WI Germany had done everything 'right' with Enigma?

All,

I am still fascinated by Enigma and the BP efforts.

It is telling that Enigma came into play in 1920's as a commercial coding machine.

A range of things contributed to the BP successes, not least German 'sloppiness' or lack of foresight.

As I read it, even with Germany on top of the game, Enigma could still be broken but that would have been a very long process.

My good questions/WI's are then:

1) IF Germany had done everything right, would BP have made inroads before US 'mega'-bombes came into it. Raw power could have made a difference

2) IF all messages would have been secure then what?
- No Matapan?
- Battle of Atlantic? what would the sinking rate then have been especially in 1940/1
- The Med in general?
- Russia?

It can also be said that Germany might have moved to a more modern system. Logic tells me that there must have been some developments since 1920 up until 1940.

Were there alternatives to Enigma? We talk about a lot of units to be deployed, a lot of manufacturing, a lot of people to go on a new course, a lot of ... a lot of things.

A comparison may be: Let us just imagine that the entire US armed forces cancel GPS and latch on to a totally new system with new hardware and different procedures, etc.

-> not something that can be done in a day (before tea that is).

Ivan
 
one problems the Enigma had, the Wehrmacht think it's Code was unbreakable
but if you use a machine to encode, you can build a machine that decode it and that happen in Bletchley Park !

improvement
standart Enigma use 4 drums, to late in war they put fifth drum in with radical different wiring
while original design had 8 drums giving 8,419,907,243,704,320 combinations !
But the Wehrmacht was not interested in that design, because this bigger Enigma had be unhandy for use on Battlefield

the Battle of Kursk was decided by decoding the orders and messages over Enigma
the victorious Red Army had exact information what Wehrmacht wanted to do during Attack
 
How effective was Ultra in 1940? How effective was B-Dienst in 1942? How effective were the Lorenz and Siemens machines?
 
Egnima and the Battle of the Atlantic

Reading Blair's book and others, by the Fall of 43' the battle of the Atlantic was going to be won anyway by

1) HuffDuff - they could reroute the convoy away from U-Boat patrol lines(Enigma did decode the orders, but the Huff/Duff also did this).
2) Closing the Air Gap with LR Bomber
3) More Escort/Hunter Killer Group
4) Escort Carriers
5) Radar on Escort & Planes that could detect surface U-Boat over the horizon & in the dark

Where Ultra really shined was being able to read the order/coordinate of the milk cows and special mission u-boats(ie the one going to Japan) and intercept/sink them.

So without Enigma, then post Fall 43' would have a little more sinking(from a LITTLE less U-Boat sinking) but not game changer.
 
How effective was Ultra in 1940? How effective was B-Dienst in 1942? How effective were the Lorenz and Siemens machines?

The 1941 Lorenz-Schlüsselmaschine was effective
but they operators make mistake to send two 4000 characters test message with only simple coding beginning with "SPRUCHNUMMER"
the receiver had to send message back beginning with "SPRUCHNR"
you can't make easier for the genius from Bletchley Park, January 1942 they decode it


Siemens & Halske Schlüsselfernschreibmaschine T52
It was crossover of decoder and teleprinter, consider fail safe by using a teleprinter circuit and not transmit via radio.
But the Wehrmacht started to use a teleprinter circuit which ran through Sweden, to connect Norway occupation force with Wehrmacht HQ
and yes in may 1940 the Swedes tappt into line given data to Bletchley Park
but they not mannage to partly decoding the T52d
sadly inexpedient use of T52d on low level of encryption, help again allot Bletchley Park.
next to that T52 was consider as teleprinter for departments, not as coding machine for battle field.
 
There was nothing wrong with Enigma that couldn't be solved by improving operational procedures

1) Information received through less secure systems was rebroadcast without change on Enigma circuits. This allowed easy cribs of the current enigma settings.

2) When the 4th rotor was added the systems were run for a period with the 4th rotor set in a stable position. This simplified the breaking for a while and reduced the effectiveness of the 4th rotor when it was made active.

3) If there were additional rotors that could be substituted into the 3 or 4 rotor positions it would have greatly increased the possibilities that would have to be checked.

