Go Back   Alternate History Discussion Board > Discussion > Alternate History Discussion: Before 1900

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 13th, 2004, 08:22 PM
tom tom is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Twinsburg, Ohio
Posts: 1000 or more
WI Jesus of Nazareth never born?

Well, what would the world be like? WouldTHIS make us Mithraic?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old January 13th, 2004, 08:33 PM
Norman Norman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 1000 or more
Tom-
Anything is possible, but remember that Christianity and Mithrism were only two of a whole bunch of religions competing for the attentionof the Romans.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old January 28th, 2012, 01:28 AM
TeddyBear TeddyBear is offline
Actually, I feel stuffed
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 33
Consider the time period, the hebrews had been looking for a messiah for centuries, and they were attempting to fight/ignore/live with Roman occupation.
John the Baptist was considered to beh the messiah at one point, but said something like 'i prepare for the one that comes after me'.

It is quite possible that the hellenist faction of judaism that becomes christianity (christ being derived from the greek for king) could have coalesced around John the Baptist, or Simon the Zealot (who was a champion of resisting Roman rule) or even someone on the Sanhedrin council.

I do find it quite interesting that the New Testament of the christian Bible covers only about a month of the live of Jesus, and the Gospels that cover that was not even writtten by the man himself. The rest of the book is focused on the works of the disciples, whose writings and letters made up the character of hellenist judaism/orthodox christianity/catholic church for the first century or so.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old January 28th, 2012, 01:34 AM
Velasco Velasco is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 1000 or more
Why is that interesting? Four separate biographies written by eye-witnesses or on second-hand account of eye-witness written within a generation is almost ASB - compare how many similar sources we have for Alexander the Great and various others.
__________________
Currently working on the 2013 Turtledove New Ancient Award-Winning:
After Actium: Two Caesars Are Not Enough
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old January 28th, 2012, 03:25 AM
scholar scholar is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Velasco View Post
Why is that interesting? Four separate biographies written by eye-witnesses or on second-hand account of eye-witness written within a generation is almost ASB - compare how many similar sources we have for Alexander the Great and various others.
No.

While it is true a number of famous people had their biographies recorded long after their death inside the west, inside the East most of the biographies of important individuals actually were being written near or a few years after their demise. In particular the SGZ was written by Chen Shou, a contemporary historian who wrote his works based on already written court sponsored biographies. There is no reason that four simple biographies written withing a generation of the events that define their religion and beliefs would be ASB. A number of Holy Texts, containing far more words, were written in less time.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old January 28th, 2012, 06:02 AM
LSCatilina LSCatilina is offline
Gremlin from the Kremlin
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Patria Linguae Occitanae
Posts: 1000 or more
Send a message via Skype™ to LSCatilina
Why ASB? Two words : Flavius Josephus.

Basically, no mention of Jesus or any equivalent religious leader, well except the parts we know for sure being added by Christians.

Or, and "divine powers", "son of God", etc. If you're believing in it, it's okay but it's still ASB by definition.
__________________
Eagles and Hawks - Updated 19 January - Two crowns for a vanished kingdom
Glossary
DeviantArt

Quote:
Originally Posted by Color-Copycat View Post
I came, I saw, I wtf'ed
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old January 28th, 2012, 05:19 PM
Velasco Velasco is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by scholar View Post
No.

While it is true a number of famous people had their biographies recorded long after their death inside the west, inside the East most of the biographies of important individuals actually were being written near or a few years after their demise. In particular the SGZ was written by Chen Shou, a contemporary historian who wrote his works based on already written court sponsored biographies. There is no reason that four simple biographies written withing a generation of the events that define their religion and beliefs would be ASB. A number of Holy Texts, containing far more words, were written in less time.
In comparison to the number of Kings and Queens whose existence can be ascertained from sometimes a single coin, having four incredibly complete eye-witness/first-hand biographies written within a generation of events is ALMOST so fantastical as to be ASB. To then have a ridiculous amount of copies of said biographies in various languages, from Ethiopia to Gaul, allowing us to compare and determine exactly the content of the original text, is also fantastical.

@Teddybear: The Gospels do not talk about only a month of Jesus' life. Between them they talk about his ancestry, his parent's marriage, his birthplace, siblings, childhood in Egypt, and then a three year ministry all around Judaea and Samaria.
__________________
Currently working on the 2013 Turtledove New Ancient Award-Winning:
After Actium: Two Caesars Are Not Enough
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old January 28th, 2012, 02:58 PM
CalBear CalBear is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: In a house on Sol-3
Posts: 1000 or more
EIGHT years?

