|
#101
|
|||
|
|||
|
This evolution of this TL continues to fascinate. I have a few comments for consideration, some only concerning details:
In a TL with a successful Weimar Republic, would an airship still be named "Hindenburg"? Hindenburg was a war hero, true, but in the eyes of the now successful and well-entrenched republic he might be seen as conservative monarchist relic of the old regime and not someone this new liberal Germany would celebrate all that much. Also, in this TL, he would not be the "elder statesman" President he became in later life. I have a problem with terms such as "air navy" and "air sailors" and the name "US Naval Airship Corps". These terms suggest that a fairly independent service is evolving, in the same way the US Army Air Corps evolved eventually into the USAF. I don't see it. As far as I know, airships were considered part of the regular fleet, the ships were commanded and classified in the same way surface units were. Officers and men could be switched between service on surface ships to airships and vice versa. Their mission was also firmly linked to fleet operations. There was no separate "US Navy Air Corps" for the navy's other aviation functions, so I doubt a formally separate airship corps would be established for airships, even in this zep-friendly TL. I would image these ships would be assigned to the atlantic and pacific fleets in the same way blimps served in patrol squadrons under fleet command. Perhaps in a manner analogous to submarines in WW2, airships might be seen as functioning within a US Navy Airship Service. Of all other countries, I think the USSR would be most likely to have interest in large rigid airships for a number of reasons. For one, relations between Weimar and the USSR were close, and the USSR collaborated with Germany in a number of clandestine military programs that helped Germany get around some of the Versailles restrictions (military aircraft design and production, flight training, tank development and tactical training, etc). Also the USSR is a large country with poorly developed road and RR system. THey also loved building big things to show off Communist technology and educate the masses. I am working on a TL for Soviet airships in which the entire Soviet aitship program is run by the Communist Party and the NKVD, with quasi-military airships carrying airplanes used for propaganda, internal security, and high-speed troop transport between European Russia and the USSR's eastern hinterlands. I just don't see either Britain or France staying very interested in airships much past the early 1930's, but there is another nation you haven't mentioned...Japan. Like the US, Japan could appreciate the value of long range aerial scouts for its fleet, and later value the use of such airships as offensive aircraft carriers. Given Japanese attitudes, they might not worry all that much about using hydrogen and survivability. I am also working on a TL concept for Japan as well. It would take a lot to plausibly make Japan a major airship-using nation, but it's not impossible. |
|
#102
|
|||
|
|||
|
Eckner, are you planning on still having some kind of Pacific war between Japan and the US (& presumably the British)? True it's going to cause advances in plane development, but probally not as much in OTL, plus airships should already become the norm for long distance air travel by then. Is a hospital airship completely out of the question (even if it's impractical I can see the USN experimenting with the concept). It'll be interesting so see how one plays out with the USN having a fleet of airships in us. Japan's definately either going to try play catch with the US re airships, or try concentrating on planes.
As for the Soviets what's their airship progam going to look like? I can see putting them to military, scientific, and propoganda uses, but would they try running a passenger service? Luxury transports for the nomenklatura are a possiblity, but the Soviets will definatly play down the luxury aspect and restrict them to (nominally) official government travel. Then again the USSR was usually perfectly willing to let capitalist tourists visit on controlled itineraries in exchange for their decandant hard currency. |
|
#103
|
|||
|
|||
|
@Zoomar:
Yes I still see the 'Hindenburg' as a viable ship name, since he was still President along with a war hero. Plus I still see Germany is staying more conservative, once the initial shock of the Nazi's wears off (and since the worst thing they did was shoot at the President and kill the Chancellor, as opposed to mass murdering 6+million jews along with all the other minorities and other atrocities they were responsible for OTL, i forsee the people swinging back center-right fairly quickly, though not as radically as with the Nazis. I have the 'monarchist party' in play at the moment, and am planning on them becoming in essence the conservative party of Germany, with Center Party being the moderates and the SPD being the left. As for the names, if I used air navy, i didn't really mean too But I could see air sailors being used, and I personally like the idea of a Naval airship corps, or just a naval air corps. I think it would better the chances of long term survival of the airship. You mention the fact that surface and airship sailors could be switched out under US practice. I see this as being part of the US problem with airships when it comes to human error. That's why I'd rather it be a semi-separate entity, but with the ships still attached to the Atlantic and Pacific fleets. And you're right in the fact that the US, Germany, Japan, and the USSR are the only countries to have longer-term ambitions with airships. I'll probably have britain's last to some extent but fade out, and France's be short lived. @alphaboi: Yes a Pacific war between the US/UK and Japan is very likely, and I'll probably have it occur at some point, within a few years of the outbreak of WWII for the US OTL. As for the Soviet airship program, it'll be mainly military, exploratory, and propaganda centered, with the possibility of some government-related passenger uses. Question for everyone reading: Do you see a conflict with the Soviet Union an eventuality say maybe in the 50s or 60s (or earlier or later) between the USSR and the West? Or would it be more like the world just skips WWII and moves straight into a cold war scenario?
