What if Republic of Viet Nam ("South Viet Nam") win the "Vietnam War"

OK, it's a light-hearted question from a friend of mine

What would happen if South Viet Nam won the Vietnam War?

As it was a joke, it wasn't "built" strongly. But we both agree to post it here to see what you think.

-------------------------------------​
Also, as a Vietnamese, I'll introduce some "key time" so that you can use to "alternate the history"
- May 7, 1954: Viet Minh (short for "Viet Nam Doc lap Dong minh hoi" or "The league for the Independence of Viet Nam) defeat the French garrison at Dien Bien Phu right before Geneva Meeting.
Note: It was the first time that an army of a colony was able to flush out an army of the "boss nation"
- July 27, 1954: Geneva Accord was signed (However, as I remember, State of Viet Nam [predecessor of South Viet Nam] and USA did NOT signe it. Hence, [technically,] they didn't have to follow it)
The final accord can be found here: http://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/inch005.asp
- Oct 1955: Ngo Dinh Diem, a Catholic, anti-Communist, anti-French and pro-US, held a referendum. State of Viet Nam officially had no king and it later named "Republic of Viet Nam". However, it was later found out that Diem cheated. He soon neutralized many threats for his nation
- 1959: The "trail" was initiated by DRVN. Later, this trail played a vital role as "Ho Chi Minh Trail"
- Dec 1960: Mặt trận Giải phóng dân tộc miền Nam Việt Nam (National Liberation Front, well-known as "Viet Cong" was formed). They put emphasize on "the withdrawal of American advisors and influence, on land reform and liberalization of the GVN, on coalition government and the neutralization of Vietnam". From this point on, the "Resistance War against Imperialist American" if fully united
- Jan 1963: Ap Bac battle. Even though Army of RVN completed their task, they suffered hgher casualites (despite the fact that they outnumber, outgun, and out-tech their enemy)
- Nov 1963: Coup. Diem and his brother (advisor) were killed. CIA is suspected to involve. An unstable time for RVN began
- Aug 2 and 4, 1964 : Gulf of Tonkin incident. USA quickly used the (fake) attack (on the second day) to begin bombardment by air force on DRVN (see below)
- 8 March, 1965: First batch of US Marines landed on Da Nang. USA officially joined the ground battle on Viet Nam.
Soon, allies also sent their troops into Viet Nam. Operation Rolling Thunder was deployed to attack the North while Arclight saw B-52s bombers attacking positions in the South.
- 1967: Nguyen Van Thieu hold power after defeating others opponents
- Dec 1967: Khe Sanh - Route 9 was besieged. US generals believed that they were seeing another "Dien Bien Phu". How wrong they were
- Jan 30 and 31, 1968: Tet Offensive (1st Phase). Despite surprising the entire army, NLF failed to capture major cities, coup the RVN government as their main force was unable to get in and help their special forces.
The only major success was in Hue. However, over 5000 citizens were found death. It is considered that ~3000 of them were under "communist" [NLF] hands. Either through massacre or "miss fire". No one knows the exact answer..
The 2nd and 3rd Phase (or Wave) took place in May and August respectively, with limited success.
Despite this, the tide was turned: US public began to doubt the war progress in Viet Nam, anti-war movements gradually got stronger. Precisely what DRVN wanted.
- 1969: US President Nixon announced "Vietnamization". Negotiation began. But only crap talk happened
- 1970: War spread to Cambodia. Pro-US PM Lol Nol deposed Sihanouk who is playing with both sides. PAVN (both "NVA" and "VC") support Pol Pot at this point
- Feb 1971: South Viet Nam launch Lam Son 719, aiming to disrupt the Trail. Leak of intel, fierce resistance... pushed them back in chaos. Until this day, the photos taken there are still used as joke by some youngster who support PAVN in the war
- March 30 and October 22, 1972: Easter Offensive (officially known in Viet Nam as Chiến dịch Xuân hè 1972 or Spring-Summer Operation 1972). PAVN quickly gained land, and if USAF didn't intervene, they could beat the crap out of RVN.
Operation Linebacker inflict heavy casualties on PAVN. However, PAVN gained a good position in South Viet Nam and on negotiation table
- Dec 18 to 29, 1972: Operation Linebacker II, also known as Christmas Bombing. B-52s were used on large scale to attack the North. Both sides claimed victory (though lost varies - and it seems the negotiation resulted in a better way for DRVN)
- Jan 27, 1973: Paris Peace Accord was signed by all 4 sides. It is said that some threaten was used to force South Viet Nam to sign this
The agreement can be read here: https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Paris_Peace_Accords
- 1974: Watergate incident in USA. It is confirmed that there would be no more US support for South Viet Nam
- Spring 1975: "Test attack" by PAVN. They realized they can win the war within 1 year without worrying about USA
Apr 1975: After liberating Central Highland and coastline in less than a month (March), PAVN ready themselves for the final push. Political tumor happens. President Thieu resigned even though he promised to stay a few days earlier
Even though Army of RVN stood up, they failed to stop PAVN. But they did bring quite a damage on advancing PAVN.
30 Apr: Fall of Sai Gon - with chaos. On 11:30, the flag of NLF was raised at Independence Palace, a few hours later, President Duong Van Minh radio boardcast the unconditional surrender.
- 6 May 1975: Fully united the country under one banner
-------------------------------------
Then, it's war against Cambodia and China
-------------------------------------​

