Go Back   Alternate History Discussion Board > Discussion > Alternate History Discussion: Before 1900

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old December 12th, 2008, 09:04 AM
Don_Giorgio Don_Giorgio is online now
Praefectus Praetorio Orientis
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Athens Greece
Posts: 1000 or more
Send a message via MSN to Don_Giorgio Send a message via Yahoo to Don_Giorgio
WI General Sharhbaraz attacked Heraclius in 628 AD?

During Heraclius's campaign in Persia in the 620s, mutual suspicion arose between Khosrau II and General Shahrbaraz.... Roman agents showed Shahrbaraz letters indicating that Khosrau II was planning the general's execution. This kept one of the main Persian armies and its best general neutral during this crucial period in Egypt and didnot attacked the invading Heraclius, speeding the end of the war and the Roman victory.
WI Sharhbaraz attacked Heraclius rear and annihilated the Roman army?
How is this altering History? Any thoughts?
__________________
http://www.alternatehistory.com/disc...d.php?t=203761
Handbook of Byzantine Protocole and Ceremonies now writing Volume II (on hiatus)

Last edited by Don_Giorgio; December 13th, 2008 at 02:50 PM..
Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.