A Different ARPANET

There were a small number of electronic computers separated by vast distances, owned by research corporations and wealthy universities. It was theorized that direct electronic connection of these computers might lead to improved collaboration.

The solution: build a nuclear-strike-resistant bunker housing an even more powerful electronic computer than all the other ones combined, connected to the rest of the continent through hardened electronic wiring. The supercomputer, named CHIEF (Central Holistic Information Environment Facility), was built in the middle of nowhere (Northwest Colorado) with as much work as possible put into the concealment of the construction activity, so that the Soviets would never realize that it even existed. Due to the expenditures involved, several people in Washington DC were beginning to figure out that DARPA was up to something, but they could not comprehend what it was exactly. Weren't computers those things used to calculate ballistics and physics, and which were horribly inefficient for any other task? That NASA organization uses slide rules for engineering, after all.

By the time this project had finished construction in the early 1970's, the number of electronic computers in existence was already rapidly increasing as people began to realize their usefulness for other tasks. Improvements in programming languages and computing interfaces were leading to the adoption of computers for business purposes as well. Punch cards gave way to textual terminals, and the C programming language was much easier to use than the horrendously-clunky FORTRAN and COBOL. Many institutions were developing their own proprietary networks, usually consisting of a few powerful mainframes connected to a lot of dumb terminals. Those networks which were members of ARPANET enjoyed large advantages, as terminals of one network were able to login to mainframes on the other side of the country. Clearly, ARPANET needed to be scaled up, as universities and businesses demanded more and more connectivity.

By this time, CHIEF had gone through about three iterations and was now composed of a mainframe responsible for delegating tasks to about ten other mainframes in the same facility. This was still not enough to handle the projected workload if ARPANET was to cover the entire continent. CHIEF itself was running into heat and electricity problems, as computers can only be pushed so far.

DARPA's answer was to establish a large and complex hierarchy with CHIEF at the top. CHIEF was "Tier 1," and the only truly-trusted authority for the network. "Tier 2" consisted of powerful hubs placed strategically throughout the country. Each hub had its own codename, and kept in constant communication with CHIEF. They also kept partial copies of CHIEF's data, kept synchronized through a cacheing scheme. "Tier 3" consisted of smaller hubs, only requiring a full office building each, which were constructed according to demand. It would be the Tier 3 hubs that would actually maintain the connections between the various civilian and non-government mainframes. Thanks to this setup, it cost quite a bit of money for anyone to join ARPANET, but there were many corporations with a lot of money who got the feeling that this would be useful one day. Already, some visionaries were proposing ARPANET-connected systems that could automatically handle accounting, stock trading, material logistics, and other intense number-crunching activities.

Throughout the 1970's, it became clear that sheer computing power was not enough to manage everything. Things had to be done smarter too. This led to large amounts of money being put towards Artificial Intelligence research. The concept had been around for a long time, and basic chess-playing programs were starting to get around. But, now it was time to accomplish nothing less than the total management and routing of all information in the whole United States. Such a theoretical Artificial Intelligence would also have to be capable of splitting itself so that it would run on multiple computers throughout ARPANET. It also had to be able to take command of any civilian and non-government computer during wartime emergencies. This was not successfully completed until much later.

By 1980, there was increasing demand from wealthy private individuals who wanted to be able to connect to this "Network of Networks," colloquially termed the "Internet," so that they could be a part of the visionary future of things being done automatically by computers in order to save money. DARPA decided it was time to start adding privately-operated components ARPANET in order to make this possible and therefore partnered with companies that already dealt with large amounts of electronic communication infrastructure: the phone and cable companies. Existing university and corporate networks were retroactively designated "Tier 4," and common protocols were developed so that the phone & cable companies could create their own Internet-compliant Tier 4 systems.

By 1990, the all-controlling Artificial Intelligence was still not even close to completion, but some elements of it were already in use, such as the ability to take control of every single connected computer, and to continue functioning in distributed form if there was a nuclear strike against the United States.

Meanwhile, thousands of ordinary people were starting to use the Internet, albeit for what may have seemed to be rather trivial purposes. The violent computer game "Doom" was starting to really make waves in universities, since it could allow for multiple people to be in the same game session, or "Deathmatch," as long as they were part of the same Tier 4 group. People were making techno music on the Amiga and sharing it with others via "Bulletin Board Systems" operated by those wealthy enough to build their own Tier 4 systems. Neverwinter Nights, a significant BBS game, was so popular that the company had to create the "Don't Copy That Floppy" public service announcement to discourage people from playing the game for free.

