Who should Queen Elizabeth I marry?

Elizabeth was born September 7, 1533.
She was the daughter of King Henry VIII of England and Anne Boleyn.
She became Queen of England on November 17, 1558.
She succeeded her sister, Queen Mary I.
Queen Elizabeth I decided to marry.
She received many offers of marriage.
from Duke Emmanuel Philibert of Savoy
King Philip II of Spain
Francois, Duke of Alencon
Prince Eric (future King Eric XIV) of Sweden
Who should Queen Elizabeth I marry?
 
Well who Elizabeth would marry is entirely dependent on when she marries them.
If she marries in her father's reign (unlikely, but possible): the candidates drifted between the duc d'Angoulême, and a Habsburg archduke (D. Felipe II of Spain or Ferdinand of Austria) or a Portuguese infante.
If she marries in her brother's reign (more likely, but possible): France had no of-age princes so they were reduced to fielding distaff line candidates - the duke of Ferrara, the duke of Guise etc. Spain offered Felipe II after his widowing by Maria Manuela, or the Hereditary Prince of Tuscany (Francesco de Medici). As for independent candidates, there are Eric of Sweden and the king of Denmark. Also, James Hamilton, son of the Earl of Arran was proposed.
If she marries during her sister's reign (less likely until Mary has an heir): Spain or a Habsburg relative i.e. the duke of Savoy, the duke of Lorraine, the duque of Segorbe, the hereditary prince of Tuscany, D. Carlos.
And finally if she marries in her own reign, she can marry anywhere she damn well pleases (and there were enough big powers as well as random princes like the erbprinz of Saxony, the duke of Holstein-something, Sweden, Denmark, Baden-Baden, etc).
 
Well who Elizabeth would marry is entirely dependent on when she marries them.
If she marries in her father's reign (unlikely, but possible): the candidates drifted between the duc d'Angoulême, and a Habsburg archduke (D. Felipe II of Spain or Ferdinand of Austria) or a Portuguese infante.
Don't forget her father split from the Church, Elizabeth is seen as the bastard child of Henry VIII and his heretic witch of a wife, Anne Boleyn, no Catholic prince will marry her in fear of losing the respect of the Pope.

If she marries in her brother's reign (more likely, but possible): France had no of-age princes so they were reduced to fielding distaff line candidates - the duke of Ferrara, the duke of Guise etc. Spain offered Felipe II after his widowing by Maria Manuela, or the Hereditary Prince of Tuscany (Francesco de Medici). As for independent candidates, there are Eric of Sweden and the king of Denmark. Also, James Hamilton, son of the Earl of Arran was proposed.
James would want his favourite sister, Elizabeth to marry a well to do royal, who would look after her but not dominate her, so Denmark and Sweden would work well. Francesco de Medici would be in trouble with his neighbouring catholic states if he brought a Protestant queen to the Italian peninsula.

If she marries during her sister's reign (less likely until Mary has an heir): Spain or a Habsburg relative i.e. the duke of Savoy, the duke of Lorraine, the duque of Segorbe, the hereditary prince of Tuscany, D. Carlos.
Mary would fear her sister marrying, a strong husband, who could unite the Protestant public, in a revolt again and if she forced her sister to marry a catholic, it would be an unhappy one to which Elizabeth would divorce as soon as she gained the throne.

And finally if she marries in her own reign, she can marry anywhere she damn well pleases (and there were enough big powers as well as random princes like the erbprinz of Saxony, the duke of Holstein-something, Sweden, Denmark, Baden-Baden, etc).
As queen at 25, she would have been, as she was IOTL, as sort after queen, however whoever's hand she chose could lead to disruption on the main land. A random German prince could work, but would an elector of the holy roman empire, give up his right to become Emperor for Elizabeth.
 
Don't forget her father split from the Church, Elizabeth is seen as the bastard child of Henry VIII and his heretic witch of a wife, Anne Boleyn, no Catholic prince will marry her in fear of losing the respect of the Pope.

I'm not sure I believe that. Marrying an English princess would always be a huge win for any family, religious problems or not. Especially since it would be looked at as an opportunity to put a devout Catholic monarch back on the throne. As long as said prince maintains his Catholic nature I think the Papacy would be rather pleased with the marriage.
 