So, based on these events, which events - if happens differently - can bring victory to Republic of Viet Nam (South Viet Nam) and failure to Democratic Republic of Viet Nam (North Viet Nam). And what would happen today if such a thing happen?

Chào thân ái và quyết thắng
Best regards and may victory is in your favor


Oh, and by the way, "Nothing is more valuable than freedom and independence"
 
OK, it's a light-hearted question from a friend of mine

What would happen if South Viet Nam won the Vietnam War?

As it was a joke, it wasn't "built" strongly. But we both agree to post it here to see what you think.

-------------------------------------​
Also, as a Vietnamese, I'll introduce some "key time" so that you can use to "alternate the history"
- May 7, 1954: Viet Minh (short for "Viet Nam Doc lap Dong minh hoi" or "The league for the Independence of Viet Nam) defeat the French garrison at Dien Bien Phu right before Geneva Meeting.
Note: It was the first time that an army of a colony was able to flush out an army of the "boss nation"
- July 27, 1954: Geneva Accord was signed (However, as I remember, State of Viet Nam [predecessor of South Viet Nam] and USA did NOT signe it. Hence, [technically,] they didn't have to follow it)
The final accord can be found here: http://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/inch005.asp
- Oct 1955: Ngo Dinh Diem, a Catholic, anti-Communist, anti-French and pro-US, held a referendum. State of Viet Nam officially had no king and it later named "Republic of Viet Nam". However, it was later found out that Diem cheated. He soon neutralized many threats for his nation
- 1959: The "trail" was initiated by DRVN. Later, this trail played a vital role as "Ho Chi Minh Trail"
- Dec 1960: Mặt trận Giải phóng dân tộc miền Nam Việt Nam (National Liberation Front, well-known as "Viet Cong" was formed). They put emphasize on "the withdrawal of American advisors and influence, on land reform and liberalization of the GVN, on coalition government and the neutralization of Vietnam". From this point on, the "Resistance War against Imperialist American" if fully united
- Jan 1963: Ap Bac battle. Even though Army of RVN completed their task, they suffered hgher casualites (despite the fact that they outnumber, outgun, and out-tech their enemy)
- Nov 1963: Coup. Diem and his brother (advisor) were killed. CIA is suspected to involve. An unstable time for RVN began
- Aug 2 and 4, 1964 : Gulf of Tonkin incident. USA quickly used the (fake) attack (on the second day) to begin bombardment by air force on DRVN (see below)
- 8 March, 1965: First batch of US Marines landed on Da Nang. USA officially joined the ground battle on Viet Nam.
Soon, allies also sent their troops into Viet Nam. Operation Rolling Thunder was deployed to attack the North while Arclight saw B-52s bombers attacking positions in the South.
- 1967: Nguyen Van Thieu hold power after defeating others opponents
- Dec 1967: Khe Sanh - Route 9 was besieged. US generals believed that they were seeing another "Dien Bien Phu". How wrong they were
- Jan 30 and 31, 1968: Tet Offensive (1st Phase). Despite surprising the entire army, NLF failed to capture major cities, coup the RVN government as their main force was unable to get in and help their special forces.
The only major success was in Hue. However, over 5000 citizens were found death. It is considered that ~3000 of them were under "communist" [NLF] hands. Either through massacre or "miss fire". No one knows the exact answer..
The 2nd and 3rd Phase (or Wave) took place in May and August respectively, with limited success.
Despite this, the tide was turned: US public began to doubt the war progress in Viet Nam, anti-war movements gradually got stronger. Precisely what DRVN wanted.
- 1969: US President Nixon announced "Vietnamization". Negotiation began. But only crap talk happened
- 1970: War spread to Cambodia. Pro-US PM Lol Nol deposed Sihanouk who is playing with both sides. PAVN (both "NVA" and "VC") support Pol Pot at this point
- Feb 1971: South Viet Nam launch Lam Son 719, aiming to disrupt the Trail. Leak of intel, fierce resistance... pushed them back in chaos. Until this day, the photos taken there are still used as joke by some youngster who support PAVN in the war
- March 30 and October 22, 1972: Easter Offensive (officially known in Viet Nam as Chiến dịch Xuân hè 1972 or Spring-Summer Operation 1972). PAVN quickly gained land, and if USAF didn't intervene, they could beat the crap out of RVN.
Operation Linebacker inflict heavy casualties on PAVN. However, PAVN gained a good position in South Viet Nam and on negotiation table
- Dec 18 to 29, 1972: Operation Linebacker II, also known as Christmas Bombing. B-52s were used on large scale to attack the North. Both sides claimed victory (though lost varies - and it seems the negotiation resulted in a better way for DRVN)
- Jan 27, 1973: Paris Peace Accord was signed by all 4 sides. It is said that some threaten was used to force South Viet Nam to sign this
The agreement can be read here: https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Paris_Peace_Accords
- 1974: Watergate incident in USA. It is confirmed that there would be no more US support for South Viet Nam
- Spring 1975: "Test attack" by PAVN. They realized they can win the war within 1 year without worrying about USA
Apr 1975: After liberating Central Highland and coastline in less than a month (March), PAVN ready themselves for the final push. Political tumor happens. President Thieu resigned even though he promised to stay a few days earlier
Even though Army of RVN stood up, they failed to stop PAVN. But they did bring quite a damage on advancing PAVN.
30 Apr: Fall of Sai Gon - with chaos. On 11:30, the flag of NLF was raised at Independence Palace, a few hours later, President Duong Van Minh radio boardcast the unconditional surrender.
- 6 May 1975: Fully united the country under one banner
-------------------------------------
Then, it's war against Cambodia and China
-------------------------------------​

