TLIAM - The Party's Over, a longer-lasting Phrygian dynasty

Prologue:

September 23rd/24th, 867 AD:

Michael III had retired to his chambers after a serious drinking bout with his lover Eudokia Ingerina, his sister Thekla and and his new co-emperor, Basil the Macedonian. But recently he had been troubled by matters of the church - mainly his deposition of Patriarch Ignatios, who still had supporters inside the empire, even in Constantinople. (POD) In a moment of drunken boldness, Michael added an additional lock on the inside of his bedroom door and posted four Excubitors outside, ordering two of them to remain concealed.

Later that night, Michael was roused from his sleep by the guards, who had captured four people outside the door who tried to force their way in. Michael was shaken to the core when he got a good look. Standing with swords and daggers at their feet were John of Chaldea, a minor noble, Basil, his brother Marinos, their father Bardas, and Basil's cousin Alyeon. Michael had the guards take them to the dungeon, curtly saying he would decide what to do with them later. After three days, Michael finally sentenced the conspirators. John of Chaldea was sentenced to house arrest and a fine of a hundred solidi. All members of Basil's family were removed from positions of power, Bardas was tonsured, Marinos castrated and Basil blinded. The emperor sent his sister Thekla back to the monastary, charged with adultery and turned his attention to his wife and mistress, both named Eudokia, Eudokia Ingerina now heavily pregnant. Michael still held affection for Ingerina but was unsure of her part in the attempt on his life, whereas Eudokia Dekapolitissa, his legal wife, had comforted him while he mulled over Basil's fate.

The next month, Eudokia Ingerina gave birth to a boy. Michael named him Stephen, but was unsure whether the child was his or Basil's, the same situation as Ingerina's last child, Leo*. Michael eventually decided to raise both of them as his sons, but decided to wait and see if his current marriage proved fruitless before fully legitimizing them. Michael's rationale for adopting Leo and Stephen was that Jesus was the son of God, but raised by Joseph, a mere carpenter, and look how well he turned out. Michael then turned his attention to the empire he had long neglected...

__________________________________________________
POD: IOTL, the locks were tampered with and no guards were present, giving the assassins easy entrance.

*: History is uncertain whether Leo and Stephen were the children of Michael or Basil. Basil hated both of them, had Stephen castrated and planned to blind Leo after the death of his eldest son, Constantine. I personally believe both of them were Basil's children, but for the purposes of TTL, I've decided to make them both Michael's sons, biological or otherwise.
__________________________________________________
The last emperor of the Phrygian/Amorian dynasty, Michael III 'the Drunkard', has been immortalized as a drunken, impious wastrel and playboy, especially compared to his successor and murderer, Basil I, founder of the famous Macedonian dynasty. But recently, his reputation has been vindicated.

To me, Michael III was an emperor who had yet to reach his full potential, and I really hate seeing wasted potential.

And I know I promised a TLIAM featuring Romanos IV, but my mind often wanders from idea to idea. If I can complete this by the end of the month, I'll have a go at writing the Manzikert TLIAM in November. But for now, enjoy this TL as it comes! Comments are always welcome!
 
Last edited:
Holy War, Part 1 - Deus vult!

868 - 870 AD:

Basil's attempted assassination would end up profoundly altering Michael's character. Still gregarious and lustful, he forsook all alcohol and started spending more time with Eudokia Dekapolitissa, finally consummating their marriage. Beneath the facade of a friendly emperor, Michael now didn't fully trust anyone, not with his personal secrets anyway. He still needed to afford his generals some matter of trust. How could he have been so foolish to not see Basil manipulated him into removing Bardas?

The greatest effect was that Michael came to believe it was a sign from God that he was straying from his duties, to be the servant of Christ his father and grandfather had failed to be. On New Year's Day, he summoned as many strategoi, bishops and nobles (or representatives thereof) to a banquet where he gave a speech:

"Senators, gentlemen, I stand now before you, not as a boy, but as a man, your Emperor. When I nearly lost my life, I realise now that God himself was giving me a sign that the citizens of the empire need their emperor now more than ever. In Sicily, the Mohammedens are marching on Syracuse and using the island to raid as far as Dalmatia! Tephrike and the surrounding area are in the hands of that heretic Chrysocheir! Crete, Cyprus and Cilicia have become havens for brigands, zealots and sinners! For as long as we can remember, the Mohammedens have sacked, pillaged and destroyed our lands as far as my ancestral hometown, Amorium, and our glorious capital!

My fellow Christians, we need a new armies, a new navy, and men with the courage and skill to command them. All of these we shall use for the defense of the weak and innocent, as condoned by Saint Basil of Caesarea. When this army is ready, I will set out for Asia Minor myself and confront our enemies. Remember this day, This will be a defining moment in Rome's history!"

