WI: Constantius Succeeds Honorius

A fair amount of the Western Empire's problems stemmed from the inability of power to be centralized in the hands of the emperor for any substantial length of time, that power which would do better in their hands fell to Generals. One such General, Constantius found his way to the position of Co-Augustus; in the later empire it seems that for the most part few of these generals took up the purple themselves. What if an established military leader took the Purple well into his stint as de-facto ruler of the West?

Side bit: Even if his ascendency or usurpation fails or lasts for a short time is the precedent likely to result in more military strongmen striking for the purple instead of being its overseer?
 
I wouldn't consider Constantius an usurper considering he was made an emperor by a legitimate senior emperor.He's also related to the emperor by marriage.
 
He wasn't a usurper. The east recognized him as co-Augustus, and Honorius had appointed him. Anyway, the immediate effect of this is it stabalizes Roman politics and allows Constantius to continue with his planned offensive into Spain.
 
He wasn't a usurper. The east recognized him as co-Augustus, and Honorius had appointed him. Anyway, the immediate effect of this is it stabalizes Roman politics and allows Constantius to continue with his planned offensive into Spain.
The East never recognized him,but Honorius,the senior emperor made him his co-emperor.Legally,the opinion of the east doesn't matter because in this case Honorius was the senior emperor over both halves of the empire.
 
Top