4) Finally - There was entirely too much traffic on the Naval circuits allowing other methods (traffic analysis, direction finding, etc) to be used in the North Atlantic
 
The T52 could have been an alternative, but it again would fail due German 'sloppiness'.

Taking all this out of the equation, how easily could BP crack anything?

Ivan
 
the best way would be if the germans took the example of their italian colleagues, and used one time pads

and the germans knew about it.
from the wiki on one time pads:
The German foreign office put this system into operation by 1923
 
There must be rule on this forum this question has to raised every 90 days.

Reading Blair's book and others, by the Fall of 43' the battle of the Atlantic was going to be won anyway by

1) HuffDuff - they could reroute the convoy away from U-Boat patrol lines(Enigma did decode the orders, but the Huff/Duff also did this).
2) Closing the Air Gap with LR Bomber
3) More Escort/Hunter Killer Group
4) Escort Carriers
5) Radar on Escort & Planes that could detect surface U-Boat over the horizon & in the dark

Where Ultra really shined was being able to read the order/coordinate of the milk cows and special mission u-boats(ie the one going to Japan) and intercept/sink them.

So without Enigma, then post Fall 43' would have a little more sinking(from a LITTLE less U-Boat sinking) but not game changer.

This covers it. With a degraded ability to decode Enigma encryption other information gathering methods are upgraded. Outside the battle of the Atlantic thinks like:

1. increased tactical reconissance

2. Better signals analysis (this is other than message decryption)

3. Increased/improved air recon, including photo recon

4. Improving intel analysis ability

Point here is there was room for improvement in all the Allied intel gathering & use. Without ULTRA as we know it there eis a larger incentive to improve everything else. One well know example would be the US 1st Army in the Autum of 1944. The Army G2 could be described as overdependant on ULTRA Enigma decrypts. In retrospect there were indicators from battlefield intel of a German attack pending. The individual Corps G2 sections raised questions and passed infer to 1st Army HQ. 12th Army Group G2 also passed some infer and question downwards. But, the G2 section was focused on the ULTRA info & failed to consider properly the other information/sources. Had there enot been such a dependance on ULTRA US 1st Army may have been better prepared.

The same thing occurred in Tunisia in February 1943. The Axis offensive that led to the Kasserine Pass battle was not identified via Enigma decrypts because few useful radio messages concerning the attack were sent. Most of the planning & preparation communication was done by face to face meetings or telephone. Post battle Eisenhower reviewed the intel available & decided his HQ G2 had been over dependent of ULTRA & missed warning signs. Ike replaced his intel chief.

Again, had there not been a over dependance on ULTRA/Enigma decrypts other intel available might have been recognized & the Axis attack anticipated. Note that the Soviet military forces had no access to ULTRA or any similar Enigma decrypts. They were able to develop other methods well enough to provide their commanders with solid intel on German deployments and operations.
 
Last edited:
Enigma if used properly was only breakable by using brute force and by the time 1940s computers would have broken the message the information would be too old to be useful. Unfortunately/Fortunately no matter how well disciplined and trained humans are they are not very good at sticking to the rules. If Enigma had used 5 from 8 available rotors, twin plugboards and no reflector some operator is still going to use his Dogs name to start a message. Much like nowadays when one of the most common passwords in use is "password".
 
Perhaps more important than any other use of the Enigma decrypts was in evaluating the many deception operations the Allies ran. Lacking spies inside the upper levels of German leadership or the ability to tap phone lines the west Allies depended on sifting through messages between high level HQ for clues on how the Germans saw the deception info fed to their intel organizations. As early as 1942 Allied deception ops had Hitler & Co. leaping after shadows. Without the ULTRA source it would have been much more difficult to evaluate German reactions.
 
Interesting points.

Of course true that getting a total picture of what the enemy is up to will require more than just one source of intel. I think we have overlooked this aspect a bit here.

North Africa is a good example.

Apparently Enigma intercepts were also hampered as Rommel had a tendency of lying to his superiors; hence what could be read would not necessarily match what would happen.

One wonders however:

1) IF the manufacture of bombes had been allocated to the US very early on, how many bombes (and improved design) would there have been in 1941?

2) Insofar as Germany were reading RN messages, how similar were the German organisations to BP? Were RN codes easier to break? didn't RN have an inclination that their messages were being read?

