Go Back   Alternate History Discussion Board > Discussion > Alternate History Discussion: After 1900

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 26th, 2012, 07:59 AM
masteroftheveiledthreat masteroftheveiledthreat is offline
Kicked
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 286
Adolf and amphetamines

It is almost certain that Hitler took a lot of amphetamines and downers the last few years of his life. What if he never took any amphetamines or anything like them, what difference would it have made?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old June 26th, 2012, 07:38 PM
Michel Van Michel Van is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Liege Belgium Europe
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by masteroftheveiledthreat View Post
It is almost certain that Hitler took a lot of amphetamines and downers the last few years of his life. What if he never took any amphetamines or anything like them, what difference would it have made?
He got allot of the stuff in his blood, but the problem is that Hitler not take them self.
It was his doctor Theodore Morell who inject "Vitamultin" into Hitler posteriors
"Vitamultin" was mixture of amphetamines.
because of this Morell nickname was "Reichsspritzenmeister" (eng: The Reich's Injections Master)
by the way
doctor Theodore Morell also prescribe pills for Hitler
at end of War Hitler taking 28 different pills a day
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old June 27th, 2012, 04:53 PM
Dave Howery Dave Howery is offline
laughs at your pain
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Cheyenne WY
Posts: 1000 or more
from what I've read, Morell was a whopping quack of a doctor. Among the things he prescribed for Hitler was very hot baths and injections of diluted strychnine (!)
__________________
Never underestimate the power of a dark clown
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old June 27th, 2012, 05:22 PM
Tongera Tongera is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Bristol, Great Britain
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Howery View Post
from what I've read, Morell was a whopping quack of a doctor. Among the things he prescribed for Hitler was very hot baths and injections of diluted strychnine (!)
No quack, more reasonable Hitler?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old June 27th, 2012, 05:52 PM
BlondieBC BlondieBC is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tongera View Post
No quack, more reasonable Hitler?
Yes, that is a logical conclusion.

What % of people make better decision as drug addicts than before they became addicted? Very close to 0.
__________________
Prince Henry of Prussia: The Rise of the U-Boat
http://www.alternatehistory.com/disc...d.php?t=225455
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old June 28th, 2012, 12:21 AM
Cook Cook is offline
Maybe I will
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Beyond the black stump
Posts: 1000 or more
It is also worth noting that British Prime Minister Anthony Eden was taking large doses of an amphetamine and barbiturate combination called Drinamyl during the Suez Crisis. Drinamyl was banned in 1978, among its side effects are listed that is can cause impaired judgement, paranoia and detachment with reality.

And of course John Kennedy was was receiving regular large injections of amphetamine from Dr Jacobson (“Dr Feelgood”) during the Cuban Missile Crisis.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Georgepatton View Post
Operation Seacamel?!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Emperor Julian View Post
Berlusconi for Pope: Why let the Church's collapse be slow?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyr View Post
a fairly realistic take on a zombie apocolypse
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old June 28th, 2012, 02:34 AM
mosodake mosodake is offline
孟宗竹
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Berkeley, CA
Posts: 347
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Howery View Post
from what I've read, Morell was a whopping quack of a doctor. Among the things he prescribed for Hitler was very hot baths and injections of diluted strychnine (!)
Strychnine, like amphetamines, acts as a stimulant at low doses. Athletes used to take it to improve endurance. They used to give it to racehorses as well.
__________________
My timeline: An Austronesian Taiwan http://www.alternatehistory.com/disc...d.php?t=165965
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old June 28th, 2012, 04:35 PM
Dave Howery Dave Howery is offline
laughs at your pain
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Cheyenne WY
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by mosodake View Post
Strychnine, like amphetamines, acts as a stimulant at low doses. Athletes used to take it to improve endurance. They used to give it to racehorses as well.
maybe, but if a doctor told me that he was going to give me an injection of strychnine because it was good for me, I'd at least get a second opinion. Apparently, one of the reasons Morrell gave him the injections was because, along with all the other abuse Hitler did to his health, he also got by on very little sleep every night...
__________________
Never underestimate the power of a dark clown
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old June 28th, 2012, 05:11 PM
BlondieBC BlondieBC is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Howery View Post
maybe, but if a doctor told me that he was going to give me an injection of strychnine because it was good for me, I'd at least get a second opinion. Apparently, one of the reasons Morrell gave him the injections was because, along with all the other abuse Hitler did to his health, he also got by on very little sleep every night...
But were the dangers understood back then?

