|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Paratroopers Actually Used for Parachute Ops?
WW2 saw the first usage of paratroopers by any nation. Britain had their SAS. Germany had their initial successes, bloodied their noses at Crete then swore the thing off and put the survivors into basically a light infantry role (in an effing desert!). Italy had their Paracadutisti units, which pretty much had the same fate as their German counterparts. And so on, with the US, Russian and Japanese airborne divisions.
As stated Germany and Italy basically used their paratoopers as elite light infantry after Crete. They were pretty good in that role, due to high standards and morale. But this is AH, so lets ask an interesting WI. What if they (the Italian Folgore division, and early German units) were used for actual paratrooper operations? Errr, more importantly what places would be possible for this type of operation? Perhaps the Folgore division could be dropped in during the Seige of Tobruk? Could airborne drops be performed on the Eastern front or during the invasion of Italy? Logically they would be useful in counter partisan operations in the Balkans, but that seems a bit degrading. Im predicting high casualties for the units during parachute operations, so its probably going to become a one time trick. Not to mention any changes in history are probably going to be pretty minor. Or might i be wrong on that point? Yes i know this is a pretty large stretch in plausibility (i realize no one in real life is going to bother with a parachute drop when your desperate for infantry as it is). But just humor the idea okay?
__________________
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
There was a bit of discussion on a similar topic in this old thread, and I think we reached the conclusion that German use of paratroopers on the Eastern Front would've been both unfeasible and ineffective.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Don't forget that Germany halted Fallschirmjäger operations at a time when it still held at least air-parity, if not supremacy in some places (the east). That situation isn't going to get any better, especially when their supply situation is only getting worse. Germany probably made the best decision regarding its paratroops. Any future operation would likely see the paras cease to exist as a coherent force, either due to better preparedness on the ground, a better enemy airforce, or failure by the Germans to relieve and/or supply them once on the ground, possibly even a combination of all three.
__________________
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
So are you just thinking Axis units?
There have been quite a few "live" parachute operations by the British and especially the US since their inception, as recently as 2003 IIRC.
__________________
It is not neccessary to change, survival is not mandatory |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
![]()
__________________
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
IIRC, I believe the IDF is almost entirely jump qualified. Not to mention parachuting is a standard insertion method for all Special Forces units.
__________________
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I didnt mean modern day, i specified in the OP that im talking about ww2 Axis (minus the Japanese) units.
__________________
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Perhaps Africa could be a profitable theatre for Axis para drops. The small forces in the theatre and minimal communications could mean that a regiment dropped in the rear during an offensive could have a huge impact. But of course it would require a huge commitment in planes which can't be used elsewhere.
__________________
"The role of the Cavalry is to add colour, dash and daring, to what would otherwise be a mindless shitfight amongst grunts". |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Folgore would've been useful at Malta in 1940.
__________________
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sorry Kome,
That was me being thick. The Germans could have used Paras effectively during Wacht Am Rhein, using company sized drops to secure supply depots before they were evecuated and/or destroyed. Although the end result would have probably been the same, i.e. German defeat. Bastogne may well have fallen, the split in the Allied lines, although temporary, would be damaging, and there's a good possibility that the Soviets would have advanced beyond their designated area, (and good luck getting Stalin to give up ground he's taken).
__________________
It is not neccessary to change, survival is not mandatory |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
No it wouldn't - it wasn't formed untill Sep. 41.
Italy only had two Libyan battalions and a new Italian with a second forming in 40. No Malta in 40 unless its a German go. ![]() |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Any mission will be a fiasco under these circumstances. The mission failed due to a lack of resources, but could have succeeded. In this case it would not have changed the outcome, because the SS division it was meant to clear the way for would not have arrived.
__________________
|
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
IMO, any Axis paratroop employment will have to be earlier whilst the Axis is still on the strategic offensive. Gen Student wanted to use Crete as a stepping stone to Cyprus and then Syria.
__________________
|
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Military Para Ops
|
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
I would say Malta for the Axis also. Maybe following Crete, which could be seen as a success, eventhough casualties were high.
|
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
The one thing about dropping them into Africa itself is pretty much that once there, there they stay. And its not as if the logistical support is going to land next to them, to make them paratroops again Best Regards Grey Wolf |
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
True...and I agree....but they would be used in their primary role, while securing a strategic island....but high casualties would indeed require a long period for rebuilding the Fallschirmjaegers afterwards.
|
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|