Go Back   Alternate History Discussion Board > Discussion > Alternate History Discussion: Before 1900

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 24th, 2009, 03:01 PM
Burton K Wheeler Burton K Wheeler is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Mom's Basement
Posts: 1000 or more
Denmark-Hanover and Sweden-Brandenburg

I have a half-conceived TL with a POD sometime in the late 16th century in which two of the main European powers are Denmark-Hanover and Sweden-Brandenburg. The exact nature of the unions isn't important, whether they are two kingdoms in personal union or the German territory is incorporated into Denmark or Sweden; if there is a Scandinavian monarch on the German throne or vice versa, etc. I don't know nearly enough about European dynastic politics during that period to begin to guess how to do it, so I ask you guys for help.

The only other thing that's critical to establish in Europe is that the 80 Years War ends in a Dutch defeat, if that helps or hinders you.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old August 24th, 2009, 03:21 PM
Valdemar II Valdemar II is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Copenhagen; the Kalmar Union
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Burton K Wheeler View Post
I have a half-conceived TL with a POD sometime in the late 16th century in which two of the main European powers are Denmark-Hanover and Sweden-Brandenburg. The exact nature of the unions isn't important, whether they are two kingdoms in personal union or the German territory is incorporated into Denmark or Sweden; if there is a Scandinavian monarch on the German throne or vice versa, etc. I don't know nearly enough about European dynastic politics during that period to begin to guess how to do it, so I ask you guys for help.

The only other thing that's critical to establish in Europe is that the 80 Years War ends in a Dutch defeat, if that helps or hinders you.
Denmark-Hanover could happen at least purely territorial with some changes in the 30 Years War (bigger Danish succes), so that the the title of Colonel of the Lower Saxon Circle become a heritable title. Sweden is easier just make a Hohenzollern marry a Swedish Princess and kill of the male heirs.

Ulrika Eleonora of Sweden and Christina of Sweden is both strong possiblities.

The other possiblity for a Danish-Hanoverian union, is that the Hanover doesn't inherited Britain, and Sophia Dorothea of Hanover marries Frederick IV of Denmark, and George II end up in a accident, before he get any children. Voila instant Denmark-Hanover (through the name would likely still be Denmark-Norway)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old August 24th, 2009, 03:30 PM
Burton K Wheeler Burton K Wheeler is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Mom's Basement
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Valdemar II View Post
Denmark-Hanover could happen at least purely territorial with some changes in the 30 Years War (bigger Danish succes), so that the the title of Colonel of the Lower Saxon Circle become a heritable title. Sweden is easier just make a Hohenzollern marry a Swedish Princess and kill of the male heirs.

Ulrika Eleonora of Sweden and Christina of Sweden is both strong possiblities.

The other possiblity for a Danish-Hanoverian union, is that the Hanover doesn't inherited Britain, and Sophia Dorothea of Hanover marries Frederick IV of Denmark, and George II end up in a accident, before he get any children. Voila instant Denmark-Hanover (through the name would likely still be Denmark-Norway)
As regards Sweden, Ulrika is probably a bit late, and Christina's mother was a Brandenburger. I'll just have John Sigismund of Brandenburg marry a notional Swedish princess instead of Anna of Prussia.

Yeah, most of my big changes would be around the time of the 30 Years War, so I'll just have a big conquest like that. Ideally Danish territory would lie a bit west of the Lower Saxon Circle, though, up to the border of the Netherlands.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old August 24th, 2009, 03:34 PM
Valdemar II Valdemar II is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Copenhagen; the Kalmar Union
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Burton K Wheeler View Post
As regards Sweden, Ulrika is probably a bit late, and Christina's mother was a Brandenburger. I'll just have John Sigismund of Brandenburg marry a notional Swedish princess instead of Anna of Prussia.

