Go Back   Alternate History Discussion Board > Discussion > Alternate History Discussion: After 1900

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 11th, 2012, 07:15 PM
Emperor Norton I Emperor Norton I is offline
As you know, Bob...
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: North
Posts: 1000 or more
WI: Germany denied Zimmermann Telegram was Real?

What if Zimmermann and the German government, rather than admit the telegram was in fact real, had denied it and allowed the US to think it was a British forgery?
__________________
Star Trek: The Lost Fleet RPG

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pieter Geyl
History is an argument without end.
Quote:
Originally Posted by John F. Kennedy
We must deal with the world as it is, and not as it might have been...
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old August 11th, 2012, 07:23 PM
wiking wiking is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Emperor Norton I View Post
What if Zimmermann and the German government, rather than admit the telegram was in fact real, had denied it and allowed the US to think it was a British forgery?
Delays US entry by 1-2 months...likely only about 3-5 weeks. The Uboat war was increasing pressure for Wilson to do something. Still, it would mean lots of unhappiness about it in the US, so the German-American community would push back against the villifying of Germany and Germans. The US will probably end up playing more hardball at Versailles and be genuinely divided over the declaration of war.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old August 11th, 2012, 07:24 PM
Badshah Badshah is offline
Badshah-e-Alam
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 1000 or more
Send a message via Skype™ to Badshah
Quote:
Originally Posted by wiking View Post
Delays US entry by 1-2 months...likely only about 3-5 weeks. The Uboat war was increasing pressure for Wilson to do something.
I'm not sure. Wasn't the anti-war platform popular? Wilson won re-election by promising not to go to war, after all.
__________________
Cardamom Dreams - An Indian TL
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old August 11th, 2012, 07:28 PM
wiking wiking is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by trollhole View Post
I'm not sure. Wasn't the anti-war platform popular? Wilson won re-election by promising not to go to war, after all.
Yes, but the East Coast was hurting very badly from the loss of trade routes caused by the danger of German subs and the sinking of US ships was not well tolerated, pushing even some in the anti-war faction to do something about it. The suggestion was to arm merchant ships and run convoys escorted by the US navy, meaning something could well start from a naval incident, but beyond this the loss of trade caused by the Entente running out of money could well end the demand for US trade anyway. Its not guaranteed that the US would go to war, but the sinking of US ships would escalate things very quickly.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old August 11th, 2012, 07:33 PM
yourworstnightmare yourworstnightmare is offline
Trubbelmakare
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Tusen Sjöars Land
Posts: 1000 or more
American ships were sunk by German submarines. Even if Germany denies the Zimmermann telegram was real, America would enter the war. The Zimmermann telegram is overrated thanks to Tuchman, the submarine warfare guarantees American entry.
__________________
Still haven't changed my opinion
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old August 11th, 2012, 07:35 PM
BlondieBC BlondieBC is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by wiking View Post
Delays US entry by 1-2 months...likely only about 3-5 weeks. The Uboat war was increasing pressure for Wilson to do something. Still, it would mean lots of unhappiness about it in the US, so the German-American community would push back against the villifying of Germany and Germans. The US will probably end up playing more hardball at Versailles and be genuinely divided over the declaration of war.
Agreed, this is about right.


Now the more interesting impact may be the speed of the USA mobilization. IOTL, the USA army actually became smaller (no stop loss) for the first 2-3 months. With a more divided public, things like conscription could be smaller or slower. If one assumes a 6 week delay in declaring war, and a 12 week delay in the mobilization schedule, we could see better German performance.

If one assume the USA goes with the original plan to fully finish training before send full corps over, the USA is even more likely to arrive too late.
__________________
Prince Henry of Prussia: The Rise of the U-Boat
http://www.alternatehistory.com/disc...d.php?t=225455
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old August 11th, 2012, 07:52 PM
The Kiat The Kiat is offline
Now 20% Holier!
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: The Left side of the State.
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by trollhole View Post
I'm not sure. Wasn't the anti-war platform popular? Wilson won re-election by promising not to go to war, after all.
That's never stopped a politician from breaking a campaign promise.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old August 12th, 2012, 12:45 AM
Rich Rostrom Rich Rostrom is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: The heights of glory, the depths of despair
Posts: 649
Quote:
Originally Posted by Emperor Norton I View Post
What if Zimmermann and the German government, rather than admit the telegram was in fact real, had denied it and allowed the US to think it was a British forgery?
The British could prove to the U.S. beyond any doubt that the ZT was genuine.

When the Great War started, the British government cut all the telegraph cables from Germany to the New World.

The German government found an alternative. The U.S. State Department had laid a cable from the U.S. to its Embassy in Denmark. The U.S. agreed to let Germany use this cable for diplomatic messages to and from its embassies in the Americas, provided the messages were sent in clear and pre-approved by the U.S.

What the Germans didn't know, and the U.S. simply overlooked, was that this cable (and several others) passed through a relay station at Porthcurno, near Land's End in Cornwall. There westbound signals were boosted for the transatlantic jump. Of course the British monitored all cable traffic through the relay station.

When it came time to send the ZT, the Germans obviously could not send it clear. So they persuaded the U.S. Ambassador to Germany to let them send this one message in cipher with some lame excuse. British cipher experts had broken many of the German ciphers, including the one used for the ZT.