__________________
|
|
#104
|
|||
|
|||
|
On the "air navy", I agree with zoomar that a semi-independent "Airship Corps" is unlikely and would expect something as per his suggestion along the Submariner's path. I'd foresee an independence of mindset, however (like the subs) and a different culture from the "wet" navy (likely more futuristic/progressive/non-traditional). They will have different symbology with a distinct badge/"wings" as a coveted badge of membership.
On ranks, the ratings would probably be called simply "Airmen" (Amn-3 to Amn-1; 3rd to 1st class) and from there the Petty Officer ranks would split by specialty as on a ship (Engineering Techs (ET) for engines and helium, etc.) plus all the usual Yeomans and Bo's'un's Mates, etc. Interestingly, they will continue most of the daily rituals and terminology from the wet navy with bosun's whistles, bells, "bulkheads", "scuttles", "messes", etc. On Japan, a lot depends on what direction it takes. Have Weimar's butterflies migrated far enough to affect Japan? The POD is pre-Chinese invasion. I forget if it is pre-militarization or not. Forgive me as I forget whether you already mentioned this or not. If Japan falls into the hands of the ultra-nationalists and invades China as per OTL some form of conflict is inevitable. Though as I foresee intact Weimar butterflying the European war I can't see Japan being dumb enough to take on the ABDA powers alone. At most I see a limited navy clash that never goes all-out war. Most likely a cold war with the US at worst. Maybe embargoes that force Japan to the table in China or a limited Franco-Japanese clash over FIC and the supplies to China from it. Perhaps a limited Russo-Japanese war over China/Mongolia/Manchuria. On the USSR: ITTL no Nazi destabilization means Stalin faces the threat of getting dog-piled if he gets too aggressive. He might try things with Finland or Romania, though Poland threatens to bring France and Germany against him. Maybe a clash with Britain in central Asia. Most likely if anything a clash with Japan as mentioned above. Stalin's aggressive, but opportunistic. More a crocodile than Hitler's rabid pitbull. Unless he thinks he can get away with easy spoils at a low risk/cost I doubt he tries anything.
__________________
Tales from the Technoyurt! The Timelines of Geekhis Khan Welcome, to the World of Mañana!! Your contribution is wanted! |
|
#105
|
|||
|
|||
|
Eckener:
Oops, sorry about the Hindenburg name questions. I should remember things in your TL better than that. Plus, if I remember correctly, I also suggested that this Weimar republic should more conservative and possibly even monarchist. Geekhis: "Airman" might work work for ratings, but I still doubt the Navy would abandon the traditional terms for enlisted personnel. Question. What terms are used for enlisted personnel (gunners, etc) serving on naval aircraft in the real world? I don't really know. As mentioned before, I have toyed around with a (fairly optimistic concept for the extensive use of military airships by a number of nations in the 1930-1950 period, including Japan and the USSR as well as the USA, which I also PM'd to Eckener. Since it could be fitted to the Eckener timeline, I am including it below. Some of the presumptions include legal and peaceful restructuring of Germany's post-versailles borders to some extent, no WW2, but perhaps a number of small regional conflicts, no accelerated development of nuclear power /weapons, and retarded development of gas turbine engines for aircraft (something I believe was esepecially accelerated in the UK and Germany in OTL because of WW2). There is a 1942-1944 Pacific War (referred to as the "Asian War" in this timeline (note, regarding US development, this is an entirely different timeline from the US Naval Airship TL I previously posted on this board. Also, excuse the format, because airship details had been put in tabular format which got mixed up): Some thoughts about the military development of rigid airships in the Eckener “Plausible survival of the airship” timeline. Since the original TL keeps evolving in response to various comments and is now also part of the President Eckener tieline, I am making no effort to tie directly into the original TL’s specifics, but I have attempted to make this conform to all or most of the basic premises: - WW1 begins and ends as in OTL - Postwar zeppelin development is curtailed in Germany as in OTL, but for a shorter time and is resurrected solely for commercial applications with more German government support and international financing and cross-fertilization than in OTL - Britain’s program avoids the R100/R101 competition and results in viable passenger airships combining good traits of both approaches which also benefit from some Zeppelin operational expertise. Britain has no need for military airships, but in the late 1920’s sells technology to USSR and Japan for military applications - US Program begins as a product of strong Goodyear-Zeppelin partnership – US becomes the dominant user of naval airships. Navy also helps fund and support the US civil airship program. Generally, the USA maintains an overall lead in the introduction and