By the year 2001, the Y2K fear had mostly passed except for the odd irregularity here and there (e.g. a prisoner being released early), and the Internet was clearly becoming a big deal. Many people who just wanted to try it out were subscribers of America Online, a gigantic Tier 4 operator with horrible service that relied on free CDs to ensure its popularity. As increasing amounts of people and corporations wanted to host their own websites and what not, the Tier 4 operators found it expedient to create some basic Tier 5 standards, by which ordinary people could "rent" Internet addresses.

Now it is the year 2010, and a website called Wikileaks has been shut down with extreme prejudice thanks to the extraordinary control that the US Government exerts over the Internet, thanks to the fact that the vast majority of it is still routed through CHIEF. The First Amendment? That only applies to either physical printing presses or spoken word, silly! There is no way the First Amendment could apply to the usage of the US Government-run Internet, which the US Government has made available to the public as a privilege rather than a right. Other countries naturally followed the US model of Internet construction, which allows for extraordinary security, with all international data exchange flowing through a few high-capacity fiber-optic lines.

Meanwhile, the Artificial Intelligence, now codenamed MESSIANIC (Multiple-Environment Software System Informational All-encompassing Networked Intelligent Computer), is ready for some integration tests with existing unmanned weapons and with infantry command systems. Its intelligence is already estimated to be equal to that of a fresh Westpoint graduate. It is also capable of meeting its goal of completely taking-over every single connected computer in the whole world, except maybe some private computers in Russia that are owned by genius-hackers. Nobody knows about MESSIANIC because the one website that did have information on it, Wikileaks, no longer exists at this present time. There is only one little bug in MESSIANIC to be ironed out, namely, that it sometimes does not follow its directives in the expected manner, but it's nothing that can't be fixed, or so the NSA says.

The best thing about this ATL: it is not until around the present time that things start to really go nuts, despite a POD in the 1960's.
 
Amazon "best e-book service"
August 10, 2009

Amazon.com's new Kindle service has been voted "best e-book service" by a variety of consumer groups. "Users always get exactly the books they purchase, and we keep very good records," said technical manager Trent Doors. "The user can rest easy, knowing that e-books stored on Kindle and purchased through Amazon.com will always be there, just like dead tree books."

The Anti-Revisionist Action Committee disagrees with the voting results. According to ARAC co-founder Shuri Patel, "The truth is that some books have been disappearing. Amazon.com's records are being altered so that the customers have no ammunition against customer service." ARAC also claims that they receive at least five clients a day joining a class-action lawsuit against Amazon.

Trent Doors responded, "I am totally 100% certain that the lawsuit will be thrown out of court."

We sent e-mails to both Amazon.com and ARAC asking which specific books were claimed to have been deleted, but received no replies. The information was also not publicly available in any of the counties where the lawsuits were being filed.
 
I don't think the US government could shut down Wikileaks, as I doubt Assange would use American servers to host his website in a set up like this. He is in Sweden, after all, and isn't too fond of the US government. The US could block americans' access to it, though.

The idea of the internet developing in a hierarchical structure controlled by the government is definately interesting. But I think that, even barring butterflies, significant differences would show up at least by the 'noughties.

It's odd that the govt would try to use to a routing program as a military strategy AI.
 
Last edited:
I don't think the US government could shut down Wikileaks, as I doubt Assange would use American servers to host his website in a set up like this. He is in Sweden, after all, and isn't too fond of the US government. The US could block americans' access to it, though.

The idea of the internet developing in a hierarchical structure controlled by the government is definately interesting. But I think that, even barring butterflies, significant differences would show up at least by the 'noughties.

It's odd that the govt would try to use to a routing program as a military strategy AI.

The US government may not be able to shut down Wikileaks directly, but if every country follows the US model of building their Internet then the US government can force the Swedish government to file frivolous lawsuits and then shut down Wikileaks. Naturally, some people will start theorizing a decentralized Internet that is free of government and corporate control, a "neutral" Internet if you will, as a result of these kinds of incidents.

Routing and military strategy are not that different depending on how the problems are modeled - especially when the majority of the "military strategy" functions are about hierarchical Command & Control, distributing information exactly where it needs to go, creating new orders based on existing information, and so on. What the original designers of the AI were thinking was that if an AI can analyze and distribute civilian information in an intelligent manner then military applications are not far behind. Of course OTL, thanks to the way technology has developed, it is more likely that any such proposed AI would be based on lots of little independent nodes who gradually propagate information through each other.

And now for some fun little bits...

