Straha
Banned
Given the previously unprecidented degree of mobilisation of African -
American troops by the North during the civil war (I undestand around
40% of the troops fighting for the north were black by the end of the
civil war .) , what if large numbers of Black soldiers had stayed and
settled in the south ? With substancial depopulation amongst southern
whites , and a large influx of Black settlers , the majority
population across large areas of the south would become Black
practically overnight .
The North , at the cost of a few weapon and large tracts of land they
didn't own or control in the first place , gets a permenant and
grateful occupation force to ensure that the south never "rises
again " , and de facto control established over large tracts of
lawless , rebel infested countryside without the necessity of
stationing massive military forces there on a permenants basis .
It also halts many of the developing racial tensions in the North by
effectively establishing an area where Blacks make up the majority .
Of course it creates waves of southern refugee's , although there
were already substancial numbers in the north anyway ...........
Can't see any major reasons why it Couldn't have happened .
Sympathy for the Rebel south was at a very low ebb and many
northerners would I think have appreciated the irony of such
a "punishment " .....
How would the establishment of large parts of the South effectively
under black domination have affected the subsiquent development and
history of the United states ?
American troops by the North during the civil war (I undestand around
40% of the troops fighting for the north were black by the end of the
civil war .) , what if large numbers of Black soldiers had stayed and
settled in the south ? With substancial depopulation amongst southern
whites , and a large influx of Black settlers , the majority
population across large areas of the south would become Black
practically overnight .
The North , at the cost of a few weapon and large tracts of land they
didn't own or control in the first place , gets a permenant and
grateful occupation force to ensure that the south never "rises
again " , and de facto control established over large tracts of
lawless , rebel infested countryside without the necessity of
stationing massive military forces there on a permenants basis .
It also halts many of the developing racial tensions in the North by
effectively establishing an area where Blacks make up the majority .
Of course it creates waves of southern refugee's , although there
were already substancial numbers in the north anyway ...........
Can't see any major reasons why it Couldn't have happened .
Sympathy for the Rebel south was at a very low ebb and many
northerners would I think have appreciated the irony of such
a "punishment " .....
How would the establishment of large parts of the South effectively
under black domination have affected the subsiquent development and
history of the United states ?