Go Back   Alternate History Discussion Board > Discussion > Alternate History Discussion: After 1900

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 21st, 2004, 04:37 PM
17inc 17inc is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 280
What if the British Empire was far stronger before WWII

Lets say in 1929 the british empier pulls a Rome in making there pound the single unit for all the crown colones and by WWII she useing all the manpower for home and the empier and so you blokes know i add 75 million pepole to 1.25 billion at the time of out breake of ALT war all 3 domions have 100 million between them and hears what the navys look like and the ARMYs of the CW reach to 34,5000,000 man


RN & EMPIER NAVYS AS OF September 1939 AND SHIPS BEEN BUILT


Royal Navy 26 BATTELSHIPS
BATTELSHIPS
12 32KTS FAST Lion Class 18” GUN SHIPS
HMS Lion LAID DOWN 1936
HMS Invincible LAID DOWN 1936
HMS Dreadnought LAID DOWN 1936
HMS Queen LAID DOWN 1936
HMS Russell LAID DOWN 1936
HMS Irresistible LAID DOWN 1936
HMS Caesar LAID DOWN 1937
HMS Mars LAID DOWN 1937
HMS Magnificent LAID DOWN 1937
HMS Vengeance LAID DOWN 1937
HMS Prince George LAID DOWN 1937
HMS Jupiter LAID DOWN 1937

5 25KTS 15”GUN QUEEN ELIZABETH CLASS SHIPS AND OTHERE SHIPS

HMS Queen Elizabeth LAID DOWN 1913
HMS Warspite LAID DOWN 1913
HMS Valiant LAID DOWN 1914
HMS Barham LAID DOWN 1914
HMS Malaya LAID DOWN 1915

2 RENOWN CLASS BATTLE CRUIERS

HMS Repulse LAID DOWN 1916
HMS Renown LAID DOWN 1916


1 HOOD CLASS

HMS Hood LAID DOWN 1916


6 Fast 15” GUN KGVS 1936,BATTELSHIPS

HMS Price of Wales LAID DOWN 1936
HMS King George V LAID DOWN 1936
HMS Duke of York LAID DOWN 1936
HMS Anson LAID DOWN 1937
HMS Howe LAID DOWN 1937
HMS Exmouth LAID DOWN 1938


FLEET CARRIERS 6 MALTA CLASS


HMS Malta LAID DOWN 1939
HMS Indomitable LAID DOWN 1939
HMS Illustrious LAID DOWN 1939
HMS Victorious LAID DOWN 1939
HMS Formidable LAID DOWN 1939
HMS Implacable LAID DOWN 1939



7LIGTH FLEET CARRIERS

HMS Ark Royal LAID DOWN 1937



HMS Courageous LAID DOWN 1916
HMS Glorious LAID DOWN 1916
HMS Furious LAID DOWN 1916
HMS Eagle LAID DOWN 1918
HMS Hermes LAID DOWN 1919
HMS Argus LAID DOWN 1917


RN CRUISERS OF 8”& 6”GUNS

THERE ARE 20 8” CRUISERS

3DEVONSHIRE CLASS

HMS Devonshire LAID DOWN 1928
HMS Sussex LAID DOWN 1928
HMS Nofolk LAID DOWN 1928

1LONDON CLASS

HMS London LAID DOWN 1927

4 KENT CLASS

HMS Kent LAID DOWN 1926
HMS Berwick LAID DOWN 1926
HMS Cumberland LAID DOWN 1926
HMS Suffolk LAID DOWN 1926

EXETER CLASS

HMS Exeter LAID DOWN 1929
HMS York LAID DOWN 1928




10 8” GUN ALDERSHOT CLASS UNDER 1936 PROGRAM

HMS Aldershot LAID DOWN 1936
HMS Exmoor LAID DOWN 1936
HMS Seaford LAID DOWN 1936
HMS Bristol LAID DOWN 1936
HMS Swindon LAID DOWN 1936
HMS Sidmouth LAID DOWN 1937
HMS Oxford LAID DOWN 1937
HMS Cambridge LAID DOWN 1937
HMS Kingswood LAID DOWN 1937
HMS Barrhead LAID DOWN 1937


41 6” GUN CRUISERS

4 LEANDER CLASS .

HMS Leander LAID DOWN 1931
HMS Orion LAID DOWN 1932
HMS Achilles LAID DOWN 1932
HMS Ajax LAID DOWN 1934


2 ARETHUSA CLASS

HMS Arethusa LAID DOWN 1934
HMS Aurora LAID DOWN 1936



5 SOUTHAMPTON CLASS

HMS Newcastle LAID DOWN 1936
HMS Sheffield LAID DOWN 1936
HMS Birmingham LAID DOWN 1936
HMS Glasgow LAID DOWN 1936
HMS Liverpool LAID DOWN 1936

1 IMPROVED SOUTHHAMPTON

HMS Belfast LAID DOWN 1938

3 DIDO CLASS 5.25 GUN SHIPS

HMS Dido LAID DOWN 1939
HMS Euryalus LAID DOWN 1939
HMS Phoebe LAID DOWN 1939

6 FIJI CLASS

HMS Bermuda LAID DOWN 1938
HMS Gambia LAID DOWN 1938
HMS Jamaica LAID DOWN 1938
HMS Kenya LAID DOWN 1939
HMS Mauritius LAID DOWN 1939
HMS Nigeria LAID DOWN 1939

3CALEDON CLASS

HMS Caledon LAID DOWN 1916
HMS Calypso LAID DOWN 1917
HMS Caradoc LAID DOWN 1916

5 CERES CLASS

HMS Cardiff LAID DOWN 1917
HMS Ceres LAID DOWN 1917
HMS Coventry LAID DOWN 1917
HMS Curacoa LAID DOWN 1917
HMS Curlew LAID DOWN 1917

4 CARLISLE CLASS

HMS Cairo LAID DOWN 1918
HMS Carlisle LAID DOWN 1918
HMS Capetown LAID DOWN 1918
HMS Colombo LAID DOWN 1918


5 DURBAN CLASS

HMS Dane LAID DOWN 1916
HMS Dauntless LAID DOWN 1916
HMS Durban LAID DOWN 1918
HMS Despatch LAID DOWN 1918
HMS Diomede LAID DOWN 1918



