Go Back   Alternate History Discussion Board > Discussion > Alternate History Discussion: After 1900

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old December 14th, 2011, 06:27 PM
KyleB KyleB is offline
I'm back!
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Boldly going where no man has gone before
Posts: 1000 or more
Another thread...

http://www.alternatehistory.com/disc...d.php?t=223550
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by KingByng View Post
Freaking ice cream trucks man! Destroying American culture, one cone at a time.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old December 14th, 2011, 06:57 PM
teg teg is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Aberystwyth (most of the time)
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by KyleB View Post
I thought the whole point of this thread was for noobs to post in here their silly Sealion ideas?

And couldn't we have a notice in the sign up page saying:

WE HAVE TALKED ABOUT SEALION LOTS. IT WOULDN'T WORK. ACCEPT IT. NOW GO AND POST SOMETHING INTERESTING.
__________________
Cornwallis gets away in Slipping the Net - What if Yorktown had not been a decisive American victory
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old December 14th, 2011, 07:30 PM
Color-Copycat Color-Copycat is offline
New Lunar Republican
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: in Taiwan for the duration of June
Posts: 1000 or more
No, the point of this thread is to direct newcomers to preexisting threads and AH scenarios that have thoroughly deconstructed the Sealion delusion in order that they may learn to accept the inevitability of its failure.
__________________

█|█|█|█|█|█|█|█|█|█| | | | | | | |
- LOADING SIGNATURE - 72.50% -
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old January 12th, 2012, 04:34 PM
Fabius Cunctator Fabius Cunctator is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 102
I hope people will also be reminded that not every opinion is related to Sea Lion. In a vote on which World War was closest for the Nazis, people had a hard time avoiding the Sea Lion admonition. Air superiority during the battle of Britain is not the exact same topic as saying that Sea Lion was likely to work with minor tweaks. Saying that WW2 was more of a toss-up at some point than WW1 is not all about sea lion either.

Just a reminder, Sea Lion, important as it was, is not always and everywhere important... except maybe on that Star Wars / Sea Lion thread with the occult bats, sea lions, and crabs. That one is comedy and there the Sea Lions are always and everywhere important.
__________________
Ancient Civilizations are fascinating!
Game New World #1: http://alternatehistory.com/discussi...d.php?t=216578
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old January 20th, 2012, 10:54 PM
eliphas8 eliphas8 is offline
New English Nationalist
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: The Free Republic Of New England
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fabius Cunctator View Post
I hope people will also be reminded that not every opinion is related to Sea Lion. In a vote on which World War was closest for the Nazis, people had a hard time avoiding the Sea Lion admonition. Air superiority during the battle of Britain is not the exact same topic as saying that Sea Lion was likely to work with minor tweaks. Saying that WW2 was more of a toss-up at some point than WW1 is not all about sea lion either.

Just a reminder, Sea Lion, important as it was, is not always and everywhere important... except maybe on that Star Wars / Sea Lion thread with the occult bats, sea lions, and crabs. That one is comedy and there the Sea Lions are always and everywhere important.
I remember that poll, wasnt it like 70% saying that World War I was easier to win with a much smaller number arguing that World War II was easier to win?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sidheach View Post
To be fair, dear husband, I find Stalin's breasts to be far more arousing then Pol Pots.
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old January 25th, 2012, 11:50 PM
Fabius Cunctator Fabius Cunctator is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 102
Quote:
Originally Posted by eliphas8 View Post
I remember that poll, wasnt it like 70% saying that World War I was easier to win with a much smaller number arguing that World War II was easier to win?
Goes to show the level of group-think. One-party states could only dream of such a vote-count.
__________________
Ancient Civilizations are fascinating!
Game New World #1: http://alternatehistory.com/discussi...d.php?t=216578
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old February 29th, 2012, 04:49 PM
Michele Michele is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fabius Cunctator View Post
Goes to show the level of group-think. One-party states could only dream of such a vote-count.
Naaah. That's just a sizable majority of thinkers.

You want to get a vague idea of one-party-state levels of vote counts? What about Turkmenistan's President who was elected with a neat 97%?
In his acceptance speech, he stated he had hoped to do better, but he'll strive for 100% in the next elections.

(This latter paragraph is a joke. The previous one isn't.)
__________________
---
Michele
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old March 8th, 2012, 07:17 PM
eliphas8 eliphas8 is offline
New English Nationalist
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: The Free Republic Of New England
Posts: 1000 or more
http://www.alternatehistory.com/disc...d.php?t=234336

We got another one.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sidheach View Post
To be fair, dear husband, I find Stalin's breasts to be far more arousing then Pol Pots.
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old March 8th, 2012, 07:19 PM
eliphas8 eliphas8 is offline
New English Nationalist
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: The Free Republic Of New England
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fabius Cunctator View Post
Goes to show the level of group-think. One-party states could only dream of such a vote-count.
NO it isnt, thats only heavy corruption and voter fraud. One party states have numbers along the lines of 179% of the people support the leading party.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sidheach View Post
To be fair, dear husband, I find Stalin's breasts to be far more arousing then Pol Pots.
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old March 29th, 2012, 11:56 AM
Shaby Shaby is offline
Sontaran
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Flagship "Undefeatable" of the Battlefleet Ib
Posts: 1000 or more
And here is a new one. Enjoy.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by sharlin View Post
'Oh damn...knew we forgot something! GUYS! WE NEED TO BUNG A CARRIER DESIGN TOGETHER ASAP!'
Reply With Quote
  #51  
Old May 1st, 2012, 02:48 AM
Armored Diplomacy Armored Diplomacy is online now
Forward, Men!
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: The Redlight District
Posts: 1000 or more
Send a message via Skype™ to Armored Diplomacy
The latest one:

http://www.alternatehistory.com/disc...d.php?t=240691

(Can anyone help me properly emb this?)

