Go Back   Alternate History Discussion Board > Discussion > Alternate History Discussion: After 1900

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 14th, 2011, 06:11 PM
theReturner theReturner is offline
99% Male,1% Pure
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 1000 or more
WI: Tom Selleck as Indiana Jones in Raiders of the Lost Ark?

As some of you may know, Tom Selleck was once upon a time going to be the actor to play the now famous character of Indiana Jones in Raiders of the Lost Ark. However, he couldn't be in both Raiders and Magnum, P.I. so as we all know, the role of Indy eventually went to Harrison Ford. However, lets say that things are different, and that Selleck can be in both Raiders and Magnum, P.I.

Would Raiders still have been the hit it was, without Harrison Ford playing Indy? How would the character of Indiana Jones be different if Selleck had played him?How Selleck and Ford's careers be different? Assuming Raiders is a success, would future films have played out?
__________________
"This is the world we live in
And these are the hands we're given
Use them and let's start trying
To make it a place worth living in."

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old January 14th, 2011, 06:29 PM
The Vulture The Vulture is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: The Wilds of Kr'rundor
Posts: 1000 or more
I like Selleck and think he's a good actor, I just don't think the character would be quite as appealing as it was with Ford. Ford gives off more of that everyman vibe, he made Jones a guy who made mistakes and got through things by the skin of his teeth. You could relate to that, which I feel was a lot of the appeal of the series.

Selleck. . . not so much, if Magnum PI is any indicator. Raiders would be remembered as a decent action movie that made back expenses at the box office, but it wouldn't be the iconic shared cultural experience. Hell, we probably wouldn't even have the "shooting the swordsman" scene.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old January 14th, 2011, 06:36 PM
The Doctor The Doctor is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: a branch of the multiverse
Posts: 1000 or more
Your very lucky my girlfriend is not a member of this wonderful board. She would dress up with the OFFICIAL hat and a leather jacket in high school. She would also give you all a very long reply, so much she would the whole page to herself.
__________________
Currently writing, but mostly reading all of your great TLs!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old January 14th, 2011, 06:38 PM
MrP MrP is offline
Witchfinder General
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Emirate of Cheshire
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Vulture View Post
I like Selleck and think he's a good actor, I just don't think the character would be quite as appealing as it was with Ford. Ford gives off more of that everyman vibe, he made Jones a guy who made mistakes and got through things by the skin of his teeth. You could relate to that, which I feel was a lot of the appeal of the series.

Selleck. . . not so much, if Magnum PI is any indicator. Raiders would be remembered as a decent action movie that made back expenses at the box office, but it wouldn't be the iconic shared cultural experience. Hell, we probably wouldn't even have the "shooting the swordsman" scene.
IIRC, the shooting the swordsman scene was down to Ford coming down with a bad case of diarrhoea and not being up to the complicated choreography of a swordfight. So I agree that's certainly a butterflyable incident.
__________________
PLC
Englishman
Wargaming and whimsy Updated 12th July, 2011!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old January 14th, 2011, 08:09 PM
Emperor Norton I Emperor Norton I is offline
As you know, Bob...
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: North
Posts: 1000 or more
Harrison Ford is more appealing: he's rugged, charming, but also has an everyman vibe to make him approachable and identifiable while likewise viewed as cool. Tom Selleck doesn't come off as rugged to me.

That said, it doesn't necessarily mean there won't be more films in the Indiana Jones franchise.
__________________
Star Trek: The Lost Fleet RPG

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pieter Geyl
History is an argument without end.
Quote:
Originally Posted by John F. Kennedy
We must deal with the world as it is, and not as it might have been...
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old January 14th, 2011, 08:15 PM
thekingsguard thekingsguard is online now
Founder of Korsgaardianism
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Virginia - near the USA-CSSA Border
Posts: 1000 or more
On the upside, you can bet there would have been no Crystal Skull movie
__________________
My website, Korsgaard's Commentary.
Read my work, comment, and share it and come again! Now on YouTube!

Communist Confederacy Disscussion
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old January 14th, 2011, 08:17 PM
Geekhis Khan Geekhis Khan is offline
I'm Not Dead Yet...
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: The vast cubicle steppes of Delmarvastan
Posts: 1000 or more
Much like the Ghostbusters movies I think the movie(s) would be remembered fondly, but probably not be considered true modern classics.

