Go Back   Alternate History Discussion Board > Discussion > Alternate History Discussion: Before 1900

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 17th, 2012, 12:47 PM
kasumigenx kasumigenx is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Occupied Selurong
Posts: 1000 or more
Send a message via Yahoo to kasumigenx
WI Richard the Lionheart or John Lackland marries Douce II of Provence

I know that Douce II of Provence died when she was a Child but what if she survives and either marries John Lackland or Richard the Lionheart as King of England, would this result in an Angevin Occitania or Philippe Augustus will try to stop them from trying to claim Provence or can they claim Provence from the crown of Aragon in the first place?

Last edited by kasumigenx; February 17th, 2012 at 12:54 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old February 17th, 2012, 01:24 PM
stateless_englishman stateless_englishman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Bertolini's Hell, Cosimo III's Paradise
Posts: 1000 or more
If the rumours about Richard I are true (which I am doubtful of) then her marrying him changes little. Either way, the marriage probably doesn't butterfly his involvement in the Crusades, so he would spend much of their marriage away, and not producing heirs. Then again, it's not impossible that whatever issue Richard had with Berengaria of Navarre that kept him from staying with her during their marriage isn't an issue he has with Douce II of Provence, so it's not impossible they have a more successful marriage, and he produces an heir.

I don't see much difference to OTL arising from her marrying John, either. If John really wants a war, then he can try and press his wife's claim to Provence, but that seems pretty suicidal. Obviously the pair will have different children to those born in our timeline, but it's difficult to see how different they might be in this timeline. I don't foresee an Angevin Occitania arising as a result.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old February 17th, 2012, 02:53 PM
Wolf Tengu Wolf Tengu is offline
Lazy Fellow
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Solihull, UK
Posts: 886
My memory is no good (it's been awhile), but wasn't that war in...120...2? Down to John not compensating that one fellow or whatnot over Isabelle of Angouleme?

Well, probably a ton of other stuff too, but I can't remember much of that. Bunch of people supporting Arthur's claim?

If that is true (Which I doubt, my memory is poor) then wouldn't marrying this person change that at all?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Georgepatton View Post
No! Pancakes should be married to bacon, not each other!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.