Go Back   Alternate History Discussion Board > Discussion > Alternate History Discussion: After 1900

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 14th, 2008, 02:00 AM
black angel black angel is offline
Gay-Jew
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 1000 or more
AH Challenge: a Major Progressive Party in the USA

taking one (or all) of the Progressive Parties that have started in the USA and make it a Major Party in the USA.

the Parties:
1912

1924

1948
__________________
Ideology without action is just masturbation.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old November 14th, 2008, 06:33 AM
burmafrd burmafrd is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Las Cruces, NM
Posts: 919
well the Democrats claim they are progressives NOW.
Of course in this day and age that is just a code word for Liberal.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old November 14th, 2008, 03:55 PM
black angel black angel is offline
Gay-Jew
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 1000 or more
i'd love to see some one try and make thge 1948 party one of the big two in the US
__________________
Ideology without action is just masturbation.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old November 14th, 2008, 06:53 PM
Aberblue Aberblue is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Wales
Posts: 105
Quote:
Originally Posted by black angel View Post
taking one (or all) of the Progressive Parties that have started in the USA and make it a Major Party in the USA.

the Parties:
1912

1924

1948
Just get Theodore Roosevelt to win in 1912, and be re-elected in 1916.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old November 14th, 2008, 07:51 PM
Bobindelaware Bobindelaware is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Dover DE USA, wherever THAT is!
Posts: 221
Right now - 2008 - the Greens are the most organized Progressive party, but I don't see them (I'm one) becoming a major party. As far as 1948, there was the danger of Progressives being labeled by McCarthy as "Communists."

Bobindelaware
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old November 14th, 2008, 08:33 PM
Chengar Qordath Chengar Qordath is offline
Princeps Qordathicus
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aberblue View Post
Just get Theodore Roosevelt to win in 1912, and be re-elected in 1916.
Definately a solid PoD, but that might well just result in the Progressives absorbing/being absorbed by the Republican party when TR makes his peace with them.
__________________
"People never lie so much as after a hunt, during a war or before an election." - Otto von Bismarck
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old November 15th, 2008, 10:55 AM
yourworstnightmare yourworstnightmare is offline
Trubbelmakare
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Tusen Sjöars Land
Posts: 1000 or more
Nah I would love to see a POD that creates a three party system in the US; Democrats, Republicans and Progressives. The two party system is just so dull.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old November 15th, 2008, 11:25 AM
Bobindelaware Bobindelaware is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Dover DE USA, wherever THAT is!
Posts: 221
Quote:
Originally Posted by yourworstnightmare View Post
Nah I would love to see a POD that creates a three party system in the US; Democrats, Republicans and Progressives. The two party system is just so dull.
Dull? That's about the best that can be said. There's actually not a whole lot of difference, and what difference ther is, polarizes the two. A viable third party would force everyone to talk, negotiate and actually collaborate and develop coalitions. More spice, more entrtainment, probably more involvement by average citizens.

Bobindelaware
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old November 15th, 2008, 04:35 PM
General Mung Beans General Mung Beans is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Western Hemisphere
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by black angel View Post
taking one (or all) of the Progressive Parties that have started in the USA and make it a Major Party in the USA.

the Parties:
1912

1924

1948
1912 is the most plausible. 1924 is barely possible while 1948 is impossible. The Progressives in '48 got 4th place and would have been destroyed in the McCarthyism of the '50s even if it survived.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old November 15th, 2008, 04:42 PM
Alexius Alexius is offline
Airship Janissary General
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: In the same chemistry lab building as Thande- oh dear...
Posts: 673
There is also the modern Vermont Progressive Party- but it's single-state and wouldn't have much chance anywhere else with the possible exception of Massachusetts.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old November 15th, 2008, 11:51 PM
Matt Wiser Matt Wiser is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Auberry, CA
Posts: 1000 or more
The 1912 incarnation is the most likely, but then TR will make peace with the GOP and go from there. There's no way for the 1948 version to survive to 1952, given the anti-communism that swept the U.S. after 1949. In those days, anyone calling themselves "Progressive" was trying to hide the fact that they were Pink at best and Red at most. The fact that the Communist Party in the U.S. endorsed the 1948 Progressive ticket didn't help them any, not to mention quite a few "fellow travelers" were involved in the campaign. Any political party in the 1950s not seen as anti-communist was doomed. Period.

Nowadays "Progressive" is a term a lot of Democrats use instead of "Liberal" (which can be a political kiss of death).
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old November 15th, 2008, 11:59 PM
black angel black angel is offline
Gay-Jew
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 1000 or more
people have talked about the 1912 party and the 1948 but not the 1924 one werid
__________________
Ideology without action is just masturbation.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old November 16th, 2008, 12:09 AM
alt_historian alt_historian is offline
Didn't mean to be away so long
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Republic of Surrey
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobindelaware View Post
Dull? That's about the best that can be said. There's actually not a whole lot of difference, and what difference ther is, polarizes the two. A viable third party would force everyone to talk, negotiate and actually collaborate and develop coalitions. More spice, more entrtainment, probably more involvement by average citizens.

Bobindelaware
Well, it would depend on the electoral system... if you keep it FPTP, then it becomes similar to the situation in Britain, where in England up to he last 15 years or so, it's effectively been two-party.

You only habitually need coalitions in a proportional representation system... so maybe that needs to change first.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quatermain View Post
It's like Six Degrees of Separation, but with Nazis instead of Kevin Bacon.
- on thread derailment
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old November 16th, 2008, 09:24 AM
Derek Jackson Derek Jackson is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1000 or more
I do not know if this is cheating but imagine in 1968 the anti war movement somehow united around the idea of a third party candidacy.

Suppose King survives the murder attempt and is persuaded that being a candiate is the right thing to do

Popular vote

Nixon Republican (37%)

King (Progressive) 28 %

LBJ(Democrat) 20%

Wallace (racist) 15%


Electoral vote


Nixon probably wins more than 270 electoral votes and otherwise is put into the White House by the House of Representatives/

Republicans easily win in 1972 but the Progressives (probably running McGovern easily push the Democrats into third place whilst George Wallace disapears.

Wategate comes out rather later than in OTL

1976 is close but Republicans win.

In 1980 Shirley Chislom is elected President

Greed is good (or God) Capitalism never takes hold the way it did in OTL.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old November 16th, 2008, 12:35 PM
black angel black angel is offline
Gay-Jew
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Derek Jackson View Post
I do not know if this is cheating but imagine in 1968 the anti war movement somehow united around the idea of a third party candidacy.

Suppose King survives the murder attempt and is persuaded that being a candiate is the right thing to do

Popular vote

Nixon Republican (37%)

King (Progressive) 28 %

LBJ(Democrat) 20%

Wallace (racist) 15%


Electoral vote


Nixon probably wins more than 270 electoral votes and otherwise is put into the White House by the House of Representatives/

Republicans easily win in 1972 but the Progressives (probably running McGovern easily push the Democrats into third place whilst George Wallace disapears.

Wategate comes out rather later than in OTL

1976 is close but Republicans win.

In 1980 Shirley Chislom is elected President

Greed is good (or God) Capitalism never takes hold the way it did in OTL.
um i doubt a King ticket could do any were near that good, and the thought of Shirley Chislom becoming President is close to ASB, how ever there is a TL about the anti-war movement forming a Progressive Party

here we are:
http://www.alternatehistory.com/disc...ad.php?t=95349
__________________
Ideology without action is just masturbation.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.