I know that arsenic bronze is not as good as tin-copper bronze, but is it possible for arsenic bronze alone to fuel a bronze age?
Arsenic *did* fuel a bronze age. It was the preferred bronze through the Middle Bronze Age, only replaced in Europe by tin-copper bronze because the latter is harder. Meso-Americans continued to use arsenical bronze because it is more ductile and thus more easily hammered into sheets.
The importance of bronze is it makes metal implements cheap enough for everyone to use. In the Copper Age, metal was only used for ornamental purposes. On the other hand, I don't know if arsenic-copper bronze is strong enough for use in general warfare and plowing and other utilitarian purposes.
When I get home, I'll log into my JSTOR account and look things up. I'm have a big interest in metallurgy
If that's true, why did Otzi have a copper axe?The importance of bronze is it makes metal implements cheap enough for everyone to use. In the Copper Age, metal was only used for ornamental purposes. On the other hand, I don't know if arsenic-copper bronze is strong enough for use in general warfare and plowing and other utilitarian purposes.
In the Copper Age, metal was only used for ornamental purposes.
If that's true, why did Otzi have a copper axe?
Yeah, but that's 'cuz in the myth, he was tossed from a freaking mountain.Asrenic bronze did poison smiths, isn't the Greek God of smiths all withered and sickly?