|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
AH Challenge: a Major Progressive Party in the USA
taking one (or all) of the Progressive Parties that have started in the USA and make it a Major Party in the USA.
the Parties: 1912 1924 1948
__________________
Ideology without action is just masturbation. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
well the Democrats claim they are progressives NOW.
Of course in this day and age that is just a code word for Liberal. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
i'd love to see some one try and make thge 1948 party one of the big two in the US
![]()
__________________
Ideology without action is just masturbation. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Just get Theodore Roosevelt to win in 1912, and be re-elected in 1916.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Right now - 2008 - the Greens are the most organized Progressive party, but I don't see them (I'm one) becoming a major party. As far as 1948, there was the danger of Progressives being labeled by McCarthy as "Communists."
Bobindelaware |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Definately a solid PoD, but that might well just result in the Progressives absorbing/being absorbed by the Republican party when TR makes his peace with them.
__________________
"People never lie so much as after a hunt, during a war or before an election." - Otto von Bismarck |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Nah I would love to see a POD that creates a three party system in the US; Democrats, Republicans and Progressives. The two party system is just so dull.
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Bobindelaware |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
1912 is the most plausible. 1924 is barely possible while 1948 is impossible. The Progressives in '48 got 4th place and would have been destroyed in the McCarthyism of the '50s even if it survived.
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
There is also the modern Vermont Progressive Party- but it's single-state and wouldn't have much chance anywhere else with the possible exception of Massachusetts.
|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
The 1912 incarnation is the most likely, but then TR will make peace with the GOP and go from there. There's no way for the 1948 version to survive to 1952, given the anti-communism that swept the U.S. after 1949. In those days, anyone calling themselves "Progressive" was trying to hide the fact that they were Pink at best and Red at most. The fact that the Communist Party in the U.S. endorsed the 1948 Progressive ticket didn't help them any, not to mention quite a few "fellow travelers" were involved in the campaign. Any political party in the 1950s not seen as anti-communist was doomed. Period.
Nowadays "Progressive" is a term a lot of Democrats use instead of "Liberal" (which can be a political kiss of death). |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
people have talked about the 1912 party and the 1948 but not the 1924 one
werid
__________________
Ideology without action is just masturbation. |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
You only habitually need coalitions in a proportional representation system... so maybe that needs to change first.
__________________
- on thread derailment |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
I do not know if this is cheating but imagine in 1968 the anti war movement somehow united around the idea of a third party candidacy.
Suppose King survives the murder attempt and is persuaded that being a candiate is the right thing to do Popular vote Nixon Republican (37%) King (Progressive) 28 % LBJ(Democrat) 20% Wallace (racist) 15% Electoral vote Nixon probably wins more than 270 electoral votes and otherwise is put into the White House by the House of Representatives/ Republicans easily win in 1972 but the Progressives (probably running McGovern easily push the Democrats into third place whilst George Wallace disapears. Wategate comes out rather later than in OTL 1976 is close but Republicans win. In 1980 Shirley Chislom is elected President Greed is good (or God) Capitalism never takes hold the way it did in OTL. |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
here we are: http://www.alternatehistory.com/disc...ad.php?t=95349
__________________
Ideology without action is just masturbation. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|