Go Back   Alternate History Discussion Board > Discussion > Alternate History Discussion: After 1900

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 7th, 2005, 09:01 PM
Nicole Nicole is offline
Apologies for the inconvenien-
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 1000 or more
WI: Sweden aids Finland in the Winter War

I've read that there was alot of support for the Finns in Sweden during their Winter War against the USSR. What if Sweden decided to enter the War? IIRC, in OTL they came very close. Could they have made a different against the Red Army? If the Finnish-Swedish alliance is still forced to give up, what peace terms will the Soviets force on the Swedes?
__________________
Austriae Est Imperare Orbi Universo
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old May 7th, 2005, 09:06 PM
Tielhard Tielhard is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1000 or more
what peace terms will the Soviets force on the Swedes?

An Ikea in every Soviet city.

Free 70s porn for the Red Army.

Strategic Advice fro Abba " .... wah wah wah wah Waterloo Napoleon did surrender".
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old May 7th, 2005, 09:14 PM
mattep74 mattep74 is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Imajin
I've read that there was alot of support for the Finns in Sweden during their Winter War against the USSR. What if Sweden decided to enter the War? IIRC, in OTL they came very close. Could they have made a different against the Red Army? If the Finnish-Swedish alliance is still forced to give up, what peace terms will the Soviets force on the Swedes?
Enter the war WITH WHAT? We sent 1/3 of our small airforce to Finland as it was and lots of weapons and ammo. The soldiers on guard against Germany almost didnt have weapons at it was.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old May 7th, 2005, 09:34 PM
Nicole Nicole is offline
Apologies for the inconvenien-
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by mattep74
Enter the war WITH WHAT? We sent 1/3 of our small airforce to Finland as it was and lots of weapons and ammo. The soldiers on guard against Germany almost didnt have weapons at it was.
Really? Hm, that does through a wrench into going to war with the USSR... I wonder, would this result in more nations joining against the USSR?
However, there is yet another wrench thrown into this: Adolf Hitler. He stated that Western troops entering Sweden to pass into Finland would be met with a Nazi invasion of Sweden.
To my knowledge, this fact means that Swedes allowing Western passage is effectively ASB.
__________________
Austriae Est Imperare Orbi Universo
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old May 7th, 2005, 11:23 PM
Dave Bender Dave Bender is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 207
Another Hitler Blunder

He stated that Western troops entering Sweden to pass into Finland would be met with a Nazi invasion of Sweden.

Another blunder by Hitler. Finland was a chance for Germany to make common cause with Britain and France, against Stalin's Soviet Union.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old May 8th, 2005, 03:39 AM
Hyperion Hyperion is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1000 or more
If Sweden had entered the war against the USSR, could the governments of both Sweden and Finland have asked Norway to help them? Even if Norway were to refuse, the Norwegian government might start appealing the the British, at the time the French, and the US for weapons, especially things such as fighters, and maybe some tanks for defense of cities, and maybe some AAA guns.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old May 8th, 2005, 04:19 AM
Grimm Reaper Grimm Reaper is offline
Desperate But Not Serious
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The previously unknown tenth ring of Dante's Inferno...
Posts: 1000 or more
Probably the most likely and best outcome for the USSR is that a Swedish-Finnish alliance is formed and, given guarantees by Stockholm as to neutrality, Stalin comes to some sort of arrangement leaving Finland out of the war in 1941. Mutual benefits for all involved.

Alternately Sweden enters the war on the Axis side. In the long run Allied bombers being able to destroy Swedish industry helps win the war as ball bearings and other specialist items can't be sold to Germany. In the short run the Axis probably cut off Murmansk and destroy Leningrad.
__________________
P.J. O'Rourke: We also elected some amateur politicians. However, politics is like vivisection—disturbing as a career, alarming as a hobby.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old May 8th, 2005, 01:48 PM
Matthew Craw Matthew Craw is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 351
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grimm Reaper
Probably the most likely and best outcome for the USSR is that a Swedish-Finnish alliance is formed and, given guarantees by Stockholm as to neutrality, Stalin comes to some sort of arrangement leaving Finland out of the war in 1941. Mutual benefits for all involved.
I hbelieve something like that was proposed sometime during 1940, but the Soviets blocked it to keep their Northern neighbour weak. Insert sound of Homer Simpson saying "d'oh" . . .
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old May 9th, 2005, 11:32 AM
Max Sinister Max Sinister is offline
Retired Myriad Club Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The Chaos TL
Posts: 1000 or more
@Dave: But Germany was at war with France and Britain at that time already. I don't think they would've changed their mind, even if it's against Stalin.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old May 9th, 2005, 12:28 PM
Dave Bender Dave Bender is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 207
Sucking up to the western allies

I don't think they would've changed their mind, even if it's against Stalin.

Maybe not. But I would have at least made the attempt.

The problem is that after Hitler broke his word over Czechoslovakia the British wanted nothing to do with Germany. And I don't blame them.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old May 9th, 2005, 12:47 PM
Jason Jason is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1000 or more
I wonder if there was a different PM therr might be a way for it to work. As long as Churchill is in charge (and thank god he was) there was no chance of peace with Germany. When we allied with the Soviet's after the German invasion he came in for some stick on the alliance-should we be allied with the evil Commies sort of thing. Churchill's answer was (roughly) "If Hitler invaded Hell, I'd make an alliance with the Devil".

Maybe if Churchill somehow no longer PM (say the Germans still loose the Battle of Britain but Britian suffers worse during it or some of the idiot upper class surrender monkey managed to fore him to resign), a slightly weaker and (dare I say it) more old fashioned PM might decide the Soviets were even worse than the Germans...

Hopefully someone will declare this ASB

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Bender
[I]The problem is that after Hitler broke his word over Czechoslovakia the British wanted nothing to do with Germany. And I don't blame them.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.