Go Back   Alternate History Discussion Board > Discussion > Alternate History Discussion: After 1900

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 12th, 2011, 12:47 AM
KyleB KyleB is offline
Comfortably Numb
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Boldly going where no man has gone before
Posts: 1000 or more
Germany cancels jet development, focuses on piston engines?

Let's say that in 1941 the RLM gets fed up with the slow progress of jet engine development and postpones jet engine/aircraft development indefinitely.

Instead they focus on building the DB 604, Argus 413 and Jumo 222 piston engines, and issue a new specification for Germany's next air-superiority fighter, powered by a single powerful piston engine driving contra-rotating pusher propellers, with tricycle landing gear and four MK108 cannon in the nose. It enters service in early 1944. Also, production and development of the Do 217, He 111, and He 177 is stopped so that the Bomber-B program can be completed.

Any thoughts?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by KingByng View Post
Freaking ice cream trucks man! Destroying American culture, one cone at a time.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old May 12th, 2011, 12:56 AM
erich von changstein erich von changstein is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 411
Germany is screwed even if they do that because even if they get that plane it does not change the fact of the bombing.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by RousseauX View Post
AH.Com 2012: reopening the Arianism debate
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old May 12th, 2011, 01:00 AM
Xgentis Xgentis is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Belgium, Wallonia
Posts: 1000 or more
It won't change the outcome of the war.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old May 12th, 2011, 01:00 AM
KyleB KyleB is offline
Comfortably Numb
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Boldly going where no man has gone before
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by erich von changstein View Post
Germany is screwed even if they do that because even if they get that plane it does not change the fact of the bombing.
Of course Germany is still going to lose the war, but I was wondering what are the repercussions, and how this changes the course of the war...
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by KingByng View Post
Freaking ice cream trucks man! Destroying American culture, one cone at a time.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old May 12th, 2011, 01:03 AM
Xgentis Xgentis is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Belgium, Wallonia
Posts: 1000 or more
Jet fighter came mutch later.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old May 12th, 2011, 01:11 AM
KyleB KyleB is offline
Comfortably Numb
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Boldly going where no man has gone before
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xgentis View Post
Jet fighter came mutch later.
The Me-262 program commenced very early but was delayed by engine difficulties.

The Me 262 actually first flew as a prototype in 1941, albeit with a piston engine.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by KingByng View Post
Freaking ice cream trucks man! Destroying American culture, one cone at a time.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old May 12th, 2011, 01:14 AM
Xgentis Xgentis is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Belgium, Wallonia
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by KyleB View Post
The Me-262 program commenced very early but was delayed by engine difficulties.

The Me 262 actually first flew as a prototype in 1941, albeit with a piston engine.
I mean after the war sorry. Jet fighter will come mutch later since there will be no captured german jet fighter.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old May 12th, 2011, 01:18 AM
Cook Cook is offline
Maybe I will
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Beyond the black stump
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xgentis View Post
Jet fighter came mutch later.


Britain developed the jet engine parallel to Germany, with the Gloster Meteor becoming operational in 1944. Frank Whittle not only invented the turbojet engine before the Germans, but his design was more mechanically reliable.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Georgepatton View Post
Operation Seacamel?!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Emperor Julian View Post
Berlusconi for Pope: Why let the Church's collapse be slow?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyr View Post
a fairly realistic take on a zombie apocolypse
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old May 12th, 2011, 01:34 AM
Das_Colonel Das_Colonel is offline
Le Bocagiste
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 92
Quote:
Originally Posted by KyleB;
Germany's next air-superiority fighter, powered by a single powerful piston engine driving contra-rotating pusher propellers, with tricycle landing gear and four MK108 cannon in the nose. It enters service in early 1944.
Any thoughts?
Almost sounds like your looking for a Do335
__________________
Gunnarz - "Which is just crazy, on the face of it. I mean if there was ever a plane that was a perfect fit for naval aviation, it's the B-52."
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old May 12th, 2011, 01:38 AM
KyleB KyleB is offline
Comfortably Numb
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Boldly going where no man has gone before
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Das_Colonel View Post
Almost sounds like your looking for a Do335
Do 335 was twin-engined, one in front and one in back.
Besides I'm wondering if something similar to this could be developed sooner, with all the benefits from having a powerplant-free nose.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by KingByng View Post
Freaking ice cream trucks man! Destroying American culture, one cone at a time.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old May 12th, 2011, 03:21 AM
Cook Cook is offline
Maybe I will
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Beyond the black stump
Posts: 1000 or more
Jet engines run on kerosene, so didn’t suffer the fuel shortages that grounded the rest of the Luftwaffe by the way; something to remember with an all piston engine air fleet.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Georgepatton View Post
Operation Seacamel?!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Emperor Julian View Post
Berlusconi for Pope: Why let the Church's collapse be slow?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyr View Post
a fairly realistic take on a zombie apocolypse
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old May 12th, 2011, 04:02 AM
danderson danderson is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 159
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cook View Post
Britain developed the jet engine parallel to Germany, with the Gloster Meteor becoming operational in 1944. Frank Whittle not only invented the turbojet engine before the Germans, but his design was more mechanically reliable.
Centrifugal flow compressors have the problem that they need to get wider to get more, umm, compression. This leads to wider fuselage and more drag.

I dunno how much research was being done on axial flow compressors in the west. Germany was all about them though. So worse case scenario, western fighters get a little fatter for longer.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old May 12th, 2011, 04:06 AM
KyleB KyleB is offline
Comfortably Numb
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Boldly going where no man has gone before
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cook View Post
Jet engines run on kerosene, so didn’t suffer the fuel shortages that grounded the rest of the Luftwaffe by the way; something to remember with an all piston engine air fleet.
Hmm, can you clarify on that and provide sources?