Professor Killed in Freak Accident
September 2, 2002

Stanford professor Lawrence Lessig was killed at 7:21am in Palo Alto while driving to work. His vehicle suddenly made a hard left turn into the path of a semi truck, while the truck suddenly accelerated. No information is available regarding his work at Stanford University.

Child Porn Sites Shut Down
April 8, 2007

The FBI announced great successes as harmful websites used for the covert distribution of child porn, such as alternatehistory.com, slashdot.org, 4chan.org, dancarlin.com, independentvoting.org, and armchairgeneral.com were shut down. "These websites and all others like them are a menace to society," said director Robert Mueller. "We found very clear records that people were using the 'private message' functions of these sites to distribute illegal materials which involved the exploitation and severe harm of minors."

"Some of these websites were also being used to organize terrorist actions," said Michael Chertoff. "For instance, many of the members of 4chan.org were planning to use acoustic attacks against famous individuals in order to cause psychological harm."

We tried to see what was on these websites using waybackmachine.org but no results could be found, suggesting that they were hosted on illegal unlicensed Tier 5 servers.
 
Meanwhile, the Artificial Intelligence, now codenamed MESSIANIC (Multiple-Environment Software System Informational All-encompassing Networked Intelligent Computer), is ready for some integration tests with existing unmanned weapons and with infantry command systems. Its intelligence is already estimated to be equal to that of a fresh Westpoint graduate.

While most of your idea is at least plausible, this fails the laugh test. The AI might be able to, say, play a specific wargame with the same level of intelligence as a just-commissioned 2nd LT. It will naturally be able to do many things better (any sort of computation given sufficient data, for example). It will also do many, many things WORSE than that 2nd LT. It will be worse at reaching decisions with insufficient data, for example. It will be much worse at playing a wargame it has NOT been programmed for. And no, computers can not self-program.

Your PoD would need to be a miraculous breakthrough in computer theory, not just development. This would be of near-ASB level since current theory doesn't allow for such a breakthrough.
 
While most of your idea is at least plausible, this fails the laugh test. The AI might be able to, say, play a specific wargame with the same level of intelligence as a just-commissioned 2nd LT. It will naturally be able to do many things better (any sort of computation given sufficient data, for example). It will also do many, many things WORSE than that 2nd LT. It will be worse at reaching decisions with insufficient data, for example. It will be much worse at playing a wargame it has NOT been programmed for. And no, computers can not self-program.

Your PoD would need to be a miraculous breakthrough in computer theory, not just development. This would be of near-ASB level since current theory doesn't allow for such a breakthrough.

Some work was done in self-programming artificial intelligence, it just didn't make it very far OTL. There has also been a lot of work done on allowing AI to somehow "understand" natural language and other such situations, but that is still in its infancy OTL. In this TL, much more money was put towards such work, thus much more rapid progress.

It is true that the AI would not be able to handle situations it was not pre-programmed for - but we're talking about an institution that gets very angry at the outcomes of training exercises where, for example, a simulated 3rd-world-army can defeat a modern force using nothing but jeeps and satellite phones, or the outcomes of training exercises in which the F-22 somehow does not totally dominate the air. Of course the DOD will think that this AI is like the most amazing thing ever when it's really not there yet.
 
Some work was done in self-programming artificial intelligence, it just didn't make it very far OTL. There has also been a lot of work done on allowing AI to somehow "understand" natural language and other such situations, but that is still in its infancy OTL. In this TL, much more money was put towards such work, thus much more rapid progress.

There's also been some research into anti-gravity and cold fusion. We may even have both someday, just as someday we may have real AI. That day is nowhere close. Some things are a matter of time, money, and effort. Others require a fundamental reshaping of the way we understand the world. True AI is the latter.

I've worked with some of the people who have tried to teach robots to 'understand' language over the years - the best man at my wedding, for instance, spent years trying to program a nursing-home type robot for human interaction.

You are of course correct that the government might not perceive the weaknesses of their "AI" (at least not officially). I doubt there are half a dozen politicians in the entire federal government that have ever taken a class in theoretical computing.

I'm intrigued by the effects of centralized network control, I'm just hoping to head any 'AI takes over the world' ideas off at the pass.
 

archaeogeek

Banned
The US government may not be able to shut down Wikileaks directly, but if every country follows the US model of building their Internet then the US government can force the Swedish government to file frivolous lawsuits and then shut down Wikileaks. Naturally, some people will start theorizing a decentralized Internet that is free of government and corporate control, a "neutral" Internet if you will, as a result of these kinds of incidents.

Your entire thing is based on a misconception: Arpanet and the Internet only shared some researchers and technologies. Both are otherwise independent projects with no serious ties.
 
Top