(Fixed)
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ian the Admin View Post
ONCE MORE AND THOU SHALT BE KICKED, SINNER
Quote:
Originally Posted by CalBear View Post
Clearly the work of drunken squirrels.

Last edited by Armored Diplomacy; May 1st, 2012 at 05:07 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old May 1st, 2012, 12:47 PM
CalBear CalBear is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: In a house on Sol-3
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Parker View Post
The latest one:

http://www.alternatehistory.com/disc...ad.php?t=24061

(Can anyone help me properly emb this?)
I'm going to assume that you actually thought this was funny.

Do this sort of thing again and you get a vacation.
__________________
Eddie would go!


Rule # 32: Gotta enjoy the little things!
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old May 1st, 2012, 04:47 PM
Armored Diplomacy Armored Diplomacy is online now
Forward, Men!
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: The Redlight District
Posts: 1000 or more
Send a message via Skype™ to Armored Diplomacy
Quote:
Originally Posted by CalBear View Post
I'm going to assume that you actually thought this was funny.

Do this sort of thing again and you get a vacation.

OOPS! That was a mistake. I actually thought that led to a recent Sealion thread. I must have typed something wrong in the link.

I meant to add in the new "Hitler takes Britain" thread by TMS2224. I see now I forgot to put a "9" in where I should have.

Fixed.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ian the Admin View Post
ONCE MORE AND THOU SHALT BE KICKED, SINNER
Quote:
Originally Posted by CalBear View Post
Clearly the work of drunken squirrels.

Last edited by Armored Diplomacy; May 1st, 2012 at 09:43 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old May 21st, 2012, 06:18 PM
Armored Diplomacy Armored Diplomacy is online now
Forward, Men!
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: The Redlight District
Posts: 1000 or more
Send a message via Skype™ to Armored Diplomacy
http://www.alternatehistory.com/disc...d.php?t=243170

Does this count?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ian the Admin View Post
ONCE MORE AND THOU SHALT BE KICKED, SINNER
Quote:
Originally Posted by CalBear View Post
Clearly the work of drunken squirrels.
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old July 13th, 2012, 01:44 AM
overoceans overoceans is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 44
Another poster brought to my attention that I had made a rather grave error by positing a Nazi invasion of Newfoundland in WWII, and advided me to check out this thread. So, here I am. Apologies again.

I suppose, in keeping with the OP of the thread, this sticky would be an apt place to house my offending post:

Ah, maybe if the Nazis had somehow managed to grab Nfld. during World War II. Then Stalin, after conferring with FDR, Churchill, and MacKenzie King, orders American and Canadian Communists to flood up there and fight the fascists. Roosevelt and King like the idea, because it'll get the domestic Communists out of their hair for a while, so they use their navies to sail partisans in and mop up. They figure they can wring the island back from the Soviets after the war. But Stalin has other ideas.

It would still be pretty hard for the Soviets to exert any control over their Newfoundland proxy in the postwar, geography being what it is. And the Socialist Republic Of Newfoundland would not enjoy much support from its citizens, such as the later third-world Communists did. The Soviets would probably just trade it away by 1950.

Here is the thread
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old July 26th, 2012, 08:41 PM
King of Rome King of Rome is offline
Alternate History Elitist
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Louisville, Kentucky
Posts: 417
Whats wrong with new folks talking about a point in history they like? Sure it's talked to death, but some new people want to talk about it.
__________________
The Last Eagle: Redux- Triumpth of the Bonaparte Dynasty
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old July 26th, 2012, 08:51 PM
Grey Wolf Grey Wolf is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Deepest Wales
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by King of Rome View Post
Whats wrong with new folks talking about a point in history they like? Sure it's talked to death, but some new people want to talk about it.
But its a violation of our collective elitism!

Best Regards
Grey Wolf
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old July 26th, 2012, 08:55 PM
King of Rome King of Rome is offline
Alternate History Elitist
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Louisville, Kentucky
Posts: 417
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grey Wolf View Post
But its a violation of our collective elitism!

Best Regards
Grey Wolf
Oh... I did not know there was an elite class. Can I join? I will totally h8 on teh n00bs in that case.
__________________
The Last Eagle: Redux- Triumpth of the Bonaparte Dynasty
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old August 27th, 2012, 07:15 PM
lycan lycan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 118
Sea Lion using help from Italian or Japanese navies

http://www.alternatehistory.com/disc...d.php?t=237049
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old November 8th, 2012, 10:19 AM
Michele Michele is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1000 or more
http://www.alternatehistory.com/disc...d.php?t=259851

Just don't come by sea, only by air. Yeah right.
__________________
---
Michele
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.