operation of sophisticated modern military airships. - Soviet program focuses of large airships for long range transport activities, exploration, propaganda, and as experimental stand-off long range aerial bombers with hook on planes. Helium deposits are discovered the Caucasus giving USSR a potential local source of helium. Airships do not become part of any existing military service, but are operated directly by the Communist Party and operated by the NKVD for combined military, internal security, and commercial uses. Early designs draw heavily on British practice (basically R101 type ships with the problems worked out). Later, pirated German and US concepts added - Japan becomes a strong proponent of the rigid airship as an offensive weapon, exploiting the aerial aircraft carrier concept as thoroughly as the USN, but within a radically different operational framework. Japanese designs blend British and Zeppelin practice. With the rise of Hitler and Japan’s membership in the anti-comintern pact, Germany sells the Japanese older commercial zeps for naval use to supplement indigenous designs. - Unlike the President Eckener TL, I presumed Hitler would come to power as in our TL, but that he would be overthrown in 1938, as an immediate response to a Nazi invasion of Czechoslovakia following collapse of Munich talks, Hitler is assassinated and the Nazi party is overthrown by an anti-nazi junta. Germany signs armistice with allies and restores integrity of Czechoslovakia. Under combined army/junker rule, Germany remains a conservative, nationalist, power but cancels most of the most offensive Nazi racial policies and adopts a much less bellicose foreign policy. Germany obtains some readjustments to Polish border peacefully. There is no European War in 1939, and eventually Germany joins an unofficial arrangement between Britain, France, Poland, and Italy to resist the USSR. - In 1942 a relatively brief Pacific War (“Asian War” in this TL) breaks out between the US/UK and Japan. The USSR joins war as an ally of China which is also at war with Japan against the Japanese, this secondarily leads to Communist takeover of China in 1944. The British Military Airship. As mentioned, Britain did not introduce any military ships after the R-34 class. However, in 1929 the Royal Airship Works produced a number of design studies for large naval scouts at the behest of Australia and Indian Viceroyalty, both of whom saw some need for this type of craft in patrolling the Indian and Pacific oceans and in high speed long range transport. These were based on the “Improved R101 design” as follows. In 1930, Australia canceled its order and the ship designs were released for export: "Improved R-101 Class" 8,300,000 cu ft. 810’ long, Hydrogen with Blaugas fuel. Never built for British service, but served as basis for a number of Soviet and Japanese ships. Space provided for onboard aircraft hanger capable of carrying 3 planes or troop transport (200 fully equipped men) The Soviet Military Airship In 1930, the Soviet Government ordered three “Improved R101 design” airships from the Royal Airship Works, the first to be built in Britain, the following two to be built in Odessa, where the Soviet Government decided to base its own airship industry. Specifications were identical to that described above. The first two, First International and October Revolution were built as long range high speed troop/paratroop transports and “Peoples’ Education Airships” for the NKVD. The third, Worker’s Soviet, was completed with an internal airplane hangar for 3 Polikarpov I-5 fighters. All three ships were complete by 1934. They were all withdrawn from service in 1942 and scrapped. In 1933, the NKVD ordered a new, Soviet designed series of ships from the Odessa Airship Establishment. These were basically enlarged First Internationals, but borrowed a number of concepts from Zeppelin and US practice: Name Volume Length Power plants Lifting gas Comments Red Dawn 10,200,000 950’ 4 Maybach diesels in exterior power cars Hydrogen Completed 1935 as long range transport and heavy duty hauler and propaganda ship Eastern Light 10,200,000 950’ 4 Maybach diesels in exterior power cars Hydrogen Completed 1935 as long range transport and heavy duty hauler and propaganda Soviet Union 10,200,000 950’ 4 Maybach diesels in exterior power cars Hydrogen Completed 1936 as combination aircraft carrier (6 Polikarpov fighters) and transport to counter Japanese airship plans Soviet Ukraine 10,900,000 1012’ 6 Maybach diesels in interior engine rooms following Goodyear-Zeppelin practice on ZRS-class of airships Helium, with internal Hydrogen cells Completed 1937. First Soviet ship inflated partially with helium, with 1/3 of lift provided by hydrogen cells within helium cells. Use of helium necessitated addition of bay to maintain same lift and capability, but allowed interior engine rooms with less drag.. Dedicated aircraft carrier, carrying seven I-15 type fighters. First Soviet ship based in Far East (Vladivostok) to counter Japanese ambitions In 1937, a follow up design to Soviet Ukraine was ordered All were originally planned for inflation with helium, small quantities of which had