|
#1441
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#1442
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#1443
|
|||
|
|||
|
I would say the difference are much greater than that, and most Muslims don't even consider Ahmadiyya or Alawites to say nothing of Druzes to be Islamic, and those group are a lot more similar to standard Islam. Of course it may be seen as Islamic still by other Muslims, because of its isolation and lack of interaction with other Muslims, but theological it would as different from standard Islam as Islam are from Christianity.
|
|
#1444
|
|||
|
|||
|
I am afraid that Guyana was a bit of a hellhole. The British did studies on whether or not to stick the Assyrian Christians who were not slaughtered by the Turks and Kurds there, though decided it was not exactly livable. As for Croatia, didn't they have some revolts when the Hungarians once tried to leave Austria, taking them with them? Also, I do not believe it would have been possible for the Spaniards to either build a canal nor keep Panama. Why would Gran Colombia have announced independence, except for a long chunk of their land up north? Besides, the French couldn't dig the canal. It needed steam shovels, dynamite, huge chunks of resources, and thousands of American and Haitian labourers. And please explain the Alaskan-Canadian border. Especially considering that gold was discovered, and the swarms of Russians, Brits, Americans, and whatnot whould have realized the stuff was on both sides. It could even be enough to tempt the Russians, Americans, and perhaps even the likely extremely anti-British Mexicans to reestablish claims to the Oregon Country again. I certainly don't see any reason for the Americans, who had Maine and Washington stolen from them without any explanation of the war's reasons, would consider the British as allies. And about the "execution of non-Christians"... What on Earth does that mean? The southerners had already driven most of the Natives, Christians included, clear onto the otherside of the Mississippi. They also silenced, deported, or beat to death any preacher who did not praise slavery, while most Blacks, free or otherwise, were Christian, with the exception of some voodooists who were kept around New Orleans for the entertainment value. And you got rid of one of the two South American buffer states... Do the Argentinians and Brazilians really trust each other that much? If so, how long 'til Uruguay goes? On a side note, what of Texas and California? I would think that their would be a great many butterflies there, especially in wars between them, the Confederates, and Mexico, along with the balances in the House and Senate.
|
|
#1445
|
|||
|
|||
|
The tragic death of George Augustus, heir to George I had set the wheels of
bloodshed in motion years ago. With George I’s passing in 1727, his daughter Sophia, the Queen in Prussia had inherited the throne of Great Britain and Ireland while his brother Ernest Augustus inherited the Electorate of Hannover. Ernest Augustus was old however and without issue. Given Salic law, the Electorate should have passed down to Louis Rudolph of Brunswick-Lüneburg. But he too was old, 62 and without issue. One had to go to Louis Rudolph’s first cousin and husband of his youngest daughter, Ferdinand Albert to find an heir with any sons. It was intolerable to Ernest Augustus that Hannover should pass so far down the line of a branch family that had separated centuries ago. In defiance of Salic law he willed that his sister’s son Frederick should inherit the Electorate. When he passed at the age of 58 in 1733 and Augustus II of Saxony and Poland followed him within the month, Europe girded itself for conflict. (I couldn't find the cause of Ernest Augustus death so I've no idea how likely him living another 5.5 years is) Augustus William protested and looked to the French for aid. Louis XV saw this has his opportunity to cripple British power in Western Europe. Hannover would be detached from the British sphere and the pro French Stanisław Leszczyński would be placed on the Polish throne. Hopefully Leszczyński would manage to hold on to his throne, but as long as he held out long enough for France to overrun the Austrian Netherlands and Hannover, while the Spanish overran Austria's southern Italian holdings, it would be enough for Louis. Austria though it ordinarily would have combated any attempt to solidify Prussian power in northern Germany, was forced by circumstance to acquiesce given the far graver threat of the loss of the Netherlands and Poland falling under a king beholden to France. In Britain, though Walpole deplored getting involved in such a continental struggle, rising tensions with the Bourbon powers, particularly Spain, led to the enthusiastic participation of Britain in the coming struggle. With the death of Ernest Augustus, Fredrick inherited Hannover (though at only 16 his father Fredrick William would rule as regent until his majority), and Europe plunged into war. France and Brunswick declared war on Hanover and in Poland Stanisław Leszczyński seized power in a coup supported by the majority of the nobility. The Hopes of the French were dashed however. The Russians and Saxons triumphed in Poland by the end of '34 and the Prussians, Austrians and British in the Austrian Netherlands by the end of '35. The War of Polish & Hannoverian Succession was a relatively short conflict. With the ascension of Maria Theresa to the Imperial Throne war once again came to Europe as Fredrick II of Prussia overran Silesia beginning the war of Austrian Succession. Britain, still under the rule of his mother Sophia, and already embroiled in a war with Spain stayed neutral. Sophia wished to help her son, but Parliament had no wish to come into any war with Austria on the side of France.