Didn't USSR get some of the message traffic pertaining to Kursk?

Is the conclusion up to this point that even if Germany had done everything right insofar as Enigma was concerned, the overall impact would not have been too dramatic.

Even if no messages were read, other means wold still have made it possible to 'guess' enemy movements with a certain degree of success?

Does this go for Battle of Atlantic as well as it is hard to spot what goes on at 'ground' level?

Ivan
 
Egnima and the Battle of the Atlantic

Even if no messages were read, other means wold still have made it possible to 'guess' enemy movements with a certain degree of success?

Does this go for Battle of Atlantic as well as it is hard to spot what goes on at 'ground' level?

Ivan
===============
Pre Fall 43' then it would result in more convoy (at least TWO, maybe more) being attacked. How many cargo ship would have been sunk, I'm not sure(don't have the books infront of me). What really would have helpd the German would be more boats on patrol & earlier working torpedoes, & Luftwaffe more allocating LR bomber to the Battle of Atlantic.

Post Fall 43' when the Allies had more resources, it wouldn't really matter.

I think U-Boat commanders sent off status reports(ie how torpedoes left, ship conditions, etc.,) to Dönitz so the Alliies were always able to triangulate positions and move convoy aound them if needed. The difference was, during the happy times, the Allies didn't know where the OTHER U-boats(beside the shadowing one) was coming from. So it lead to more Wolfpak/convoy battles since the convoy would change course then stumbe onto a group or single U-Boat. BUT once the ALLIES had more escort, airplanes and HK groups. It didn't really matter. A bunch of U-boats could try to attack the Convoys but the Allies had enough escort to keep the U-boats submerge, then the HK group would goto work and sink them.

Also, didn't the German 39-42/43 able to READ the Allies merchant codes? Which help them position the boats correct. BUT after 43, the Allies plug that intellegent hole. So Enigma or no Enigma isn't going to change that.

Now, what would be a interesting question is what if the GERMAN could cont reading the Merchant codes WITHOUT the allies reading Enigma. Could Donitz setup an intercept with one or both of the Queen troopship? They usually sail unescorted using their speed. BUT what if Donitz could position a boat exactly to get a shot off. Like the Allies did with the milk cows or the USN did to Japanese convoys(by reading Japanese messages).

What would the impact be when an ENTIRE US INF DIV personnel was lost.
 
Even if no messages were read, other means wold still have made it possible to 'guess' enemy movements with a certain degree of success?

Does this go for Battle of Atlantic as well as it is hard to spot what goes on at 'ground' level?

Short answer is yes


Also, didn't the German 39-42/43 able to READ the Allies merchant codes? Which help them position the boats correct. BUT after 43, the Allies plug that intellegent hole. So Enigma or no Enigma isn't going to change that.

Now, what would be a interesting question is what if the GERMAN could cont reading the Merchant codes WITHOUT the allies reading Enigma. Could Donitz setup an intercept with one or both of the Queen troopship? They usually sail unescorted using their speed. BUT what if Donitz could position a boat exactly to get a shot off. Like the Allies did with the milk cows or the USN did to Japanese convoys(by reading Japanese messages).

What would the impact be when an ENTIRE US INF DIV personnel was lost.

Actually there were several months in 1942-43 when both the Naval Enigma source was blacked out to the Allies, and the Convoy code was being read by the Germans. I'll have to look up the exact dates dates, but the merchant convoy code had been penetrated from sometime in mid 1942, & not closed until late winter 1943. February I think. The advent of the four rotor machines aboard the submarines blacked out that source until a combination of the newest hyper fast decryption machines from the US & Turings attack programs were available.

What was the effect? First, some of the senior British leaders like Churchill were in a panic.

Second, convoy losses on specific convoys in the mid Atlantic soared.

There are two key phrases in that 2d result. "specific convoys" and "mid Atlantic". Some of the convoys running through the north Atlantic in the winter of 1942/43 never saw a torpedo hit. Owning the convoy code did not enable every one to be intercepted. There were so many convoys running the N Atlantic only a portion could be effectively attacked. Many of the attempts failed because a "intercept line" or wolf pack could not be set up fast enough. There were not enough submarines operational to effective attack every convoy. Fact is Donitz was only able to get the results he did that winter by concentrating nearly everything available in the North Atlantic. Only a few diversionary subs were sent to the mid or South Atlantic, or to other regions.