The Me 262 suffered from drastic fuel shortages too. Often the problem was not that there was no fuel, but that the infrastructure to move the fuel to the Luftwaffe's airfields was wrecked, and that the omnipresent danger of fighter-bombers meant that any serious attempt to move fuel from the factories where synthetic fuel was made to the airfields resulted in a gigantic ball of flames.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by KingByng View Post
Freaking ice cream trucks man! Destroying American culture, one cone at a time.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old May 12th, 2011, 06:32 AM
Cook Cook is offline
Maybe I will
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Beyond the black stump
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by KyleB View Post
Hmm, can you clarify on that and provide sources?
Actually they may have been omnivorous with regard to fuel, I’ll see what I can dig up.

Cal should be along shortly to sort this out anyway.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Georgepatton View Post
Operation Seacamel?!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Emperor Julian View Post
Berlusconi for Pope: Why let the Church's collapse be slow?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyr View Post
a fairly realistic take on a zombie apocolypse
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old May 12th, 2011, 07:56 AM
Riain Riain is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1000 or more
It would be very short sighted to not develop the next step in fighters in order to develop a piston fighter that will only be marginally better than the ones on the drawing board. Keep in mind that in 1941 nobody could have forseen that jet engines would take quite so long to perfect, or that the war would turn against Germany quite so badly. Perhaps they could have been ready in 1943, or perhaps the war could have turned out a bit differently and Germany controlled more territory and resources in late 44.
__________________
"The role of the Cavalry is to add colour, dash and daring, to what would otherwise be a mindless shitfight amongst grunts".
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old May 12th, 2011, 10:44 AM
Astrodragon Astrodragon is offline
Coffee-seeking Dragon
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: UK - Oxfordshire
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by danderson View Post
Centrifugal flow compressors have the problem that they need to get wider to get more, umm, compression. This leads to wider fuselage and more drag.

I dunno how much research was being done on axial flow compressors in the west. Germany was all about them though. So worse case scenario, western fighters get a little fatter for longer.
The British were developing them in parallel. They decided at the time that the centrifugal engine was better (at that stage of development), and they were probably right.
__________________
The Whale Has Wings, a shiny new Fleet Air Arm in WW2. Timelines go better with Whales...
http://www.astrodragon.co.uk/Books/TheWhaleHasWings.htm
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old May 12th, 2011, 02:44 PM
Faralis Faralis is offline
Sometimes is Capt Obvious
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Astrodragon View Post
The British were developing them in parallel. They decided at the time that the centrifugal engine was better (at that stage of development), and they were probably right.
Yep, more or less same output ( a bit more powerful IIRC ) but much more reliable, Germans had to change the engines after 100 hour of use ( and sometimes it was even worse ...)
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old May 12th, 2011, 03:30 PM
The BigI The BigI is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 95
Quote:
Originally Posted by danderson View Post
Centrifugal flow compressors have the problem that they need to get wider to get more, umm, compression. This leads to wider fuselage and more drag.

I dunno how much research was being done on axial flow compressors in the west. Germany was all about them though. So worse case scenario, western fighters get a little fatter for longer.

The British went for centrifugal for the meteor over axial because Sir Frank Whittle didn't think that Britsh industry wouldn't be able to produce the refined metals for axial flow engines. The F.2 Freda which was a flyable test bed used on a lancaster bomber had a higher thrust than the jumo 004c and it was flying in 1941. The main issue with centifugal is that technolgically it was a dead end, 1st and 2nd gen centrifugal were more/as powerful as the same axial flow but that would be the most you could really push centrifugal tech while you can with axial. Axials engines used "exotic" material hard to get during a world war, the German's could have made more reliable jet engines but they would have had to curtail u-boat production...so it depends on what you think is more important I suppsoe.

Also a lot of people think that the Germans were much more advanced than the Britsh because they were flying jets sooner, but realistically that was only because the Germans were desperate for a war winner and push the B-17 and B-24's out of the sky fortunately the Britsh didn't have that issue as shown by the late 40 and 50's where the British jet engines were the best in the world.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old May 12th, 2011, 03:46 PM
BlairWitch749 BlairWitch749 is offline
resident right wing apologist
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Long Island NY
Posts: 1000 or more
Send a message via MSN to BlairWitch749
German late war piston engine fighters like the ME-109 series K and the FW-190 D where already very competitive anyway. The whole reason jets where attractive to Germany was that they offered a (potential) MASSIVE increase in performance which they thought could be a multiplier to make up for their hyper numerical inferiority

this pod doesn't change much... maybe some elements of wing design get pushed back a few years but the time line would merge with otl by 1955 more or less
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Astrodragon View Post
OK, where is the real BlairWitch and what have you done with him!!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fleetlord View Post
I feel a little dirty supporting BlairWitch
Manstein in Africa: resumed
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old May 12th, 2011, 04:10 PM
Michel Van Michel Van is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Liege Belgium Europe
Posts: 1000 or more
it not only the RLM fault
one Major Problem was Hitler him self
He demanned that Jet-Fighter Me 262 are produce as Jet-BOMBER !

the other Major Problem was Reichsmarschal Göring chaotic ruel over RLM
he hate the innovative Do 335 design (also BLOHM & VOSS aircraft Design)
wat cornier Göring consider as "that no Aircrafts, but delusional idea of maniacs"

Next to that was RLM catastrophic pilot training or better the lack of it
at end of war they try put non-skilled glider pilots in He 162 Jet-Fighter
wat even experiencing Test Pilots consider as "it is merciless on Pilot-error"

BMW, Mercedes, Junkers had extrem problems on R&D of new Aircraft engines
the lack of vital raw materials like titan, manganese, chromium, vanadium, and tungsten
constant change at RLM demands, lack of resources, man power and engineer
play also an important consideration
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.