Go Back   Alternate History Discussion Board > Discussion > Alternate History Discussion: After 1900

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 6th, 2009, 02:40 AM
Caesar Caesar is offline
The Nemesis to your Hubris
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1000 or more
Equal Rights Amendment Passes

What would the results be if in 1978 the Equal Right's Amendment passed and was added to the Constitution?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by TNF View Post
Solidarity Forever, muthafuckas.
The Complete Works of Caesar

New Story: The Great Change: A Veil Lifted
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old November 6th, 2009, 01:33 PM
Orville_third Orville_third is offline
Defender of Abkhazia
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Carolina Free State
Posts: 1000 or more
Much the same as in OTL, actually. Much of the ERA's impact has been done through ordinary lawws- it just doesn't have the Constitution backing it up. (Though women still are discriminated against, much as African-Americans still are.)

I'm not sure how it would affect the Religious Right, who grew in power in part due to opposition ot the ERA.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr. Strangelove View Post
I see yours and raise a supercomputer inside a medieval chapel.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jello_Biafra View Post
I'm voting for the fairy princess, because that sounds most plausible.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old November 6th, 2009, 02:31 PM
Magniac Magniac is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Ava Gardner's fave Australian town
Posts: 1000 or more
Little or no effect at all--if it passed before the cultural Right went to war against it, that is.

However, it would never pass once it became a kulturkampf issue. The US amendment process is too easy to stall.

Though perhaps some US constitutional scholars would come to complain about the ERA being an empty platitude, a feelgood Amendment which just expressed the bleeding obvious:

Quote:
Section 1. Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.

Section 2. The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.

Section 3. This amendment shall take effect two years after the date of ratification
That's it. That's the whole controversial shebang.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Orville_third View Post
I'm not sure how it would affect the Religious Right, who grew in power in part due to opposition ot the ERA.
The likes of Schlafly being very talented creators of agitprop, they find something else to mobilise their troops against.

Also, ironically, there would probably arise conservative activist groups that invoked the ERA for their own causes (as per the 'conservative feminist' tendency) . There's a group called the Susan B. Anthony List that models itself as a pro-life version of Emily's List, f'rinstance.
__________________
Wanna be like Nancy and Lee
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old November 6th, 2009, 03:08 PM
Mark E. Mark E. is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Forgottonia, USA
Posts: 1000 or more
We must remember some of the issues that killed it, and how those would have gone to the supreme court.

In all, the amendment came up two states short. The states that came closest were Iowa, Missouri and Nevada. It went to the voters in Iowa, and appeared to be so close nobody could predict the results. Had it passed there, one of the other two states may have ratified it and it would have become part of the constitution.

It failed in Iowa, not because of religious-right rhetoric, but because opponents came out with the argument that if you could not discriminate by sex, you might eliminate girls' basketball in high school, since you could not keep boys off the teams.

That's right, the issue of girls' high school basketball killed it in one of only two states needed for ratification.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old November 6th, 2009, 07:22 PM
Seraph Seraph is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 333
wouldn't a bigger more serious issue that was considered for the timewas that women would now have to register for the selective service and possibly having to be in direct combat?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old November 6th, 2009, 08:39 PM
Chengar Qordath Chengar Qordath is offline
Princeps Qordathicus
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seraph View Post
wouldn't a bigger more serious issue that was considered for the timewas that women would now have to register for the selective service and possibly having to be in direct combat?
Among other things. The problem the ERA ran into was that unlike most other forms of discrimination (race, religion, etc) there actually are significant differences between men and women and the law and society have to be capable of accounting for that. The amendment's wording is simple enough that it could easily be read as "No distinctions between the genders ever" which would just cause all kinds of problems; IMO the Supreme Court would have interpreted it to allow common sense exceptions though.
__________________
"People never lie so much as after a hunt, during a war or before an election." - Otto von Bismarck
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old November 6th, 2009, 08:47 PM
Mark E. Mark E. is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Forgottonia, USA
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seraph View Post
wouldn't a bigger more serious issue that was considered for the timewas that women would now have to register for the selective service and possibly having to be in direct combat?
Actually, that issue was brought up in the seventies. Conservatives suggested the ERA could be a lesbian conspiracy to draft women into the military.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old November 6th, 2009, 08:55 PM
Super_Cool Super_Cool is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 458
If it passed, would all bathrooms in government run buildings, like schools, been unisex?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old November 6th, 2009, 09:01 PM
RogueBeaver RogueBeaver is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Montréal
Posts: 1000 or more
Send a message via MSN to RogueBeaver
Somewhat surprisingly, Nixon supported the ERA, though his Oval Office tapes tell a rather different story. Especially on the issue of abortion as it relates to biracial children.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ian the Admin View Post
Average people don't give a shit until extremists randomly find something that they can use for propaganda.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.