Go Back   Alternate History Discussion Board > Discussion > Alternate History Discussion: Before 1900

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 11th, 2009, 04:36 AM
Doraemon Doraemon is offline
From the 22nd Century
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: 22nd century Japan
Posts: 404
No Open Door Policy In China

So, what would have happened if there was no US Open Door policy in 1898? Would China have been divided up as in Africa and Southwest Asia, or was this inevitable with the political situation then?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old June 11th, 2009, 05:05 AM
Hawkeye Hawkeye is offline
Bamed
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1000 or more
A single Chinese province would have been too much for a European colonial power. The population of this Chinese colony would have outnumbered the occupying force. And that is just a piece of the iceberg for the colonialists wouldn’t be facing just the population of the colony but all of China which they've had their own version of nationalism a lot longer then Europeans had theirs.

And finally Europe did not want to cut up China into pieces. The British, French, Russians, and Germans (and Japanese, but I think calling Japan a European nation, well you get the idea) were content with having spheres of influence. I think it was because things were more profitable this way.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MacCaulay View Post
You say the word "capitalism" on this board and it's like people think of the Monopoly Man hunting homeless people for sport.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old June 11th, 2009, 05:17 AM
Doraemon Doraemon is offline
From the 22nd Century
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: 22nd century Japan
Posts: 404
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hawkeye View Post
A single Chinese province would have been too much for a European colonial power. The population of this Chinese colony would have outnumbered the occupying force. And that is just a piece of the iceberg for the colonialists wouldn’t be facing just the population of the colony but all of China which they've had their own version of nationalism a lot longer then Europeans had theirs.

And finally Europe did not want to cut up China into pieces. The British, French, Russians, and Germans (and Japanese, but I think calling Japan a European nation, well you get the idea) were content with having spheres of influence. I think it was because things were more profitable this way.
Well India itself was much larger than a Chinese province and almost comparable to China itself, but Britain managed it pretty well for a few centuries.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old June 11th, 2009, 05:19 AM
Ridwan Asher Ridwan Asher is offline
Jungle Arab
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: In the middle of nowhere
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Emperor Akahito View Post
Well India itself was much larger than a Chinese province and almost comparable to China itself, but Britain managed it pretty well for a few centuries.
Well there was the factor of political and administrative disunity in India for the British to exploit, for one thing.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grey Wolf View Post
Morality is what the general consensus of the majority of people of a certain culture at a certain period of time feel is right
bacchantesnest.com
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.