Go Back   Alternate History Discussion Board > Discussion > Alternate History Discussion: After 1900

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old May 7th, 2012, 08:06 PM
Dathi THorfinnsson Dathi THorfinnsson is offline
Daši Žorfinnsson
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Syracuse, Haudenosaunee, Vinland
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt Wiser View Post
One thing to remember: the torpedo was a Mark-15. Which had the same issues with reliablity that the submarine force's Mark-14, and the Mark-13 aerial torpedoes had. Even if it hit the Iowa, there's no guarantee that it would've gone off.
Would the very visible dud have caused a quicker fix of the torpedo problems?
__________________
David Houston
un Canadien errant
my TL: Canada-wank (99% ASB-free) Turtledove 2010
updated: 1 Sep '12
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old May 7th, 2012, 08:11 PM
Snake Featherston Snake Featherston is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Lake Charles, Louisiana
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt Wiser View Post
One thing to remember: the torpedo was a Mark-15. Which had the same issues with reliablity that the submarine force's Mark-14, and the Mark-13 aerial torpedoes had. Even if it hit the Iowa, there's no guarantee that it would've gone off.
Good point. Now that would really be an interesting POD.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old May 7th, 2012, 08:21 PM
M79 M79 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1000 or more
A really odd POD might be a president leaning over the rail when the dud hits, knocking him off the side to drown *and* letting the armed forces know that the torpedo is a dud.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old May 7th, 2012, 08:28 PM
e of pi e of pi is offline
Aerospace Engineering Student
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Halfway to Anywhere
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snake Featherston View Post
Good point. Now that would really be an interesting POD.
It lloks to me like by the time the Willie D was conducting her antics, the program to fix the Mark 14 was already underway. Her inadvertant attack was in November, but the first of the new and improved (read: functional) Mark 14s were starting to come into service in September. So it'll highlight the issue, but it's basically already solved.
__________________
Eyes Turned Skywards
An alternate post-Apollo space age
Atomic Rockets Seal of Approval, Turtledove Nominee 2011
Visit the wiki page for details
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old May 7th, 2012, 11:06 PM
hairysamarian hairysamarian is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by M79 View Post
A really odd POD might be a president leaning over the rail when the dud hits, knocking him off the side to drown *and* letting the armed forces know that the torpedo is a dud.
How is a dud going to knock anything off an Iowa-class BB? He wouldn't feel a thing; maybe he'd hear a noise.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old May 8th, 2012, 12:58 AM
Matt Wiser Matt Wiser is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Auberry, CA
Posts: 1000 or more
The issues with the Mark-14 were being fixed by that time, but the Mark-13 and Mark-15 were never fully debugged. Not the first time that those going into combat have had to deal with weapons that didn't work, but imposed upon them by politically connected weapons makers. The contrast between the U.S. torpedo designers and the German is striking: those who designed and built the Mark-14 and -15 went on to high rank-among them, RADM Ralph Christie, Commander Submarines Southwest Pacific; and Fleet Admiral William Leahy, FDR's Chief of Staff and Chairman, JCS. In Germany, those who designed the G7a and G7e torpedoes, when confronted with their failures, were court-martialed and sent to prison.

Assume the torpedo is a dud and hits anyway. No explosion, just a small fountain of water. FDR would be commenting on the narrow escape, but would also wonder if all torpedoes are duds. He'd no doubt launch an investigation of the matter, and the complaints from all three branches of the Navy (Naval Aviation, the sub force, and destroyers) would come to the forefront. One might even see Congressional investigation-perhaps run by the committee headed by Sen. Harry S Truman (D-MO), which was ferreting waste and abuse in the war effort.
__________________
Diplomacy is the art of telling someone to go to hell so eloquently that he packs for the trip.

War is the simpler art of bringing hell to him.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old May 8th, 2012, 01:06 AM
Know Nothing Know Nothing is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Real Amurica
Posts: 426
Quote:
Originally Posted by Plumber View Post
Blowing FDR up is, but he could still die.
Sorry, I was making an unclear joke at one of the more infamous WWII timelines of AH.com. The writer used the Porter incident, and it was probably the least ASB aspect of the timeline.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old May 8th, 2012, 01:10 AM
hairysamarian hairysamarian is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt Wiser View Post
Assume the torpedo is a dud and hits anyway. No explosion, just a small fountain of water. FDR would be commenting on the narrow escape, but would also wonder if all torpedoes are duds. He'd no doubt launch an investigation of the matter...
Has it occurred to anyone else what a strange situation that would be? Basically, the President of the United States would be hauling the Bureau of Ordinance onto the carpet to explain how they managed to fail to kill him and sink an American capital ship in the process. Twilight Zone, here we come.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old May 8th, 2012, 01:52 AM
Matt Wiser Matt Wiser is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Auberry, CA
Posts: 1000 or more
He'd be asking some very pointed questions, no doubt about it. But the basic one would be "Are all of our torpedoes like that one? And if so, fix them, or I'll be looking for a new Chief of BuOrd." And some very unpleasant things for BuOrd would come up-their ignoring complaints from those in the field, hide-bound insistence on no further tests even when field fixes ID the problem, and so on.
__________________
Diplomacy is the art of telling someone to go to hell so eloquently that he packs for the trip.

War is the simpler art of bringing hell to him.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old December 3rd, 2012, 03:45 PM
burmafrd burmafrd is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Las Cruces, NM
Posts: 924
LOL at the Iowa being in danger even if hit 3 times with our Torpedoes.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.