The other point here is "mid Atlantic", the famous Mid Atlantic Gap. This was the area the Allies could not cover with the PBY or other patrol planes made available to ASW mission in 1942. Those could not cover a wide swath in the mid Atlantic. However they could cover a considerable distance from the US/Canadian east coast, and the waters from Iceland, the UK, and Bermuda. There were aircraft as early as 1939 that could patrol over this region, but they were denied to Coastal Command or the RN through opposition from the USAAF & RAF leaders. They were able to deny the Very Long Range (VLR) aircraft to Coastal Command until early 1943.

IMPORTANT POINT HERE!!!
Where the Allies could cover with air ASW patrols the German subs could no longer operate effectively. That is from the autum of 1942 ASW air patrols from the US meant constant danger of attack from aircraft, followed by surface searches/attacks. Losses were too high to justify the declining ship sinking in the regions under air coverage. Around the UK this point had been reached in early or mid 1941. The Western & Southern Approaches to the UK ports were simply too dangerous for subs to patrol in. largely because of air patrol. Those transiting these waters to the Atlantic, or the Bay of Biscay from the French ports had to transit at high speed with minimal surface time at night. It had become too dangerous to make the transit in daylight or at economical cuirsing speeds to save fuel.

So just so you don't miss the critical point here; despite having the convoy code and the submarine encryption being blacked out the German sub fleet could not effective operate under Allied ASW air coverage.

When in the late winter when the Allies 'won' the Battle of the Atlantic it was not just blacking out the convoy codes, or breaking back into the submarine version of Enigma. Air coverage of the mid Atlantic was finally accomplished. That "panic" I referred to earlier on the part of the Brit leaders forced the issue. Churchill threw every bit of his political power into ensuring a small group of 24-30 VLR planes were in Coastal Commands hands. These were naval versions of the B24 bomber & flying from the UK and Iceland they closed the gap. Imeadiatly they sank several subs, more important they forced others to dive on a daily basis, and brought surface hunter teams onto the area. Abruptly the sub commanders had difficulty forming the wolf packs into intercept lines, no longer able to run on the surface without interfeance.

This air gap was closed in March 1943 when the VLR group started patrols. In a few weeks Doneitz decided the mid Atlantic battle was going badly & ordered the wolf packs withdrawn in early April. Losses had soared in march to unsustainable levels.

To belabor the point. Even with the naval version of Enigma blacked out the German submarines could not effectively operate in regions under Allied air ASW coverage. Losses were to high and cargo ships sunk too few to justify it.

I'd recommend both 'The Battle for the Code' by Montifiore & 'The Battle for the Atlantic' by Hughes & Costello. The former is the best source on the naval code war between the Brits & Germans. The second has detailed data for cargo ships and submarines sunk, including location for each calendar quarter. Those charts clearly indicate how the Battle of the Atlantic shifted about from year to year.
 
The problem for the RN was that it simply wasnt possible to provide each Merchant Ship with the British Enigma equivalent (actually more secure) TYPEX machine. The cost would have been phenomenal plus the problem of training enough operators to use what was a very complex machine requiring regular servicing.

Merchant Book codes had to be used the codes were good but had to be kept to a limited number of messages so it could be read relatively easily by a Merchant Marine officer who might have had only a mornings training. B Dienst broke it several times because copies were obtained by Raiders from ships they captured plus the limited messages meant a cardinal sin of sending regular messages with the same number of characters.
 
Even if no messages were read, other means wold still have made it possible to 'guess' enemy movements with a certain degree of success?

Does this go for Battle of Atlantic as well as it is hard to spot what goes on at 'ground' level?

Ivan
===============
Pre Fall 43' then it would result in more convoy (at least TWO, maybe more) being attacked. How many cargo ship would have been sunk, I'm not sure(don't have the books infront of me). What really would have helpd the German would be more boats on patrol & earlier working torpedoes, & Luftwaffe more allocating LR bomber to the Battle of Atlantic.

Post Fall 43' when the Allies had more resources, it wouldn't really matter.

