Go Back   Alternate History Discussion Board > Discussion > Alternate History Discussion: Before 1900

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #221  
Old January 18th, 2009, 08:12 PM
Rex Britanniae Rex Britanniae is offline
Now in high-definition!
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: In the Heat of the Moment!
Posts: 609
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolfhound View Post
Hahahah, I'm loving this Haig.

Excellant update Old Boy.
Thank you.

Quote:
Originally Posted by stevep View Post
Rex Britanniae

Good to see your back and interesting to see how things develop from here. Sounds like the Venezeulans are making a big effort, especially given the difficulty of getting troops into the area. Was Haig such a heavy drinker in OTL?

Should be a lot less of the mega-posts as we now have the TL to discuss.

Steve
Thanks.

I am going to be completely honest and say that I have no idea how much he did or did not drink. I would assume not, but I was trying to create a certain type of character to work with. If it helps, think of it as a sort of Personal PODTM
__________________
An Anglo-American War? In the 1890s?! They Call it Civilization!
Reply With Quote
  #222  
Old January 18th, 2009, 08:30 PM
tchizek tchizek is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Halfway between Detroit and Chicago
Posts: 1000 or more
Great update!
Reply With Quote
  #223  
Old January 18th, 2009, 08:51 PM
Leistungsfähiger Amerikan Leistungsfähiger Amerikan is offline
Angry American with Guns
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: America City(Washington DC)
Posts: 1000 or more
Your back! huzza!
Reply With Quote
  #224  
Old January 18th, 2009, 10:02 PM
Rex Britanniae Rex Britanniae is offline
Now in high-definition!
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: In the Heat of the Moment!
Posts: 609
It has been 2 hours since the update, so here is the first and last bump for those who have not seen it. It is on the previous page.
__________________
An Anglo-American War? In the 1890s?! They Call it Civilization!
Reply With Quote
  #225  
Old January 19th, 2009, 12:00 AM
Leistungsfähiger Amerikan Leistungsfähiger Amerikan is offline
Angry American with Guns
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: America City(Washington DC)
Posts: 1000 or more
Been two more hours. Bump Bump Bump.
Reply With Quote
  #226  
Old January 19th, 2009, 04:55 AM
BrotherToAll BrotherToAll is offline
Student of G.K. Chesterton
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 568
He hath returned!
__________________
“Poets have been mysteriously silent on the subject of cheese.”

― G.K. Chesterton
Reply With Quote
  #227  
Old January 19th, 2009, 01:30 PM
xchen08 xchen08 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1000 or more
So, is this the Douglas Haig? And is he as incompetent as his reputation generally makes him out to be? Though I understand he does have his defenders nowadays.

Quote:
The effect may depend on how long the war lasts and what happens elsewhere. Rex Brit has been hinting about a long war with other powers getting drawn in so could get a lot more complex. However it could be a danger although if the war lasted a while and Russia isn't drawn in a prolonged economic boost could exceed any slump at the end.
Hmm, if the war does expand, it seems Russia is a prime candidate to join against Britain this long before the Anglo-Russian entente. Anglo-German relations haven't yet soured so much, and Anglo-French haven't warmed up much yet.
Reply With Quote
  #228  
Old January 19th, 2009, 02:04 PM
Rex Britanniae Rex Britanniae is offline
Now in high-definition!
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: In the Heat of the Moment!
Posts: 609
Quote:
Originally Posted by xchen08 View Post
So, is this the Douglas Haig?
Yes, it is.
__________________
An Anglo-American War? In the 1890s?! They Call it Civilization!
Reply With Quote
  #229  
Old January 19th, 2009, 10:16 PM
Rex Britanniae Rex Britanniae is offline
Now in high-definition!
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: In the Heat of the Moment!
Posts: 609
Next update coming...
__________________
An Anglo-American War? In the 1890s?! They Call it Civilization!
Reply With Quote
  #230  
Old January 19th, 2009, 10:16 PM
Rex Britanniae Rex Britanniae is offline
Now in high-definition!
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: In the Heat of the Moment!
Posts: 609
Fort Assiniboine, Montana
August 9, 1896

