Go Back   Alternate History Discussion Board > Discussion > Alternate History Discussion: Before 1900

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 28th, 2005, 07:29 AM
Jason Sleeman Jason Sleeman is offline
Glamrocker
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Martinsburg, WV
Posts: 276
Send a message via AIM to Jason Sleeman
AH Challenge: President Joshua L Chamberlain

With a P.O.D from 1865 on create a timeline in which Joshua L Chamberlain becomes U.S President.

What might his presidency be like?

How might things be changed by a Chamberlain Presidency?

Have Fun

Jason Sleeman
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old June 28th, 2005, 11:54 AM
Derek Jackson Derek Jackson is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1000 or more
Who was Joshua L Chamberlain?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old June 28th, 2005, 01:43 PM
JLCook JLCook is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Iowa
Posts: 404
Joshua Lawrence Chaimberlain

Quote:
Originally Posted by Derek Jackson
Who was Joshua L Chamberlain?
LtCOL Joshua Lawrence Chaimberlain commanded the 20th MAINE regiment, at Little Round Top, during the battle of Gettysburg! More specificlly, he ordered and led a bayonet charge, downhill, against attacking Confederates, sweeping them before him, AFTER his troops ran out of ammunition!

For this, he was awarded the Congressional Medal of Honor. He was later wounded and also promoted to at least Major general.

After the war ended, he went home to Maine, was elected Governor repeatedly, and finally served as President of his Alma Mater, Bowdoin College.

He was perhaps the greatest Maine war hero ever, and he died of his wounds in ~1919!

The Ted Turner movie, GETTYSBURG, and Michael Shaara's book, "THE KILLER ANGELS", both featured him!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old June 28th, 2005, 01:49 PM
Steffen Steffen is offline
Kursed as a Klever Kraut
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 775
iīm curious. besides being maineīs greatest war hero- and the question if itīs roughly the same as the greatest seeman of switzerland,
was he an able governeur?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flocculencio
Fachos...nachos for authoritarians. Available in a dictatorship near you!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old June 28th, 2005, 02:01 PM
Archangel Michael Archangel Michael is offline
Archie
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: My parent's basement
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by JLCook
For this, he was awarded the Congressional Medal of Honor. He was later wounded and also promoted to at least Major general.
He was awarded the Medal of Honor in 1893. Wonder why they waited so long?

Quote:
Originally Posted by JLCook
He was perhaps the greatest Maine war hero ever, and he died of his wounds in ~1919!
1914 to be exact.
__________________
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old June 28th, 2005, 02:06 PM
Mike Stearns Mike Stearns is online now
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1000 or more
I'm only familiar with him from Gods and Generals, both the movie and the book but I get the impression from those sources that he'd have been a great president.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old June 28th, 2005, 03:16 PM
David S Poepoe David S Poepoe is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: El Segundo, California
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Stearns
I'm only familiar with him from Gods and Generals, both the movie and the book but I get the impression from those sources that he'd have been a great president.
Getting anything from Hollywood should be viewed with suspicion. Shaaras' (both father and son) books are probably better. The best would be to look at his life. I know Chamberlain did write a few books and there must be an autobiography or biography of him available. However, one has to look beyond the war mystique. Grant was great at war, but sort of stumbled as president.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old June 28th, 2005, 03:19 PM
Kurt_Steiner Kurt_Steiner is offline
That's a years supply!
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Barcelona, Catalunya
Posts: 997
Quote:
Originally Posted by Derek Jackson
Who was Joshua L Chamberlain?
read "Conceived in Liberty" by Mark Perry and you will know a lot about him -and about William Oates- . It is worth reading it.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old June 28th, 2005, 03:50 PM
Wendell Wendell is offline
Panned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lost in what might have been
Posts: 1000 or more
Getting to the point of this timeline, he could run in 1884 instead of the senator (Blaine) from Maine running, and maybe go on to beat Cleveland?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old June 28th, 2005, 08:07 PM
Derek Jackson Derek Jackson is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1000 or more
I had heard that Democrats alleged, and were believed, that Blaine was more or less corrupt. I guess another candidate might have defeated Cleveland. Maybe that changes things because it might seem that Democrats can NOT win the Presidencey.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old June 29th, 2005, 03:49 AM
Wendell Wendell is offline
Panned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lost in what might have been
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Derek Jackson
I had heard that Democrats alleged, and were believed, that Blaine was more or less corrupt. I guess another candidate might have defeated Cleveland. Maybe that changes things because it might seem that Democrats can NOT win the Presidencey.
"Blaine! Blaine! James G. Blaine! Contemptible senator from the State of Maine!"


Here's an idea: Make Chamberlain Garfield's VP. Guiteau kills Garfield, and voila.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old June 29th, 2005, 04:01 AM
Archangel Michael Archangel Michael is offline
Archie
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: My parent's basement
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wendell
"Blaine! Blaine! James G. Blaine! Contemptible senator from the State of Maine!"