Thus within a day or two, the British had the cleartext. They presented it to the U.S. along with the ciphertext which the U.S. knew had been sent over its line, and demonstrated the decoding. There was no possible question about it after that. And of course there was the added insult of the Germans using the U.S.'s line in the course of inciting war on the U.S.

Presenting it to the U.S. was a bit awkward; the British didn't want to admit to the U.S. that they were tapping the U.S. cable. So they claimed that the ciphertext was intercepted on retransmission from Washington to Mexico City via commercial telegraph. (IIRC they claimed to have bribed clerks in the Mexican telegraph service.)

Beyond that, when the ZT was published, a cover story was required to conceal that the cipher was broken; the British gave out that the cleartext had been stolen from the German embassy in Mexico. The German Foreign Ministry chewed out the German ambassador, and demanded that he find the traitor. He indignantly and quite correctly denied any leaks on his end, and the ministry backed down.

All this may be found in The SIGINT Secrets by Nigel West.

Zimmerman's admission was merely the cherry on top of the sundae.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old August 12th, 2012, 12:55 AM
BlondieBC BlondieBC is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Rostrom View Post
The British could prove to the U.S. beyond any doubt that the ZT was genuine.
Likely yes, but only at the cost of informing the Germans the codes are broken. The USA will likely provide the information to the Germans intentionally or unintentionally.
__________________
Prince Henry of Prussia: The Rise of the U-Boat
http://www.alternatehistory.com/disc...d.php?t=225455
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old August 12th, 2012, 01:24 AM
Grimm Reaper Grimm Reaper is offline
Desperate But Not Serious
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The previously unknown tenth ring of Dante's Inferno...
Posts: 1000 or more
Admiral Hall and the British had already concluded that proving this point was worth the risk to Room 40's operational secrecy.

As for denial...since Zimmerman in particular and the German government as a whole never even considered this possible course of action...perhaps due to the message being sent three different ways, all of which were picked up by the British(!).
__________________
P.J. O'Rourke: We also elected some amateur politicians. However, politics is like vivisection—disturbing as a career, alarming as a hobby.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old August 12th, 2012, 01:26 AM
Snake Featherston Snake Featherston is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Lake Charles, Louisiana
Posts: 1000 or more
Given the Germans didn't think that adding the USA to their list of enemies was worth worrying about IOTL, denying the Telegram just means another casus belli replaces the OTL one.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old August 12th, 2012, 05:55 PM
Mikestone8 Mikestone8 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Peterborough, UK.
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by wiking View Post
Yes, but the East Coast was hurting very badly from the loss of trade routes caused by the danger of German subs and the sinking of US ships was not well tolerated, pushing even some in the anti-war faction to do something about it. The suggestion was to arm merchant ships and run convoys escorted by the US navy, meaning something could well start from a naval incident, but beyond this the loss of trade caused by the Entente running out of money could well end the demand for US trade anyway. Its not guaranteed that the US would go to war, but the sinking of US ships would escalate things very quickly.


Did the East Coast alone have enough clout to get the US into war?

My impression is that the ZT "reached the parts that other issues can't reach", by creating a credible German threat to areas that didn't give a hoot about what happened in the Atlantic ocean.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old August 12th, 2012, 06:05 PM
wiking wiking is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mikestone8 View Post
Did the East Coast alone have enough clout to get the US into war?

My impression is that the ZT "reached the parts that other issues can't reach", by creating a credible German threat to areas that didn't give a hoot about what happened in the Atlantic ocean.
I doubt it on their own, but sinking of US ships by USW would get enough of the rest of the country angry, especially after Germany promised it wouldn't repeat the killing of US citizens like what happened on the Arabic and Lusitania, to get a majority interested in war over 'neutral rights' and 'freedom of the seas', which were a joke with the British blockade in progress.

The sinking of US merchant ships was considered a serious insult to the US, as even the Germans sinking ships off of the US coast in international waters in 1916 fastideously following Cruiser Rules pissed off a lot of Americans, especially as the USN had to stand aside and watch as the Germans did this.

Part of the problem though was the decreasing support for the Germans in the US media, which could influence US opinion all throughout the country, and many of the papers were based close to the East Coast or in it. Plus the closing down of shipping in international waters, though not even in the war trade, was hurting industry not associated with Entente war trade, so this has an effect deeper into the country. Still though it would take the sinking of a US merchant ship and death of US citizens by USW to get a majority interested in war.

I wonder what the economic effect would be on the Entente if the US took another 2 months or so to get involved in the war as Entente credit was drying up. Demand for US shipping would drop anyway due to lack of orders, so perhaps the USW would become less of an issue without war orders coming in....perhaps the credit crunch would prevent US entry over USW if US entry was delayed long enough.

Last edited by wiking; August 12th, 2012 at 06:11 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old August 13th, 2012, 08:13 PM
Rich Rostrom Rich Rostrom is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: The heights of glory, the depths of despair
Posts: 649
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlondieBC View Post
Likely yes, but only at the cost of informing the Germans the codes are broken. The USA will likely provide the information to the Germans intentionally or unintentionally.
1) The British had a cover story for their possession of the cleartext, which the Germans swallowed.

2) The British did tell the U.S. how the message was decrypted. The U.S. kept the secret.

So the British had little risk to their secret; against that the tremendous advantage of proving the ZT's authenticity and bringing the U.S. into the war. It didn't take them five minutes to make that choice, IMO.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.