The speech was polarizing to say the least. The idea of a 'holy war' was extremely popular with the soldiers, who were tired of losing and playing defense, the people who were tired of being raided, and the military aristocracy who were glad major action was finally about to be taken. Opposition was strongest amongst the clergy, who did not consider the shedding of blood justifiable, and the civil aristocracy, who lived in terror of the army's potential to turn on them. Regardless, Michael sent the talented admiral Niketas Oryphas to hold the line in Malta and Syracuse while he himself began organising his new army around the three guard units - the Excubitors (sentinels), Hetaireia (companions) and Hikanatoi (the Able Ones). He expanded their ranks with Armenians, Franks, Varrangoi, Lombards, Slavs - men who didn't like the civil aristocrats, hated the Mohammedans, but loved money and God. One who stood out was an Armenian named Theophylact Lekapanos, nicknamed 'the Unbearable' by his colleagues. Michael didn't trust him, but he liked him.

After nearly two years of preparation, Michael was informed by Niketas Oryphas that Malta was in danger of being lost and reinforcements were required. Michael had originally intended to sic his new army upon the Paulicians in Tephrike, but now realised he needed to secure his western flank. So he kissed his pregnant wife goodbye and set sail for Italy...
 
Last edited:
Ah, been playing Crusader Kings II recently, have you? ;) Great TL, keep up the good work.

Thanks. I'm kind of obsessed with CK2.;) To be honest, my knowledge of this time period is not too strong. The most I know of it IOTL was Patriarch Ignatios being reinstated, which won't happen here so I'm not sure if the Photian schism will move into the scale of the 1056 schism, an alliance with Constantinople and Louis II of Italy, the Anarchy of Samarra, the rise of the Bagratids and Sicily falling because Basil I diverted a relief fleet to haul marble for a church instead.
 
Normally, this would be an update, but, as I wrote earlier, my knowledge of this time period is haphazard at best, especially in regards to the Carolingian empire and it's successor kingdoms. Tomorrow, I will definitely try to post an update, but if anyone could give me some information regarding these questions, I would be most grateful:

1. I realise now I completely forgot about the Magyars. Orthodox or Catholic ITTL?

2. How vital was the alliance with Louis II in regaining territory in Southern Italy?

3. Could the Carolingian Empire be reunited permenantly as Charles 'the Fat' tried to do, or would it be impossible due to the cultural and political differences between the different Francias, combined with Salic inheritence?

4. In the last update, Michael's fleet was setting sail for Malta and Sicily, but would Crete and Cyprus, being closer to home, be the better targets?

5. I'd imagine illegitimate children of emperors had little to no claim to the imperial throne, but if, say, they were older than the legitimate heir, would they still try to press their claim? I really don't want to waste Leo and Stephen.

6. Armenia, Bulgaria, Duchy of Benevento, Serbians and Croatians - more useful as buffer states, allies or themes?

7. I have nothing against the Russians, but I am interested in exploring a surviving Khazaria, where Judaism eventually succeeds in penetrating the steppes further. Was Khazaria's fall inevitable?

Again, any comments and advice would really be appreciated.
 
Since no one seems to be interested in this TL, I have rebooted Aima! Drasis! Bloody Prophecies! and am considering abandoning this one, at least until I can get more information on the time period.
 
Also lurking. I don't know much about the Byzantines, so I can't really help out on that front, except....

1. Kind of shamanistic/pagan until the tenth century.
3. As long as Carolingian rulers had multiple sons, there was going to be partitioning galore - that was just how it worked, it was a kind of collective, clan-based Empire rather than a Capetian-style generational sequence of rulers.
4. Crete was used for raiding by the Muslims, but otherwise basically worthless in comparison with the difficulty of conquering it. Hence why nobody succeeded until Nikephoros Phokas, and even then it took years.
5. Byzantines were pretty cool about bastards, actually. In a succession crisis like this one, I don't think anyone would mind all that much. The real division was between children born before the accession of their father and the Porphyrogennetoi. Thus, Constantine VII was technically a bastard, but in 913 there was really no-one esle, and he was born in a room full of marble, after all, so why complain?
 
There's plenty of lurkers reading, we just don't much to contribute. :p

We are intrested, but we would like to see more...

Also lurking.

That's good to hear, but I think now I jumped into this particular TL without doing enough research, and now my main focus is back on Aima! Drasis! Bloody prophecies!.

I don't know much about the Byzantines, so I can't really help out on that front, except....