Yeah, most of my big changes would be around the time of the 30 Years War, so I'll just have a big conquest like that. Ideally Danish territory would lie a bit west of the Lower Saxon Circle, though, up to the border of the Netherlands.
Denmark would still gain Oldenburg in 1667, and if Denmark is succesful, there lies the big nice Bishopric of Münster between the Lower Saxon Circle and Netherland, and East Friesland could always become part of Netherland in a different 30 Years War.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old August 24th, 2009, 03:38 PM
Burton K Wheeler Burton K Wheeler is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Mom's Basement
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Valdemar II View Post
Denmark would still gain Oldenburg in 1667, and if Denmark is succesful, there lies the big nice Bishopric of Münster between the Lower Saxon Circle and Netherland, and East Friesland could always become part of Netherland in a different 30 Years War.
Perfect, thank you!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old August 24th, 2009, 03:38 PM
Rudie Rudie is offline
so not dangerous.
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 132
If the Danish have more success in the 30 Years War, all the protestant states would probably be more successful. This means, that to prevent Dutch independence the 80 Year War need to end a lot sooner, at least 20 - 30 Years.
Maybe you could keep England catholic and by this preventing english support to the Dutch. This could give the Spanish enough of an advantage to win the war before the outbreak of TTL's 30 Years War.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old August 24th, 2009, 03:43 PM
Burton K Wheeler Burton K Wheeler is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Mom's Basement
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rudie View Post
If the Danish have more success in the 30 Years War, all the protestant states would probably be more successful. This means, that to prevent Dutch independence the 80 Year War need to end a lot sooner, at least 20 - 30 Years.
Maybe you could keep England catholic and by this preventing english support to the Dutch. This could give the Spanish enough of an advantage to win the war before the outbreak of TTL's 30 Years War.
I imagined a much earlier end to the 80 Year's war, perhaps even before 1600, as the primary POD. I hadn't figured exactly when I wanted that POD to be. I don't think that keeping England Catholic is what I want to do, though.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old August 24th, 2009, 03:48 PM
Rudie Rudie is offline
so not dangerous.
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 132
Quote:
Originally Posted by Burton K Wheeler View Post
I imagined a much earlier end to the 80 Year's war, perhaps even before 1600, as the primary POD. I hadn't figured exactly when I wanted that POD to be. I don't think that keeping England Catholic is what I want to do, though.
Well, that was just my first idea regarding a Dutch defeat. I'm pretty sure that there are enough Spanish mistakes during the war that could be just as a POD leading to a Spanish victory.

Edit:
You could also have Spain not interventing against the coronation of Henry IV of France (maybe have him convert to Catholicism earlier) and instead focus stronger on the war against the Dutch. This could save the northern Netherlands for Spain and help ending the 80 Years War earlier with a spanish victory.
__________________


Last edited by Rudie; August 24th, 2009 at 04:00 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old August 24th, 2009, 04:15 PM
Grey Wolf Grey Wolf is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Deepest Wales
Posts: 1000 or more
With regard to the Hannove part of the name, it would remain one of the Electorates (as long as all this is not butterflied or bulldozed away) so the name would remain viable and important. In terms of a territorial union, the use of the name would be subsumed under Denmark

A quick look up of info shows that the name Hannover was not used for the Electorate until 1636. It depends on what is happening elsewhere as to whether the same sequence of events come about

Sweden-Brandenburg actually makes more sense than Sweden-Poland since you have two Protestant lands coming together, rather than one of them Catholic

Best Regards
Grey Wolf
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old August 24th, 2009, 04:28 PM
Gonzaga Gonzaga is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Porto Alegre, Brazil
Posts: 1000 or more
Send a message via MSN to Gonzaga
Quote:
Originally Posted by Burton K Wheeler View Post
I imagined a much earlier end to the 80 Year's war, perhaps even before 1600, as the primary POD. I hadn't figured exactly when I wanted that POD to be. I don't think that keeping England Catholic is what I want to do, though.
Maybe you could avoid the Spanish Armada. Until it the Duke of Parma's armies were doing quite well in Netherlands, with a big and well paid army. With the Armada his troops were diminished, the payments of the soldiers were delayed and thei movements were stopped for an entire year. Without the attempt of invade England these problems wouldn't happen, and Parma could have a chance of defeat the Dutch.
__________________
Because we all love mad kings: Madness and Greatness: a history of Portugal (1578 - 1640) Last update: 21/September/2010
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old August 24th, 2009, 04:31 PM
Rudie Rudie is offline
so not dangerous.
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 132
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gonzaga View Post
Maybe you could avoid the Spanish Armada. Until it the Duke of Parma's armies were doing quite well in Netherlands, with a big and well paid army. With the Armada his troops were diminished, the payments of the soldiers were delayed and thei movements were stopped for an entire year. Without the attempt of invade England these problems wouldn't happen, and Parma could have a chance of defeat the Dutch.
Maybe the Armada could be avoided / the war with England delayed, if Mary Stuart is not beheaded.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old August 24th, 2009, 05:04 PM
Thande Thande is offline
Is back
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: University of Sheffield
Posts: 1000 or more
Oddly enough I was pondering various X-Hanovers earlier today for my own timeline, including Denmark-Hanover. But I see Valdemar's answered this better than I ever could.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old August 24th, 2009, 05:05 PM
Susano Susano is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Königstein im Taunus
Posts: 1000 or more
Send a message via ICQ to Susano Send a message via AIM to Susano Send a message via MSN to Susano
Quote:
Originally Posted by Valdemar II View Post
The other possiblity for a Danish-Hanoverian union, is that the Hanover doesn't inherited Britain, and Sophia Dorothea of Hanover marries Frederick IV of Denmark, and George II end up in a accident, before he get any children. Voila instant Denmark-Hanover (through the name would likely still be Denmark-Norway)
Not necessarily. The other Welf lines certainly would raise claims, too.

