Go Back   Alternate History Discussion Board > Discussion > Alternate History Discussion: After 1900

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 18th, 2011, 11:36 AM
Gosing Gosing is offline
Canned
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: You May Dream, But Never Find
Posts: 1000 or more
AHC/WI: American Equivelant To The Merlin

A defining character of most American aircraft (especially fighters) in the 1930s and early 1940s was the overall crappiness of their engines-the P-39, whose design was greeted with great enthusiasm, ended up off frontline service due to the lack of a good engine, and two of America's most famous WWII-era fighters (the P-51 and the later model P-40s) used an American-produced version of the famous Rolls-Royce Merlin, which was used in the Spitfire and Hurricane.

So, how could the US develop an engine that was about as effective as the Merlin in the 1933-35 time range? And what effect, if any, would it have on the course of American aircraft development, and the coming war? Any takers?
__________________
The Horde of the Lord: Look, it has an army of Jewish Mongols swooping down on Europe to avenge anti-Semitic pogroms. Do you need to know any more?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old February 18th, 2011, 02:46 PM
Peabody-Martini Peabody-Martini is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 1000 or more
The only American V-12 engine was the Allison V-1710, not a bad engine at lower altitudes. The trouble was that the turbo superchargers made by General Electric, as a separate unit, never did work quite right even on successful designs like the P-38. The turbocharger was deleted in the P-39 at the same time significant amount of weight was added to the airframe.

If Allison had built a version of the V-1710 with a crank driven multi-stage supercharger like the Merlin it would have been competitive to the Rolls-Royce designs. The Allison had a smaller parts count and required less parts to be hand made lending its self for easier mass production. Also my personal opinion the Allison engine seems to run a bit smoother than the Merlin.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old February 18th, 2011, 03:10 PM
Kevin Renner Kevin Renner is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Badgerland today, Badgerland tomorrow, Badgerland forever
Posts: 565
The reason the Allison did not have a good gear driven Supercharger (they did have one it just wasnot as efficent as the Merlins) is that the engineers at Allison were working under the assumption that the engine would be turbo-charged. But bombers and such had the priority on turbos due to metals shortages. Pluis the Allison has a beefier bottom end and a better haed design that the Merlin. What one should wonde ris just what could of become of the Curtis Conqueror if the idiots at Wright Field had not insisted on such a high operating temperature.
__________________
Discussing W/Cs on Mote Prime thank you very much
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old February 18th, 2011, 03:27 PM
Peabody-Martini Peabody-Martini is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 1000 or more
Much like the Merlin engine evolved from earlier V-12 engines, the Curtiss engines could have gone a similar rout. Acording to Wikipedia the government funding dried up and there was not enough demand for use by airlines at that time to continue production of the V-1570 AKA Curtiss Conqueror.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.