Go Back   Alternate History Discussion Board > Discussion > Alternate History Discussion: After 1900

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 6th, 2009, 05:26 PM
Melvin Loh Melvin Loh is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Darwin, NT, Australia
Posts: 1000 or more
Hague Rules of Air Warfare 1922-23 become binding international law

http://www.lawofwar.org/hague_rules_of_air_warfare.htm
http://www.icrc.org/web/eng/siteeng0...256B66005C0BF1

These draft rules as proposed by the US post-WWI never came into force, but WI a separate treaty specific to the laws of aerial warfare had indeed been adopted (in a similar fashion as the Geneva Conventions govern the laws for land & sea warfare in separate treaties) ?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old October 6th, 2009, 06:19 PM
Derek Jackson Derek Jackson is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1000 or more
Would it have made any difference to the behavior of the British in Iraq and parts of India?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old October 6th, 2009, 07:18 PM
Minchandre Minchandre is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Tel Aviv
Posts: 1000 or more
I'm sure that it would be just as influential as the earlier Hague Conventions.
__________________
This space currently blank
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old October 6th, 2009, 07:23 PM
wormyguy wormyguy is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Your [insert relative here]
Posts: 1000 or more
Send a message via AIM to wormyguy
The most important parts of this are that missiles are banned (exploding projectiles) and so is aerial bombardment of civilians. This will have significant effects on WWII and later 20th century conflicts.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old October 7th, 2009, 02:01 AM
David S Poepoe David S Poepoe is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: El Segundo, California
Posts: 1000 or more
I doubt much would be different until the Second World War. The aerial bombings during the Spanish Civil War may not occur, but I suspect the Japanese will still do as they wish in the Far East. With the 'blitzkrieg' type of war the Hague Rules will probably be tossed out altogether.
__________________
Coincidence? We invite you, the reader with no inclination to do his own research, to decide.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old October 7th, 2009, 02:52 AM
CalBear CalBear is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: In a house on Sol-3
Posts: 1000 or more
Be something nice to read while you were in the bomb shelter.

Article XXII and Article XXIV make everything else window dressing. It could be forcefully argued that, with the exception of one major raid the U.S. made on Berlin the U.S. followed Article XXII to the letter, including the attacks on both Hiroshima and Nagasaki, as well as the firebombing of Toyko.

The USAAF always stated it was going after military targets, and, generally, that was the case. The weapons, however, were not up to the precision of task required.

There is also the example of the rules laid out interwar regarding submarines. They lasted exactly as long as it took for the war to start. A weapon exists and it WILL be used.
__________________
Eddie would go!


Rule # 32: Gotta enjoy the little things!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old October 7th, 2009, 03:16 AM
LeoXiao LeoXiao is offline
無忝爾所生
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: VS Amerika
Posts: 1000 or more
Blitzkrieg is too essential to the German war plan, so they'll just break the treaty and after WW2, after the USA/UK find that bombing cities is pretty fun , everyone will forget the agreement existed.
__________________
Works:
Stars and Flowers
WAR IS PEACE (in-progress)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.