“Run, you lazy dogs, run!” yelled John Pershing, at the head of a column of Negro soldiers. “Come on, hurry up! Whoever falls behind gets put on latrine duty for the next two weeks.” That got the slackers running faster, just as he had hoped. They should have cherished having such nice weather to run in. As Fall was beginning, this was probably one of the last warm, sunny days Montana would see, and he intended to make the best of it. These men, most of which weren’t from this state, were finishing up their three-mile run, and he could understand why anyone else would be tired. But these were soldiers. If they couldn’t handle this, he frequently told them, there was no way they could handle war. Almost all of them had fewer than his own 36 years of experience and life, and shouldn’t younger men be better able to handle such strenuous physical exercise? Yet here he was, the commanding officer, and he could outrun any one of them. Shameful.

That wasn’t to say that he was having an easy time. His legs were aching and he had run out of breath a long time ago. Each step hurt more than the last. Yet still, he persevered, never breaking stride, and that was what separated him from the men under his command. Luckily, each step brought him closer to the finish line, if it could be called that, that marked the end of his three-mile journey. Thirty feet remained...twenty...ten...five...he stepped through the gate and came to a halt. His muscles were terribly tight, but nothing he hadn’t experienced before. Behind him, all twenty men who had run with him entered in good time. No one was far enough behind that they had to be reprimanded, but he would have been pleased if they had finished even a few seconds earlier.

Regardless, they had done well, and deserved the rest he had promised them afterwards. It was 12:30 in the afternoon, and the black men of the 10th Cavalry Regiment looked more exhausted than they had been in days, so he left them to their well-earned break, himself walking through the fort to the bar. “Hey, Marjorie,” he said, greeting the bar tender.

“Oh, hey there, Lieutenant John.” That was her name for him. “How are you doing this fine day?” He loved to hear and see her speak. With every word, her golden curls bounced up and down, and she always greeted him with a big smile. He enjoyed her accent, as well, one of the most pleasant Midwestern tones he had ever heard. She would have made a good singer. Not only was she kind, she was quite a looker as well.

“Just fine, Marge, just fine. And you?”

“Oh, I reckon I could use a bit of good news. We ran out of brew here late last night, and couldn’t hardly make anymore without malts, and we’re fresh out of that, too. Also, Roy is back in town, and he ain’t in a good mood neither.” That depressed John, who hated to see such a pretty girl sad, though she certainly didn’t look it. Also, he had just been reminded of her boyfriend, Roy, who was the sole thing standing between him and courting her. Seeing that she had got him down, she smiled again. “Oh, now don’t you go taking none of this to heart. Listen to me prattling on about my problems. I’m having a right fine time, since you’re here.”

“Thanks, Marge.”

“What’ll you have. You must be tired after running around with them colored folks all day.”

“No, I’ll last. But I will take a Coca-cola, if you have any of that.” He had recently grown very fond of the drink.

“Coming right up. Would you like the paper, too? There’s a good story in there about some battle that just happened in Guyana. I thought you might like it, so I saved you one.”

“That would be appreciated. Thanks. Oh, may I also have one of those hamburgers?” She handed him the paper, and he began reading as she set herself to preparing his meal. Indeed, it was interesting. The aforementioned battle, called the “Mabaruma Melee” by the Montana Gazette, a newspaper based in Helena (which was his only option, as Assiniboine didn’t have its own paper), was the biggest such fight thus far in the war. “Venezuelan soldiers,” it read, “bravely charged the lines of the British, who cowered in barns and houses. It was a sad day for the military of our allies, which lost over 300 brave souls on this occasion. The British, it has been predicted, lost a mere 60 or 70 men. Nevertheless, the fear struck into the hearts of our foes will surely affect them. It is only a matter of time before they surrender.” He found that hopelessly quixotic, even for journalists as unprofessionally biased as those at the Montana Gazette.