So, based on these events, which events - if happens differently - can bring victory to Republic of Viet Nam (South Viet Nam) and failure to Democratic Republic of Viet Nam (North Viet Nam). And what would happen today if such a thing happen?

Chào thân ái và quyết thắng
Best regards and may victory is in your favor


Oh, and by the way, "Nothing is more valuable than freedom and independence"

Define victory. RVN survives, reunification under Saigon? The former is plausible to pull off. North Vietnam being annexed by South Vietnam however is rather difficult. Also, does the fate of Laos and Cambodia matter as well?
 
Define victory. RVN survives, reunification under Saigon? The former is plausible to pull off. North Vietnam being annexed by South Vietnam however is rather difficult. Also, does the fate of Laos and Cambodia matter as well?

According to my friend, victory here is defined as the South completely annexed the North under the banner of Republic of Viet Nam. Simply put, Viet Nam is united under the "yellow flag"

Laos and Cambodia are not really relevant. They could ether be mentioned or not
 
IMO, in order to win, SVN may need to do these differently:

- In 1963, Pres. Diem must secure his position even stronger. His generals at that time were quite crap - they were promoted as they know how to kiss his butt, not because of their talent. He also need to keep his ideas in secret - It is now known that he planned to negotiate with NVN for a real unification. It's a 50-50 chance for him to win against Ho Chi Minh in a fair election
But CIA didn't want that to happen... And I doubt China wants it too

- In 1968, after Tet Offensive, PAVN (both "NVA" and "VC") suffer high casualties: major regular units were damaged, secret cells in cities were wiped out. If RVN pushed forward (with or without US support) and neglected the reaction of the international community, they can neutralize the end of the Trail. Thus, put PAVN in a dire circumstance.

- In 1971, with better tactics (and intel security), RVN can interrupt the Trail. May be not enough to win the war, but enough to stall in for a few years more
 
long live the Saigon government! :D

Long live Ho Chi Minh :p
OK, enough joke. What do you think? How could SVN won? And if so, what is the situation now at Viet Nam (40 years seem a bit hard - especially when we had 2 extra wars after that. So... what would Viet Nam be like in 90s if SVN won)
 
Long live Ho Chi Minh :p
OK, enough joke. What do you think? How could SVN won? And if so, what is the situation now at Viet Nam (40 years seem a bit hard - especially when we had 2 extra wars after that. So... what would Viet Nam be like in 90s if SVN won)

