Go Back   Alternate History Discussion Board > Discussion > Alternate History Discussion: After 1900

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old August 28th, 2012, 05:37 PM
Emperor Norton I Emperor Norton I is offline
As you know, Bob...
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: North
Posts: 1000 or more
Patton disliked politics, had no interest in holding office, and is therefore not going to be president nor try to be elected anything. This is not a cased of the "President [Popular Person]" trope, because Patton is so blatantly no a politician and not interested in becoming one.
__________________
🐞
Star Trek: The Lost Fleet RPG

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pieter Geyl
History is an argument without end.
Quote:
Originally Posted by John F. Kennedy
We must deal with the world as it is, and not as it might have been...
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old August 28th, 2012, 05:44 PM
Bob in Pittsburgh Bob in Pittsburgh is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 166
"If you want to see Patton call JFK a 'Washington Sissy' on video, on national television, this is your chance."

I would doubt that Patton would heep such a criticism on the holder of the Navy Cross. Remember Patton won the Army equivilent the Distinguished Service Cross.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old August 28th, 2012, 05:51 PM
BlairWitch749 BlairWitch749 is offline
resident right wing apologist
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Long Island NY
Posts: 1000 or more
Send a message via MSN to BlairWitch749
Quote:
Originally Posted by mattep74 View Post
What about Truman dragging him out of retirement after sacking Mac in Korea?
replacing Mac because he couldn't control what he would say to the media, couldn't follow orders and was a general blowhard; with patton

the irony just made my head explode
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Astrodragon View Post
OK, where is the real BlairWitch and what have you done with him!!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fleetlord View Post
I feel a little dirty supporting BlairWitch
Manstein in Africa: update 5/30
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old August 28th, 2012, 05:51 PM
Emperor Norton I Emperor Norton I is offline
As you know, Bob...
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: North
Posts: 1000 or more
Frankly, Patton could be dead by Kennedy's time. He was born in 1885. He'd be 75 in 1960. His father lived to 71, his mother to 67.
__________________
🐞
Star Trek: The Lost Fleet RPG

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pieter Geyl
History is an argument without end.
Quote:
Originally Posted by John F. Kennedy
We must deal with the world as it is, and not as it might have been...
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old August 28th, 2012, 05:52 PM
BlairWitch749 BlairWitch749 is offline
resident right wing apologist
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Long Island NY
Posts: 1000 or more
Send a message via MSN to BlairWitch749
Quote:
Originally Posted by Emperor Norton I View Post
Frankly, Patton could be dead by Kennedy's time. He was born in 1885. He'd be 75 in 1960. His father lived to 71, his mother to 67.
plus he had been a drunk nearly all of his adult life; that doesn't bode well for making it farther than he did
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Astrodragon View Post
OK, where is the real BlairWitch and what have you done with him!!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fleetlord View Post
I feel a little dirty supporting BlairWitch
Manstein in Africa: update 5/30
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old August 28th, 2012, 06:41 PM
unclepatrick unclepatrick is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Huntsville Al
Posts: 800
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmc247 View Post

Patton was in no way politician material, but he in my view had a far better reading of human history and human military history then the other important American generals in the war and certainly political leaders in Washington.
This make my wonder if Patton might have spend the 1950 as a Historian and Political Writer.
If he live, he would have certainly wrote his Autobiography and with his love of History , he could have written some military Histories. His combat experience should give him a interesting view of past Military Leaders and Battles. (Assuming he keep his belief in reincarnation out of his Histories)

His Political opinions would have interested many people and in the 50 as today there were many Political journals that would have love to print opinions from a formal general of Patton reputation.
__________________
Who decides that the Workday is nine to five, rather than eleven to four?

....I'm with Them- same group, different department.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old August 28th, 2012, 06:43 PM
unclepatrick unclepatrick is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Huntsville Al
Posts: 800
Quote:
Originally Posted by superkuf View Post
Patton would be to old and to eurocentric for Korea, which anyway is very bad tank country.

Politics and Patton would not mix. The question is if Patton would realize that or make some failed political attempts?

The biggest impact would be
a) Pattons memoirs, which were to be brutal and
b) his general comments on political events

Before Prague/Berlin 1948 the western (at least the US) were fairly friendly towards the Soviets. Patton could change that by his memoirs, other writings, speeches etc.

The view of WW2 would definetly be affected by a well written memoir/other books by Patton.
I don't know if Patton could change the friendly view of the Soviet that most American had, but I agree that he would have been a vocal spokesperson for the right.
__________________
Who decides that the Workday is nine to five, rather than eleven to four?

....I'm with Them- same group, different department.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old August 28th, 2012, 07:20 PM
jmc247 jmc247 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by unclepatrick View Post
I don't know if Patton could change the friendly view of the Soviet that most American had, but I agree that he would have been a vocal spokesperson for the right.
Patton couldn't do it, hell Churchill the man who was lauded for warning about the Nazis ahead of time was panned in the U.S. for his Iron Curtain speech as an old warmonger who just wants to attack our ally Joe Stalin.

The top level of the U.S. government in the early to mid 40s saw Stalin as the enemy of my enemy which was correct, but they forgot that just because someone is fighting my current enemy doesn't make them my friend. So, they hyped Stalin into something he was not when they really didn't have to and then they bought into their own propaganda.

Churchill was somewhat hoodwinked by Stalin at times, but far less so then the U.S. government and as the war was rapping up he could plainly see that the Soviet's weren't going to play nice buddies for very long after Germany was finished off.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.