Go Back   Alternate History Discussion Board > Discussion > Alternate History Discussion: After 1900

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 19th, 2012, 09:02 AM
Adler17 Adler17 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1000 or more
WI U-203 had sank USS Texas

Quote:
1941

U-203 encountered the US battleship USS Texas and its destroyer screen on Neutrality Patrol about 800 miles south-southeast of Iceland. The U-boat followed the ship for over 20 hours and Mützelburg identified her clearly. He even tried to get in attack position because the ships were moving eastwards into the declared blockade area around Britain, but never came into firing range and stopped chasing them as they turned around.
From: Uboat.net

U-203 encountered USS Texas on June 19th. So what if USS Texas did not turn and moved into the blockade area and U-203 sank her? The USA were already fighting a kind of undeclared war against Germany. So what now?

Adler
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old June 19th, 2012, 09:10 AM
Devolved Devolved is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adler17 View Post
From: Uboat.net

U-203 encountered USS Texas on June 19th. So what if USS Texas did not turn and moved into the blockade area and U-203 sank her? The USA were already fighting a kind of undeclared war against Germany. So what now?

Adler
I wasn't aware of this one and if true then what a lost opportunity!

It would be great for everyone except the Germans and of course sailors on the USS Texas.

America would have to come into the war if A BATTLESHIP was torpedoed and sunk. They could overlook a destroyer or two but not the USS Texas. The vote for war would be less than for Pearl Harbor but it would be enough. It also comes 3 days before Barbarossa. What does Hitler do then?

A rather amusing problem I think.The U boat captain is either greeted as a hero on his return or gets a firing squad!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old June 19th, 2012, 09:17 AM
corditeman corditeman is offline
Corditeman
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Dalbeattie, Scotland
Posts: 1000 or more
Cool U-203 in trouble...

...Escort force would probably sink the submarine.

Diplodisaster for Germany - whether immediate US declaration of war is unclear because Wilson was a wuss.

Lloyd-George complained that at Versailles he had Jesus Christ (Wilson) on one side of him and the Devil (Clemenceau) on the other. No wonder the Treaty of Versailles was such a mess...
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old June 19th, 2012, 09:18 AM
Devolved Devolved is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by corditeman View Post
...Escort force would probably sink the submarine.

Diplodisaster for Germany - whether immediate US declaration of war is unclear because Wilson was a wuss.

Lloyd-George complained that at Versailles he had Jesus Christ (Wilson) on one side of him and the Devil (Clemenceau) on the other. No wonder the Treaty of Versailles was such a mess...
Wrong war.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old June 19th, 2012, 09:31 AM
MattII MattII is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 1000 or more
Roosevelt gets his casus belli, and the Pacific War is possibly averted after Japan realises that the the US aren't going to cry mother over losing battleships, they're going to fight even more fiercely.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old June 19th, 2012, 09:52 AM
Shaby Shaby is offline
Sontaran
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Flagship "Undefeatable" of the Battlefleet Ib
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by MattII View Post
Roosevelt gets his casus belli, and the Pacific War is possibly averted after Japan realises that the the US aren't going to cry mother over losing battleships, they're going to fight even more fiercely.
I do not think it would alter that much of Japanese outlook. They wagered their victory more on territorial gains and setting up impenetrable defensive barrier than on sinking fleet units. To them the latter was just a means to get to the former. They might even get encouraged by the fact that US attention is getting focused on Atlantic.

Provided U-Boat captain being so dimwit as to not recognize a US ship when he saw one, then all sorts of unpleasant things will ensue. Unpleasant that is, for Germany. Overall, I do not see US being able to do anything much earlier than it actually did OTL. Additional 5 months of full scale preparation might bring D-Day in May '44. Of course weather permitting. Maybe Africa gets secured before '42 runs out. All of those in itself welcome but not overall game changing differences.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by sharlin View Post
'Oh damn...knew we forgot something! GUYS! WE NEED TO BUNG A CARRIER DESIGN TOGETHER ASAP!'
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old June 19th, 2012, 09:58 AM
MattII MattII is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 1000 or more
If Operation Torch goes through early, the Japanese might be given cause to think again, after all, it will prove that the US can do en masse amphibious invasions.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old June 22nd, 2012, 03:41 AM
The Kiat The Kiat is offline
Now 20% Holier!
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: The Left side of the State.
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shaby View Post
I do not think it would alter that much of Japanese outlook.
They'd have zero chance for a surprise attack is the armed forces were already at war. Since Japan and Germany had their pact going, the Navy will be keeping an eye on the Pacific. Japan would still need the oil, so maybe they can lure the 7th Fleet out to the Phillippine Sea (ala War Plan Orange) and destroy them in some really deep water.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old June 20th, 2012, 04:36 AM
hairysamarian hairysamarian is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1000 or more
It says something bad about me, or my sense of humor at least, that my first thought was, "Well, at least THIS problem goes away:" http://news.yahoo.com/100-old-battle...210525969.html
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old June 20th, 2012, 05:00 AM
MUC MUC is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 919
What if U-203 spots the Texas group at night and misidentifies it for a British battleship? Perhaps bad weather leads to the contact being made at fairly short range,
Wherr US shhip zickzacking before the DOW already?
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old June 20th, 2012, 05:00 AM
metastasis_d metastasis_d is offline
Full Battle Rattle
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Texas occupied Missouri
Posts: 1000 or more
Quote:
Originally Posted by hairysamarian View Post
It says something bad about me, or my sense of humor at least, that my first thought was, "Well, at least THIS problem goes away:" http://news.yahoo.com/100-old-battle...210525969.html
I hadn't heard about that.

Glad I've already been there plenty of times.
__________________
Basemap
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old June 21st, 2012, 09:12 AM
Cook Cook is offline
Maybe I will
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Beyond the black stump
Posts: 1000 or more
800 mile S-SE of Iceland puts the USS Texas somewhere near Ballycastle in Northern Ireland. That is considerably off track for a Neutrality Patrol, even by the navigational standards of the US navy.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Georgepatton View Post
Operation Seacamel?!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Emperor Julian View Post
Berlusconi for Pope: Why let the Church's collapse be slow?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyr View Post
a fairly realistic take on a zombie apocolypse
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.