I don't think SVN will gain the political traction in the international stage to survive after fully invading North Vietnam even if that was possible. It's good to remember what happened in Korea when they went all the way.
But then, I guess a good strategy is, if they had the military to successfully pull one off, stop at the 18th parallel.
On the military level there needs to be less corruption and nepotism. Whoever the fuckface was that only allowed Catholics to become part of the government needs to obviously never reach the Presidency.
The war also needs to look less like the US attempting to establish an American Indochina after France. That means international cooperation, drumming up support from the Anti-Communist nations around the world in the effort to fight the North Vietnamese - Britain, Canada, South Korea, Taiwan, Philippines, and Thailand seem the easiest that come to mind.
This obviously isn't enough for SVN to win the war, but it's a good start.
 
Ho Chi Minh's régime was competent, popular, and not corrupt.

The South Vietnamese leadership was the exact opposite.

I'm not saying Ho was an angel, his régime was oppressive (but even there, not as bad as the south), but he had the reputation and actuality of being a long standing freedom fighter.

So...

Absolute minimum, you need to get rid of Ho. Replace him by a Soviet or Chinese puppet.

Even then, the South is, and is perceived as being, a puppet of Imperialist White powers (first France, then the US). How on earth you get that perception to change, I don't know.

-------

Hmmm.... I know. Have Ho use Saigon as his base! Then the (communist) South can beat the (US backed) north!! Does that work?
 
Ho Chi Minh's régime was competent, popular, and not corrupt.

The South Vietnamese leadership was the exact opposite.

I'm not saying Ho was an angel, his régime was oppressive (but even there, not as bad as the south), but he had the reputation and actuality of being a long standing freedom fighter.

So...

Absolute minimum, you need to get rid of Ho. Replace him by a Soviet or Chinese puppet.

Even then, the South is, and is perceived as being, a puppet of Imperialist White powers (first France, then the US). How on earth you get that perception to change, I don't know.

-------

Hmmm.... I know. Have Ho use Saigon as his base! Then the (communist) South can beat the (US backed) north!! Does that work?

Wow. You are clearly misled. Ho's regime was not competent, very corrupt, and somewhat popular. How can his regime be "competent" if all the people in the North are starving? If he wanted to "liberate" the South, he should have liberated the North FIRST.

Sure, South VietNam's government wasn't the best, but compared to the North and other Asian countries at the time, it'd probably be ranked among the top. I have done this comparison many times. During the conception of the ROK (Republic of Korea), the country dealt with widespread corruption (worse than the RVN), limited freedoms, bad infrastructure, almost extreme oppression, and very incompetent leadership that relied heavily on the US (*ahem*... Rhee) . See, both the ROK and RVN might have been "puppets" of the US to some people, but it was merely having the US as as adviser and supporter. Did the North Vietnamese not have the Chinese and USSR pour money and military aid into the country? Singapore DREAMED to be like South VietNam when the RVN was in it's prime. Now it is the top city-state in the whole of Asia.

Ho WAS VERY oppressive. He was also very much of a puppet of the USSR. He had to ask for permission from the USSR to begin Land Reforms! Officially, 172,000 land owners and "wealthy" farmers were killed during the campaign. However, these "official" figures leave out the number of people killed for having membership in the National People's Party. These political prisoners killed by the Vietnamese Communists range from 200,000-900,000 people..

Diem on the other hand, was still a dictatorship, but at least people could have some freedom of speech. You could publicly criticize the government and their actions without being killed, whereas in North VietNam and South Korea (at the time), criticizing either Ho or Rhee could result in being deemed a "political prisoner". Diem had only 30-50 Buddhists killed for suspicious Communist activities, while Rhee killed 200,000-300,000 of "suspected" communists, causing the quick downfall of the ROK govt in 1950. Diem, or any of his successors were not nearly as bad as Ho and his leadership. The simple comparison between the RVN and ROK during their conception shows how they were different, but similar.

Back to the ORIGINAL topic, had the RVN won, it would most likely become a part of the leaders of Asia. Being a Vietnamese myself, however, it would still be sad to see the North still being under Communism. The RVN already showed potential in developing much quicker than many other Asian countries as it possessed a strong agricultural economy. Rice was never lacking in South VietNam. Not only that, the RVN had some inventions of their own. Granted, some of them were "kind of" copies of French or America things, at least they had the initiative. The RVN had created their own cars, single engine airplanes, had their world famous 33 beer, and even had a space and nuclear program. Sure, the RVN was being helped economically by the US, but weren't the Taiwanese and the South Koreans? Look at how they turned out.. and then look at how the Vietnamese turned out.
 