I think U-Boat commanders sent off status reports(ie how torpedoes left, ship conditions, etc.,) to Dönitz so the Alliies were always able to triangulate positions and move convoy aound them if needed. The difference was, during the happy times, the Allies didn't know where the OTHER U-boats(beside the shadowing one) was coming from. So it lead to more Wolfpak/convoy battles since the convoy would change course then stumbe onto a group or single U-Boat. BUT once the ALLIES had more escort, airplanes and HK groups. It didn't really matter. A bunch of U-boats could try to attack the Convoys but the Allies had enough escort to keep the U-boats submerge, then the HK group would goto work and sink them.

Also, didn't the German 39-42/43 able to READ the Allies merchant codes? Which help them position the boats correct. BUT after 43, the Allies plug that intellegent hole. So Enigma or no Enigma isn't going to change that.

Now, what would be a interesting question is what if the GERMAN could cont reading the Merchant codes WITHOUT the allies reading Enigma. Could Donitz setup an intercept with one or both of the Queen troopship? They usually sail unescorted using their speed. BUT what if Donitz could position a boat exactly to get a shot off. Like the Allies did with the milk cows or the USN did to Japanese convoys(by reading Japanese messages).

What would the impact be when an ENTIRE US INF DIV personnel was lost.

I believe the Queens were not routed with the 'Merchant Code' They were important enough that they were handled more like Navy ships complete with Naval coordinating detachments aboard. So I believe they used regular naval codes.

The other problem was that because of their speed there was no margin of error for an intercepting U-boat. The U-boat would have to be directly in the path (not a couple miles either side) in order to make a successful attack
 
and the loss of a 'queen' would mean a big loss of personnel transport capacity.
they made a lot of runs, and thus transported quite a lot of people.
 
there were a few issues with trying to prevent the cracking of the enigma:
1. Replacing them all would have been horrendously expensive (less so for the navy since they'd only have needed one for every ship), so trying to get a 4-rotor system working would have been a long-winded process that likely would have resulted in a great deal of trouble for the Germans (until you were sure everyone had a 4-rotor machine you'd have to find a way of sending a three-rotor message, thus defeating the point and giving the British a leg up on cryptanalysis for the 4-rotor)
2. There's only a certain number of rotors available, and you will have some sets near the coast, so the British will raid them as soon as they can't read the messages any more.
3. you have to let the guy on the other end know which rotors to use and what their starting positions are, and at least a part of that message can't be in code, so that offers the British another window. for this bit, that means giving them the first half of a six (or eight) letter word, with the last three (or four) letters referring to rotor positions. The key here is that the receiver operator has to work out the missing letters, but if they can do it, so can the British.
 
Last edited:
Why not skip the wireless communications all together, forgo the centralized command structure, giving instead localized control to commanders in the field? For example, without wireless communication Von Paulus could have pulled back from Stalingrad without contravening direct orders from Hitler. The u-boats could have looked for their own targets as opposed to reporting their positions back to HQ and waiting for fleet-wide orders to follow some larger plan.

I imagine once wireless communication was introduced into, for example, the Royal Navy, many older officers looked fondly back on the days when the local commander didn't need to check in with politicians and bureaucrats back home before making any decision beyond immediate tactics.
 
Why not skip the wireless communications all together, forgo the centralized command structure, giving instead localized control to commanders in the field? For example, without wireless communication Von Paulus could have pulled back from Stalingrad without contravening direct orders from Hitler. The u-boats could have looked for their own targets as opposed to reporting their positions back to HQ and waiting for fleet-wide orders to follow some larger plan.

I imagine once wireless communication was introduced into, for example, the Royal Navy, many older officers looked fondly back on the days when the local commander didn't need to check in with politicians and bureaucrats back home before making any decision beyond immediate tactics.

Problem with that the Atlantic is a massive ocean and a convoy is comparitively small. The U Boats were strung out in a patrol line. The U Boat that spotted a convoy didnt attack but trailed it radioing position and weather reports to U Boat HQ in France which then guided the Wolf Pack into position ahead of the convoy at the right time. No radio and the U Boat that spots the convoy has to attack and by the time the rest of the U Boats are warned the convoy has moved away. With the widespread use of Radar and Very Long Range aircraft or Escort Carriers the U Boat was force to submerge during the day losing most of its speed and all of its visual range.
 
Top