2 HAWKINS CLASS

HMS Frobisher LAID DOWN 1916
HMS Hawkins LAID DOWN 1916


1 EMERALD CLASS

HMS Emerald LAID DOWN 1918



RN DESTROYERS BUILT BEFOR MAJOR REPLACMENT PORGRAM STARTING IN 1936

28 W & V TYPES

HMS Vega LAID DOWN 1917
HMS Velox LAID DOWN 1917
HMS Walpole LAID DOWN 1918
HMS Vanessa LAID DOWN 1918
HMS Vanity LAID DOWN 1918
HMS Vimy LAID DOW 1917
HMS Wolfhound LAID DOWN 1918
HMS Winchester LAID DOWN 1918
HMS Winchelsea LAID DOWN 1917
HMS Westmintler LAID DOWN 1918
HMS Windsor LAID DOWN 1918
HMS Wrestler LAID DOWN 1918
HMS Valorous LAID DOWN 1918
HMS Walker LAID DOWN 1918
HMS Westcott LAID DOWN 1918
HMS Vivien LAID DOWN 1917
HMS Vivacious LAID DOWN 1917
HMS Vanco LAID DOWN 1917
HMS Vanquisher LAID DOWN 1917
HMS Watchman LAID DOWN 1917
HMS Verdun LAID DOWN 1917
HMS Versatile LAID DOWN 1917
HMS Vesper LAID DOWN 1917
HMS Vidette LAID DOWN 1918
HMS Wallace LAID DOWN 1918
HMS Wolsey LAID DOWN 1918
HMS Woolston LAID DOWN 1918

6 CAMPBELL CLASS

HMS Douglas LAID DOWN 1917
HMS Campbell LAID DOWN 1917
HMS Montrose LAID DOWN 1917
HMS Mackey LAID DOWN 1918
HMS Malcolm LAID DOWN 1918
HMS Keppel LAID DOWN 1918


5 V TYPE

HMS Thorycroft LAID DOWN 1916
HMS Viceroy LAID DOWN 1916
HMS Viscount LAID DOWN 1916
HMS Wishart LAID DOWN 1918
HMS Witch LAID DOWN 1918

11 ADMIRALTY MODIFIED W.”

HMS Withshed LAID DOWN 1918
HMS Witherington LAID DOWN 1918
HMS Wivern LAID DOWN 1918
HMS Wolverine LAID DOWN 1918
HMS Worcester LAID DOWN 1918
HMS Vansittart LAID DOWN 1918
HMS Venomous LAID DOWN 1918
HMS Verity LAID DOWN 1918
HMS Voluntreer LAID DOWN 1918
HMS Wanderer LAID DOWN 1918
HMS Whitehall LAID DOWN 1918

2 A TYPE

HMS Amazon LAID DOWN 1926
HMS Ambuscade LAID DOWN 1926


2 ADMIRALTY TYPE LEADERS

HMS Duncan LAID DOWN 1930
HMS Codrington LAID DOWN 1928



4 ESCAPADE CLASS

HMS Escapade LAID DOWN 1931
HMS Forester LAID DOWN 1932
HMS Fury LAID DOWN 1932
HMS Fame LAID DOWN 1932

1 ADMIRALTY TYPE LEDER.

HMS Faulknor LAID DOWN 1932

1 GALLANT CLASS

HMS Gallant LAID DOWN 1934


4 ISIS CLASS

HMS Isis LAID DOWN 1936
HMS Impulsive LAID DOWN 1936
HMS Ilex LAID DOWN 1936
HMS Icarus LAID DOWN 1936


20 TRIBAL CLASS BIULT UNDER EMERGENCY PORGAM WHEN JAPAN WALKS OF 1936 LONDON NAVY CONFERENCE


HMS Tribal LAID DOWN 1936
HMS Nubian LAID DOWN 1936
HMS Tartar LAID DOWN 1936
HMS Eskino LAID DOWN 1936
HMS Ashanti LAID DOWN 1936
HMS Pelican LAID DOWN 1936
HMS Pellew LAID DOWN 1936
HMS Marne LAID DOWN 1936
HMS Opportune LAID DOWN 1936
HMS Nugent LAID DOWN 1937
HMS Paladin LAID DOWN 1937
HMS Noble LAID DOWN 1937
HMS Magic LAID DOWN 1937
HMS Menace LAID DOWN 1937
HMS Ossory LAID DOWN1937
HMS Marvel LAID DOWN 1937
HMS Mandate LAID DOWN 1938
HMS Manners LAID DOWN 1938
HMS Pasley LAID DOWN 1938
HMS Orfrod LAID DOWN 1938


17 L CLASS

HMS Lochinvar LAID DOWN 1939
HMS Liewellyn LAID DOWN 1939
HMS Lennox LAID DOWN 1939
HMS Lawford LAID DOWN 1939
HMS Leonidas LAID DOWN 1939
HMS Lucifer LAID DOWN 1939
HMS Laertes LAID DOWN 1939
HMS Lysander LAID DOWN 1939
HMS Lance LAID DOWN 1939
HMS Lookout LAID DOWN 1939
HMS loyal LAID DOWN 1939
HMS Legion LAID DOWN 1939
HMS Laforey LAID DOWN 1939
HMS Louis LAID DOWN 1939
HMS Lassoo LAID DOWN 1939
HMS Laurel LAID DOWN 1939
HMS Liberty LAID DOWN 1939



SLOOPS

6 SANDWICH CLASS

HMS Leith LAID DOWN 1933
HMS Falmouth LAID DOWN 1932
HMS Milford LAID DOWN1932
HMS Rochester LAID DOWN 1931
HMS Scarborough LAID DOWN 1930
HMS Sandwich LAID DOWN 1928


3 ABERDEEN CLASS

HMS Aberdeen LAID DOWN 1936
HMS Fleetwood LAID DOWN 1936
HMS Highflyer LAID DOWN 1938

1 STORK
HMS Stork LAID DOWN 1936


RN SUBMARINES


7 H CLASS SUBMARINES

H28 H32 H33 H34 LAID DOWN 1918
H43 H44 H50 LAID DOWN 1919

3 P CLASS

P552, P512, LAID DOWN 1919


L CLASS

L23,L26,27 LAID DOWN 1918/19


4OBERON CLASS

OBERON ,OTWAY, LAID DOWN 1926

OSIRIS , OUTUS , LAID DOWN 1928

3 PORTEUS CLASS

PROTUES, PANGORA, LAID DOWN 1929

ROVER LAID DOWN 1930

4 STURGEON CLASS

STURGEON LAID DOWN 1929
SEALION LAID DOWN 1931
SEAWOLF LAID DOWN 1933
SUNFISH LAID DOWN 1934

FLEET OILERS

50 IN ALL


















ROYAL AUSTRALIAN NAVY

6AUSTRAIAN NAVY 15” GUN KGV CLASS BATTLESHIPS ALL 6
SHIPS LAID DOWN AT JERVIS BAY NSW AUSTRALIAN


HMAS Australia LAID DOWN 1936
HMAS Dominion LAID DOWN 1936
HMAS Commonwealth LAID DOWN 1936
HMAS New South Wales LAID DOWN 1937
HMAS Victoria LAID DOWN 1937
HMAS Queensland LAID DOWN 1938


