Go Back   Alternate History Discussion Board > Discussion > Alternate History Discussion: After 1900

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old June 17th, 2012, 03:55 PM
Stolengood Stolengood is online now
Premium Blend
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1000 or more
McNutt-Lucas?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Meadow View Post
We're discussing alternate history. The whole basis of this subject is thesis and argument combined with fact.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fleetlord View Post
Oh my god, did we break Spain?
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old June 17th, 2012, 04:04 PM
Paul V McNutt Paul V McNutt is offline
Paul V McNutt
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1000 or more
If there was a two term limit in those days, Roosevelt might have endorsed somebody, but who?
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old June 17th, 2012, 04:06 PM
Paul V McNutt Paul V McNutt is offline
Paul V McNutt
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stolengood View Post
McNutt-Lucas?
They were from neighnoring states. McNutt would need a Southerner.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old June 17th, 2012, 04:11 PM
Emperor of Scandinavia Emperor of Scandinavia is offline
Emperor of Scandinavia
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 367
Why not Wendell Willkie?

He was a registered Democrat until he decided to run for the GOP nomination.

He supported most of FDR's big projects, and was an internationalist, so he might be acceptable.

However to get Willkie as the DEM nominee, we need either the GOP, led by Taft, Vandeberg, and Dewey to say "NO we don't want you"

or

Have FDR suffer a stroke, or some other health debilitation right after the 1938 midterm election that makes a run in 1940 impossible. Perhaps in that position, FDR might want a young, charismatic, forward looking man to continue his legacy.

I'm not sure on running mates, but no Willkie means either taft, or Vandeberg are the GOP nominee.

Wishing you well, his majesty,
The Scandinavian Emperor
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old June 18th, 2012, 02:55 AM
Orville_third Orville_third is offline
Defender of Abkhazia
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Carolina Free State
Posts: 1000 or more
Wallace was growing support as Ag Secretary, but likely wouldn't have been the nominee then.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr. Strangelove View Post
I see yours and raise a supercomputer inside a medieval chapel.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jello_Biafra View Post
I'm voting for the fairy princess, because that sounds most plausible.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old June 18th, 2012, 03:00 AM
Stolengood Stolengood is online now
Premium Blend
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1000 or more
Wallace could've brought his enthusiasm to balance out Hull's guardedness on the ticket.

Hull-Wallace, perhaps?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Meadow View Post
We're discussing alternate history. The whole basis of this subject is thesis and argument combined with fact.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fleetlord View Post
Oh my god, did we break Spain?
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old June 18th, 2012, 03:24 AM
pharoahjared pharoahjared is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Glendale AZ, USA
Posts: 109
Some of the leaders in the democratic party wanted John Nance Garner to run.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old June 18th, 2012, 03:30 AM
Stolengood Stolengood is online now
Premium Blend
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by pharoahjared View Post
Some of the leaders in the democratic party wanted John Nance Garner to run.
But Roosevelt didn't, and if Roosevelt wasn't running, he'd certainly be allowed to influence the choice of his successor -- and he and Garner were like chalk and cheese.

There's no way Roosevelt would let Garner become the nominee.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Meadow View Post
We're discussing alternate history. The whole basis of this subject is thesis and argument combined with fact.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fleetlord View Post
Oh my god, did we break Spain?
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old June 28th, 2012, 06:08 AM
Rich Rostrom Rich Rostrom is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: The heights of glory, the depths of despair
Posts: 669
Quote:
Originally Posted by bguy View Post
Wouldn't FDR move heaven and earth to prevent a Wheeler nomination? He isn't going to want to see an isolationist in the White House and was really insulted by Wheeler's comment on Lend Lease, describing it as "the rottenest thing that has been said in public life in my generation."
Wheeler's OTL vote against Lend-Lease was in 1941. FDR would be opposed to an Isolationist, but if he doesn't think the world crisis requires him, then it's not such an important issue.

Also, if FDR is forced to withdraw by last-minute illness - he won't have time to organize against Wheeler, and the convention will be "thrown wide open". And FDR may be too ill to do anything.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old June 28th, 2012, 06:08 AM
Rich Rostrom Rich Rostrom is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: The heights of glory, the depths of despair
Posts: 669
Quote:
Originally Posted by pharoahjared View Post
Some of the leaders in the democratic party wanted John Nance Garner to run.
Garner did run, and went nowhere.
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old June 28th, 2012, 06:10 AM
Rich Rostrom Rich Rostrom is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: The heights of glory, the depths of despair
Posts: 669
Quote:
Originally Posted by Emperor of Scandinavia View Post
Why not Wendell Willkie?
Because he became a public figure as an opponent of the New Deal?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.