Go Back   Alternate History Discussion Board > Discussion > Alternate History Discussion: Before 1900

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 5th, 2011, 05:25 PM
DirtyCommie DirtyCommie is offline
Patron Deity of Neglecting TLs
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Posts: 547
AHC: Etruscan Empire replacing Rome

With a POD no earlier than 600 B.C. and no later than 500 B.C., turn the Etruscans into the uber-power in Europe by 1 A.D. and turn Rome into at least a vassal state, at most a burned skeleton of a city.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dathi THorfinnsson View Post
We're up to our Elbe(ows) in Slavs!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old March 5th, 2011, 07:22 PM
Mongo Mongo is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 410
Well, one obvious PoD would be for the Capuan Etruscans to defeat the alliance led by the Greek colony of Cumae (ruled by the tyrant Aristodemus) in 524 BCE instead of being defeated. It was after this that Etruscan power began to seriously diminish. 15 years later, in 509 BCE, Rome overthrew its Etruscan monarchy and instituted a republic, and I am sure that one factor was the reduced prestige of the Etruscans in general.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old March 5th, 2011, 07:28 PM
robertp6165 robertp6165 is offline
Confederate Troll
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: South Carolina: The Cradle of Secession
Posts: 1000 or more
I actually started a timeline on basically this POD some time ago, then got sidetracked after I had brought it forward to about 200 BC. One day I do plan to return to it...but it might give you some ideas.
__________________
England Expects That Every Man Will Do His Duty, the adventures of Horatio Nelson in Anglo-Saxon England, is available on lulu.com and on Amazon.com!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old March 6th, 2011, 09:18 AM
Cèsar de Quart Cèsar de Quart is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 187
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mongo View Post
Well, one obvious PoD would be for the Capuan Etruscans to defeat the alliance led by the Greek colony of Cumae (ruled by the tyrant Aristodemus) in 524 BCE instead of being defeated. It was after this that Etruscan power began to seriously diminish. 15 years later, in 509 BCE, Rome overthrew its Etruscan monarchy and instituted a republic, and I am sure that one factor was the reduced prestige of the Etruscans in general.
The Etruscans were not a unified country, they were a loose confederacy of city-states and petty kingdoms.

I don't see the different lucumones (kings) and zilaths (magistrates) uniting into an Empire unless there's some external threat. The same way very few Greeks concieved a unified Greece (it was an aberration for them), I don't think any Etruscan would even want to see a unified Etruria.

If some external power forces them to, however (like Macedon did with Greece, and later Rome), there you have your timeline. I can imagine a Greek Sicilian adventurer becoming mercenary leader in the wars between city states in Etruria, stopping a Gaul / Umbrian invasion, getting power in a city state and begin conquests from there. Rome would be his ultimate achievement.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.