And yes, the standard Sweden-Brandenburg scenario is Christina marrying the Great Elector. If that is too late, either the Vasas or the Hohenzollerns need to be cut down that there is an daughter as heir earlier. Personally, of course, I have absolutly no problems with Gustav Adolph not being born

Of course, this would prevent the Brandenburg-Prussia union. This means the Duchy of Prussia remains a Polish fief, or it becomes per conquest a Swedish fief, consideirng Swedens more powerful role in this timeline. It shortly was for a time IOTL, too, and a stronger Sweden could well rule the entire Baltic regions from Estonia to Prussia. Maybe even the entire southern Baltic coast down to Mecklenburg. Some Swedish-Polish wars seem almost ensured in this situation...

If Denmark manages to conquer the large north west German bishoprics (Münster, Osnabrück, Paderborn, Bremen, Verden - the latter two IOTL fell to Sweden after the 30Y War) then this would require a totally different 30 Years War, considering that the Lower Saxon War where Denmark invaded the Empire was quite early and IOTL quite short, so this requires major changes from early on. One could even deduce that if Denmark is so successful in grabbing imperial territory, then France and Sweden might be more sucessful, too, though its difficult to see what further territories Sweden could gain. France, though... there are a lot of Swabian territories with no strong interests involved, or they gain Lorraine and the Lorrainian Duke is compensated with some more secularised bishoprics (the Würzburg/Bamberg/Fulda territory, maybe)

Or alternatively, as a random idea... IOTL, France wanted to win territories staying inside the Empire, so that it could influence the Empire. The Habsburgs prevented that by making a big show out of that this theoretcially meant the French King would have to swear fealty to the Emperor, with all including symbolism, etc. Now, if the Protestant powers are stronger in this 30Y War, and Imperial power is more weakened, it could well end up that the Peace Treaty says such is not necessary, and hence the French King gains territories inside the Empire, maybe even the overlordship over the Upper Rhenish Circle (if Denmark gets the overlrodship over the Lower Saxon Circle)... I dont like it of course , but if the foreign meddling powers in the 30Y Wars are such stronger, its a possibility...
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old August 24th, 2009, 05:12 PM
Faeelin Faeelin is online now
Lord of Ten Thousand Years
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1000 or more
Send a message via AIM to Faeelin
But if you crush the Dutch revolt, would the Habsburgs do worse in the Thirty Years War?
__________________
Quote:
Freedom was not just for the English, after all- it was for all men, even Papists.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old August 24th, 2009, 05:14 PM
Burton K Wheeler Burton K Wheeler is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Mom's Basement
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Faeelin View Post
But if you crush the Dutch revolt, would the Habsburgs do worse in the Thirty Years War?
I was imagining them crushing the free provinces, but still having to deal with general revolts thoughout the whole Netherlands.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old August 24th, 2009, 05:15 PM
Susano Susano is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Königstein im Taunus
Posts: 1000 or more
Send a message via ICQ to Susano Send a message via AIM to Susano Send a message via MSN to Susano
Quote:
Originally Posted by Faeelin View Post
But if you crush the Dutch revolt, would the Habsburgs do worse in the Thirty Years War?
Well, I applied a bit of reverse causality there. The Habsburgs have to do worse in the war, in order to allow Denmark to conquer all those bishoprics. But yes, if the Netherlands remain Spanish, then this means quite some ressources more on Habsburg side, so, hm, this an issue that needs to be adressed. Maybe for whatever reason the Spanish Habsburgs dont participate in the war?
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old August 24th, 2009, 05:17 PM
Burton K Wheeler Burton K Wheeler is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Mom's Basement
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Susano View Post
Not necessarily. The other Welf lines certainly would raise claims, too.