Regardless of the author’s opinions and diction, he followed the story to page 2, where the strategies employed were explained. The Venezuelans, despite the sugarcoating of the story, seemed to have no strategy beyond that of flooding the British with human waves, and destroy their defenses in a headlong charge. The British, on the other hand, held their ground, destroying the advancing Venezuelans with their new rifles, the Lee-Enfields. The last part, about the guns, was not described in the story, as he suspected the author didn’t know it, as he probably couldn’t have. The only reason Pershing did was because he paid exquisite detail to all military news from around the world. He had heard of the rifle when it was made standard issue a year ago, but suspected few others around here had as well.

Not long after the main thrust into the center of Mabaruma became a definite failure, the Venezuelans retreated and regrouped to the west of the city, and returned to within their own borders shortly afterwards. It was a clear British victory, to which the President of Venezuela, as quoted by the paper, responded, “This is just step one. We intended to scare them, and we did. Though the loss in unfortunate, those men died to pave the way for their followers to capture the city, and win the war for Venezuela.” That statement struck Pershing as terribly callous and self-serving.

“Here you go, Lieutenant John,” said Marjorie, who brought him back from his thoughts. “Don’t get too preoccupied with that paper, now. You may be a big, tough soldier, but everyone needs a break and some food now and then.” Her invariable smile, though he rarely saw her without it, still brightened his day. He returned it in kind, and prepared to eat. After taking a swig of Coca-cola, giving him the tingly sensation that he so loved, he picked up the burger and took a huge bite. The feeling his mouth experienced was one of refreshment, as well as a scintillating mixture of tastes.

He looked up to see that he had forgotten Marjorie was still there. After swallowing what was in his mouth, he spoke up. “It’s good,” he said truthfully, which rid Marge of the curious look on her face. “My apologies, it seems I’ve forgotten my manners. I shouldn’t gorge myself in front of you.”

“Oh, it’s no bother, really.”

This time, he smiled. “Thanks. If you don’t mind, I’ll go back to my food then.” The rest of his meal went on in silence. He could not be extricated from his enrapturing, food-induced trance. When he was all done, he picked what he could from his teeth, and sighed the sigh of a man content.

“Well, I hate to leave so soon, Marge, but I’d better be off. These soldiers don’t train themselves, now do they?”

“I suspect not, but then, I ain’t no military girl. I’ll take your word for it. That’ll be 13 cents, please.”

He dug in his pockets, and came up with the appropriate change. “Here you go.”

“Thank you. Have a fine day now.”

“You too.” With a smile and a wave, he walked out of the bar as he had done so many times before. At one-o’-clock sharp, his men met him back at the training center near the barracks. They were a motley crew, a mixture of black enlisted men and white officers, most of whom were members of the Pershing Rifles, the drill company he had personally formed five years earlier, and which had since adopted his name. He was training all of his men to become elite. The white men were occasionally at variance with the blacks, but the two groups got along overall. Many of the whites would take a distinct pleasure in insulting the blacks during drilling, and the blacks were none too fond of the whites as a result, but Pershing himself, having taught black schoolchildren years earlier, had a long history of interaction with that race, and did not permit outright hate crimes, instead promoting cooperation between the two, and even desegregation in the military on a higher level. He may have been the only one of the soldiers at this fort who wasn’t despised by either group.

“Alright, men, we’re going to do shooting exercises for the next few hours.” At that, he divided up the men with the officers as he deemed necessary, and ended up taking the same twenty who had run with him earlier in the day. They followed him to the firing range, and took up positions. The soldiers then began the drill, and most of them did very well. With their Model 1896 Springfield Carbines, they were able to hit the targets, even though they were almost 3,000 feet away. Of course, since that was the maximum effective range, far from all of the shots fired actually hit their marks. While his men took aim, he paced up and down the line, shouting encouraging yet cautious lines, such as “Watch your aim, men” and “Steady, steady”.

The hours passed slowly but surely this way. When someone got several shots in a row far from their target, he scolded them as necessary. Once the exercise was done, he had them clean their rifles, disassemble them, and reassemble them. Thereafter, they all walked back with him to the main training camp, where the daily physical combat training ensued. He always enjoyed that. After all of that, they were given freedom to do what they wanted for what remained of the evening.