6 LIGTH FLEET ARK ROYAL CAIRRERS

HMAS Tasman LAID DOWN 1937
HMAS Bass strait LAID DOWN 1937
HMAS Jervis Bay LAID DOWN 1937
HMAS SPENCER LAID DOWN 1938
HMAS Carpentaria LAID DOWN 1938
HMAS Capeyork LAID DOWN 1938


12 ALDERSHOT CLASS

HMAS Canberra LAID DOWN 1936
HMAS Sydney LAID DOWN 1936
HMAS Melbourne LAID DOWN 1936
HMAS Brisbane LAID DOWN 1936
HMAS Adelaide LAID DOWN 1936
HMAS Perth LAID DOWN 1936
HAMS Hobart LAID DOWN 1937
HMAS Darwin LAID DOWN 1937
HMAS Wollongong LAID DOWN 1937
HMAS Parramatta LAID DOWN 1937
HMAS Sale LAID DOWN 1937
HMAS Roto LAID DOWN 1937


12 SOUTHHAMPTON CLASS

HMAS Gunnedah LAID DOWN 1937
HMAS Graffon LAID DOWN 1937
HMAS Port Macquarie LAID DOWN 1937
HMAS Darmick LAID DOWN 1937
HMAS Tongo LAID DOWN 1937
HMAS Batemans Bay LAID DOWN 1937
HMAS Berri LAID DOWN 1938
HMAS Yunta LAID DOWN 1938
HMAS Urana LAID DOWN 1938
HMAS Alice Springs LAID DOWN 1938
HMAS Bowen LAID DOWN 1938
HMAS Mooba LAID DOWN 1938


20 TRIBAL CLASS DESTROYERS

HMAS Arunta LAID DOWN 1936
HMAS Warramamunga LAID DOWN 1936
HMAS Kurnai LAID DOWN 1936
HMAS Condamine LAID DOWN 1936
HMAS Murchison LAID DOWN 1936
HMAS Shoalhaven LAID DOWN 1936
HMAS Barcoo LAID DOWN 1936
HMAS Baewon LAID DOWN 1936
HMAS Burdekin LAID DOWN 1936
HMAS Culgoa LAID DOWN 1936
HMAS Hawkesbury LAID DOWN 1936
HMAS Lachlan LAID DOWN 1937
HMAS Moruya LAID DOWN 1937
HMAS Narooma LAID DOWN 1937
HMAS Kiama LAID DOWN 1937
HMAS Ulladulla LAID DOWN 1937
HMAS Bega LAID DOWN 1937
HMAS Orbost LAID DOWN 1937
HMAS Geelong LAID DOWN 1937
HMAS Nowra LAID DOWN 1937

20 L CLASS DESTROYERS

HMAS Swan LAID DOWN 1939
HMAS Warrego LAID DOWN 1939
HMAS Ararat LAID DOWN 1939
HMAS Ballarat LAID DOWN 1939
HMAS Bathurst LAID DOWN 1939
HMAS Bendigo LAID DOWN 1939
HMAS Bunbury LAID DOWN 1939
HMAS Bundaberg LAID DOWN 1939
HMAS Castlemaine LAID DOWN 1939
HMAS Cessnock LAID DOWN 1939
HMAS Colac LAID DOWN 1939
HMAS Cootamundra LAID DOWN 1939
HMAS Cowara LAID DOWN 1939
HMAS Platypus LAID DOWN 1939
HMAS Stawell LAID DOWN 1939
HMAS Goulburn LAID DOWN 1939
HMAS Strahan LAID DOWN 1939
HMAS Warrnambool LAID DOWN 1939
HMAS Whyalla LAID DOWN 1939
HMAS Wagga LAID DOWN 1939


AND 15 FLEET OILERS






















ROYAL NEW ZEALND NAVY

3 KGV CLASS BATTLESHIPS BUILT IN WELINGTON

HMNZS New Zealand LAID DOWN 1936
HMNZS Wellington LAID DOWN 1936
HMNZS Christchurch LAID DOWN 1938

6 ALDERSHOT CRUISERS

HMNZS Ackland LAID DOWN 1936
HMNZS Hasting LAID DOWN 1936
HMNZS Castlepoint LAID DOWN 1936
HMNZS Te pirita LAID DOWN 1936
HMNZS Owen River LAID DOWN 1936
HMNZS Gore LIAD DOWN 1937

6 SOUTHHAMPTONS CLASS

HMNZS Hokitika LAID DOWN 1937
HMNZS Charleston LAID DOWN 1937
HMNZS Ahaura LAID DOWN 1937
HMNZS Rotorua LAID DOWN 1937
HMNZS Blenheim LAID DOWN 1937
HMNZS Fox Glagier LAID DOWN 1938

15 TRIBAL CLASS

HMNZS Acorn LAID DOWN 1936
HMNZS alarm LAID DOWN 1936
HMNZS Brisk LAID DOWN 1936
HMNZS Sheldarke LAID DOWN 1936
HMNZS Cameleon LAID DOWN 1936
HMNZS Nemesis LAID DOWN 1936
HMNZS Nereide LAID DOWN 1936
HMNZS Nymphe LAID SOWN 1936
HMNZS Hope LAID DOWN 1936
HMNZS Larne LAID DOWN 1937
HMNZS Lyra LAID DOWN 1937
HMNZS Martin LAID DOWN 1937
HMNZS Minstrel LAID DOWN 1937
HMNZS Redpole LAID DOWN 1937
HMNZS Rifleman LAID DOWN 1937


15 L CLASS

HMNZS Ruby LAID DOWN 1939
HMNZS Badger LIAD DOWN 1939
HMNZS Hornet LAID DOWN 1939
HMNZS Hind LAID DOWN 1939
HMNZS Hydra LAID DOWN 1939
HMNZS Goshawk LAID DOWN 1939
HMNZS Defender LAID DOWN 1939
HMNZS Druld LAID DOWN 1939
HMNZS Jackal LAID DOWN 1939
HMNZS Tigrees LAID DOWN 1939
HMNZS Lapwing LAID DOWN 1939
HMNZS Lizard LAID DOWN 1939
HMNZS Sandfly LAID DOWN 1939
HMNZS Ferret LIAD DOWN 1939
HMNZS Forester LAID DOWN 1939




10 FLEET OILERS












ROYAL CANADIAN NAVY


6 KGV CLASS BATTELSHIPS BUILT AT QUEBEC

HMCS New Brunswick LAID DOWN 1936
HMCS Quebec LAID DOWN 1936
HMCS Ontario LAID DOWN 1936
HMCS Manitoba LAID DOWN 1937
HMCS Saskatchewan LAID DOWN 1937
HMCS Canada LAID DOWN 1937