King Philip II of Spain

England returns to the true faith and Elisabeths kids will rule an empire were the sun never sets. And a bit of fresh Bastard-blood would be something the Habsburg really need.
 
Last edited:
Probably Elizabeth would marry during the reign of her sister Queen Mary.
In the way that Philip had suggested to his wife, Elizabeth needed not a warder, but a husband with an iron fist. None of the English candidates was suitable [Edward Courtenay, Earl of Devon (c. 1527 – 18 September 1556), first cousin of Henry VIII; Lord Maltravers, Henry FitzAlan (1538–1556), son of Henry FitzAlan, Earl of Arundel (1512-1580) and Katherine Grey, aunt of Lady Jane Grey]. Elizabeth resided at Woodstock during the time which Mary's marriage to Philip was celebrated and consummated and a child confidently expected. Suddenly Elizabeth was summoned to Hampton Court by her sister to witness the birth of the prince who would make her politically irrelevant. This reconciliation was encouraged by Philip. At last she was admitted to Mary's presence at Hampton Court, and to an uneasy meeting on 21 May, intended to achieve reconciliation. The pregnancy was false, and her husband, who now in effect deserted her, distracted by many other imperial designs, began to see in Elizabeth, now almost beyond question the heir to the throne, a means of keeping the succession out of the hands of Mary, queen of Scots [betrothed to the Dauphin François de France, later King François II]. Paradoxically, Philip from now on kept Elizabeth, and her hopes of succeeding to the throne, alive. In October 1555 Elizabeth settled back at Hatfield, but soon she was at the centre of fresh plots, the Dudley's conspiracy of 1556, which once again involved the Earl of Devon Edward Courtenay, and in which she may have been more actively involved than in 1554. However, it was Philip, now in Brussels, who gave explicit instructions, with which Mary complied, that Elizabeth's probable guilt should not be investigated further. As a precaution, Sir Thomas Pope, a privy councillor, was installed at Hatfield to make sure that she behaved herself. Now the best way to control Elizabeth would be marriage to some foreign prince.
The perfect candidate chosen by Philip was his cousin, Emmanuel Philibert (1528-1580), prince of Piedmont and duke of Savoy, a diplomatic pawn squeezed between the Habsburg and Valois monarchs and from Philip's point of view a perfect consort (Carolly Erickson).

I would have another suggestion: Sigismund II Augustus of Poland (1520-1572).
Previously, in 1546, he was pursuing an english marriage with Mary Tudor, daughter of Henry VIII, but has not been realized.
Widower of Barbara Radziwiłł (1520-1551), Sigismund II Augustus, just to go against the will of the mother Bona Sforza (1494-1557), returns to the design of an english marriage, this time with Elizabeth.
The young Lady Elizabeth had golden red hair, eyes dark brown, nose ridged or hooked in the middle, lips rather thin, and cheek bones pronounced. Her hair was also probably naturally curly or at least wavy. She may well have had freckles on her pale skin, but like all ladies she would have taken care to avoid getting the sun on her face. Elizabeth also had exceptionally long fingers, possibly made even more striking by long finger nails. The Tudor period was an extravagant period, and vanity was perhaps a prime ingredient. Court life was flamboyant and people dressed to impress.
«Her face is comely rather than handsome, but she is tall and well-formed, with good skin, though swarthy; she has fine eyes», wrote the Venetian Ambassador, Giovanni Michiele, in 1557.

While Bona continued to lobby against the marriage and instead proposed Archduchess Catherine of Austria (1533-1572), sister of Sigismund's first wife (this marriage was a purely political union), the project liked much to Mary and Philip. Kraków was a court very rich and sophisticated, but, above all, on the edge of the world, far away from London.

Sigismund II mediated for twenty years between the Catholic Church and the Protestants. The King's marriage was a matter of great import to Polish Protestants. The Protestants hoped that Elizabeth would have a strong influence on the king and thus bring about a breach with Rome at the moment of a religious crisis and struggle in Poland. Sigismund's reign was a period of internal turmoil. He saw the introduction of the Protestant Reformation into Poland and Lithuania, and the collapse of the Commonwealth's acquisition of Livonia with the consolidation of the Lutheran power in the duchy.