John Pershing walked up the stairs to the roof of the building where he resides. The sun was beginning to fall in the sky, creating a beautiful mosaic of colors in the heavens. But he wasn’t looking at any celestial body. He stared directly north, to the Dominion of Canada. There lied his future. “We’re almost ready, by jingo. I don’t care what the President says is the policy regarding Canada. My boys’ll make ‘em fear the United States, they will. Those rolling plains are ours for the taking.”
__________________
An Anglo-American War? In the 1890s?! They Call it Civilization!
Reply With Quote
  #231  
Old January 19th, 2009, 11:57 PM
Rex Britanniae Rex Britanniae is offline
Now in high-definition!
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: In the Heat of the Moment!
Posts: 609
Comments? Questions? Bump?
__________________
An Anglo-American War? In the 1890s?! They Call it Civilization!
Reply With Quote
  #232  
Old January 20th, 2009, 01:18 PM
xchen08 xchen08 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1000 or more
Well, Pershing's quite certain that he's going north no matter what Cleveland might say...
Reply With Quote
  #233  
Old January 20th, 2009, 03:10 PM
tchizek tchizek is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Halfway between Detroit and Chicago
Posts: 1000 or more
Interesting verry interesting...I like the description of Pershing as a go getter forcing himself to do better than younger men. cool update!.
Reply With Quote
  #234  
Old January 20th, 2009, 07:49 PM
stevep stevep is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rex Britanniae View Post
Comments? Questions? Bump?
Rex Britanniae

Couldn't reply yesterday as rather busy. Just a quick query on the range of the Springfield Carbines. Could they actually manage 3000'? [Although thinking about it possibly comparing with yards elsewhere].

Sounds like Cleveland has imposed some restrictions on US actions, which is probably a good thing for them until they recruit and train a lot more troops. Not sure of the time-scale however.

Given that the US has declared war is there much trade war going on yet? That would probably be important for both sides as the economic impact would be pretty dramatic.

Steve
Reply With Quote
  #235  
Old January 20th, 2009, 07:58 PM
Rex Britanniae Rex Britanniae is offline
Now in high-definition!
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: In the Heat of the Moment!
Posts: 609
Quote:
Originally Posted by stevep View Post
Rex Britanniae

Couldn't reply yesterday as rather busy. Just a quick query on the range of the Springfield Carbines. Could they actually manage 3000'? [Although thinking about it possibly comparing with yards elsewhere].

Sounds like Cleveland has imposed some restrictions on US actions, which is probably a good thing for them until they recruit and train a lot more troops. Not sure of the time-scale however.

Given that the US has declared war is there much trade war going on yet? That would probably be important for both sides as the economic impact would be pretty dramatic.

Steve
I know little about the weapons of the time, so my information in that regard generally comes from wikipedia, despite all the disdain the people of this site feel for it. It says that the effective range of the rifles in question was 3,000 feet.

As for a trade war, not quite yet. The war, after all, is not that far along. Thus far, he is trying to contain it to Venezuela, though an eventual trade war may be inevitable. The United States will do what it can, but against the Royal Navy, it would have a big problem imposing the most effective and most common form of trade strangulation, the blockade. As for other methods, you may see them surface soon enough.
__________________
An Anglo-American War? In the 1890s?! They Call it Civilization!
Reply With Quote
  #236  
Old January 20th, 2009, 08:07 PM
bm79 bm79 is offline
Citoyen Louisianais
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: New Orleans, Louisiana
Posts: 667
Send a message via Yahoo to bm79
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rex Britanniae View Post
I know little about the weapons of the time, so my information in that regard generally comes from wikipedia, despite all the disdain the people of this site feel for it. It says that the effective range of the rifles in question was 3,000 feet.