Here's an idea: Make Chamberlain Garfield's VP. Guiteau kills Garfield, and voila.
Wasn't Blaine the only other Republican president, and lead the Union in another war against the Confederacy?



__________________
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old June 29th, 2005, 04:04 AM
Wendell Wendell is offline
Panned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lost in what might have been
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Archangel Michael
Wasn't Blaine the only other Republican president, and lead the Union in another war against the Confederacy?



Yeah, I think so?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old July 1st, 2005, 01:31 AM
Jason Sleeman Jason Sleeman is offline
Glamrocker
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Martinsburg, WV
Posts: 276
Send a message via AIM to Jason Sleeman
Some Good Ideas

I Had Chamberlain pegged to run in 1896 with Mckinley as his veep and winning again in 1900 with T.R as his veep. Mckinley resigning due to ill health at the end of the first term.

Chamberlain would likely be a progressive, liberal minded Republican President.
And he was a strong advocate of African American civil rights.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old July 1st, 2005, 02:28 AM
Wendell Wendell is offline
Panned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lost in what might have been
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason Sleeman
I Had Chamberlain pegged to run in 1896 with Mckinley as his veep and winning again in 1900 with T.R as his veep. Mckinley resigning due to ill health at the end of the first term.

Chamberlain would likely be a progressive, liberal minded Republican President.
And he was a strong advocate of African American civil rights.
Chamberlain was rather ill by the end of the 1880's. Have him run in 1880, or 1876. I agree that he would be a Republican. Remember, he had been governor of Maine for several terms of office.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old July 1st, 2005, 09:38 PM
Jason Sleeman Jason Sleeman is offline
Glamrocker
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Martinsburg, WV
Posts: 276
Send a message via AIM to Jason Sleeman
Chamberlain's health

"Chamberlain was rather ill by the end of the 1880's" I was unaware he had had any serious bout of illness until shortly before his death. Was this a result of his many battle injuries? did he recover his health at any point later, enough perhaps to assume public office?

Jason Sleeman
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old July 2nd, 2005, 03:35 AM
Wendell Wendell is offline
Panned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lost in what might have been
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason Sleeman
"Chamberlain was rather ill by the end of the 1880's" I was unaware he had had any serious bout of illness until shortly before his death. Was this a result of his many battle injuries? did he recover his health at any point later, enough perhaps to assume public office?

Jason Sleeman
My understanding is that he continued to deteriorate until his death.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old July 3rd, 2005, 12:35 PM
Melvin Loh Melvin Loh is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Darwin, NT, Australia
Posts: 1000 or more
Excellent idea. I reckon the sorta leader Joshua Lawrence Chamberlain was during the ACW would've been caiired over well into civilian politics had he decided to go all the way to run for pres- remember, prewar, he'd also been prof of rhetoric at Bowdoin College, so he was a very learned and capable intellectual in addition to becoming the great tactician and leader at Little Round Top and into the Virginia campaigns of 1864-65. I agree with Jason on his perspectives in politics as a liberal, which were alluded to in GETTYSBURG during his speech to the 2nd Maine contingent re how the entire land should be unified with freedom for all, regardless of colour, and his positive references in his conversations with Sgt Kilrain re the few freedmen he knew back in Portland.

BTW, Jeff Daniels (the same guy from DUMB & DUMBER) played Chamberlain in both GETTYSBURG and GODS & GENERALS- wonder how the last instlament of the series, THE LAST FULL MEASURE, will come out ?
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old July 3rd, 2005, 05:48 PM
Romulus Augustulus Romulus Augustulus is offline
Cynical Bastard, Dry Wit, etc.
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Spokane, Washington, United States of America
Posts: 1000 or more
How's the 1876 election, as a Republican? He plays on his war hero status to win handily over Samuel Tilden, among other things. Well, he wins narrowly, but he isn't hanging by a chad. I'd say he continues the program of civil rights and Reconstruction. It could also have ripple effects in Europe, since the years from 1877-1880 were very important in shaping future events in Europe. For starters, you have the 1877-1878 Russo-Turkish War, the 1879 Austro-German alliance...
__________________
Proud Member of the United Sensible Federation--Since January 19th, 2005
And as always, no offense unless otherwise indicated.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old July 3rd, 2005, 07:31 PM
Derek Jackson Derek Jackson is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Romulus Augustulus
How's the 1876 election, as a Republican? He plays on his war hero status to win handily over Samuel Tilden, among other things. Well, he wins narrowly, but he isn't hanging by a chad. I'd say he continues the program of civil rights and Reconstruction. It could also have ripple effects in Europe, since the years from 1877-1880 were very important in shaping future events in Europe. For starters, you have the 1877-1878 Russo-Turkish War, the 1879 Austro-German alliance...
It strikes me as more credible that Civil Rights could have been advanced im 1876 than by 1880 or 1884. Presumably Chamberlain would also have been in better health.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.