|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Vote in the 2008 Retrospective US Presidential Election! | |||
| Charles Baldwin (Constitution) |
|
1 | 0.65% |
| Bob Barr (Libertarian) |
|
5 | 3.25% |
| John McCain (Republican) |
|
40 | 25.97% |
| Cynthia McKinney (Green) |
|
8 | 5.19% |
| Ralph Nader (Independent) |
|
20 | 12.99% |
| Barack Obama (Democratic) |
|
80 | 51.95% |
| Voters: 154. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#81
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
Pendulum Swing: America's Electoral Future |
|
#84
|
|||
|
|||
|
#85
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
![]()
__________________
|
|
#86
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
#87
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
|
|
#88
|
|||
|
|||
|
What's the Australian equivalent of a fox? A wombat?
__________________
Quote:
Worldwar: Out of Balance Star Wars: Point of Divergence |
|
#89
|
|||
|
|||
|
Probably a Dingo.
|
|
#90
|
|||
|
|||
|
You could vote for the Americans Elect nominee, nobody. They'll be appearing on the ballot in 29 states without any candidate listed.
|
|
#91
|
|||
|
|||
|
Oh, and by the way, I'm sorry if offended blindgoose or anybody else on my response to his post.
|
|
#92
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
Basemap |
|
#93
|
|||
|
|||
|
No, the one that started it all.
|
|
#94
|
|||
|
|||
|
#95
|
|||
|
|||
|
The dingo's more like our wolf, I'd say. I was thinking of a marsupial. You used to have a thylacine, which was probably like our fox, but you made it go extinct. How about a quoll?
__________________
Quote:
Worldwar: Out of Balance Star Wars: Point of Divergence |
|
#96
|
|||
|
|||
|
Missed seeing this before. I have to wait until after the election to see who receives at least 0.05% of the popular vote. Then I can run an election here, although it will probably only be "retrospective" by a week or so. It's a way to give closure to the project and to the TLs generated by it, though.
__________________
Quote:
Worldwar: Out of Balance Star Wars: Point of Divergence |
|
#97
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Then again, if no one is in danger of meeting/missing the .05% threshold it wouldn't matter that much. |
|
#98
|
|||
|
|||
|
Seriously, I always hear people bashing FOX News, but I never hear an exact reason. Why?
|
|
#99
|
|||
|
|||
|
Because it's legally exempted itself from telling the truth!
__________________
|
|
#100
|
|||
|
|||
|
Are you kidding? It's because it's a far right wing news show that's sole purpose is to scare people about "the terror threat level", and the "evils of the left wing welfare machine" into watching more of their entertainment news to drive up ratings, get more advertisers, and make Rupert Murdoch more money.
__________________
Economic score: -4.13, Social score: -5.04 |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|