|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Queen Victoria, Nudist
how would the Victorian Englands world be rocked if Queen Victoria and husband Albert became Nudists?
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
On many levels Modern Society is a few degrees more conservative than the Victorian Era. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
I guess it would have a massive impact on British society. "Victorian principles" would have a completely different meaning. You can be sure that everyone would want to follow.
Consequences? Two possibilities. People could freely outlive their sexuality without having a bad conscience instead of doing everything (maybe pervert) in the closet. This could also have consequences for what people think about homosexuality. (Good for people like Oscar Wilde or, later, Alan Turing.) OTOH, not everyone looks exactly like a supermodel (especially not then), so people could either lose lust for sex. BTW, I remember that Kaiser Wilhelm II was a nephew of Vicky. What do you think he'd think about that? ![]() |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think this touches on a point made by many historians. The trend towards sexuality had been one of more accomodation and liberalization since the Enlightenment had removed much social control from the churches. Victorianism was reactionary in that it suggested that people should not enjoy sex at all, and should be modest in its regard. The real POD should be if someone other than Victoria were the monarch of England, what would the consequences of sexual morality be.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
I hate the royal families of Europe so much. They're simply packs of disgusting inbreds!
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sometimes I feel the same. My former Girlfriend on the other hand wanted to visit evry shitty castle and similar things in england. I got enraged when I saw the people admiring the nobeles for their wealth, forgetting where it came from.
Where are you from, Romulus? BTW, why did you choose the emperor that lost the empire? |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
I get the Feeling that lots of you equate Nudistism with increased Sexually. In fact Nudists are generally more modest as reguards the Sexual revelution. . You rapidly get desenitized, and almost forget about, what the people you are with are not wearing.
Most people use clothes to hide behind, or to accent their best [sexyist] feature. The use of clothes to tantalize and Excite, is completly absent in nudist colonies. The biggest effect would be in the- Fashion -area, and the second biggest would be in the -Beach/Swimming -area
__________________
Washington And Jefferson Maed Menee A Joek. Van Buren Had Tue Pae, Taylor's Frieyeeng Pan Broek. Lincoln Just Gaat Hoem Graetlee Usttaanishd: |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
By the way, does this topic bring to mind that famous picture of Victoria in her later years (where she's sitting and looking stern in her black dress)...with a slight alteration? <shudder>
__________________
England Expects That Every Man Will Do His Duty, the adventures of Horatio Nelson in Anglo-Saxon England, is available on lulu.com and on Amazon.com! |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
I wrote a TL where he poisoned Odoacer and ruled for fifty years, raising the Empire from its grave. Go figure. That's why it's my alias.
|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
THAT is NOT right... *shudders* now if anyone get me a barf bag... |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Isn't nudism in fact a Victorian movement? Sort of along the lines of Kellogg's Road to Wellness philosophy which was VERY anti-sexual. |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
OK, I admit, nudism doesn't automatically mean that people start to become sexually liberated. But still I think: If nudism became a mass movement (or at least fashionable - and it would be if the queen herself did it), people wouldn't think that sex itself is a sin you have to be ashamed for. They wouldn't exactly start orgies, but they'd be more relaxed about sex, at the very least.
|
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|