Really?

This is, no question, the oldest thread ever resurrected (sort of ironic, considering).

This sort of thing is seriously looked down on here. The exception is if you actually have something significant to add, even then it is far better to start a new thread.

Please keep this in mind.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TeddyBear View Post
Consider the time period, the hebrews had been looking for a messiah for centuries, and they were attempting to fight/ignore/live with Roman occupation.
John the Baptist was considered to beh the messiah at one point, but said something like 'i prepare for the one that comes after me'.

It is quite possible that the hellenist faction of judaism that becomes christianity (christ being derived from the greek for king) could have coalesced around John the Baptist, or Simon the Zealot (who was a champion of resisting Roman rule) or even someone on the Sanhedrin council.

I do find it quite interesting that the New Testament of the christian Bible covers only about a month of the live of Jesus, and the Gospels that cover that was not even writtten by the man himself. The rest of the book is focused on the works of the disciples, whose writings and letters made up the character of hellenist judaism/orthodox christianity/catholic church for the first century or so.
__________________
Eddie would go!


Rule # 32: Gotta enjoy the little things!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old January 28th, 2012, 03:05 PM
MerryPrankster MerryPrankster is offline
www.accordingtoquinn.com
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by CalBear View Post
EIGHT years?

Really?

This is, no question, the oldest thread ever resurrected (sort of ironic, considering).

This sort of thing is seriously looked down on here. The exception is if you actually have something significant to add, even then it is far better to start a new thread.

Please keep this in mind.
Oops. Didn't see the date.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old January 28th, 2012, 02:48 AM
Lord Grattan Lord Grattan is offline
quinquagenarian
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Michigan USA
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by tom View Post
Well, what would the world be like? WouldTHIS make us Mithraic?
Two recent threads might shed some light the topic ...

Jesus Was Never Born:
http://www.alternatehistory.com/disc...d.php?t=222756

Jesus Christ Dies At Child Birth:
http://www.alternatehistory.com/disc...d.php?t=217831
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old January 28th, 2012, 02:52 AM
CandyDragon CandyDragon is offline
The Righteous Man
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Too far away
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord Grattan View Post
Two recent threads might shed some light the topic ...

Jesus Was Never Born:
http://www.alternatehistory.com/disc...d.php?t=222756

Jesus Christ Dies At Child Birth:
http://www.alternatehistory.com/disc...d.php?t=217831
Maybe there should be an index of threads like this, just like they have about seamammal threads in the Post 1900 forum.
__________________
Consistere contra adversa fata: Pertinax and the Praetorians 2.0
Quote:
Originally Posted by Burton K Wheeler View Post
THIS IS NOT THE LESBIAN SEX ROLEPLAYING BOARD
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old January 28th, 2012, 07:44 AM
HeWhoIsMe HeWhoIsMe is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 80
Quote:
Originally Posted by tom View Post
Well, what would the world be like? WouldTHIS make us Mithraic?
Since conditions were ripe for the emergence of another great monotheistic religion in the Mediterranean basin, around the time that Jesus emerged in world history, I'm thinking it is quite possible that things wouldn't be radically different today.

There could have been some other, equally charismatic, Jewish preacher, to take up the mantle of divine messenger and preach equal rights and love universal to the Hebrews. There was a ton of them back then, active mostly, in and around Judaea.

If one of them alt-Jesuses gain support among the people, it is not unreasonable to assume that there is a slight chance, they could go on to be the founding figureheads of a universal monotheistic religion like the J-man was. Provided they also get the PR and logistics support that J-man could rely on the Apostles for.

What kind of a religion would it be? Probably some alteration or evolution to the original hebrew faith as is Christianity.
It could have had a stronger flavour of magic and mirale working as well as stronger Bhaalist references if, for instance, Simon the Magus, was the one to head the nascent religion.
Still, I believe, that in its principles this alternate religion wouldn't be all that much alien to a modern Christian. Not if it wanted to survive and thrive.

Mithraism now...I'm not quite sure about this. I think Mithraism was more of a religion for the Roman military upper-class, although common people were known to attend Mithraic mysteries and congregations. I'm not sure it could ever attain the wide-spread appeal Judaeo-Christianity has among the people.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old January 28th, 2012, 05:17 PM
Enigmajones Enigmajones is offline
Human Male
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Look behind you
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by tom View Post
Well, what would the world be like? WouldTHIS make us Mithraic?
Well I expect Brian of Bethlehem will finally get his due.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.