Go Back   Alternate History Discussion Board > Discussion > Alternate History Discussion: After 1900

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old September 12th, 2009, 11:35 PM
Onkel Willie Onkel Willie is offline
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Brunssum, South Limburg, Netherlands
Posts: 1000 or more
Wi Charles Evans Hughes had won the 1916 election?


Sp, what if Charles Evans Hughes had won the election instead of Woodrow Wilson? I'm not sure if it's possible, but I'm interested in how WW1 and the peace afterwards would have shaped up without Wilson in charge; that is if America even gets involved in WW1. I don't know what the Republican party's stance on the war was so I'd like to know. Don't know enough about American politics of the era nor about Hughes as a person to be sure.
The Soft Underbelly - a Gallipoli TL, last updated 2 May. '16

Hail Frieza - a Dragonball Z fanfic Last updated: 5 Jul. '15
Reply With Quote
Old September 12th, 2009, 11:47 PM
Presbyman Presbyman is offline
Bring Back Churchill
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 365
Well, if Teddy Roosevelt preserved any meaningful influence in the GOP (he had bolted in 1912 but came back and supported Hughes in 1916), America would have found some reason to enter the war ASAP. Ironically, that might not have made a huge difference. New Presidents were not inaugurated until March (this was true until sometime in FDR's Presidency). So Hughes assumes office in March, 1917. When Wilson was President, the US entered the war in November 1917 if I am not mistaken. Maybe under Hughes the US would have entered a few months earlier. It's really a damn shame ... this was not really a war we should have entered, IMO, with the benefit of hindsight. Oh well ...

I would like to think Hughes would have been more realistic and flexible after the war than Wilson and perhaps a more durable peace could have been created ... but with France and to a lesser extent England out for blood (understandably enough) that would have been a challenge.
Reply With Quote
Old September 13th, 2009, 02:13 AM
Tom_B Tom_B is offline
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1000 or more
President Hughes comes up here periodically. The foreign policy differences are not all that big. USA joins the war a little bit earlier. The most significant delta is Leonard Wood not Persching will lead the AEF and so a President Wood down the road is likely if he does not screw up as a general. As for the peace there are also some Wilsonian ideas in Hughes though I don't see him as inflexible as WW. He may alter the League of Nations enough from Wilsonism (IIRC Taft had some interesting ideas) to appease Hydrochloric Acid (HCL) so America joins it.

An important domestic delta is that the racial segregation of the civil service that Wilson implemented is likely to be dismantled.
Reply With Quote
Old September 13th, 2009, 09:12 AM
Derek Jackson Derek Jackson is offline
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1000 or more
I thought that Wilson planned to ask his VP to resign, to appoint Hughes S of S and then to resign to avoid a long lame duck period in that situation.

I fear that the US still goes to war.

The optimistic version of this is

1) Republicans get blame for US in WW1, lose heavily in 1920.

2) Rather consevative Democrats take charge in the 20s

3) The progressive elements take charge of the Republican Party

4) The New Deal becomes a Republican thing, without the disadvantage FDR had of needing to be nice to Southern Racist in Congrss (though in this super optimistic view FDR is still President as a progresive Republcian)

5) Most events 1933-45 are the same except that the new deal makes fewer concessions on race.
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:48 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.