|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Denmark-Hanover and Sweden-Brandenburg
I have a half-conceived TL with a POD sometime in the late 16th century in which two of the main European powers are Denmark-Hanover and Sweden-Brandenburg. The exact nature of the unions isn't important, whether they are two kingdoms in personal union or the German territory is incorporated into Denmark or Sweden; if there is a Scandinavian monarch on the German throne or vice versa, etc. I don't know nearly enough about European dynastic politics during that period to begin to guess how to do it, so I ask you guys for help.
The only other thing that's critical to establish in Europe is that the 80 Years War ends in a Dutch defeat, if that helps or hinders you. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Ulrika Eleonora of Sweden and Christina of Sweden is both strong possiblities. The other possiblity for a Danish-Hanoverian union, is that the Hanover doesn't inherited Britain, and Sophia Dorothea of Hanover marries Frederick IV of Denmark, and George II end up in a accident, before he get any children. Voila instant Denmark-Hanover (through the name would likely still be Denmark-Norway) |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Yeah, most of my big changes would be around the time of the 30 Years War, so I'll just have a big conquest like that. Ideally Danish territory would lie a bit west of the Lower Saxon Circle, though, up to the border of the Netherlands. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Perfect, thank you!
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
If the Danish have more success in the 30 Years War, all the protestant states would probably be more successful. This means, that to prevent Dutch independence the 80 Year War need to end a lot sooner, at least 20 - 30 Years.
Maybe you could keep England catholic and by this preventing english support to the Dutch. This could give the Spanish enough of an advantage to win the war before the outbreak of TTL's 30 Years War.
__________________
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Edit: You could also have Spain not interventing against the coronation of Henry IV of France (maybe have him convert to Catholicism earlier) and instead focus stronger on the war against the Dutch. This could save the northern Netherlands for Spain and help ending the 80 Years War earlier with a spanish victory.
__________________
Last edited by Rudie; August 24th, 2009 at 04:00 PM.. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
With regard to the Hannove part of the name, it would remain one of the Electorates (as long as all this is not butterflied or bulldozed away) so the name would remain viable and important. In terms of a territorial union, the use of the name would be subsumed under Denmark
A quick look up of info shows that the name Hannover was not used for the Electorate until 1636. It depends on what is happening elsewhere as to whether the same sequence of events come about Sweden-Brandenburg actually makes more sense than Sweden-Poland since you have two Protestant lands coming together, rather than one of them Catholic Best Regards Grey Wolf |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Maybe you could avoid the Spanish Armada. Until it the Duke of Parma's armies were doing quite well in Netherlands, with a big and well paid army. With the Armada his troops were diminished, the payments of the soldiers were delayed and thei movements were stopped for an entire year. Without the attempt of invade England these problems wouldn't happen, and Parma could have a chance of defeat the Dutch.
__________________
Because we all love mad kings: Madness and Greatness: a history of Portugal (1578 - 1640) Last update: 21/September/2010 |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Oddly enough I was pondering various X-Hanovers earlier today for my own timeline, including Denmark-Hanover. But I see Valdemar's answered this better than I ever could.
|
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
And yes, the standard Sweden-Brandenburg scenario is Christina marrying the Great Elector. If that is too late, either the Vasas or the Hohenzollerns need to be cut down that there is an daughter as heir earlier. Personally, of course, I have absolutly no problems with Gustav Adolph not being born ![]() Of course, this would prevent the Brandenburg-Prussia union. This means the Duchy of Prussia remains a Polish fief, or it becomes per conquest a Swedish fief, consideirng Swedens more powerful role in this timeline. It shortly was for a time IOTL, too, and a stronger Sweden could well rule the entire Baltic regions from Estonia to Prussia. Maybe even the entire southern Baltic coast down to Mecklenburg. Some Swedish-Polish wars seem almost ensured in this situation... If Denmark manages to conquer the large north west German bishoprics (Münster, Osnabrück, Paderborn, Bremen, Verden - the latter two IOTL fell to Sweden after the 30Y War) then this would require a totally different 30 Years War, considering that the Lower Saxon War where Denmark invaded the Empire was quite early and IOTL quite short, so this requires major changes from early on. One could even deduce that if Denmark is so successful in grabbing imperial territory, then France and Sweden might be more sucessful, too, though its difficult to see what further territories Sweden could gain. France, though... there are a lot of Swabian territories with no strong interests involved, or they gain Lorraine and the Lorrainian Duke is compensated with some more secularised bishoprics (the Würzburg/Bamberg/Fulda territory, maybe) Or alternatively, as a random idea... IOTL, France wanted to win territories staying inside the Empire, so that it could influence the Empire. The Habsburgs prevented that by making a big show out of that this theoretcially meant the French King would have to swear fealty to the Emperor, with all including symbolism, etc. Now, if the Protestant powers are stronger in this 30Y War, and Imperial power is more weakened, it could well end up that the Peace Treaty says such is not necessary, and hence the French King gains territories inside the Empire, maybe even the overlordship over the Upper Rhenish Circle (if Denmark gets the overlrodship over the Lower Saxon Circle)... I dont like it of course , but if the foreign meddling powers in the 30Y Wars are such stronger, its a possibility... |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
But if you crush the Dutch revolt, would the Habsburgs do worse in the Thirty Years War?
__________________
Quote:
|
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
I was imagining them crushing the free provinces, but still having to deal with general revolts thoughout the whole Netherlands.
|
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
Well, I applied a bit of reverse causality there. The Habsburgs have to do worse in the war, in order to allow Denmark to conquer all those bishoprics. But yes, if the Netherlands remain Spanish, then this means quite some ressources more on Habsburg side, so, hm, this an issue that needs to be adressed. Maybe for whatever reason the Spanish Habsburgs dont participate in the war?
|
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
Well, there could be another uprising in the Netherlands during TTL's 30 Years War, which is ultimately crushed by Habsburg but occupies forces for some years. Additionally the Huguenots in France could do worse, enabling France to enter the war earlier (which would also go well with Henry IV converting to Catholicism earlier...).
__________________
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|