with the Japanese, and the ROC is picking fights with them daily. together they present too much of a challenge to the japanese to fight at one time. This bloc is very friendly with the Americans but they are suspicious of the recent thawing of relations. France is the second most powerful country in europe, the germans arent all powerful. there isnt much to stop them Also, if you look at the map the yanks have the faeroes, greenland and iceland, you can bet they are packed to the brim with nukes. The closest the germans can get to the USA are the Azores The Japanese managed to hold on because the yanks Last edited by Looseheadprop; November 8th, 2011 at 10:39 AM.. Reason: forgot something |
|
#7974
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#7975
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Didn't say they were taken over. But the UK is unlikely to _surrender_ outright for less than starvation: armistice, I can buy. Quote:
Even with Soviet mismanagement and wartime damage, it only killed about 1.5 million people, mostly Ukrainians. OTL the Soviets lost 20 million people and kept fighting: the drought ain't going to knock them out of the war. The less useful will be "triaged." OTL was close. In a 1945 invasion where the Soviets are expecting an attack, the Germans will do rather worse. Quote:
How so? OTL the US beat the Japanese essentially with one hand tied behind its back (the great bulk of the war effort was directed towards Europe.) India may be a formidable threat to Japan in 1970, but it sure won't be in 1940-something. Quote:
So the US nuclear blackmails the Germans into letting the French rearm? No German ICBMs in this TL? Von Braun blew himself up at an early age? Hold onto what now? Bruce Edit: PS - I'm sorry if I'm coming across as a bit harsh. It just annoys me the way people keep coming up with some way to put a few more points in the Nazi column and then go "yes! Now I can write my cool Nazi victory scenario!" without examining compensating factors. Everyone is just so pantingly eager to find a way for them to win, you know? Getting then to win is just hard or requires major PODs as much as a decade or more before the war: so I'm cool with a somewhat ASB TL which produces a really nice map. Just don't keep on claiming that it's not ASB at all. ![]() Addendum: and why would Hitler wait till '45 to attack, anyway? He was in poor health by the 40s and in a hurry to get his war done while he was still alive... Last edited by B_Munro; November 8th, 2011 at 03:17 PM.. |
|
#7976
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
And the flags are nice. What is the year, and when is the initial POD?(I must quibble re Red Latin America: it is after all a great many pretty different countries, and such universal Red Success seems a trifle unlikely...domino theory, anyone? ) Bruce |
|
#7977
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
It's around the mid 21st century. 2007 to be exact. There are several PODs. Among them are : - Western Australia succeeds in becoming it's own dominion and later votes to become a republic along with South Africa. - The Bolsheviks accepting Russian democracy following the Russian Constituent Assembly election of 1917. - Gran Colombia, Central America and Peru-Bolivia stay intact. - Indonesia stays hard-line Socialist until the mid-80's which causes the... - The Clandestine Communist Organization to be able to seize north Borneo with the help of the Brunei People's Party with Indonesian funding and assistance, both material and financial. - Earlier independence for South Sudan. - Civil wars in Iran and the DR Congo. - Reformists fail to take over the Chinese Communist Party. China has begun small scale reforms. Something akin to Doi Moi in OTL Vietnam. - The US is far more right-wing, free market oriented and export based than OTL. When TTL's financial recession hit, the US has one of the worst countries hit and is experiencing it's own American Spring of sorts.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
#7978
|
|||
|
|||
|
a little work in progress map of my araldyana tl:
1856: ![]()
__________________
|
|
#7979
|
|||
|
|||
|
As always, I'm loving this series. Especially Scanden.
![]()
__________________
The Story of a Party- Fremont wins in '56! Updated May 9
A Dance in Aetherium Ceci n'est pas une signature. |
|
#7980
|
|||
|
|||
|
I really like it, just as the other Araldyana ones. Curious to see the rest of the world, which you haven't finished yet.
__________________
My new TL: The Reign of the Rasna - an Etruscan empire |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|