In April 1557, Elizabeth's health deteriorated and she was tormented by increasingly frequent ailments. In Kraków, on 24 September 1557, as a result of a fall from a horse, the Queen Elizabeth died. There was a suspicion that she had been poisoned by the Queen Mother, Bona Sforza.
 
Ooh a Jagiellon England? That would be interesting, especially since both Siggie and Liz were adept politically. However, I'm surprised at Bona wanting a Habsburg bride for Sigismund. Oh well, live and learn.

Although when James I was born, Elizabeth commented "now the Scots queen is lighter of a fair son, while I am of barren stock". Was she referring to the fact that she didn't have children? Or do you think she knew perhaps that she couldn't have children? Also, is it possible that if there was a genetic mutation that caused her parents' to fail at having another kid, that it affected her too?
 
Don't forget her father split from the Church, Elizabeth is seen as the bastard child of Henry VIII and his heretic witch of a wife, Anne Boleyn, no Catholic prince will marry her in fear of losing the respect of the Pope.

And let's also not forget that Henry himself legally bastardized her after he annulled his marriage to Anne Boleyn [right before he executed her] and neither Edward VI or Mary I reversed Henry's stance which means that Elizabeth was considered a bastard not just by the Catholics but also by nearly everyone else. I think at best she may have been married off to some English social climbing family [ similar to the Boleyns themselves] who'd want to improve their fortunes by marrying a king's [barely]acknowledged daughter even though she would have been by no means a princess.
It was only after Elizabeth became Queen [and reversed her bastardization] that she became a 'catch' for Continental princes. :cool:
 
Although when James I was born, Elizabeth commented "now the Scots queen is lighter of a fair son, while I am of barren stock". Was she referring to the fact that she didn't have children? Or do you think she knew perhaps that she couldn't have children? Also, is it possible that if there was a genetic mutation that caused her parents' to fail at having another kid, that it affected her too?

It has been suggested that perhaps Elizabeth I never married because she knew herself to be infertile for some reason, but there's no convincing reason to suspect she was (though I suppose it's also impossible to prove she was fertile). I have also read the suggestion that her experiences at the hands of Thomas Seymour (which amounted to molestation/sexual assault/abuse) caused her to be unable to face sexual relationships.
 
And let's also not forget that Henry himself legally bastardized her after he annulled his marriage to Anne Boleyn [right before he executed her] and neither Edward VI or Mary I reversed Henry's stance which means that Elizabeth was considered a bastard not just by the Catholics but also by nearly everyone else. I think at best she may have been married off to some English social climbing family [ similar to the Boleyns themselves] who'd want to improve their fortunes by marrying a king's [barely]acknowledged daughter even though she would have been by no means a princess.
It was only after Elizabeth became Queen [and reversed her bastardization] that she became a 'catch' for Continental princes. :cool:

Liz never reversed the bastardization, AFAIR. She wanted to, as well as have her parents' marriage declared valid (much like her half-sister had done) but someone (Cecil, I think) recommended against it. However, Anne's condemnation for treason is rendered invalid by that annulment, since therefore she was not queen of England thus committing adultery was no more treasonous than any other wife. So, perhaps some suitors considered Liz "naturalized" by the last months of her parents' marriage (between Catherine of Aragon's death and Anne's own).
Bastard or no, she was regarded as being good enough for several reigning monarchs or their heirs (i.e. Felipe II, Joao of Portugal and Sigismund of Poland (all Catholics who would theoretically take issue with her bastard/ ambivalent status, and yet none did to my knowledge)).
 
On January 22, 1552 Edward Seymour the Protector died.
The leader of the Council, John Dudley, became the major force in the English Court.
John Dudley considered the possibility of Princess Elizabeth marrying Francesco d'Este, Prince of Massa Lombarda and son of Alfonse d'Este, Duke of Ferrara and Lucrecia Borgia.
 
I rather like the idea of Eric of Sweden. A union (even impermanent) between England and Sweden would be a force to be reckoned with.

Almost as interesting would be if she did marry Robert Dudley. The interesting part is mostly the continuation of the Tudor dynasty and no union with Scotland.
 
I'm not sure I believe that. Marrying an English princess would always be a huge win for any family, religious problems or not. Especially since it would be looked at as an opportunity to put a devout Catholic monarch back on the throne. As long as said prince maintains his Catholic nature I think the Papacy would be rather pleased with the marriage.

