|
#101
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#102
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
-On Israel-Iran Last edited by ObssesedNuker; June 20th, 2012 at 06:31 PM.. |
|
#103
|
|||
|
|||
|
All I can say is, if you have to bring your harbors with you, it's definitely one of the worst - except for considerations like why the Allies felt it was worth it.
And I think the Allied planners knew what they were doing there. Not just because it worked, but because of how. |
|
#104
|
|||
|
|||
|
ll it might take was an Abwehr offiicer at the right level or maybe just a few in key positions to interpret information differntly and draw the correct conclusions. The Allies may well realise what has happened due to Enigma intercepts but, even in this case SD Day probably must go ahead anyway.
|
|
#105
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#106
|
|||
|
|||
|
And even if that's avoided, this is an extremely sophisticated plan. You're not going to unravel it by someone "interpreting information differently".
Not to mention that even if that's handled, and Canaris (and his followers) are handled, that leaves convincing the people who would make a decision on what to do about it that you have the correct information in time to do anything about it. "Easier said than done" doesn't even begin to describe thwarting Overlord's deception aspect. |
|
#107
|
|||
|
|||
|
True and true. But the body of the last one took a while to find. My thought was that had the Germans shown a little more initiative, it is at least plausible that they could have captured one or more of those individuals before they drowned/died of exposure. Naturally, I can understand them not wanting to dally in enemy-controlled waters when they had no reason to know what they'd just stumbled across.
|
|
#108
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
they had to bring their own harbours because the existing ones wwere both well defended and mined. To avoid that theyd have had to make tthe primary invasion through southern france or the balkans.
__________________
David Houston un Canadien errant my TL: Canada-wank (99% ASB-free) Turtledove 2010 updated: 1 Sep '12 |
|
#109
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
No, Normandy wasn't the worse location they could have landed at. There were other locations that were almost identical to Normandy in terms of their beach make-up... except they were outside the range of Allied (land-based) tactical airpower.
__________________
-On Israel-Iran |
|
#110
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
And I know that they had (heavier than Normandy) defenses, thus the whole "except for considerations like why the Allies felt it was worth it." - normally, one does NOT invade when one has to bring one's harbors with you, which is why the Germans expected the Allies to regard needing a harbor as an overriding concern instead of suspecting the Allies would have something like the Mulberries, which were an extremely clever - but not exactly inconceivable - solution. If I was Ike, the better part of the reason for picking Normandy is not that its a good location to having to land and supply an army from but that the good locations are too tough to crack (at a reasonable price in men/materials/time). Which is not to fault the decision - as stated, I think the Allied planners made the best choice of their available options, with the benefit of seeing how they went about dealing with the reasons against Normandy (very, very effectively). |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|