12 ALDERSHOT CLASS

HMCS Moncton LAID DOWN 1936
HMCS Gagon LAID DOWN 1936
HMCS Harrison LAID DOWN 1936
HMCS St Lawrence LAID DOWN 1936
HMCS Malartic LAID DOWN 1936
HMCS Prince Alber LAID DOWN 1936
HMCS Humboldt LAID DOWM 1936
HMCS Falher LAID DOWN 1937
HMCS Vancouer LAID DOWN 1937
HMCS Tanzace LAID DOWN 1937
HMCS Buick LAID DOWN 1937
HMCS Fierside LAID DOWN 1937

6 LIGTH FLEET CAIRRERS ARK ROYAL CLASS

HMCS Hudson Bay LAID DOWN 1937
HMCS Cobot LAID DOWN 1937
HMCS Labrador LAID DOWN 1937
HMCS Ontario LAID DOWN 1937
HMCS Superior LAID DOWN 1937
HMCS Georgian LAID DOWN 1937




12 SOUTHHAMPTON CLASS

HMCS Achilles LAID DOWN 1937
HMCS Cochrane LAID DOWN 1937
HMCS Warrior LAID DOWN 1937
HMCS Defence LAID DOWN 1937
HMCS Shannon LAID DOWN 1937
HMCS Minotaur LAID DOWN 1937
HMCS Ontario LAID DOWN 1938
HMCS Border City LAID DOWN 1938
HMCS Fort Francis LAID DOWN 1938
HMCS Rockciffe LAID DOWN 1938
HMCS Sault LAID DOWN 1938
HMCS Ste Marie LAID DOWN 1938


20 TRIBAL CLASS

HMCS Haida LAID DOWN 1936
HMCS Horon LAID DOWN 1936
HMCS Iroquois LAID DOWN 1936
HMCS Athabaskan LAID DOWN 1936
HMCS Cayuga LAID DOWN 1936
HMCS Micmac LAID DOWN 1936
HMCS Nootka LIAD DOWN 1936
HMCS Crescent LAID DOWN 1936
HMCS Crusader LAID DOWN 1936
HMCS Algonquin LAID DOWN 1936
HMCS Sioux LAID DOWN 1937
HMCS Lake LAID DOWN 1937
HMCS ST John LAID DOWN 1937
HMCS Royalmount LAID DOWN 1937
HMCS Orkney LAID DOWN 1937
HMCS Wentworth LAID DOWN 1937
HMCS New Brunswick LAID DOWN 1937
HMCS Ottawa LIAD DOWN 1937
HMCS North Bay LAID DOWN 1937
HMCS Earfalls LAID DOWN 1937



20 L CLASS

HMCS Black Prince LAID DOWN 1939
HMCS Leviathan LAID DOWN 1939
HMCS Swiftsure LAID DOWN 1939
HMCS Diamdond LAID DOWN 1939
HMCS Skirmisher LAID DOWN 1939
HMCS Patrol LAID DOWN 1939
HMCS Keg River LAID DOWN 1939
HMCS Hudsons Hope LAID DOWN 1939
HMCS Little Smoke LAID DOWN 1939
HMCS Lower Post LAID DOWN 1939
HMCS Tuchitua LAID DOWN 1939
HMCS Nelson Forks LAID DOWN 1939
HMCS Dall Island LAID DOWN 1939
HMCS Auke Bay LAID DOWN 1939
HMCS Hunter Island LAID DOWN 1939
HMCS Warren Island LAID DOWN 1939
HMCS Yale LAID DOWN 1939
HMCS Faro LAID DOWN 1939
HMCS Yakutart LAID DOWN 1939
HMCS Auke LAID DOWN 1939


15 FLEET OILERS





ROYAL INDIAN NAVY



7 KGV CLASS BULT AT BOMBAY & CALCUTTA


HMIS Calcutta LAID DOWN 1936
HMIS Bombay LAID DOWN 1936
HMIS Punjab LAID DOWN 1936
HMIS Bangalore LAID DOWN 1937
HMIS Baroda LAID DOWN 1937
HMIS West Bengal LAID DOWN 1938
HMIS India LAID DOWN 1938




12 ALDERSHOT CLASS

HMIS Nagercoil LAID DOWN 1936
HMIS Tirunelveli LAID DOWN 1936
HMIS Tuticorin LAID DOWN 1936
HMIS Virudunagan LAID DOWN 1936
HMIS Tiruchchendur LAID DOWN1936
HMIS Tondi LAID DOWN 1936
HMIS Madurai LAID DOWN 1937
HMIS Dindigul LAID DOWN 1937
HMIS Kumbakonam LAID DOWN 1937
HMIS Attur LAID DOWN 1937
HMIS Cuddlore LAID DOWN 1937
HMIS Tindivanam LAID DOWN 1937



12 SHOUTHHAMPTONS CLASS

HMIS Tiruavannamalai LAID DOWN 1937
HMIS Madras LAID DOWN 1937
HMIS Gudur LAID DOWN 1937
HMIS Nellore LAID DOWN 1937
HMIS Ongole LAID DOWN1937
HMIS Guntur LAID DOWN 1937
HMIS Tenali LAID DOWN 1938
HMIS Colombo LAID DOWN 1938
HMIS Vijayawada LAID DOWN 1938
HMIS Machilipatnam LAID DOWN 1938
HMIS Gudivada LAID DOWN 1938
HMIS Eluruy LAID DOWN 1938



25 TRIBAL CLASS

HMIS Thiruvananthapuram LAID DOWN 1936
HMIS Kollam LAID DOWN 1936
HMIS Alappuzha LAID DOWN 1936
HMIS Kochi LAID DOWN 1936
HMIS Kottayam LAID DOWN 1936
HMIS Valparai LAID DOWN 1936
HMIS Thrissur LAID DOWN 1936
HMIS Palakkat LAID DOWN 1936
HMIS Coimbatore LAID DOWN 1936
HMIS Trippur LAID DOWN 1936
HMIS Erode LAID DOWN 1937
HMIS Salem LAID DOWN 1937
HMIS Dharmapuri LAID DOWN 1937
HMIS Kozhikode LAID DOWN 1937
HMIS Badagara LAID DOWN 1937
HMIS Kannur LAID DOWN 1937
HMIS Mysore LAID DOWN 1937
HMIS Mandya LAID DOWN 1937
HMIS Madliker LAID DOWN 1937
HMIS Hassan LAID DOWN 1937
HMIS Kasaragod LAID DOWN 1938
HMIS Mangalore LAID DOWN 1938
HMIS Udupi LAID DOWN 1938
HMIS Kumta LAID DOWN 1938
HMIS Karwar LAID DOWN 1938