been recently discovered in natural gas deposits in the Caucasus, but problems with Soviet helium extraction technology resulted in their eventual inflation with hydrogen. Also, because the loss of Soviet Revolution on its delivery flight and other changes in Soviet military priorities, only one other of the original class of six were completed, and this ship was withdrawn from military service shortly after the ourbreak of the 1942-44 Asian War.. Name Volume Length Power plants Lifting gas Comments Soviet Revolution 11,800,000 1075’ 4 Maybach diesels in exterior power cars Hydrogen Planned as aircraft carrier for use in far east - ten I-15 fighters could be carried. Completed in 1938. Based at Vladivostok. Destroyed in hydrogen fire while en route to far east, Aviation fuel fire in airplane compartment determined cause of disaster. Up to 230 people were executed on Stalin’s orders for “sabotaging” the ship, including its two chief designers, S. Prokofiev and D. Shostakovich Marat 11,800,00 1075’ 4 Maybach diesels in exterior power cars Hydrogen Completed in 1939. Based at Vladivostok. At outbreak of Asian War, was refitted as troop transport and used to ferry troops and material to Chinese front. Withdrawn from service in 1943. The Japanese Military Airship. Japan was a somewhat surprising, and relatively late, nation to consider the military potential of rigid airships. Because of the intense inter-service rivalry between the Imperial Navy and the Imperial Army, both services initiated airship programs in 1934, but only the navy’s saw fruition. The first Japanese airships were direct copies of the “Improved R-101” types offered for export by the British government. Subsequent ships incorporated a mixture of British, German, and US design concepts. Japan never considered the use of helium lifting gas for its ships. This was in part because the United States would never have provided helium to a prospective enemy state, but more importantly because the Japanese had a different attitude to airship survivability. From the beginning, even before the US Navy proved the concept, all Japanese naval airships were designed and built to carry aircraft with offensive capabilities. Japanese Navy doctrine envisaged that its airships would be used in high risk long range attacks on high-value military targets where the loss of the ships and crews were considered very likely. As the Asian War approached, the concept evolved into the use of its airships as expendable “first strike” weapons intended to deliver decisive blows at the start of hostilities with a stronger enemy (presumably the United States or Great Britain). This doctrine presumed most or all of the airships would be lost, but that these losses would be more than compensated for by the destruction of high value military or political targets. Japanese airships carried more capable attack aircraft (and many more of them) than equivalent US ships. This was possible, not only because the Japanese used more buoyant hydrogen lifting gas, but because the ships carried only enough fuel and stores for one attack, and the embarked aircraft themselves were not compromised by the size of hangars and the need to return and land on the airships. To exemplify this, the standard hydrogen-filled Japanese Hi-10 class airship of 13,500,000 cubic feet was capable of carrying no fewer than 15 bombed-up B5N torpedo bombers or D3A dive bombers on staggered individual perches along the bottom of the hull, while the equivalent helium-filled USS Santa Cruz, designed for long distance, high endurance scouting and secondary ASW missions, shipped only 8 aircraft in two service hangars, most of them light scouts with limited offensive capability. The “surprise” Japanese airship attacks on Allied naval assets and facilities at Pearl Harbor, Manila, the Panama Canal, San Diego, Seattle, and Singapore that opened the Asian War exemplified this policy, as did the loss of all but two of the 12 ships committed to the operation. Name Volume Length Powerplants Lifting Gas Comments Asahi Yamato 8,300,000 810 6 Mitsubishi (Maybach) diesels in exterior power cars Hydrogen Completed in 1935-1936. Slightly modified “Improved R-101” types. Ordered in Britain and built in British-designed fabricating hanger at Yokohama Naval Base. Operated by IJN crews as training ships, and employed as civil transports. Small hangar carried three onboard planes used to ferry mail. Hi-1 Hi-2 Hi-3 Hi-4 8,800,000 825 6 Mitsubishi (Maybach) diesels in exterior power cars Hydrogen Completed in 1937-39. Slightly enlarged version of Asahi design. First standard IJN ships optimized for naval operation as scouts with secondary “special attack” role. Dispensed with hangar used in Asahi. 