Go Back   Alternate History Discussion Board > Discussion > Alternate History Discussion: After 1900

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 16th, 2005, 05:07 PM
Kurt_Steiner Kurt_Steiner is offline
That's a years supply!
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Barcelona, Catalunya
Posts: 997
Gunships in Eastern Front long nights

I have sometimes wondered, would it had been worthwile.

In eastern front night-fighter opposition was very low, and nights were long during the winters. Germans were many times forced to man the front with outposts in circle defence, as there weren't ever enough men to man an continuous HKL. Reinforcing those outposts was troublesome if they were attacked, because long distances and lack of roads, liming the usefullness of fast motorized troops, even if they were available (and also were vulnerable to attack).

Soviet themselves used effectively the light bombers Po-2 and R-5 to harass Germans, and Germans responded by similar night harassment units.

But would an concept more than harassment been worthwile ??

You know the concept - an AC-47. In eastern front it would had ofcourse been Ju-52 armed maybe with 6-10 7.92mm machineguns. Slow speed is not an concern. Reliabilily, ruggedness, short field perfomance, slow approach speed, payload capacity and endurance is there plenty. Also in outpost defence an Ju-52 could have been used for air-supply of ammunition, medical supplies, etc...

Lack of night vision would had hampered them, but on the other hand, on defence of outpost under attack the enemy could be seen easily, and everywhere in eastern front there was open fires to warm up troops during 7-8 months of year - which would had been very attractive targets for gunship. Also protection of trains and large road convoys in areas of partisan activity comes to my mind.

Ofcourse there would never had been enough of them - but i think a hundred or so in service at given time would had been very usefull.

Thoughts ??
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old January 17th, 2005, 07:55 AM
Tony Williams Tony Williams is offline
Greybeard
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 740
Quite possibly, with one caveat. The first US gunships were armed with 7.62mm MGs and had no night-vision aids; they relied on flares. However, although they were very effective against infantry they suffered casualties once they came up against 23mm Flak. So they would have to choose their targets with some care.

Tony Williams: Military gun and ammunition website and discussion
forum
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old January 17th, 2005, 08:06 AM
Kurt_Steiner Kurt_Steiner is offline
That's a years supply!
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Barcelona, Catalunya
Posts: 997
I think the concept would work. Combine it with flare-dropping and small incendiary bombs to start fires in the target area, and it should be possible to get results.

Also, tt would have lasted during the time the Russians have needed to develop their own night figthers or purchasing the technology from the Western Allies. However, in the radar/elint/ecm/communications/navigation -equipment the Soviets were hopelessly out of the game. Western allied had it all, but when same time in the middle of bomber campaign over Germany and U-boat war - I think there would had been very little they can do to help the Soviets until 1944/45.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.