25 L CLASS


HMIS Sirsi LAID DOWN 1939
HMIS Ranibennur LAID DOWN 1939
HMIS Chitradurga LIAD DOWN 1939
HMIS Bhadravatia LAID DOWN 1939
HMIS Sira LAID DOWN 1939
HMIS Tumkur LAID DOWN 1939
HMIS Panji LAID DOWN 1939
HMIS Venguria LAID DOWN 1939
HMIS Ratnagiri LAID DOWN 1939
HMIS Srivardhan LAID DOWN 1939
HMIS Sangli LAID DOWN 1939
HMIS Karad LAID DOWN 1939
HMIS Pandhapur LAID DOWN 1939
HMIS Satara LAID DOWN 1939
HMIS Poona LAID DOWN 1939
HMIS Ahmadnagar LAID DOWN 1939
HMIS Nashik LAID DOWN 1939
HMIS Manmad LAID DOWN 1939
HMIS Baroda LAID DOWN 1939
HMIS Mhow LAID DOWN 1939
HMIS Bengal LAID DOWN 1939
HMIS Sikar LAID DOWN 1939
HMIS Nagaur LAID DOWN 1939
HMIS Godhra LAID DOWN 1939
HMIS Agra LAID DOWN 1939


15 FLEET OILERS
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old May 21st, 2004, 05:14 PM
Pax Britannia Pax Britannia is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Wales, The British Empire
Posts: 389
Well, the outcome is pretty obvious. If WW2 does occur then Britain will be in a better position to fight it. I assume that the expansion that the RN has benefited from is also the case with the RAF. A Battle of Britain in this TL will be less in the balance as the RAF wins a comfortable victory. And the war in the pacific may be avoided altogether or fought largely with British forces.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old May 21st, 2004, 05:15 PM
17inc 17inc is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 280
and hear are the ship BB & CA tpyes




KGV, UK Battelship laid down 1936

Displacement:
69,922 t light; 73,311 t standard; 78,521 t normal; 82,376 t full load
Loading submergence 2,580 tons/feet

Dimensions:
999.00 ft x 120.00 ft x 35.00 ft (normal load)
304.50 m x 36.58 m x 10.67 m

Armament:
12 - 15.00" / 381 mm guns (3 Main turrets x 4 guns, 1 superfiring turret)
20 - 5.25" / 133 mm guns (10 2nd turrets x 2 guns)
55 - 1.57" / 40 mm AA guns
66 - 0.80" / 20 mm guns
Weight of broadside 21,820 lbs / 9,898 kg

Armour:
Belt 16.00" / 406 mm, ends unarmoured
Belts cover 115 % of normal area
Main turrets 16.00" / 406 mm, 2nd turrets 7.00" / 178 mm
AA gun shields 1.00" / 25 mm, Light gun shields 2.00" / 51 mm
Armour deck 8.39" / 213 mm, Conning tower 16.00" / 406 mm
Torpedo bulkhead 3.25" / 83 mm

Machinery:
Oil fired boilers, steam turbines,
Geared drive, 5 shafts, 305,800 shp / 228,127 Kw = 33.00 kts
Range 12,000nm at 15.00 kts

Complement:
2,345 - 3,048

Cost:
£31.318 million / $125.272 million

Distribution of weights at normal displacement:
Armament: 2,728 tons, 3.5 %
Armour: 30,593 tons, 39.0 %
Belts: 6,563 tons, 8.4 %, Armament: 6,647 tons, 8.5 %, Armour Deck: 14,014 tons, 17.8 %
Conning Tower: 636 tons, 0.8 %, Torpedo bulkhead: 2,733 tons, 3.5 %
Machinery: 8,580 tons, 10.9 %
Hull, fittings & equipment: 27,871 tons, 35.5 %
Fuel, ammunition & stores: 8,599 tons, 11.0 %
Miscellaneous weights: 150 tons, 0.2 %

Metacentric height 7.2

Remarks:
Hull space for machinery, storage & compartmentation is excellent
Room for accommodation & workspaces is excellent
Ship has slow, easy roll, a good, steady gun platform
Good seaboat, rides out heavy weather easily

Estimated overall survivability and seakeeping ability:
Relative margin of stability: 1.05
Shellfire needed to sink: 103,204 lbs / 46,813 Kg = 61.2 x 15.0 " / 381 mm shells
(Approx weight of penetrating shell hits needed to sink ship excluding critical hits)
Torpedoes needed to sink: 15.3
(Approx number of typical torpedo hits needed to sink ship)
Relative steadiness as gun platform: 76 %
(Average = 50 %)
Relative rocking effect from firing to beam: 0.62
Relative quality as seaboat: 1.21

Hull form characteristics:
Block coefficient: 0.655
Sharpness coefficient: 0.40
Hull speed coefficient 'M': 7.14
'Natural speed' for length: 31.61 kts
Power going to wave formation at top speed: 51 %
Trim: 63
(Maximise stabilty/flotation = 0, Maximise steadiness/seakeeping = 100)

Estimated hull characteristics & strength:
Underwater volume absorbed by magazines and engineering spaces: 76.0 %
Relative accommodation and working space: 212.7 %
(Average = 100%)
Displacement factor: 113 %
(Displacement relative to loading factors)
Relative cross-sectional hull strength: 1.00
(Structure weight / hull surface area: 218 lbs / square foot or 1,065 Kg / square metre)
Relative longitudinal hull strength: 1.02
(for 29.00 ft / 8.84 m average freeboard, freeboard adjustment 6.13 ft)
Relative composite hull strength: 1.00


Lion class, UK Battelship laid down 1936

Displacement:
119,296 t light; 125,220 t standard; 142,992 t normal; 156,637 t full load
Loading submergence 3,740 tons/feet

Dimensions:
1,199.00 ft x 166.00 ft x 47.00 ft (normal load)
365.46 m x 50.60 m x 14.33 m

Armament:
12 - 18.00" / 457 mm guns (3 Main turrets x 4 guns, 2 superfiring turrets)
20 - 5.25" / 133 mm guns (10 2nd turrets x 2 guns)
150 - 1.56" / 40 mm AA guns
175 - 0.80" / 20 mm guns
Weight of broadside 36,769 lbs / 16,678 kg

Armour:
Belt 18.50" / 470 mm, ends unarmoured
Belts cover 100 % of normal area
Main turrets 22.50" / 572 mm, 2nd turrets 5.25" / 133 mm
AA gun shields 1.00" / 25 mm, Light gun shields 2.00" / 51 mm
Armour deck 10.00" / 254 mm, Conning tower 25.00" / 635 mm
Torpedo bulkhead 5.66" / 144 mm

