Have Japan a predominately Christian (preferable Catholic) nation today. I would prefer the POD to be when they kicked the Christians out, but you could use another. Also, Japan should be at least as powerful now as it is in OTL.
Duncan said:Several daimyo were converted to Christianity in the 16th-17th century, mostly in the south-west. Although Hideyoshi was ordering the expulsion of missionaries as early as 1587, complete prohibition of Christianity only came after the Shimabara rebellion of 1637-38.
I don't think any of the Kyushu Christian daimyo were in any position to unify Japan, nor that any of the actual unifiers were likely to convert. Possibilities:
- The Catholic invasion that was always feared actually happens. A Spanish armada lands in Kyushu, supported by the local Christian daimyo. Japan becomes a Spanish colony
- The Shimabara rebellion never takes place, or is snuffed out by local authorities. The Tokugawa are thus never moved to finally outlaw Christianity, and despite intermittent persecutions it gradually gains strength throughout the 17th-19th centuries, finally being siezed upon as a way to modernise the nation after the Meiji Restoration
Can't say I see either as especially likely.
Alternatively, the first Nestorian Christians are thought to have arrived around the 5th century...
Prunesquallor said:I think you may be confusing cause and effect here. I got the impression (though I've only a general reader's knowledge of these matters) that the Shimabara Rebellion was caused by a crackdown on Christianity, not vice versa. Also (this is just a vague memory, I'm afraid), wasn't the Rebellion rather dubiously Christian, having elements in it foreign to orthodox Christianity, rather like the Taiping?
A rule of thumb seems to be: in order for Christianity to successfully implant itself in a given East Asian society, said society must have been "softened up" by colonization, war, deliberate destruction of pre-existing culture, and, in the case of Cambodia, outright genocide. Either that or the natives are simply converted at gunpoint, like the Filipinos under Spanish rule. So it depends how much suffering one is willing to inflict on an ATL Japan, considering that even nuclear bombings and unconditional surrender didn't shake it up enough for Christianity to interest more than anecdotal numbers of Japanese in OTL.Hermanubis said:(keep in mind, however that Chrsitianity has been doing well in Korea of late(last Century or so), so it can’t be that incompatible to East Asian Culture.)
Keep in mind that South Korea has been thoroughly "westernized." They were ruled by an authoritarian government until the 80s that made western-style economic growth its chief priority. The Korea of today is very different from the period we're discussing.Hermanubis said:I was thinking about making a thread about this (Japan is unified by Christians in the Sengoku Period) thou from this thread it seems a bit unlikely. (Keep in mind, however that Christianity has been doing well in Korea of late (last Century or so), so it can’t be that incompatible with East Asian Culture.)
It depends, really. Buddhism didn't need to completely destabilize Asian societies in order to spread, it merely waited for new dynasties or periods of interregnum; Japan's conversion to Buddhism during the Nara period was a mostly peaceful time. Even Islam, a religion for which I have no love lost, seems to have been able to spread mostly peacefully in the area, following the trade routes through the Indonesian archipelago and all the way to the Southern Philippines.Leo Caesius said:I'd argue that Hendryk's rule of thumb applies even more generally, and beyond Christianity; while people are content, they will not consider breaking with tradition or abandoning their faith. It's only in times of radical change and transition periods that new faiths find an attentive audience. A shock to the system, such as wars of conquest, would provide the soil for a new ideology to grow.