__________________
Quote:
Last edited by Timmy811; December 5th, 2010 at 06:00 AM.. |
|
#1446
|
|||
|
|||
|
Shouldn't the Japanese and British Far East Fleets by able to cut the logistical support of the invasion even in the face of Soviet air control? They don't really have any dedicated naval bombers do they?
__________________
Quote:
|
|
#1447
|
|||
|
|||
|
Soviet warships and planes would still have the edge technologicaly
__________________
A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step - but it sure helps if that step is on to a 747. |
|
#1448
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
The viking sat down, and listened very closely to what he was hearing, he stood up and said "Are you not aware? This is Hyperborea! The sun does not always rise from the horizon, and sometimes it stays stuck in the sky! All we have to eat is pork, we have no other option. And no mead? We have naught else to drink! If I were to adopt your faith, my good guest, you would be killing me. So no, you may take your Allah and his servants back to the land of sand and fire, and I shall stay with Odin and his kind in this, the land of snow, fire, and eternal night."
__________________
That's right, I'm going to fuck the fear-turkey. |
|
#1449
|
|||
|
|||
|
It is worth noting that the Viking period was a warmer - not colder - period. And, er they did have other things to drink (Scandinavia is one of the centres of lactose tolerance), the inaccuracy of the sun staying stuck in the sky have already been touched upon...
Last edited by LordInsane; December 4th, 2010 at 09:33 PM.. |
|
#1450
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
And then he would go on with his life as usual, not giving a crap about what the rules says he can't do.
__________________
AH.com podcast #4 - Saturday the 3rd of September 20:00 GMT. Looking for participants! |
|
#1451
|
|||
|
|||
|
Well, I did say things got a little out of hand, didn't I? You assume I know a lot more than I do - the extent of my non-NZ official history education is Weimar Germany-WWII, touching on Ireland and Black Civil Rights (important but boring).
As for the borders - yes, they are convergent in many places (including Alaska) but as I said, I don't know how or why that specific border was formed, only that it was like that before the Russians sold iOTL, and still is. ITTL Russia is a lot more aggressive and centralised during the latter half of the 19th Century through to the 20th, meaning more effort into industrialising and populating the Far East. Russia has a massive population, with a lot of viable manpower, so it's not that implausible that the border would remain that. The Anglo-American War would have been over the regions you mentioned. Oregon? And execution of non-Christians; I was assuming that the South wasn't simply white masters - black slaves. Muslims, Chinese, Jews...? They were around for 30 years, and that's 30 years of increasing pressure to give up their backwards society and join the rest of the proggressive world. When an unstable state gets destabilised, bad things happen. As for Spanish Panama - ITTL Spain wasn't quite the political mess it was OTL. Gran Colombia's War of Independence, while still a win for Colombia, ended at the Panama-Colombia border. Re your comments on Mexico - Look at it. Look at it. Texas is richer and recieves a lot of immigration from the USA, Mexico itself, Europe, etc., and so does California after the gold rushes there. Now Texas has oil too? Sure there were some wars between CA and TX, but CA is pretty firmly Britain's bitch lest the Yanks do some annexing.
__________________
|
|
#1452
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
![]() Quote:
Quote:
![]()
__________________
|
|
#1453
|
|||
|
|||
|
On the same note, how did all the ships go back in time as well? Some would surely be in the ports, but submarines would be best to have out in the water before hand. Not even getting into the canals... Rapheal, how far out into the water did the Event go? And why kill Hitler?
|
|
#1454
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#1455
|
|||
|
|||
|
I have'nt finished the whole map (have 75% of Asia to finish), but here's the America's in in the first map of a map series and possible Timeline I'm doing.
