|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Reverse Gnosticism
What if the gnostics denied Yeshua Bar-Yahweh's divinity instead of his humanity?
would there not be the denial of divinity today do to the lack of writings of apologists on humanity? |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
So what is he instead? Just a profet, a sorth of gnostic muhammed, another midel-eastern merlin with a magic book?
__________________
Life is too short to wear boring socks. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Then they would have been part of the Ebionite sect.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Probably as a mortal human messianic prophet but not as divine; similar to what Muslims believe about Jesus. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
that would just be one more proof that the Gnostics are evil heretics who don't truly understand God or the Faith.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Arians denied the divinity of Christ. So do modern Jehovah's Witnesses and Unitarians.
__________________
David Houston un Canadien errant my TL: Canada-wank (99% ASB-free) Turtledove 2010 updated: 1 Sep '12 |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Arians at very minimum saw Christ as semi-divine. I think they would say that they saw him as divine, just created and subordinate to the Father, who was uncreated.
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
if there was a lot more documents on the divinity of christ i feel that it would be the humanity of christ that is more widely rejected. i am also thinking of dan brown's the da vinci code. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Arians thought christ was the son of god, but not god born as man. This still make him divine, but not a god.
__________________
Life is too short to wear boring socks. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
...According to which, the Gnostics did deny Jesus' divinity, but...
My wife and I are reading that together, and she's getting increasingly pissed off every time I mention a historical inaccuracy. Which happens approximately every other paragraph. ![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|