As for a trade war, not quite yet. The war, after all, is not that far along. Thus far, he is trying to contain it to Venezuela, though an eventual trade war may be inevitable. The United States will do what it can, but against the Royal Navy, it would have a big problem imposing the most effective and most common form of trade strangulation, the blockade. As for other methods, you may see them surface soon enough.
Even in well trained hands, the effective range of either the Springfield or the Lee-Enfield rifle at the time was no more than 650 yards. Doesn't really change things much, in the end, just a factoid to throw out...

EDIT: I was thinking of WWI-era weapons. The Americans haven't yet improved their weaponry in response to the experience they gained against Spanish forces wielding German Mausers, and the Britsh will probably be in the same boat as the Boer War hasn't yet occured...
__________________
Die Religion ist das Opium des Volkes

Last edited by bm79; January 20th, 2009 at 08:21 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #237  
Old January 20th, 2009, 08:15 PM
Rex Britanniae Rex Britanniae is offline
Now in high-definition!
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: In the Heat of the Moment!
Posts: 609
Quote:
Originally Posted by bm79 View Post
Even in well trained hands, the effective range of either the Springfield or the Lee-Enfield rifle at the time was no more than 650 yards. Doesn't really change things much, in the end, just a factoid to throw out...
Thank you. I know that Wikipedia isn't always reliable for things such as that, and I've been trying to find a better source for weapons information.
__________________
An Anglo-American War? In the 1890s?! They Call it Civilization!
Reply With Quote
  #238  
Old January 20th, 2009, 08:42 PM
bm79 bm79 is offline
Citoyen Louisianais
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: New Orleans, Louisiana
Posts: 667
Send a message via Yahoo to bm79
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rex Britanniae View Post
Thank you. I know that Wikipedia isn't always reliable for things such as that, and I've been trying to find a better source for weapons information.
You're welcome...Note my edit though. The WWI issue Spingfields and the Lee-Enfields were each effective to 650 yards in trained hands, but we're talking about 1896. I spoke out of turn, basically, and the info I presented isn't revelant to the conflict at hand. Sorry . At this time, the Brits will still be armed with Martini-Henry rifles, which are great guns for their time, but I don't know their capacities like later weaponry. A lot depends on whether the Mauser has reached the Americas by this point in any real numbers. The Americans, in their wars with the Indians, will still have more experience fighting with lesser-caliber arms, and so no matter what might find their tactics lacking before the British...
__________________
Die Religion ist das Opium des Volkes
Reply With Quote
  #239  
Old January 21st, 2009, 12:46 AM
perfectgeneral perfectgeneral is offline
Anything but the Conservatives
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Cambridge, UK, OTL
Posts: 1000 or more
Digging at wiki sources...

There is a Russian firearms site that is very good (lost the link for the minute - I'll post it when I find it). In the meantime I'll dig past the wiki to the sources:
Quote:
Krag site
Apparently the United States Regular Army and New York volunteer units in the Spanish American War were supplied with this weapon. The "Rough Riders" carried a carbine version of the same gun. Most other units, with the exception of those from Wyoming, were equipped with the older United States .45-70 rifle.
Advantages/Disadvantages:

The Krag-Jorgensen Rifle had several advantages over the United States .45-70, which was the more predominant longarm used by the American forces in the Spanish American War. Most importantly, the "Krag" fired ammunition that contained smokeless powder. The smokeless powder would not betray the location of the shooter as readily as would the cloud of white smoke from the blackpowder ammunition used by the .45-70. Also, the shooter did not have to wait for the smoke to clear to see his target. Secondly, the weapon utilized a five shot magazine. The .45-70 was a single shot weapon. The extra shots were a definite firepower advantage, though something not acknowledged by the War Department at the time. The War Department claimed that the average soldier required a minute to aim and shoot. The fourteen shots a minute which could be fired by the "Krag" were therefore considered to be wasteful. The government wanted its troops to treat the gun as a single-shot weapon, with the magazine acting as a reserve in case of an emergency. The weapon was designed to be capable of being used as a single shot weapon in accordance with this theory.
The ammunition for the Krag-Jorgensen Rifle was of a smaller calibre than that of the .45-70, therefore, a trooper could carry more rounds with him (one hundred .30 calibre cartridges weighed the same as sixty .45 calibre cartridges).
Lastly, the Krag-Jorgensen Rifle fired on a flatter trajectory and therefore could be aimed more accurately with less training.
The weapon had several disadvantages which became apparent with time. The muzzle velocity was relatively low, and the mechanism had a tendency to fail. The smaller calibre "Krag" did not have the "take down" capability of the large .45 calibre weapons that were used previously.
Quote:
Krag Collectors Association
Selection of magazine arms from various U.S. and foreign inventors during the early 1890’s, resulted in final approval of the five shot bolt-action weapon that was loaded through a hinged gate on the right side of the receiver. This design was submitted by Col. Ole Krag and Eric Jorgensen of Norway in 1892. Common names given were; “Krag-Jorgensen”,“.30-40 Krag” or simply “Krags”.
During the ten years (1894-1904) of Krag production less than 500,000 arms were completed and changes to reduce costs and facilitate ease of manufacture resulted in non-interchangeability of parts requiring many new model designations. All were manufactured at Springfield Armory in Massachusetts. Similarly with improvements to the smokeless-powder base, which effected trajectory, front and rear sights were recalibrated often, requiring again, many rear sight model designations.
Though short lived, the discoveries through trial and error, experiments with prototypes and in field usage during the Spanish-American War, Boxer Rebellion and Philippine Insurrection, gave the foundation to U.S. military shoulder arms that we have today.
I've underlined those bits that show one production line of a weapon still in development. Regular army issue only. Anyone called up is going to be firing a .45-40 for the duration.

That link to Modern Firearms .ru
Only has the 1895 Winchester lever action:


Makers marks on Lee-Enfields (UK only)
FY or ROF(F) = Royal Ordnance Factory in Fazakerly, Lancashire
M or RM or ROF(M) = Royal Orndance Factory in Maltby, Yorkshire
B or 85B or M 47 = BSA-controlled company in Shirley, near Birmingham

They were later also made in India and Australia.
RSAF Enfield
RSAF Sparkbrook
LSA.Co - London Small Arms
BSA.Co - Birmingham Small Arms
Lithgow Arms Factory
RFI - Rifle Factory Ishapore
ROF Maltby
BSA Shirley
ROF Fazakerley
SSA - Standard Small Arms
NFR - National Rifle Factory 1
LongBranch Arsenal
Savage Arms Co
POF - Pakistan Ordinance Factory

Quote:
http://enfieldrifles.profusehost.net/gh1.htmHISTORY OF THE LEE ENFIELD RIFLE
The Lee-Enfield (or what would become the Lee-Enfield) rifle actually began its tenure as Britain’s primary service rifle in 1888 when the British War Office adopted the Magazine Rifle MkI. This rifle originally designed by James Paris Lee a firearms designer who worked chiefly in the USA and Canada, incorporated a "cock-on-closing" bolt with rear locking lugs and a detachable 10 round magazine. RSAF Enfield married this action with a Metford rifled barrel chambered for the .303 British black powder cartridge and thus was the birth of the longest serving military rifle in history. Originally replacing the Martini-Henry in 1888, this rifle in various forms remained in the hands of front line troops until 1957 before being replaced by the FN FAL.

The Magazine Rifle MkI, the first of the Lee rifles, was most commonly referred to as the Lee-Metford, or Magazine Lee-Metford (MLM). As the Lee-Metford was designed to fire a black powder cartridge, the subsequent change to a smokeless powder (Cordite) loaded cartridge presented a couple of problems. The first was expected as the increased velocity altered the ballistics of the .303 British cartridge and this required a new backsight to accommodate the different trajectory. What was not completely expected was the Metford rifling’s inability to withstand the hotter temperatures of the Cordite loading, unacceptable throat erosion began to present itself rapidly. RSAF Enfield dealt with this problem by designing a new rifling pattern that had sharper edges, was cut deeper, and had lands and grooves of equal width, needless to say it was named Enfield rifling. Adopted in 1895 the new barrel, with altered sights, fitted to the Lee action became the Lee-Enfield Magazine Rifle Mark I, or Magazine Lee-Enfield (MLE).
This implies that most of the rifle had been in production since 1888 and that the MLE was just a new barrel and sight for existing MLMs.