8 aircraft could be operated from individual trapezes along bottom keel. All four ships participated in attacks on Singapore in March 1942, all but Hi-3 were lost. Hi-3 subsequently employed in operations with IJN against British Naval forces in eastern Indian Ocean. Hi-3 destroyed by accidental hydrogen fire, January 1943. Hi-5 10,500,000 950 4 Mitsubishi (Maybach) diesels in exterior power cars Hydrogen Completed in 1938. First Japanese designed airship. Based on contemporary German Vaterland commercial airliner design, optimized for naval use. Reverted to use of internal hangar (replacing passenger space in commercial design), limiting aircraft complement to 6 planes. Considered a disappointment by IJN and sold to Asahi Newspaper concern in 1940 for re-conversion back to civil use. !n 1942 used as fast troop transport during initial stages of Asian War. Destroyed by British carrier aircraft in late 1942 off Sumatra. Hi-6 Hi-7 Hi-8 Hi-9 11,500,000 1050’ 4 Mitsubishi (Maybach) diesels in exterior power cars Hydrogen Ordered 1939 as enlarged versions of Hi-1 class ships. Work on Hi-6 and Hi-7 initiated in 1940, but cancelled to concentrate all work on even larger H-10 standard airships. None completed. Hi-10 Hi-11 Hi-12 Hi-13 Hi-14 Hi-15 Hi-16 Hi-17 Hi-18 Hi-19 Hi-20 Hi-21 Hi-22 Hi-23 Hi-24 13,500,000 1100’ 5 Mitsubishi (Maybach) diesels in exterior power cars Hydrogen Standard IJN airship. Ordered in 1939 and developed in secret crash program as “special attackers” when Asian War with US and UK appeared inevitable. Entirely optimized for long-range, single mission, attack. Standard aircraft compliment 15 dive/torpedo bombers. Completed 1941-43. All but Hi-22, Hi-23, and Hi-24 completed in time for March 1942 special attacks opening Asian War. Only Hi-11 survived, and together with Hi-22, Hi-23, and Hi-24 converted to high speed transports, None survived war. Hi-11 and Hi-23 shot down by US carrier aircraft; Hi-22 and Hi-24 destroyed in aerial bombing attacks on home islands. No Japanese airships survived the Asian War and virtually all Japanese airship fabricating facilities and hangers were destroyed by British and US air raids. After the March 1944 Revolution, the post-war Federal Republic of Japan and Formosa lost all interest maintaining an airship industry. The US Military Airship No doubt because of the presence of commercially extractable helium deposits in the American Southwest, the United States was by far the chief proponent and innovator in the use of rigid airships for military (chiefly naval) purposes. Properly operated, helium-filled airships have a significantly better chance for survival in combat zones than standard hydrogen-filled vessels. Also, because the US was fortunate to be separated from any significant potential adversaries by wide tracts of ocean, the operational areas for US airships included many vast areas in which they could fulfill important transport and ASW duties while being essentially immune from attack by modern aircraft on land or in the air. Through the Goodyear-Zeppelin partnership, the Americans could draw upon the latest proven zeppelin technology. Finally, the vast industrial capacity of the United States allowed it the luxury of experimenting with numerous new innovations in airship technology and operation during and after the Asian War, while the other airship-operating nations had to divert their more limited industrial capacity to other, more strategically essential, purposes. As in Japan, inter-service rivalry between the Army and Navy in the late 1920’s led to parallel airship programs in both services. Prior to the perfection of the multi-engine long-range bomber, both services saw rigid airships as a way to project strategic power using their capacity to carry aircraft. However, the Army’s program was hamstrung from the start by the complete lack of interest the USAAC rank-and-file had in such craft. Although a number of design studies were undertaken by Goodyear-Zeppelin for large Army airships, none of these saw fruition. In 1932, the Army abandoned all interest in airships of any type, transferring those few facilities and non-rigid airships it possessed to the Navy. Name Volume Length Powerplants Lifting gas Comments ZR-1 USS Shenandoah 2,300,000 635’ Helium Based on World War German L-49 design. Lost in storm 1925 ZR-2 British R-38. Broke up in air before official US christening in 1923 ZR-3 USS Los Angeles German Lz-126. Operated from 1924-1939. Served as training airship for most of her career. Scrapped 1942 ZRS-4 USS Akron ZRS-5 USS Macon ZRS-6 USS Wichita ZRS-7 USS Lincoln First class of aircraft carrying scout airships. Internal hangar capable of carrying 4-5 small scout fighters. This number later reduced to 3 when larger aircraft introduced. Akron and Macon completed 1933-1935. Wichita and Lincoln completed in 1937-1937 to slightly modified design. During Asian War, all four served with Pacific fleet for ASW and Search and Rescue missions. Wichita lost in heavy weather, 1942. Akron destroyed by Japanese submarine-launched attack planes in 1943. ZRN-8 USS Landsdowne ZRN-9 USS Maxfield Dedicated training airships ordered from and built by Zeppelin Company in Germany in 1937 Very similar in basic design to contemporary LZ-129 commercial airliner, with passenger spaces replaced by aircraft hangar. 