Uh, because Henry broke away from the Pope to divorce Catherine of Aragon, as far as Catholics are concerned, Elizabeth is Henry's bastard by Anne Boleyn. Plus, Elizabeth is a Protestant, so the Catholics of Europe aren't really going to want to be married to a bastard Protestant. Where is the attraction in that!? Mary was seen as legitimate because she was the daughter of Catherine of Aragon, still Henry's wife (until her death) if you ask the Pope, and she was Catholic. She looks more attractive to the Spanish, etc. (which is why it she who married the King of Spain).

I think that finding Elizabeth a match in Denmark or Sweden is a good move. Perhaps a Danish Prince, since if Elizabeth marries and there is an heir, then no James VI and I to marry Anne of Denmark.
 
Princess Elizabeth marries Francesco d'Este, Marquess of Massalombarda (1516-1578) in 1552.
Their children are:
Enrico
Maria
Ercole
Francesco
 
And let's also not forget that Henry himself legally bastardized her after he annulled his marriage to Anne Boleyn [right before he executed her] and neither Edward VI or Mary I reversed Henry's stance which means that Elizabeth was considered a bastard not just by the Catholics but also by nearly everyone else. I think at best she may have been married off to some English social climbing family [ similar to the Boleyns themselves] who'd want to improve their fortunes by marrying a king's [barely]acknowledged daughter even though she would have been by no means a princess.
It was only after Elizabeth became Queen [and reversed her bastardization] that she became a 'catch' for Continental princes. :cool:

Actually Henry restored Elizabeth (and Mary) to the succession in the Third Succession Act of 1543.
 
PoD: Manco Inca Yupanqui's attempted escape in 1535 succeeds. He ends up reaching sympathetic Portuguese folk in Brazil.

He takes a boat over to Portugal (the Azores). Portuguese want to be friendly and have the Inca on their side, so they give Manco an island in the Azores as a good gesture.

In other news, it's 1539. The six-year-old Princess Elizabeth was on a nice trip to the beach with her nannies. But suddenly! Elizabeth is sitting on a log, when a big wave comes along; and Elizabeth is gone without a trace!

A Portuguese boat is cruising along in the middle of the ocean, when they spot a little girl on a log. They pick her up, nursing her back to health. It reaches its destination in the Azores. They're not sure what to do with the girl.

But the God of Dice was on their side that day! It turns out that Manco, Inca Emperor, just happened to be a pedophile. He found the little princess, took her in, they married, and she lived to the ripe old age of 114.

What became of this curious tale, you may ask? Manco became just the first emperor of the golden Second Inca Empire in the Azores; as anyone knows the Second Inca Empire has probably been the best seafaring empire in History!

Nobody discovered the true identity of that washed-up little girl until last year. They did a DNA test, and it turned out she was an English Princess!

As you can imagine it caused quite the media stir.

But the rest of the story of our Glorious Ancestors is for another time.

~Part 1 of the Unusual World Tales collection by the wonderfully creepy Renesmee the Alien Space Bat!~

The next installment shall come at a later date.
 
King Philip II of Spain was determined that Elizabeth marry Emmanuel Philibert, Duke of Savoy.
The plan had the benefit that if she did inherit the throne, Philip's cousin, Emmanuel Philibert would rule as Elizabeth's husband and King of England.
 
Philip II would be an interesting match. Their son might rule England, Spain, Portugal, Phillipines, most of the Western Hemisphere, much of northern and southern Italy along with Mediterranean islands, Ireland, modern Benelux, Franche-Comte, and parts of northern Africa. If their son marries a French princess a grandson literally rules the whole of Europe west of the Rhine and south of the Alps. A great-grandson merged with Austrian Hapsburg stock all but unites Europe about 1700.
 
Philip II would be an interesting match. Their son might rule England, Spain, Portugal, Phillipines, most of the Western Hemisphere, much of northern and southern Italy along with Mediterranean islands, Ireland, modern Benelux, Franche-Comte, and parts of northern Africa. If their son marries a French princess a grandson literally rules the whole of Europe west of the Rhine and south of the Alps. A great-grandson merged with Austrian Hapsburg stock all but unites Europe about 1700.
France has salic law.If you want to use force to claim the French throne,Elizabeth's claim from Edward III would already be suffice.
 
Top