1. Kind of shamanistic/pagan until the tenth century.

I was actually asking if people wanted to see the Magyars convert to Catholicism or Orthodoxy. I guess the former would be more likely, even if the Carolingian Empire still fragments.

3. As long as Carolingian rulers had multiple sons, there was going to be partitioning galore - that was just how it worked, it was a kind of collective, clan-based Empire rather than a Capetian-style generational sequence of rulers.

So the best way to prevent further partitioning would be to keep the Carolingians celibate. But infant mortality rates were higher back then, so they couldn't take any chances. Perhaps an earlier cultural exchange between Constantinople and the West might make a difference in that area.

4. Crete was used for raiding by the Muslims, but otherwise basically worthless in comparison with the difficulty of conquering it. Hence why nobody succeeded until Nikephoros Phokas, and even then it took years.

Okay, so Cyprus, Sicily and Italy are bigger fish, but it's still going to be reconquered sooner or later.

5. Byzantines were pretty cool about bastards, actually. In a succession crisis like this one, I don't think anyone would mind all that much. The real division was between children born before the accession of their father and the Porphyrogennetoi. Thus, Constantine VII was technically a bastard, but in 913 there was really no-one esle, and he was born in a room full of marble, after all, so why complain?

Okay then. Looks like I'll have a bit of civil strife on my hands when I get back to this. Part of the reason I asked was because part of the reason the Carolingian Empire broke up was Charles the Fat's only son, Bernard, was illegitimate. But if a western ruler was powerful enough, would it really matter? The stability of the realm and all that.

Anyways, since my focus is back on Aima! Drasis! Bloody prophecies! V2.0, which I've also just updated (shameless plug), I might leave this TL on hold until I've done more work on that TL and am more educated on the 9th and 10th centuries.
 
Okay, having been distracted by life and my other two major TLs, this clearly won't be finished in the deadline I set for it. But I've decided to come back to it now, and I've decided to take this TL until around 913 AD, the OTL date of Alexander II's (the first Roman emperor of that name being Alexander Severus) death.

I've also edited this TL so Michael III's lawful wife, Eudokia Dekapolitissa, will have a larger role.
 
Holy War, Part 2 - Nika! Nika! Nika!

870 - 873 AD:

Michael III and his forces arrived at Malta just as the islands were about to fall completely. After driving all Aghlabid forces out, the Romans sailed north and wintered at Syracuse, the last major Sicilian city in Christian hands. From there, Messina was retaken after a siege, linking Sicily and Calabria for the first time in 28 years. A son was born during the siege by Eudokia Dekapolitissa, named Theophilos, "friend of God", but Michael had to remain with the army to ensure the army and navy cooperated. The navy under Niketas Ooryphas and the army under Michael and Theophylact Lekapenos mved west from Messina and began besieging Palermo, which fell after a dissatisfied Berber soldier was 'encouraged' to assassinate its commander. He was one of the few Muslims in the city to escape the cruelty of Niketas Ooryphas. The Aghlabid sultan, Muhammed II, offered to evacuate the island after hearing reports of the Roman slaughter, combined with reports of a strange disease spreading in his lands. Michael accepted, though it took a few more months to exterminate the last pockets of resistance - Berbers and Andalusians who refused to surrender.

873 - 878 AD:

Michael was forced to return to Constantinople when heard reports that Eudokia Ingerina was showing signs of pregnancy as well. He did remember giving her a good tumble before he left, so he could be certain the child was his. After making the governor of Syracuse the new strategos of Sicily, Michael ordered Niketas and Theophylact to jointly attack the Emirate of Bari. The emperor's ship was attacked by pirates from Crete then blow off course by a storm into the Gulf of Saros, but he and his crew persevered and Michael made it back to the capital just in time for the birth. It was a girl - Theodora.

While war raged in Italy, Michael devoted himself to the affairs of state, in particular completing a codification of laws which began under his uncle Bardas and expanding the royal brood. Taranto and Bari were recaptured and Neapolis swore fealty to the empire, but progress beyond Cannae was hindered by the Lombards of Benevento and Salerno. Just as affairs in the West were settled, trouble rose up in the East once more. Michael was determined to reclaim all of Cyprus and crush the Paulicians of Tephrike once and for all.

__________________________________________________
Children of Michael III by 878 AD:

Leo (Ing) - b. 866
Stephen (Ing) - b. 867
Theophilos (Deka) - b. 870, designated heir
Theodora (Ing) - b. 871, betrothed to Romanos Lekapenos
Bardas (Deka) - b. 874
Helena (Ing) - b. 874
Alexander (Deka) - b. 876
Anna (Deka) - b. 877
 
Top