The questions is more would your grandfather or great-grandfather have refused the shot?
__________________
Prince Henry of Prussia: The Rise of the U-Boat
http://www.alternatehistory.com/disc...d.php?t=225455
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old July 1st, 2012, 08:56 AM
masteroftheveiledthreat masteroftheveiledthreat is offline
Kicked
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 286
Maybe I should have mentioned this was inspired by "The medical casebook of Adolf Hitler : his illnesses, doctors, and drugs" by Leonard L. Heston. Very interesting.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old July 1st, 2012, 01:48 PM
Snake Featherston Snake Featherston is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Lake Charles, Louisiana
Posts: 1000 or more
None whatsoever as Hitler retaining all centralized power in his hands is strategically unworkable and by 1944 the gap in favor of the Allies is incapable of changing in the favor of the Axis regardless of what the Axis do or do not do.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old July 1st, 2012, 02:01 PM
Snake Featherston Snake Featherston is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Lake Charles, Louisiana
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tongera View Post
He could have avoided the pressure if he wasn't an idiot (war with the USA (largest industrial power), UK (largest navy and Emprie) and the Soviet Union (largest land army)).
Hitler has a major dilemma here, however.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tongera View Post
I agree with you about bringing Germany back into a great power. He was still an idiot for fighting three of the powers i mentioned at the same time.
For you see Hitler didn't want to defeat the UK and destroy the British Empire, as he made clear over and over again. But he also didn't rate the USA very highly as a military power (which to be fair, the US Army did display major weaknesses in force structure, especially in infantry, but it didn't matter in terms of WWII as it was), while he was guaranteed unless he had really, really, really, really, really, really fucked up the invasion of France to go to war with the Soviet Union. An invasion that as he deliberately sets it up, he can only fail and leave himself in an impossible situation of waging a major unwinnable war in the East while facing the impending catastrophe in the West.

If Nazis weren't real, they'd be called a near-perfect situation for a novel, the villains just threatening enough to scare the pants off of everyone but for inherent reasons incapable of ever closing their victories fully. Like if someone had tried to take High Fantasy Dark Lords and make them real life rulers of a state subject to the rules of logistics and the iron law of attrition.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old July 1st, 2012, 03:01 PM
jmc247 jmc247 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snake Featherston View Post
For you see Hitler didn't want to defeat the UK and destroy the British Empire, as he made clear over and over again. But he also didn't rate the USA very highly as a military power (which to be fair, the US Army did display major weaknesses in force structure, especially in infantry, but it didn't matter in terms of WWII as it was), while he was guaranteed unless he had really, really, really, really, really, really fucked up the invasion of France to go to war with the Soviet Union. An invasion that as he deliberately sets it up, he can only fail and leave himself in an impossible situation of waging a major unwinnable war in the East while facing the impending catastrophe in the West.
It wasn't the American troops that were the real threat to Germany it was the massive aid to the Soviets and the UK through Lend Lease. What most people don't get is that was coming in if Hitler did or did not declare war on the US he still would have lost. He did so he could get at those ships openly. He vastly overestimated the abilities of his U-Boat fleet. I actually suspect Hitler wouldn't have declared war after Pearl Harbor if the U.S. hadn't just given the Soviet's Lend Lease and multi billion dollar loans. Hitler wasn't that demented and insane as of 1941, but there were certainly signs he was becoming demented. Amphetamines was actually a pretty common treatment for Parkinsonian dementia back then as they had no real treatment for it.

Lend Lease made certain defeat for Germany if the U.S. did or did not enter the war, without it Germany could have fought the Soviet's and the UK to a draw and held on to a good chunk of Europe

Last edited by jmc247; July 1st, 2012 at 03:07 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old July 3rd, 2012, 09:27 AM
masteroftheveiledthreat masteroftheveiledthreat is offline
Kicked
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 286
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmc247 View Post
It wasn't the American troops that were the real threat to Germany it was the massive aid to the Soviets and the UK through Lend Lease. What most people don't get is that was coming in if Hitler did or did not declare war on the US he still would have lost. He did so he could get at those ships openly. He vastly overestimated the abilities of his U-Boat fleet. I actually suspect Hitler wouldn't have declared war after Pearl Harbor if the U.S. hadn't just given the Soviet's Lend Lease and multi billion dollar loans. Hitler wasn't that demented and insane as of 1941, but there were certainly signs he was becoming demented. Amphetamines was actually a pretty common treatment for Parkinsonian dementia back then as they had no real treatment for it.

Lend Lease made certain defeat for Germany if the U.S. did or did not enter the war, without it Germany could have fought the Soviet's and the UK to a draw and held on to a good chunk of Europe
OK, now if the Nazis don't declare war on the USA after Pearl Harbor how does FDR sell continuing Lend Lease when its getting whammed by Japan?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old July 2nd, 2012, 04:05 PM
Urban fox Urban fox is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: The Grand Duchy of Kilmarnock
Posts: 1000 or more
Send a message via MSN to Urban fox
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snake Featherston View Post
Hitler has a major dilemma here, however.



For you see Hitler didn't want to defeat the UK and destroy the British Empire, as he made clear over and over again. But he also didn't rate the USA very highly as a military power (which to be fair, the US Army did display major weaknesses in force structure, especially in infantry, but it didn't matter in terms of WWII as it was), while he was guaranteed unless he had really, really, really, really, really, really fucked up the invasion of France to go to war with the Soviet Union. An invasion that as he deliberately sets it up, he can only fail and leave himself in an impossible situation of waging a major unwinnable war in the East while facing the impending catastrophe in the West.

If Nazis weren't real, they'd be called a near-perfect situation for a novel, the villains just threatening enough to scare the pants off of everyone but for inherent reasons incapable of ever closing their victories fully. Like if someone had tried to take High Fantasy Dark Lords and make them real life rulers of a state subject to the rules of logistics and the iron law of attrition.
I think Stalin fits that bill, he was both sane & utterly evil with a mostly sane goverment under him acting for logical reasons (at least insofar as sustaining his own power was concerned). Hitler and his goons were a bunch of nutcases.
__________________
Quote:
aktarian on anti-Soviet propaganda

Really? I thought it was Trotsky at first but since he has clothes on that couldn't be him
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.