According to my friend, victory here is defined as the South completely annexed the North under the banner of Republic of Viet Nam. Simply put, Viet Nam is united under the "yellow flag"

Laos and Cambodia are not really relevant. They could ether be mentioned or not

The Republic of Vietnam will never reunify Vietnam. At least until perhaps the Cold War ends and North Vietnam somehow collapses. China will not allow an Anti-Communist state on its borders that is allied with the West. If you want an Anti-Communist Vietnam, then the outcome of the Chinese Civil War has to be altered, because if there's an invasion of North Vietnam once they get too far it turns into Korea 2.0.

At the most, there might be a limited invasion north of the DMZ, with occupied territory being annexed. Even then, this is an extremely fortuitous outcome.

Could South Vietnam survive? Yes. Could Cambodia avoid the Khmer Rouge taking over? Yes. Laos I doubt the most of surviving as a neutral state. However, there's not going to be a clean sweep in Southeast Asia.
 

bookmark95

Banned
Park Chung-hee, as we all know was a ruthless dictator, but he put South Korea on the path to economic stability. Wasn't there someone in the South Vietnamese government who was a combination of autocrat and technocrat?

My dad was stationed in Korea during the 1970s. He saw the changes going in Korea, and thus admires Park- Chung-hee. My dad believed that South Vietnam could have easily become an economic tiger had they had an efficient strongman. According to him, we could have easily had "made in Vietnam" as early as the 80s.

Is there anyone in the history of South Vietnam who meets that criteria?
 
Park Chung-hee, as we all know was a ruthless dictator, but he put South Korea on the path to economic stability. Wasn't there someone in the South Vietnamese government who was a combination of autocrat and technocrat?

My dad was stationed in Korea during the 1970s. He saw the changes going in Korea, and thus admires Park- Chung-hee. My dad believed that South Vietnam could have easily become an economic tiger had they had an efficient strongman. According to him, we could have easily had "made in Vietnam" as early as the 80s.

Is there anyone in the history of South Vietnam who meets that criteria?

In my opinion, definitely Diem. He made the most use of his country's natural resources; rubber and agriculture (if that counts). My dad lived under the RVN regime from 1954-1975, and he remembers Diem being the ONLY leader to guarantee a stable living standard for South Vietnamese citizens.
 
Could Ngo Dinh Diem have become one feeling threatened by the failed coup ITTL (1963)? Like declaring martial law, weeding out dissent ruthless (though not like OTL Hafizullah Amin in Afghanistan). Then he goes to South Korea, where he sees first hand the effects of economic reform, and decides to enact them in South Vietnam?
 
Could Ngo Dinh Diem have become one feeling threatened by the failed coup ITTL (1963)? Like declaring martial law, weeding out dissent ruthless (though not like OTL Hafizullah Amin in Afghanistan). Then he goes to South Korea, where he sees first hand the effects of economic reform, and decides to enact them in South Vietnam?

Well, from what I know, the RVN was ahead of the ROK at the time. However, due to the war, the ROK ended up beating the RVN in the mid 70s.
 
The Republic of Vietnam will never reunify Vietnam. At least until perhaps the Cold War ends and North Vietnam somehow collapses. China will not allow an Anti-Communist state on its borders that is allied with the West. If you want an Anti-Communist Vietnam, then the outcome of the Chinese Civil War has to be altered, because if there's an invasion of North Vietnam once they get too far it turns into Korea 2.0.

At the most, there might be a limited invasion north of the DMZ, with occupied territory being annexed. Even then, this is an extremely fortuitous outcome.

Could South Vietnam survive? Yes. Could Cambodia avoid the Khmer Rouge taking over? Yes. Laos I doubt the most of surviving as a neutral state. However, there's not going to be a clean sweep in Southeast Asia.

I agree. China would do exactly what it did in Korea. If the RVN were any close to winning, it'd probably be just keeping its own side under the 17th parallel.
 
the biggest problem, of course, being that it's simply too easy for North Vietnam to use RVN's neighbours to infiltrate the country.
 

Japhy

Banned
Well, the DRVN's supporters say Ho Chi Minh win, why RVN's supporter say Diem win. Who knows?
Though I'd vote for Ho Chi Minh if you ask me. He is (more or less) traditional and national.

No. Its not a question of who would win, its that Diem was never negotiating to have a referendum in the first place. There was never going to be a vote under Diem.
 
Top