Originally posted by Finn
I don't know what you are trying to say. That Lithuania became Christian? It's not like I didn't know that. I just want a scenario where some Pagans remain, not all of them, just enough for modern Lithuanian paganism to claim to be a continuation, not a revival.
It was a commentary to
Merry Prankster's post. My bad I didn't made it clear.
I also intended to show there were many reasons for Lithuania to become officially Christian: a big part of it was Christian already (Lithuanians started their conquests well before the baptism), there was a Christian threat which could have been at least partially neutralized by the baptism (the Teutonic Order, but not only that); and, as Merry Parankster noticed, there was a chance for Lithuanian Grand Duke to become King of Poland.
So, a lot spoke for the Christianity (which also offered a significant civilisational progress), few things for remaining pagan. Of course at that time it meant that the ruling class was to become Christian and support the Church in christianizing the rest of the people.
Personally, I have my doubts about any bigger chances for the paganism to survive. Sure, some pagan customs remained in Lithuania (as in any Christian country) but Christianity was very good at assimilating some pagan holidays and beliefs (Christmas/Yule/Saturnalia anyone?). If the ruling class converts, it is only a matter of time.
Did it have to convert? I think yes, sooner or later. Even if there was no Teutonic Order, Poland probably would have taken its place organizing crusades against pagan Balts. After all the Christian knights were supposed to fight pagans, didn't they? And the Teutonic Order never complained about lack of volunteers to fight Prussians. Christianity was useful as a shield and an instrument of progress. Of course it didn't have to be Catholicism. Lithuania might have very well gone Orthodox.