Machinery:
Oil fired boilers, steam turbines,
Direct drive, 6 shafts, 358,316 shp / 267,304 Kw = 32.00 kts
Range 29,000nm at 15.00 kts

Complement:
3,676 - 4,779

Cost:
£49.793 million / $199.174 million

Distribution of weights at normal displacement:
Armament: 4,596 tons, 3.2 %
Armour: 52,683 tons, 36.8 %
Belts: 9,478 tons, 6.6 %, Armament: 9,833 tons, 6.9 %, Armour Deck: 24,216 tons, 16.9 %
Conning Tower: 1,486 tons, 1.0 %, Torpedo bulkhead: 7,671 tons, 5.4 %
Machinery: 10,054 tons, 7.0 %
Hull, fittings & equipment: 51,763 tons, 36.2 %
Fuel, ammunition & stores: 23,696 tons, 16.6 %
Miscellaneous weights: 200 tons, 0.1 %

Metacentric height 12.3

Remarks:
Hull space for machinery, storage & compartmentation is excellent
Room for accommodation & workspaces is excellent
Ship has slow, easy roll, a good, steady gun platform
Good seaboat, rides out heavy weather easily

Estimated overall survivability and seakeeping ability:
Relative margin of stability: 1.07
Shellfire needed to sink: 222,650 lbs / 100,992 Kg = 76.4 x 18.0 " / 457 mm shells
(Approx weight of penetrating shell hits needed to sink ship excluding critical hits)
Torpedoes needed to sink: 59.4
(Approx number of typical torpedo hits needed to sink ship)
Relative steadiness as gun platform: 88 %
(Average = 50 %)
Relative rocking effect from firing to beam: 0.31
Relative quality as seaboat: 1.24

Hull form characteristics:
Block coefficient: 0.535
Sharpness coefficient: 0.38
Hull speed coefficient 'M': 7.02
'Natural speed' for length: 34.63 kts
Power going to wave formation at top speed: 44 %
Trim: 71
(Maximise stabilty/flotation = 0, Maximise steadiness/seakeeping = 100)

Estimated hull characteristics & strength:
Underwater volume absorbed by magazines and engineering spaces: 55.6 %
Relative accommodation and working space: 173.9 %
(Average = 100%)
Displacement factor: 130 %
(Displacement relative to loading factors)
Relative cross-sectional hull strength: 1.08
(Structure weight / hull surface area: 294 lbs / square foot or 1,434 Kg / square metre)
Relative longitudinal hull strength: 0.98
(for 25.64 ft / 7.82 m average freeboard, freeboard adjustment -0.14 ft)
Relative composite hull strength: 1.00


ALDERSHOT CLASS, UK CRUISER laid down 1936

Displacement:
16,483 t light; 17,173 t standard; 18,838 t normal; 20,095 t full load
Loading submergence 1,156 tons/feet

Dimensions:
877.00 ft x 70.00 ft x 20.00 ft (normal load)
267.31 m x 21.34 m x 6.10 m

Armament:
12 - 8.00" / 203 mm guns (4 Main turrets x 3 guns, 2 superfiring turrets)
12 - 4.70" / 119 mm guns (6 2nd turrets x 2 guns)
25 - 1.56" / 40 mm AA guns
35 - 0.80" / 20 mm guns
Weight of broadside 3,751 lbs / 1,702 kg
8 - 21.0" / 533.4 mm above water torpedoes

Armour:
Belt 3.00" / 76 mm, ends unarmoured
Belts cover 88 % of normal area
Main turrets 4.00" / 102 mm, 2nd turrets 2.00" / 51 mm
AA gun shields 1.00" / 25 mm, Light gun shields 1.00" / 25 mm
Armour deck 2.00" / 51 mm, Conning tower 8.00" / 203 mm

Machinery:
Oil fired boilers, steam turbines,
Geared drive, 3 shafts, 109,936 shp / 82,012 Kw = 32.08 kts
Range 8,800nm at 15.00 kts

Complement:
803 - 1,045

Cost:
£7.396 million / $29.583 million

Distribution of weights at normal displacement:
Armament: 469 tons, 2.5 %
Armour: 3,106 tons, 16.5 %
Belts: 607 tons, 3.2 %, Armament: 879 tons, 4.7 %, Armour Deck: 1,498 tons, 7.9 %
Conning Tower: 122 tons, 0.6 %, Torpedo bulkhead: 0 tons, 0.0 %
Machinery: 3,085 tons, 16.4 %
Hull, fittings & equipment: 9,724 tons, 51.6 %
Fuel, ammunition & stores: 2,355 tons, 12.5 %
Miscellaneous weights: 100 tons, 0.5 %

Metacentric height 3.3

Remarks:
Hull space for machinery, storage & compartmentation is excellent
Room for accommodation & workspaces is excellent
Ship has slow, easy roll, a good, steady gun platform
Good seaboat, rides out heavy weather easily

Estimated overall survivability and seakeeping ability:
Relative margin of stability: 1.06
Shellfire needed to sink: 31,892 lbs / 14,466 Kg = 124.6 x 8.0 " / 203 mm shells
(Approx weight of penetrating shell hits needed to sink ship excluding critical hits)
Torpedoes needed to sink: 2.9
(Approx number of typical torpedo hits needed to sink ship)
Relative steadiness as gun platform: 78 %
(Average = 50 %)
Relative rocking effect from firing to beam: 0.69
Relative quality as seaboat: 1.37

Hull form characteristics:
Block coefficient: 0.537
Sharpness coefficient: 0.32
Hull speed coefficient 'M': 10.08
'Natural speed' for length: 29.61 kts
Power going to wave formation at top speed: 43 %
Trim: 57
(Maximise stabilty/flotation = 0, Maximise steadiness/seakeeping = 100)

Estimated hull characteristics & strength:
Underwater volume absorbed by magazines and engineering spaces: 73.7 %
Relative accommodation and working space: 202.0 %
(Average = 100%)
Displacement factor: 144 %
(Displacement relative to loading factors)
Relative cross-sectional hull strength: 1.21
(Structure weight / hull surface area: 151 lbs / square foot or 740 Kg / square metre)
Relative longitudinal hull strength: 0.94
(for 23.11 ft / 7.04 m average freeboard, freeboard adjustment 5.92 ft)
Relative composite hull strength: 1.00
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old May 21st, 2004, 05:51 PM
Ward Ward is online now
The sick old fart
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: West Mich
Posts: 1000 or more
With the Br. Empire dropping out of the Washington treaty like this I can see the US matching the Br. navy Ship for Ship . Also were would the New Zealand navy get the men to man its ships . As well as the rest of the empire
rember the Br. empire at the end of the war could not man all of its ships it had .