I have'nt established the exact PoD(s), but basically Mexico and Texas ending up fighting to a stand still, leading to Mexico grudginly recognizing Texas's Independence, though not its massive land claims, however, this along with various internal strife leads to a Civil War in Mexico (which they were trying to avoid by recognizing Texas in the first place), which resulted in in Mexico splitting into two; the Federative States of Mexico and the Republic of California. California, wanting to keep America from getting any 'Grand Ideas' negotiated a new border with the U.S. to satisfy Teaxan claims. It's now 1855 (the civil war ended in 1851) and the new regime in Mexico (which is more democratic and concillatory) has managed to get the Yucatan to re-join and has since recognized California's independence. Meanwhile California is in the process of adopting a Constitution and generally nation building, which has been helped along by the steady stream of immigrants not only from Mexico and the U.S., but even some from Europe (mainly Irish with some South Germans and Poles mixed in). |
|
#1456
|
|||
|
|||
|
First Post
Second Post The third map of my Araldyana Series: This time I depict the state in the year 1625. The Federation: The Araldyan Federation was founded back in 1541 as an alliance to defend against the European nations. But nowadays the Federation is the mighties power on the continent. The Europeans now have to defend their settlements in the New World. Leader of the Federation is Emperor Thorvald(us) III. (sometimes also called Deivis III.). A council of experienced men and women advise him. Most of them are former imperial Vicars or princely officials. Capital is Rœhmiar. The Federation consists of the (Roman) Empire and 14 Principalities: The Empire: Ruler of the Empire in personal union leader of the Federation is Thorvald III. The Empire is the direct sucessor of the Western Roman Empire (see also first post). The most people speak a Gaellic language and are christians. But there is also a very large native minority especially in the southern part of the Empire who speak indigenous languages and are mostly pagans. In religious questions is the Empire and also the whole Federation more tolerant than the most OTL states at this time (see also religion). The Empire consists of 17 admistrative divisions called Dioceses which are ruled by an Imperial Vicar. Some information about a few Dioceses: Romarium: -not to be confused with Romarum the latin name of the capital Rœhmiar which lies in the diocese -the city of Rœhmiar is one of the world largest cities with over 600,000 inhabitans -the region was settled by Romans since the late 13th century Araldana Australis and Borealis -named after the first Roman city in the new world -today the city of Araldana is part of the diocese of Brytona not of one of the Araldan dioceses Colonia Thorvaldium and Colonia Asvaldium: -named after the present Emperor and the former Emperor -founded in 1593 after the victory over the Lusitanish Viceroyality of Romana Liberia Minor: -a former Principality -Liberia = Land of the Free -named after the Iroquois, the Roman scholars were fascinated by the society of the Iroquois it seems them to be the ideal system The Principalities Principalities are de-jure ruled by an Prince but de-facto by the Council of Sachems. Women as well as men can reach high positions in the Principalities and in the Federation. The most Principalities very democratic organised. The Sachem system: -all Sachems of an principality form the Council of Sachems -a Sachem is in the most principalities elected by the council of elders -there are many ways to form a Council of Elders by the Iroquois for example the council is formed by the clan mothers -if a principality joins the Empire (like Liberia Minor) as a diocese the Sachems receive the right to elect the Imperial Vicar but the Emperor can depose him The map also shows the trade route from Rœhmiar to Tanuctalium (Tenochtitlan) capital of the Actecs THE MAP: ![]()
__________________
|
|
#1457
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
What exactly do you mean by "that bit of Romanian territory poking into Russia? Do you mean the strait to the Black Sea? At the moment the Red Navy is still reasonably strong in the med and the Pacific, it's in the Baltic where they've been beaten. In terms of Hong Kong, right now the Navy in the Pacific is focused primarily on Japan, so not yet. Well missionaries are class enemies usually, so you can probably guess what'll happen to them. As for Africa, don't be too sure. It all depends on whether General Aslanov can force the Allied lines at Suez. On the flat North African Terrain Soviet tanks would rule. Jerusalem already fell, and there will be a real dustup over Mecca. There are active resistance movements in Finland and Sweden, the Swedish government managed to evacuate with most of the treasury to London where they maintain continuity in exile with a relic of their navy and military forces. There is even a suprising White Russian underground, since in this case the monarchy is recalled as relitively free compared to Stalin's dictatorship. And yes, significant refugee populations exist in Norway, Greece, and Switzerland.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
#1458
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
As for Hitler, Stalin has been executing all the future leaders he captures in occupied territory (I believe I mentioned Mustafa Kemal as well). In 1939 Hitler wasn't hated for operation Barbarossa, Holocaust, etc. but he was known as a highly charismatic leader. Exactly the sort of person who could pose a threat tio Stalin's power, therefore he has to go.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
#1459
|
|||
|
|||
Oh my... it's perfect!!!And I live in Romarium!!! ![]() |
|
#1460
|
|||
|
|||
|
VERY cool map. I'll need to massively improve my GIMPsmanship to compete.
![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|