3 aircraft typically carried internally, but exterior perches were eventually provided for an additional 3 planes. In 1941, Landsdowne renamed America and refitted as high-speed Presidential transport. Served in this role until 1958 when replaced by Boeing Model 606 airliner. ZRCV-10 USS Santa Cruz ZRCV-11 USS Sacramento ZRCV-12 USS Phoenix ZRCV-13 USS Memphis ZRCV-14 USS Tallassee ZRCV-15 USS New Haven First true “Fleet Airships”. Completed 1941-1942. Capable of carrying up to 8 scout or attack planes in two internal hangars. Although designed as fleet scouts with a secondary offensive strike capability, most were employed in ASW and convoy escort duties duties. Home based at Hilo NAS. Sacramento and Memphis lost to Japanese aircraft off Leyte, June 1944. ZRCV-16 ZRCV-17 ZRCV-18 ZRCV-19 Additional Santa Cruz-class units. Ordered 1940 but cancelled in favor of the new ZRCV-20 class. ZRCV-20 USS San Juan ZRCV-21 USS Bismarck ZRCV-22 USS Honolulu ZRCV-23 USS Anchorage ZRCV-24 USS Tampa Bay ZRCV-25 USS Tulsa Ordered in 1940 and completed 1942-43. Largest US airships. Replaced internal hangar bay with tandem service perches for up to 13 aircraft. All six ships Initially planned to operate together as a high-speed, rapid reaction, strike force capable of providing equivalent offensive capacity to a single Hornet-class carrier when such ships were not available. In practice, by the time all 6 ZRCV-20 class ships were operational, the USN had more than enough fleet carriers for all theatres of operation in the Asian War. Consequently, these ships were relegated to ASW work and extremely long range strategic reconnaissance tasks. Bismarck, and Tulsa were lost to Japanese aircraft during the latter stages of the Asian War. In the aftermath of the war, Honolulu was based for several with the allied occupation forces on Okinawa. In this capacity, she participated in the airdrops of food to the Japanese population during the Red Hand Revolution and, in 1948, evacuated the Imperial family to Formosa when it appeared the Reds were getting the upper hand in the home islands. All surviving ships were retired during the depression of 1952-53. All were scrapped in 1955. Last edited by zoomar; January 14th, 2010 at 01:39 PM.. |
|
#106
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
[From wiki and refers to the modern US Navy. Not sure what differences there were (if any) in the 30s]
NCO (Petty Officer) ranks will be titled by specialty as OTL. Again from Wiki: "Petty Officers serve a dual role as both technical experts and as leaders. Unlike the sailors below them, there is no such thing as an "undesignated Petty Officer." Every petty officer has both a rank and rate (job, similar to an MOS or AFSC in other branches). The rank and rate combined are known collectively as a sailors rating. A petty officer's full title is a combination of the two. Thus, a Petty Officer Third Class who has the rate of Fire Control Technician is called a Fire Control Technician Third Class. The term petty officer is, then, only used in abstract, the general sense, when referring to a group of petty officers of different ratings, or when the petty officer's rate is unknown. "Each rating has an official abbreviation, such as FT for Fire Control Technician, STS for Sonar Technician Submarines, or ET for Electronics Technician. When combined with the petty officer level, this gives the short-hand for the petty officer's rank, such as FT3 for Fire Control Technician Third Class. It is common practice to refer to the petty officer by this short hand in all but the most formal correspondence (such as printing and inscription on awards). Often, the petty officer is just referred to by the short hand designation, without using the surname. Thus FT3 Shearer would just be called FT3." Here's links to the rates and their symbols: "Seaman" rates: http://www.navy.mil/navydata/navy_legacy_hr.asp?id=262 "Fireman" rates: http://www.navy.mil/navydata/navy_legacy_hr.asp?id=263 "Airmen" rates: http://www.navy.mil/navydata/navy_legacy_hr.asp?id=264 EDIT: Here's a wiki list of links to the specific rates: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Categor...s_Navy_ratings Note that OTL you had Boatswain's Mates (BM; Seamen) become Aviation Boatswain's Mates (AB; Airmen) [1] and Machinist's Mates (MM; Firemen) become Aviation Machinists Mates (AD; Airmen) when in air service jobs. I'm up in the air on whether all Firemen rates will become Airmen or not given the certain ship-like quality of the Airships. I'm leaning towards "yes, they will". Ergo we'll have an enlarged Airmen rate category to encompass Seaman and possibly Fireman rates. I assume the standard rate symbols for such "Air-Seaman" and "Air-Firemen" will be given wings to become Airman rates, as with AB (Aviation Boatswain's Mate) rate. There may also be all-new rates for the specific Airship jobs: will Helium control technicians become a new "Lifting Gas Tech" (AL) rate, or will they fall under Av. Machinist's Mates? Some rates will have an added sub-designator (a third letter) like the Submariners do (they use S, like STS for Sonar Tech, Subs), say "A" for "Airship": ET for Electrical Tech (ship), ETS for submarines, ETA for Airships. 1 - Note that OTL the AB rate is only for E-9. Since the larger airship crews will have the need for actual working Boatswain's Mates this will become a full independent rate rather than the effective honorary title it is OTL. Same for Aviation Structural Mechanic (AM).
