|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Post World War III: Red Storm Rising
One thing about Red Storm Rising is that the postwar world isn't set up very much, mainly because Clancy intended it to be a one-off novel. So, any ideas about how the postwar world starts to develop? One thing that may happen: A Soviet division or Army commander comes home with a Soviet version of the "stab in the back" a la WW I in Germany, perhaps? There is one parallel: the army is defeated, and yet still occupies enemy territory at the time of the cease-fire. One can also assume that the Warsaw Pact fell apart soon after, and the Soviets decided to go home from Eastern Europe for good. But would the strain of the war, a wrecked Soviet economy, and no doubt restlesss nationalities in the USSR lead to civil strife at the very least? Maybe full-blown civil war in some locales, a la Hackett's Third World War? Have at it, folks, because Clancy sure won't.
__________________
Diplomacy is the art of telling someone to go to hell so eloquently that he packs for the trip. War is the simpler art of bringing hell to him. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Another question might be looking at how to rebuild the damage done in Germany, and the results of other actions, particularly stuff like the cruise liner in the Med hit by a SLCM, and rebuilding the losses of the allied Navies and armies. There would be a problem with demographics with the number of dead from that war.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
The URSS has basically lost the war, spent a lot of men, tank, oil, treasure and all to be back at square one in the end, with still the problem of oil production. So in a eery mix of rage for the lost war and the death toll and hardship for the cold and food scarcity an armed revolution or a civil war with a lot of ethnic strife is on schedule. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
With the Soviets having lost a good chunk of their best divisions in the European conflict, they might have difficulty suppressing Islamic uprisings in their Central Asian republics.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Another upside, if you can call it that, is the chance to reform the military into a small, highly professional force, rather than a bloated army ready to oppose the West.
__________________
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Plus there are the plucky sidekick aka the rest of the Warsaw Pact who can use the situation to dislodge themselfs from the tight embrace of Moscow expecially now that a military invasion ala Hungary is not a given |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Maybe no armed revolts in European Russia or the Far East, but the 'stans, perhaps? And the Transcaucusus region....the whole Armenia-Azeri thing might get started earlier-and there'd be plenty of combat veterans coming home that are angry, frustrated, and looking for someone to vent on. Not just in those regions, but elsewhere in the USSR, too.
And the Warsaw Pact countries have their own problems, with a USSR unwilling to intervene on the side of the Communist governments. German reunification probably within a year to 18 months, for example.
__________________
Diplomacy is the art of telling someone to go to hell so eloquently that he packs for the trip. War is the simpler art of bringing hell to him. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|