And yes, the standard Sweden-Brandenburg scenario is Christina marrying the Great Elector. If that is too late, either the Vasas or the Hohenzollerns need to be cut down that there is an daughter as heir earlier. Personally, of course, I have absolutly no problems with Gustav Adolph not being born

Of course, this would prevent the Brandenburg-Prussia union. This means the Duchy of Prussia remains a Polish fief, or it becomes per conquest a Swedish fief, consideirng Swedens more powerful role in this timeline. It shortly was for a time IOTL, too, and a stronger Sweden could well rule the entire Baltic regions from Estonia to Prussia. Maybe even the entire southern Baltic coast down to Mecklenburg. Some Swedish-Polish wars seem almost ensured in this situation...
Reading my mind, dude. I was also thinking that Poland-Lithuania could deal more effectively with Muscovy and remain more powerful for longer, even though the Szchlacta wasn't really built for long-term success.

Quote:
If Denmark manages to conquer the large north west German bishoprics (Münster, Osnabrück, Paderborn, Bremen, Verden - the latter two IOTL fell to Sweden after the 30Y War) then this would require a totally different 30 Years War, considering that the Lower Saxon War where Denmark invaded the Empire was quite early and IOTL quite short, so this requires major changes from early on. One could even deduce that if Denmark is so successful in grabbing imperial territory, then France and Sweden might be more sucessful, too, though its difficult to see what further territories Sweden could gain. France, though... there are a lot of Swabian territories with no strong interests involved, or they gain Lorraine and the Lorrainian Duke is compensated with some more secularised bishoprics (the Würzburg/Bamberg/Fulda territory, maybe)

Or alternatively, as a random idea... IOTL, France wanted to win territories staying inside the Empire, so that it could influence the Empire. The Habsburgs prevented that by making a big show out of that this theoretcially meant the French King would have to swear fealty to the Emperor, with all including symbolism, etc. Now, if the Protestant powers are stronger in this 30Y War, and Imperial power is more weakened, it could well end up that the Peace Treaty says such is not necessary, and hence the French King gains territories inside the Empire, maybe even the overlordship over the Upper Rhenish Circle (if Denmark gets the overlrodship over the Lower Saxon Circle)... I dont like it of course , but if the foreign meddling powers in the 30Y Wars are such stronger, its a possibility...
That works quite well, I suppose, but if Denmark and Sweden are so successful against the Hapsburgs, would France necessarily even enter?
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old August 24th, 2009, 05:18 PM
Burton K Wheeler Burton K Wheeler is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Mom's Basement
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Susano View Post
Well, I applied a bit of reverse causality there. The Habsburgs have to do worse in the war, in order to allow Denmark to conquer all those bishoprics. But yes, if the Netherlands remain Spanish, then this means quite some ressources more on Habsburg side, so, hm, this an issue that needs to be adressed. Maybe for whatever reason the Spanish Habsburgs dont participate in the war?
Or the Spanish Hapsburgs are involved in a full-out war with the French? Say the French try to occupy the Low Countries instead of Lorraine/Swabia as you suggested?
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old August 24th, 2009, 05:19 PM
Valdemar II Valdemar II is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Copenhagen; the Kalmar Union
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Susano View Post
Well, I applied a bit of reverse causality there. The Habsburgs have to do worse in the war, in order to allow Denmark to conquer all those bishoprics. But yes, if the Netherlands remain Spanish, then this means quite some ressources more on Habsburg side, so, hm, this an issue that needs to be adressed. Maybe for whatever reason the Spanish Habsburgs dont participate in the war?
Or the French join earlier, or the British join it. With British and French armies running anmok in the Rhineland and Netherland, the Habsburg may focus less on Denmark.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old August 24th, 2009, 05:20 PM
Rudie Rudie is offline
so not dangerous.
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 132
Well, there could be another uprising in the Netherlands during TTL's 30 Years War, which is ultimately crushed by Habsburg but occupies forces for some years. Additionally the Huguenots in France could do worse, enabling France to enter the war earlier (which would also go well with Henry IV converting to Catholicism earlier...).
__________________

Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.