__________________
Tales from the Technoyurt! The Timelines of Geekhis Khan Welcome, to the World of Mañana!! Your contribution is wanted! Last edited by Geekhis Khan; January 14th, 2010 at 06:27 PM.. Reason: Added new link |
|
#107
|
|||
|
|||
|
new update
Okay, so here is the next update, in full
Quote:
__________________
|
|
#108
|
|||
|
|||
|
Eckener seems to be doing really well, when does he hit hard times?
great update |
|
#109
|
|||
|
|||
|
Great update Eckener. Here's my synopsis of alternate version of an OTL film that might fit in with your timeline (your other timeline mentions a wave of airship films).
Quote:
Here's the real IMDB page for the film. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0029319/ Last edited by alphaboi867; January 15th, 2010 at 11:58 PM.. Reason: fix spelling |
|
#110
|
|||
|
|||
|
Love it! That's a really good piece.
As far as a lowpoint for Eckener...I'm thinking maybe him not siding with the monarchist, and have them push through the Monarchy Bill in a few years from where I'm at now. That and possibly declining health. Not sure yet though. I have a question: what would be come of Israel ITTL? any thoughts on this? I was thinking that in the Holy Land a non-radical Palestinian state is born that's more pro-western. (kinda like Turkey). The only thing about this that I'm not sure about would be Tel Aviv, which was a pretty good sized city by the PoD. Would the zionists still be able to establish a Jewish state in the holy land without the Nazis?
__________________
|
|
#111
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
As for the zionist, if there is no WW2 they have no reason to demand a land of their own. yes Russian pogroms are pretty bad and depending upong what happens in Hungry, Romania, and USSR there may be a reason for an Israel. Something to keep in mind though. Jews were going to Israel anyway and they had a sizable presence already. I believe the last Ottoman census counted more Jews in Jerusalem (or possibly Palestine proper I can't remember) than Muslims. Also something to consider Jews served with distinction on both sides of WW1. While they were mostly assimilated that doesn't mean they couldn't have found g-d in the trenches. One thing to keep in mind is that a lot of the modern middle east conflict is rooted in 1948 and the resulting policitization of the Arab-Israeli conflict first by the Cold War and then later by radical fundamentalism. I don't think we would see such a schism in the middle east that we see today. Remember that a lot of the military advisors in the Middle East after 1945 were ex-Wehrmacht or SS. I just don't see a Jewish dominated Israel arising but possibly a an actual working hybrid state is possible. More likely the Jews continue coming to US or possibly staying put and making Eastern European culture ever more vibrant. |
|
#112
|
|||
|
|||
|
Okay, here is the next installment.
Quote:
A couple of other things to think about and that I'd like your opinions on: -What about Fascist Italy? What would go on there without a Nazi Germany? -The Space Race....I see it being three ways, between the US, Germany, and the USSR, with Germany being the leader. I'd also see it that the competition between the US and Germany would be of a friendly nature, where as the competition between those to and the Soviet Union being more akin to the OTL Space Race. I'd probably also see that ITTL the Space Race not starting until the late 50s, with Germany launching the first satellite MAYBE by 1959. -And down the road, what about computers? Or cell phones and other modern technology that we all enjoy? TV, console games, etc... After I wrap up Germany up to about the 1950s (Eckener's death in 1953), things will be a little longer in coming, since I'm going to have to focus on a more global scope. Any input will be much appreciated as I'll be treading pretty deep water pretty quickly, as the Eckener's 7 1/2 year presidency really rearranges the rest of the 20th and 21st Centuries.