Webley .455 caliber MK. II (Mark 2, 1894)

I have yet to find production figures applicable to 1895-1896
__________________
“No argument, however seductive, must lead you to abandon that Naval supremacy on which the life of our country depends”. Winston Churchill.

Last edited by perfectgeneral; January 21st, 2009 at 01:17 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #240  
Old January 21st, 2009, 01:54 AM
perfectgeneral perfectgeneral is offline
Anything but the Conservatives
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Cambridge, UK, OTL
Posts: 1000 or more
See MLE play

http://www.rememuseum.org.uk/arms/rifles/armbsr.htm
Quote:
Rifle Long Lee-Enfield No I Mk I (1897)

Adopted in November 1895, it is a 'Lee' designed action with an 'Enfield Rifled' barrel. The Lee bolt action was first used in December 1888 but was fitted with a Metford rifling barrel. This was in the days of the black-powder loaded cartridge which had a soft lead bullet. With the introduction of 'cordite' and the cupro-nickel jacketed bullet, the result of wear and tear in the barrel was disastrous, especially at the breech end. The life span of the Metford barrel was reduced from 10,000 to 4200 rounds, when barrels became completely unserviceable. The answer to this was a new form of rifling developed at the RSAF Enfield. This was approved and embodied in what was previously the Lee-Metford rifle, and it was introduced in the British Service as the 'Lee-Enfield' Magazine Rifle Mk 1. The sights were also modified. It saw service in Boer War.
The Museum's example was modified in 1908 for clip loading. Other modifications were made to the sight protector and backsight to allow target shooting. Marked - Issue mark '12 L.D.' (probably for the 12th Light Dragoons). Rack Number 787.
Barrel Length : 30¼ inches, Calibre : .303 inches.


Weapon No 9
Carbine Magazine Lee-Metford Mk I


Adopted in 1897, being a shortened version of the Lee-Metford Rifle Mk II. This example is a cavalry carbine.
Markings - butt stamp for the Royal Manufactuary Enfield Class I. It has a dust cover to the bolt and a 5 round magazine.
Barrel Length : 30 7/8 inches, Calibre : .303 inches.
The MLMs seem to have lost their barrels after about 4200 rounds and were then sent back to Enfield for barrelling and sighting to the new standard. Do I read that wrong?

Quote:
http://www.jouster.com/cgi-bin/lee-e....pl?read=66269
The service presure of the Mark I and II black powder rounds was about 19 tons. Metfords were originally proofed at 20-21 tons but in 1900 this was increased to 22 tons.
Meanwhile for L-Es, service pressure of the Mark I cordite round was 17.5 tons, the Mark II was 16.5 tons and the Mark VI 17.5 to 18 tons. When the Mark VII was introduced in 1910 the service pressure increased to 19.5 tons.
The early cordite proof rounds gave a pressure of about 20 tons but in 1908 the Mark III proof round increased this to 24 tons. This proof round remained in service until the end of the .303, the only change being an increase to 25 tons in 1944 to allow the Mark III to be also used for automatic weapons.
Theoretically, the Mark VII round is just within the proof pressue of the early actions, but those early proof cartridges were known to give unreliable pressures, sometimes as low as 17 tons.
Regards
A proof round is an overpressure round to test the rifle. There is no doubt that a 1888 Lee-Metford could fire a cordite round. They would just wear out the barrel after about 4200 rounds.

I wonder if Kitchener needs loads of new barrels in Sudan at the same time as the Anglo-American war?
__________________
“No argument, however seductive, must lead you to abandon that Naval supremacy on which the life of our country depends”. Winston Churchill.

Last edited by perfectgeneral; January 21st, 2009 at 12:55 PM..
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.