Last edited by Ward; May 21st, 2004 at 07:49 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old May 21st, 2004, 06:00 PM
David S Poepoe David S Poepoe is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: El Segundo, California
Posts: 1000 or more
Fairly, mild to extremely unrealistic. The Lion class is a bit extreme for use in European waters. It beggers the question of how either Great Britain, New Zealand and Australia would pay for, let alone man, all these ships. For India I would wonder how they would just pay for them.

I do agree with the naval historian D.K. Brown that it is likely that the British retained too many WWI era battleships. With the amount of new construction the older ships, like the Queen Elizabeth, Revenge and Repulse classes should have been scrapped.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old May 21st, 2004, 10:08 PM
Redbeard Redbeard is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Copenhagen , Denmark
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by David S Poepoe
Fairly, mild to extremely unrealistic. The Lion class is a bit extreme for use in European waters. It beggers the question of how either Great Britain, New Zealand and Australia would pay for, let alone man, all these ships. For India I would wonder how they would just pay for them.

I do agree with the naval historian D.K. Brown that it is likely that the British retained too many WWI era battleships. With the amount of new construction the older ships, like the Queen Elizabeth, Revenge and Repulse classes should have been scrapped.
The KGV's were intended to replace the R class, but war kept the R's in service until 43-44.

But back to a stronger Empire the decision to have the Pound be convertible to gold in the post war years (when Churchill was Chancellor of the Exchequer) probably damaged British and Empire economy more than WWI. And had the British earlier listened to one of her great sons - J.M. Keynes (who actually was part of the British delegation at Versailles) - the depression to a large degree could have been avoided - and an extended naval construction programme could have been an important part.

The OTL British rearmament programme started in 1936, mainly as a reaction to the Italian invasion of Abyssinia in 1935. If we have Mussolini or some other jerk do something similar earlier I guess we will also have the rearmament start earlier. The OTL 1936 programme planned to build 18 BB's before 1948 of which the KGV's were the first five, the Lion I's and Vanguard the next (as well as loads of other vessels), so in order to have them all finished by 1939 we need a major threat to the Empire in 1927. I believe Japan then was in political chaos and financially bankrupt, and Italy probably in a similar state financially- any other ideas?

Regards

Steffen Redbeard
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old May 22nd, 2004, 07:12 AM
17inc 17inc is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 280
Well lets see as to ship building. Hitlers niaze partys on the riase as in our time but hes puting more in to ship bulding from 1933 on woulds and plan Z well under way and the domions are a lot lager POD Australia has 40 million with canada 40 million all so New Zealand has 20 million and are a lot richer.

In the 19 centry the US Civil runs for all most 8 long years so pepole are looking to go some where othere then the US and one last thing the UK know of the 18inc gun ships been built in japan .
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old May 22nd, 2004, 07:56 AM
Valamyr Valamyr is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 592
What if Hitler had 13,000,000 men, 40 000 tanks, 35 000 planes incluing 12 500 jets, a fully complete Z-plan navy and 4 nukes on 22nd of june 1941? :P

Maybe mine is slightly less realistic, but not that much. Obviously, in either case, theyd wipe the floor with their opponents.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old May 22nd, 2004, 08:25 AM
David S Poepoe David S Poepoe is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: El Segundo, California
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by 17inc
In the 19 centry the US Civil runs for all most 8 long years so pepole are looking to go some where othere then the US and one last thing the UK know of the 18inc gun ships been built in japan .
The Yamato was laid down under extremely top secret measure in 1937. Which would imply that the British were laying down and planning their 18in guns far in advance - since the Lion class was laid down before the Yamato.

Just looking the thing over a bit more carefully, the British can't "pull a Rome" - whatever that means or implies - in 1929, let alone any other time. How can she? Invade the Dominions? Britain can't impress the Canadians to do anything they don't want to - mostly because of the neighbor to their south. I certainly don't see why there would be so many aircraft carriers built at a time when the true power of the aircraft carrier has not be proven yet.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old May 22nd, 2004, 09:04 AM
17inc 17inc is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 280
cant you tell the defiernts between crown colones and the dominons i never side that the pound would horsted on the dominons just on the crown colones . where a lager part of the Pops live in the Empier David s poepoe .
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old May 22nd, 2004, 11:08 AM
Anthony Appleyard Anthony Appleyard is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 532
Now find the trained crew and the fuel for all those ships.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old May 22nd, 2004, 04:06 PM
David S Poepoe David S Poepoe is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: El Segundo, California
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by 17inc
cant you tell the defiernts between crown colones and the dominons i never side that the pound would horsted on the dominons just on the crown colones . where a lager part of the Pops live in the Empier David s poepoe .
What the heck are you saying? I think the application of punctuation would allow people to make better sense of you sentences.

Yes, I do know the difference between the Crown Colonies and Dominions, but I suspect the latter has the greater population than the former.

17inc said "Lets say in 1929 the british empier pulls a Rome in making there pound the single unit for all the crown colones and by WWII she useing all the manpower for home and the empier and so you blokes know..."

Okay that would be the populations of Hong Kong, Gibralter, probably Malta, and probably the underperforming, unindustrialized Africa colonies. I have to admit that India occupies a position of neither colony or dominion. I'm fairly sure that their currancies were pretty much tied the performance of the British pound, tho if this would be a benefit economically I don't know.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old May 22nd, 2004, 05:02 PM
Flocculencio Flocculencio is offline
Friendly Forum Authoritarian
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The Serene Republic of Singapore
Posts: 1000 or more
Send a message via MSN to Flocculencio
Quote:
Originally Posted by David S Poepoe
Okay that would be the populations of Hong Kong, Gibralter, probably Malta, and probably the underperforming, unindustrialized Africa colonies.
Add Singapore, Malacca and Penang to the list of Crown Colonies (if I remember my school history lessons properly).

India was indeed neither a Crown Colony nor a dominion- in 1876 it's title became officially the Indian Empire and the Queen appointed a Viceroy to rule it. It had it's own India Office and Secretary of State which were seperate from the Colonial Office.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leo Caesius on the Khmer Rouge
The black pajamas were rather funky. It looked like the entire country had been invited to a sleepover...a sleepover of DOOM!
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old May 22nd, 2004, 11:09 PM
Sean Swaby Sean Swaby is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 234
The only other Crown Colony I can think of is Cyprus.

Now looking at a list of Crown Colonies:
Malta, Gibraltar, Cyprus, Singapore, Malacca, Penang, Hong Kong, and some (not all) African colonies: British East Africa, Uganda, Nigeria (maybe), Gold Coast, Sierra Leone, Gambia (maybe), northern Rhodesia, Nyasaland.

