You are aware that the Swedish fleet was NOT at Fårösund at the time?
It was conducting exercises in the southern part of the Stockholm Archipelago at the time. The destroyer squadron von Essen intended to send north to mine the main channels of the Archipelago might have run into the main force of Kustflottan, but at Fårösund von Essen would have found two or three patrol boats (old 3rd class torpedo boats) and maybe a minesweeper.
Well, I didn't mention the exact location of the fleet in the text, so one could assume that ITTL, the actual attack went differently from the OTL plans, or that a more accurate angle of attack being planned is the main POD, with butterflies or an extra POD leading to the plan not being found out. Choose for yourself, I'd say.
BTW, does the Åland islands belong to Sweden or the Kingdom of Finland in this TL? I would assume Sweden since the islands didn't really want to be part of Finland anyways and the population there is pretty much entirely Swedish-speaking.
They go to Sweden. Finland could get them, but the Swedes do want some direct gain out of the war and the Åland islands are as good as anything. It doesn't really make too much of a difference anyway.
EvilSpaceAlien said:
Another question: Looking at the post-war map, does Sweden get Ösel and Dagö or are those islands part of the Baltic Duchy?
They go to the Baltic Duchy. The Germans wanted them in their sphere of influence and they probably appeased the Swedes by adding a few economic concessions here and there. And in the end, it doesn't matter anyway, since the CP's lost and as a result, the treaty of Bialystok is going to last as long as the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk did IOTL.
Eurofed said:
So, a rather counterintuitive WWI where the CP manage to reap defeats from the jaws of victory, despite the huge advantage of CP Sweden and Italy, through an exceeding dose of sheer stupidity (failure to coordinate on the Western and Balkan fronts, provoking the US into an early entry despite German-Americans, Italian-Americans, and Swedish-Americans all lobbying for the CPs).
Well, it was you who gave me the idea in your
AHC: CP Italy and Sweden, Entente wins idea. And trust me, seeing the Central Powers go down like this hurts me as much as it hurts you. But they will get their revenge, and there will be some minor Ameriwank in the next chapter, and I figured you'd appreciate that.
Well, I suppose it is possible, stupidity is something that all WWI actrs deployed in abundant amounts, although I'm going to beat with the metaphorical big stick any bloody Entente or Pink Blot fanboy that dares say this is the most likely outcome.
Yes, as it was, I had to work hard to make this scenario work in any sort of plausible manner.
But please, please, do avoid the ASBish clichè that Italian national unity was so fragile that it would be threatened because of military defeat. Please strike this "with several movements proclaiming the republic and some obscure movements demanding independence or self-rule of their respective province" from the TL, since it is way ASBish.
The key word here is obscure. These movements were barely big enough to be mentioned, and they won't be a thread to Italian unity. And there are always
some people who will go to the streets and claim mad things when they get the opportunity, but they will hardly get any following.
There were no significant separatist movements in Italy back then, that was the age of nationalism, Italian national self-consciousness was solid, and national minorities were insignificant before post-WWI annexations.
Yeah, I would have a hard time seeing Italy break up because of this too. But Entente forces are on Sicily and Sardinia, and they might have a different opinion...
Italy falling apart because of defeat in WWI is about as plausible as France or Germany doing the same.
Well, actually, Germany did have a Bavarian independence movement in the years after WWI, with the Bavarian socialist republic and all that, but also some monarchist movements. I sort of see Sicily as being the same thing. While they couldn't establish independence on their own, and such an idea would probably have even less following than in Bavaria, Entente force of arms will enable them to succeed. ITTL, America has no idealist Wilson in charge, and America will be distracted during the negotiations with Germany and Italy, which, coupled with the fact that the victory was far closer than IOTL, will make more French "let's strike them down for good" ideas get popularity. As soon as they hear that one fringe movement proposes Sicilian independence, they could very well go for it, and it's an interesting idea to have them do so.
That said, I have absolutely no intentions to establish a lasting Republic of Sicily. Sicily will be just one of those post-WWI states that were established and disestablished shortly thereafter. As soon as the peace is signed, people will start calling for reunification, and not even the Entente is going to deny them that. Within three years after the peace, a military coup could occur in favor of Italy, and the Entente won't have any choice. Sicily won't last any longer than the Armenia established at Sevres did. There were so many states proclaimed in the chaos after WWI and they all fell down within a few years, and ITTL, Sicily will simply be one more member of that list. Once the chaos ends, sanity will prevail and Sicily will return to Italy.
Instead of that part, if you wish, insert some far-left insurrection attempts, they were much more plausible.
Those are pretty much covered by the republican insurrections, but indeed, there will be several.
A nitpick: I rather doubt that post-defeat Romania had the means to re-enter the war and make a meaningful attack on the CP. The peace treaty was rather harsh, and they did nothing of the sort IOTL.
They did enter IOTL (see Wikipedia) at the day before the Germans surrendered. And after all, at this point, Austria-Hungary is collapsing. Perhaps I should slightly limit their successes, though.
An honest question out of curiosity: did TTL Germans allow Lenin to return to Russia all the same, or is the Russian Revolution being led by someone else, such as Trotzki, instead ?
Lenin stays in Switzerland.
If the Germans think they are winning, and the RR starts because of greater CP victories, they may never bother, and the Revolution gets led by Trotzki instead. This would mean a rather different Soviet Union (just as totalitarian, but more expansionist).
Of course, there is still the chance that the revolution might actually fail. After all, ITTL, the Whites signed peace with the Germans, not the Bolsheviks, and they keep their hold on Petrograd. With the revolution lacking Lenin and thus a clear leader (although Trotsky will have some ideas about that), it isn't as strong, even if it doesn't mean that the Russian Republic will win an easy victory.
Anyway, in all likelihood, this WWI victory is going to be quite the Pyrrhic victory and swan song for the Entente. The USA are going to return to isolationism as quickly and resolutely as OTL, if not more, since to fight the origin countries of their two biggest immigrant nationalities for the sake of Anglo-French imperialism is going to give them quite the bitter aftertaste.
Certainly. The United States might wonder sometimes whether it hadn't been better if they had stayed out of the war all together.
Britain and France are going to have very little friends in Europe apart from the no-good Little Entente, and with Germany-Austria, Italy, Russia, Sweden, and Hungary hostile to the Versailles order from day one, it is going to fall apart even more quickly and decisively than OTL.
That is granted. The Entente will regret this peace treaty much more than OTL by the time we arrive in the late 1930s and early 1940s. But by then, it will be too late...
lukedalton said:
Italy is almost assured to get rid of the monarchy...this defeat is too much, the problem is now what become of her?
No, that's a little too much. There will be proposals to abolish the monarchy for sure, but they won't be enacted in the end, and as the last paragraph indicates, the Hohenzollerns are preserved in Germany as well. But yes, Italy has some turbulent times in front of her. Of course, there might be some "friends" from Berlin willing to lend a hand...