__________________
|
|
#113
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
As for restablising the German monarchy; what does the new German constitution look like? Does the Kaiser essentially get all the powers of the Reichspräsident or is he made into a ceremonial figure like the Bundespräsident in OTL? After a decisive victory for monarchy in the plebiscite I can see groups like the Social-Democrats doing whatever they can to make sure he's as politcally impotent as possible. And what about the constitute monarchs of the German Empire? There were 4 kingdoms (the King of Prussia being the German Emperor), 6 grand duchies, 5 duchies, and 7 principalities; each with it's own monarch. Under the Weimer Republic these many of the smaller Staaten where merged to form 19 republican Länder. Are they reestablised in some form too; say as purely honorary titles (like the British peerage) with no actual politcal role in their former territories? And I know you aren't going to like it, but eventually airplanes will replace airships. IMHO the '40s will be remembered as the Golden Age of airships. They've become an establised mode of transport for the rich (& the economy is doing better), one can fly around the world on thanks to PanAm and DELAG, and planes aren't yet a serious competitor (though it's on the horizon). I think the British will be the ones to start focusing on long-distance passenger planes as a replacement for their (inferior) airships. By the '50s it's becoming clear that the airship's days are numbered what with new advances in pressurised aircraft, longer ranges, and civil night-flying that result in faster (& cheaper) air travel. Airships struggle, PanAm lose's it's monopoly on overseas flights (& either folds or comes to embrace new long-distance planes), DELAG either folds or merges with Lufthansa, and by the '60s airships have gone the way of the ocean liner in OTL (ITTL ocean liners also decline around the same time). But they never fully go away and by the '70s or '80s are revived for tourism and deliberately seek to invoke nostalgia (although they probally never become as common as cruise ships). Passenger jets probally enter the picture in the '70s. Oh, and with a more stable Europe in 1938 and the several airships of it's own I can see the newly crowned King George VI and Queen Elizabeth chartering one of them to go on a grand tour of the Empire (ie the White Dominions + India). In OTL they only went to Canada (& US of course). You already have President Eckener doing state visits in the Graf; the British & Americans will probally start to do the same thing. Maybe it doesn't get as far as a dedicated royal air yacht (though somebody will draw up a plan for one). Last edited by alphaboi867; January 16th, 2010 at 05:45 AM.. |
|
#114
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#115
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Weimar Germany was also quite friendly with the Soviets. I can see them (the Germans) having a 'friendly' space race with the Soviets akin to a 'friendly' space race with the Americans. |
|
#116
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
I also like the idea of reestablishing the Staaten. Quote:
Regular airship service I see continuing into the 1960s, maybe the 1970s. I also think that a few routes would be kept in service, for old times sake if nothing else. Then in the 80s or 90s, a reeamergance of the airship as a 'cruise ship'. And I love the idea of the 1938 tour by George VI and Queen Elizabeth on the airship. As for your 'nitpicks', thanks. I goofed on my math on LF's age. And as for the title, I'll fix that.
__________________
|
|
#117
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
#118
|
|||
|
|||
|
Considering OTL's plans on re-developing airships as (manned or unmanned) command and control as well as observation platforms due to their vastly greater endurance compared to planes, I think this concept could be developed much earlier in your TL. Think of AWACS, just slower and much, much bigger.
There is always the problem of protecting one of these whales of the air but I am pretty sure there are ways. Concerning the "no WW2" comments...wasn't there a hint about the Western Allies (including Germany) facing off against the Soviet Union at some time in the future? I mean, I can live without an alt-great slaughter. But I am really intrigued about how you are going to make ends meet. Great TL, btw. I always like timelines where Germany doesn't get screwed over (deservedly or undeservedly). Whenever I think about the potential of Germany to achieve good things in the world and for the world that was pissed away in the two world wars, I get angry and frustrated... |
|
#119
|
|||
|
|||
|
I too like TLs where Germany doesn't get screwed over in one way or another.
As far as a war with the Soviets....I haven't decided for sure yet, but I'm thinking about a possible war over Poland...maybe the soviets back some commie revolution in poland, and the WAllies come to the aid of the anti-communists in Poland. This still wouldn't be as big as WWII though. I really want to avoid having that big of a conflict. Just a series of smaller wars over the decades.
__________________
|
|
#120
|
|||
|
|||
|
Does Austria stay independent or does it unite with Germany? Oh and for added fun with the German-Soviet relationship if Prince Louis Ferdinand marries the same woman as in OTL (he married in 1938, before you have him coming to the throne) his wife will be Grand Duchess Kira Kirillovna of Russia. Her late father, Grand Duke Cyril Vladimirovich of Russia was the pretender to the Russian thone after Grand Duke Michael was executed. He died in 1938, and his son succeeded him as pretender. So the German Emperor is going to be the titular Tsar of all Russia's brother-in-law.
Granted the imperial couple's going to have very limited (if any) influence on foreign policy, but that's going to lead to some very frosty and akward diplomatic events. Maybe a minor international incident or too.Last edited by alphaboi867; January 19th, 2010 at 01:55 AM.. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|