|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
Would the very visible dud have caused a quicker fix of the torpedo problems?
__________________
David Houston un Canadien errant my TL: Canada-wank (99% ASB-free) Turtledove 2010 updated: 1 Sep '12 |
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
A really odd POD might be a president leaning over the rail when the dud hits, knocking him off the side to drown *and* letting the armed forces know that the torpedo is a dud.
|
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
It lloks to me like by the time the Willie D was conducting her antics, the program to fix the Mark 14 was already underway. Her inadvertant attack was in November, but the first of the new and improved (read: functional) Mark 14s were starting to come into service in September. So it'll highlight the issue, but it's basically already solved.
__________________
Eyes Turned Skywards
An alternate post-Apollo space age Atomic Rockets Seal of Approval, Turtledove Nominee 2011 Visit the wiki page for details |
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
How is a dud going to knock anything off an Iowa-class BB? He wouldn't feel a thing; maybe he'd hear a noise.
|
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
|
The issues with the Mark-14 were being fixed by that time, but the Mark-13 and Mark-15 were never fully debugged. Not the first time that those going into combat have had to deal with weapons that didn't work, but imposed upon them by politically connected weapons makers. The contrast between the U.S. torpedo designers and the German is striking: those who designed and built the Mark-14 and -15 went on to high rank-among them, RADM Ralph Christie, Commander Submarines Southwest Pacific; and Fleet Admiral William Leahy, FDR's Chief of Staff and Chairman, JCS. In Germany, those who designed the G7a and G7e torpedoes, when confronted with their failures, were court-martialed and sent to prison.
Assume the torpedo is a dud and hits anyway. No explosion, just a small fountain of water. FDR would be commenting on the narrow escape, but would also wonder if all torpedoes are duds. He'd no doubt launch an investigation of the matter, and the complaints from all three branches of the Navy (Naval Aviation, the sub force, and destroyers) would come to the forefront. One might even see Congressional investigation-perhaps run by the committee headed by Sen. Harry S Truman (D-MO), which was ferreting waste and abuse in the war effort.
__________________
Diplomacy is the art of telling someone to go to hell so eloquently that he packs for the trip. War is the simpler art of bringing hell to him. |
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sorry, I was making an unclear joke at one of the more infamous WWII timelines of AH.com. The writer used the Porter incident, and it was probably the least ASB aspect of the timeline.
|
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
|
He'd be asking some very pointed questions, no doubt about it. But the basic one would be "Are all of our torpedoes like that one? And if so, fix them, or I'll be looking for a new Chief of BuOrd." And some very unpleasant things for BuOrd would come up-their ignoring complaints from those in the field, hide-bound insistence on no further tests even when field fixes ID the problem, and so on.
__________________
Diplomacy is the art of telling someone to go to hell so eloquently that he packs for the trip. War is the simpler art of bringing hell to him. |
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
|
LOL at the Iowa being in danger even if hit 3 times with our Torpedoes.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|