Go Back   Alternate History Discussion Board > Discussion > Alternate History Discussion: After 1900

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #101  
Old June 20th, 2012, 06:17 PM
Elfwine Elfwine is online now
Byzantophilic Brony
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: West of Constantinople
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by CalBear View Post
Well, as was noted earlier in this thread, even AFTER the war there sere plenty of senior German officers who still didn't believe that Normandy hadn't been planned as a feint that became the main axis of attack after it was unexpectedly successful.

Once you fall in love with a strategic believe it is difficult to let it go.
Especially when it makes sense. Normandy was a worse location, that's why the Allies picked it over the better (and better defended) options, isn't it?
__________________
Author of The Eagle of the Bosporus - a timeline inspired by Isaac's Empire
Reply With Quote
  #102  
Old June 20th, 2012, 06:23 PM
ObssesedNuker ObssesedNuker is offline
Resident Nuke Launcher
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: A ICBM Complex
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elfwine View Post
Especially when it makes sense. Normandy was a worse location, that's why the Allies picked it over the better (and better defended) options, isn't it?
It wasn't the worst, but it was far from the best... which in one of those military paradoxes is also why it was the best.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by David S Poepoe View Post
I believe that tactic is called MAD - Multiple Attorney Deployment.
-On Israel-Iran

Last edited by ObssesedNuker; June 20th, 2012 at 06:31 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #103  
Old June 20th, 2012, 06:28 PM
Elfwine Elfwine is online now
Byzantophilic Brony
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: West of Constantinople
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by ObssesedNuker View Post
It wasn't the worst, but it was far from the best.
All I can say is, if you have to bring your harbors with you, it's definitely one of the worst - except for considerations like why the Allies felt it was worth it.

And I think the Allied planners knew what they were doing there. Not just because it worked, but because of how.
__________________
Author of The Eagle of the Bosporus - a timeline inspired by Isaac's Empire
Reply With Quote
  #104  
Old June 20th, 2012, 06:45 PM
lucaswillen05 lucaswillen05 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 476
Quote:
Originally Posted by MattII View Post
Oh I'm not saying a more co mpetent Abwehr is impossible, just that it isn't going to get there suddenly, and it isn't going to surprise the allies in doing so either, because they're going to be reading the German messages.
ll it might take was an Abwehr offiicer at the right level or maybe just a few in key positions to interpret information differntly and draw the correct conclusions. The Allies may well realise what has happened due to Enigma intercepts but, even in this case SD Day probably must go ahead anyway.
Reply With Quote
  #105  
Old June 20th, 2012, 07:28 PM
MattII MattII is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by lucaswillen05 View Post
ll it might take was an Abwehr offiicer at the right level or maybe just a few in key positions to interpret information differntly and draw the correct conclusions. The Allies may well realise what has happened due to Enigma intercepts but, even in this case SD Day probably must go ahead anyway.
The problem is, Canaris is the head of Abwehr, and had a fair few followers, so it would be quite easy for critical pieces of information to get 'lost'.
Reply With Quote
  #106  
Old June 20th, 2012, 07:34 PM
Elfwine Elfwine is online now
Byzantophilic Brony
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: West of Constantinople
Posts: 1000 or more
And even if that's avoided, this is an extremely sophisticated plan. You're not going to unravel it by someone "interpreting information differently".

Not to mention that even if that's handled, and Canaris (and his followers) are handled, that leaves convincing the people who would make a decision on what to do about it that you have the correct information in time to do anything about it.

"Easier said than done" doesn't even begin to describe thwarting Overlord's deception aspect.
__________________
Author of The Eagle of the Bosporus - a timeline inspired by Isaac's Empire
Reply With Quote
  #107  
Old June 21st, 2012, 05:52 AM
hairysamarian hairysamarian is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlondieBC View Post
Very few officers on the exercise new of the location D-Day. Ike made sure all were accounted for after the loss.
True and true. But the body of the last one took a while to find. My thought was that had the Germans shown a little more initiative, it is at least plausible that they could have captured one or more of those individuals before they drowned/died of exposure. Naturally, I can understand them not wanting to dally in enemy-controlled waters when they had no reason to know what they'd just stumbled across.
Reply With Quote
  #108  
Old June 21st, 2012, 02:12 PM
Dathi THorfinnsson Dathi THorfinnsson is offline
Daši Žorfinnsson
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Syracuse, Haudenosaunee, Vinland
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elfwine View Post
All I can say is, if you have to bring your harbors with you, it's definitely one of the worst - except for considerations like why the Allies felt it was worth it.
w.
they had to bring their own harbours because the existing ones wwere both well defended and mined. To avoid that theyd have had to make tthe primary invasion through southern france or the balkans.
__________________
David Houston
un Canadien errant
my TL: Canada-wank (99% ASB-free) Turtledove 2010
updated: 1 Sep '12
Reply With Quote
  #109  
Old June 22nd, 2012, 02:40 PM
ObssesedNuker ObssesedNuker is offline
Resident Nuke Launcher
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: A ICBM Complex
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elfwine View Post
All I can say is, if you have to bring your harbors with you, it's definitely one of the worst - except for considerations like why the Allies felt it was worth it.
They were probably going to have to do that no matter where they landed. Dieppe had shown the folley of directly attacking a defended harbor and all of the ports along the occupied coast of northern Europe had some kind of German garrison.

No, Normandy wasn't the worse location they could have landed at. There were other locations that were almost identical to Normandy in terms of their beach make-up... except they were outside the range of Allied (land-based) tactical airpower.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by David S Poepoe View Post
I believe that tactic is called MAD - Multiple Attorney Deployment.
-On Israel-Iran
Reply With Quote
  #110  
Old June 22nd, 2012, 05:22 PM
Elfwine Elfwine is online now
Byzantophilic Brony
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: West of Constantinople
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dathi THorfinnsson View Post
they had to bring their own harbours because the existing ones wwere both well defended and mined. To avoid that theyd have had to make tthe primary invasion through southern france or the balkans.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ObssesedNuker View Post
They were probably going to have to do that no matter where they landed. Dieppe had shown the folley of directly attacking a defended harbor and all of the ports along the occupied coast of northern Europe had some kind of German garrison.

No, Normandy wasn't the worse location they could have landed at. There were other locations that were almost identical to Normandy in terms of their beach make-up... except they were outside the range of Allied (land-based) tactical airpower.
One of the worst. Not "the worst".

And I know that they had (heavier than Normandy) defenses, thus the whole "except for considerations like why the Allies felt it was worth it." - normally, one does NOT invade when one has to bring one's harbors with you, which is why the Germans expected the Allies to regard needing a harbor as an overriding concern instead of suspecting the Allies would have something like the Mulberries, which were an extremely clever - but not exactly inconceivable - solution.

If I was Ike, the better part of the reason for picking Normandy is not that its a good location to having to land and supply an army from but that the good locations are too tough to crack (at a reasonable price in men/materials/time).

Which is not to fault the decision - as stated, I think the Allied planners made the best choice of their available options, with the benefit of seeing how they went about dealing with the reasons against Normandy (very, very effectively).
__________________
Author of The Eagle of the Bosporus - a timeline inspired by Isaac's Empire
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.