"Yea, Indiana Jones, the ones with that Magnum guy fighting the Nazis. I liked those. Whatever happened to him?"
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old January 14th, 2011, 08:34 PM
lounge60 lounge60 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by theReturner View Post
Would Raiders still have been the hit it was, without Harrison Ford playing Indy? How would the character of Indiana Jones be different if Selleck had played him?How Selleck and Ford's careers be different? Assuming Raiders is a success, would future films have played out?
Well,Tom Selleck was probably more right for the role of an 30s adventurer.
Selleck is more in line with the actors of the Hollywood golden age,like Clark Gable , Errol Flynn or Douglas Fairbanks Jr.
So i think that was a more classic Indiana Jones.
Harrison Ford is not truly in line with 30s.

Assuming a blockbuster like in OTL,i think that Selleck would become a very big name.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old January 14th, 2011, 09:22 PM
David S Poepoe David S Poepoe is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: El Segundo, California
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by lounge60 View Post
Well,Tom Selleck was probably more right for the role of an 30s adventurer.
Anybody remember Selleck in 'High Road to China' which is set in the 19202-30s? I barely do. I would wonder if Selleck as Jones would usher in a new age of the moustache - more so than Magnum.
__________________
Coincidence? We invite you, the reader with no inclination to do his own research, to decide.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old January 14th, 2011, 09:42 PM
MrP MrP is offline
Witchfinder General
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Emirate of Cheshire
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by David S Poepoe View Post
Anybody remember Selleck in 'High Road to China' which is set in the 19202-30s? I barely do. I would wonder if Selleck as Jones would usher in a new age of the moustache - more so than Magnum.
There is something unnaturally alluring about Selleck's moustache. Or perhaps I'm just possessed by the spirit of Monica Geller.
__________________
PLC
Englishman
Wargaming and whimsy Updated 12th July, 2011!
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old January 14th, 2011, 09:45 PM
trekchu trekchu is online now
British Unionist
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Anglo-German Empire
Posts: 1000 or more
Curses upon all of you! I now want to do an Indiana Jones Marathon!
__________________
ST:SOF EP2 - Updates

IGC 03/06/13
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old January 14th, 2011, 11:42 PM
lounge60 lounge60 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by David S Poepoe View Post
Anybody remember Selleck in 'High Road to China' which is set in the 19202-30s? I barely do. I would wonder if Selleck as Jones would usher in a new age of the moustache - more so than Magnum.
1936.
Professor Henry Walton "Indiana" Jones Jr.

Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old January 14th, 2011, 11:51 PM
lounge60 lounge60 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1000 or more


Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old January 14th, 2011, 11:55 PM
cumbria cumbria is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 577
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrP View Post
IIRC, the shooting the swordsman scene was down to Ford coming down with a bad case of diarrhoea and not being up to the complicated choreography of a swordfight. So I agree that's certainly a butterflyable incident.
I saw when he said that.
Great stuff.
Best part of the film.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old January 14th, 2011, 11:56 PM
cumbria cumbria is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 577
To be honest an Englishman should have played the role.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old January 15th, 2011, 12:24 AM
theReturner theReturner is offline
99% Male,1% Pure
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by cumbria View Post
To be honest an Englishman should have played the role.
Why an Englishman? And which Englishman?
__________________
"This is the world we live in
And these are the hands we're given
Use them and let's start trying
To make it a place worth living in."

Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old January 15th, 2011, 12:31 AM
Emperor Norton I Emperor Norton I is offline
As you know, Bob...
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: North
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by theReturner View Post
Why an Englishman? And which Englishman?
Alec Guinness?
__________________
Star Trek: The Lost Fleet RPG

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pieter Geyl
History is an argument without end.
Quote:
Originally Posted by John F. Kennedy
We must deal with the world as it is, and not as it might have been...
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old January 15th, 2011, 12:51 AM
cumbria cumbria is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 577
Quote:
Originally Posted by theReturner View Post
Why an Englishman? And which Englishman?
An Englishman would fit with the Colonial adventurer role more than an American.
As for choices im not sure.
Oliver Reed may have been good as long as he sported the English playboy tash.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old January 15th, 2011, 01:05 AM
theReturner theReturner is offline
99% Male,1% Pure
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by cumbria View Post
An Englishman would fit with the Colonial adventurer role more than an American.

I don't know about that. What about Teddy Roosevelt?
__________________
"This is the world we live in
And these are the hands we're given
Use them and let's start trying
To make it a place worth living in."

Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old January 15th, 2011, 01:06 AM
LordVetinari LordVetinari is offline
Creating the World of Tomorrow
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Retro-Future Equestria/Earth
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by cumbria View Post
An Englishman would fit with the Colonial adventurer role more than an American.
As for choices im not sure.
Oliver Reed may have been good as long as he sported the English playboy tash.
I'm not sure. It is Indiana Jones, not Essex Jones, Manchester Jones, or Cockney Jones.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.