I pose the question on whether and how this British Empire has overcome racism by 1929. I doubt the high commanding officers in the Royal Navy will much mind the Maltese, Gibraltarians and Cypriots manning vessels (they are all European after all), or British descended East Africans or Hong Kongers. However I think they may all die of heart attacks at the sight of vessels manned by all Ibo or all Yoruba (both from Nigeria) crews.

Also forcing the crown colonies to adopt the British pound would run into several problems:
Firstly, that goes against the way the British have been administering their Empire since the early 1800s or before. The reason the British Empire lasted as long as it did and was dismantled as peacefully as it was, was because British administration was flexible. A colony could be a crown colony today, an autonomous one (with a legislative assembly) tomorrow and maybe a dominion next week. Or it could be a protectorate (like Swaziland) instead of colony. Or a mandate (e.g. Tanganyika). Adopting the pound in a case like Jamaica would be foolish as the country went from autonomous colony with it own legislative assembly to crown colony (rule from London) and back to having its own assembly again and all in less that 15 years during the 1800s. In that case the colony would have its own currency, be forced to adopt the pound and then regain its currency. Sounds like an economic rollercoaster.
Secondly, forcing the adoption of the pound would only increase anti-imperial/anti-colonial/anti-British sentiment since a local currency was a symbol of autonomy and be forced to adopt another currency is only sure to stir up nationalistic feelings. This will only weaken the British Empire, not strengthen it. On the surface the Empire would look more united, but beneath it would probably to start to rot.
Thirdly, adoption of the pound could have some serious economic consequences. If the local people prefer their old currencies and continue to use them, then the supply of The Pound would increase, but demand would not and so the pound may lose some of its value relative to other currencies. And what of cases where the local currency may have been slightly stronger than the Pound? I doubt the local people would want to change to the Pound.
And if memory serves me correctly, Scotland prints its own local Pound and it would look a bit silly to enforce the Pound on the Crown Colonies, when the Pound is not the sole currency of the UK itself. And look on the Crown Dependencies (as opposed to Colonies) which were in a special relationship with Britain, e.g. Isle of Man, the Channel Islands. These are closer physically to the UK (and many outsiders consider them a direct part of the UK- how mistaken they are) and they have their own currencies.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old May 22nd, 2004, 11:54 PM
Archangel Michael Archangel Michael is online now
Dirk Diggler
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Cornell (the other Cornell, you bastards)
Posts: 1000 or more
Send a message via Skype™ to Archangel Michael
Quote:
Originally Posted by 17inc
12 32KTS FAST Lion Class 18” GUN SHIPS
The British wouldn't even of got one done.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 17inc
6 KGV CLASS BATTELSHIPS BUILT AT QUEBEC
Could the Canadians even build these things, much less man them?

Quote:
Originally Posted by 17inc
7 KGV CLASS BULT AT BOMBAY & CALCUTTA
Same argument as Canada

Quote:
Originally Posted by 17inc
6AUSTRAIAN NAVY 15” GUN KGV CLASS BATTLESHIPS ALL 6
SHIPS LAID DOWN AT JERVIS BAY NSW AUSTRALIAN
Same argument as Canada

Quote:
Originally Posted by 17inc
3 KGV CLASS BATTLESHIPS BUILT IN WELINGTON
Same argument as Canada
__________________
A Brother to Dragons
The Eschatology and Apocalypse of St. Michael the Archangel

In the Court of the Winter Queen
A Brother to Dragons side story
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old May 23rd, 2004, 12:19 AM
Tom_B Tom_B is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1000 or more
Ze Plane, Ze Plane

More SuperFleet fantasies.

What is interesting to carry the absurdity further and posit that the buildup is all naval--esp. the heavy surface ships which is just so damn important in SuperFleet fantasies, but Army and RAF are not any stronger. We can have a situation where

NOBODY COMES OUT TO PLAY

That is Hitler decides the Kriegsmarine cannot compete on the surface and emphasizes U-Boats and airpower. Italy decides either not to get involved or if it does get involved abandons Africa and pursues a fleet in being policy, hoping for the war to be won in Russia. America is po'd because the RN forced them to play SuperFleet as well so Lend Lease and other support is much smaller if at all. There is a limit to Japanese stupidity so they behave themselves. This is still World War II so Nazis lose eventually but it has more to do with T-34s than 18" gunned SuperFleet battleships which end up as razor blades in the mid 1950's never having fired a shot in anger.

Welcome to Springsharp Island.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old July 19th, 2006, 10:15 AM
NapoleonXIV NapoleonXIV is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: America, Home of the fee and the knave
Posts: 1000 or more
Hitller isn't blind or foolish. He can see all this buildup and realizes he can't match it.

So he doesn't try. He notes how well the Uboat did in WWI and builds lots more of them, and bigger with better torpedoes; the kind that can sink even big BBS.

When war comes he bottles up the RN in harbor and does a much more effective job of sinking food coming from the US. Starvation forces the British surrender by 1943.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old July 19th, 2006, 10:28 AM
OperationGreen OperationGreen is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 633
Quote:
Originally Posted by NapoleonXIV
Hitller isn't blind or foolish. He can see all this buildup and realizes he can't match it.

So he doesn't try. He notes how well the Uboat did in WWI and builds lots more of them, and bigger with better torpedoes; the kind that can sink even big BBS.

When war comes he bottles up the RN in harbor and does a much more effective job of sinking food coming from the US. Starvation forces the British surrender by 1943.
Long Lance? Maybe get some off the Japs..
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old July 19th, 2006, 10:30 AM
Floid Floid is offline
Sudan's Only Gymnast
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 830
Quote:
Originally Posted by NapoleonXIV
When war comes he bottles up the RN in harbor and does a much more effective job of sinking food coming from the US. Starvation forces the British surrender by 1943.
Wouldn't Germany deliberately sinking US merchant ships cause an entry into the war by the Americans? And anyway, it's not like this is going to butterfly away Pearl Harbour. Why would the British surrender in 1943?
__________________
This is the best signature in the history of Earth.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old July 19th, 2006, 10:44 AM
NapoleonXIV NapoleonXIV is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: America, Home of the fee and the knave
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Floid
Wouldn't Germany deliberately sinking US merchant ships cause an entry into the war by the Americans? And anyway, it's not like this is going to butterfly away Pearl Harbour. Why would the British surrender in 1943?
Because they've got nothing to eat.

Churchill once said that the only time he thought the British might lose the war was when it seemed they were losing the Battle of the Atlantic. Of course, he also said that his main worry was that the US would not enter the war eventually.

I think the Germans would still lose, but to the US and Russia.

Hopefully, Britain would scuttle her fleet before giving it to the Germans.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.