Very true, but knowing something is possible is half the battle. Photographs give a good starting point.
Ja, but the US and UK had some very bright people, too. Once they start working on it they can catch up fast.
I don´t doubt the intellectual capacities of Russia, UK or the US, but working from nearly scratch with just some photos as help is hard, no matter which country attempts it. You will get dead ends rather often, which costs time.
But the Nazi educational system was a disaster, and the economy was based on squeezing resources from conquered areas. Sure, if they decrease spending on military stuff they can put more resources into tech. But the US had vastly more industrial power. It was, OTL, able to pull off the B-29 project and the Manhattan project and furnish a large army and (other) airforce, without even going to a full wartime economy.
OTL, Germany has very well trained work force. That would NOT be the case iTTL.
As much as I dislike the Nazis, they could be very pragmatic when it suited them. The school system had indoctrination added in, but nothing that reduced quality as much as you think. The Nazis were technophiles and knew you get it only from a well-oiled industry. Even the "children and kitchen" for the women was not set in stone. There were plans for after the war to "uplift" a sizeable part (mostly the nordic blonde, but that´s a given considering who made this plans)of the german women to something of "elite women". Very highly educated, some military knowledge, shooting and driving skills, etc. to be the foundation of the nazi plans for racial purity.
Nope. Germany may well still be ahead in 55, but the US will be catching up really fast, and the Soviets will likely be as well.
Yes, the gap will be smaller in 55, but still larger than you think.
[/QUOTE]I don't think I underestimate the importance of the captured German techs at all. I think YOU underestimate the vast indifference the US had in space from 1945 to the early 50's. There were bright people in the US, too, you know, and 1945-1955 is AFAIK longer than it took von Braun to build his stuff from scratch. Remember, the size of US industry and the depth of her talent.
Oh. If by 'on the way to the moon' you mean a 10kg lunar probe, then, yes, I'll buy that. If you mean so much as a man in orbit, I really doubt it.[/QUOTE] As said above, I don´t doubt the brains of the US, but you underestimate the difficulties to start from near the beginning. Germany began in the thirties and build a decades-of-development lead by the mid fourties. In the race to catch up, the US will run into dead ends, no matter how good the teams are, because some problems always pop up when you try new research. This is true for Germany too, but they have a tech buffer over the others in the space race. Given the fact, that the US has a larger pool of researchers (not that much more, since Germany is one of the worlds research centers to this day, it won´t be different in TTL, but still larger) they might be able to narrow the lead down to a decade by 55.
Von Braun was not only a good engineer, but a good salesman too. And he wanted to bring mankind into space. If he had to showcase the military capabilities to get get founding for a full space programm, he´d do it. TTL´s Germany will keep on founding rocketry. With the research going on without stop Germany will be able to do the moon landing in the late fiefties.