American politics seems dull to the British. The moderate two party consensus, the genial attitude of their legislature, the good-natured tone of their campaigns. They seem grey, insipid and boring to a native of Britain's shores. But ask an American what they think of British politics, and if they know about it at all, they'd call it either one of the most atrocious displays of casual tribalistic violence in Europe, or one of the greatest political spectator sports on the planet.
Beginning in the 1930s at the extremes of the political spectrum, the phenomenon of the political paramilitary has entered the mainstream. Every party that has a presence on the political scene has a branch of marching troops, dressed in colourful uniform and occasionally armed. More than anything else, the paramilitaries are responsible for the dramatic polarisation of British politics and the scarcely concealed aggression of Parliamentary debates.
Whereas the Democratic and Progressive Parties of the United States have broadly similar outlooks on the world and indeed collaborate on a great deal, this cannot be said of Britain. People identify with a political party in a tribal way that many foreigners find difficult to comprehend, and while alliances of parties are necessary to make government function, there is deep-seated animosity directed against their opponents. 'Tories' versus 'Socialists', 'Nationals' versus 'Independents', 'Commies' versus 'Nazis' versus 'Kibbos'. Britain's divided multi-party system is violent, ideological and bitter.
In this essay, we will study the paramilitary arm of each major party, their history, their traditional alliances, and their tactics. We will also look into the impact these uniformed political battalions have had on their communities and on the discourse of British politics.
Beginning in the 1930s at the extremes of the political spectrum, the phenomenon of the political paramilitary has entered the mainstream. Every party that has a presence on the political scene has a branch of marching troops, dressed in colourful uniform and occasionally armed. More than anything else, the paramilitaries are responsible for the dramatic polarisation of British politics and the scarcely concealed aggression of Parliamentary debates.
Whereas the Democratic and Progressive Parties of the United States have broadly similar outlooks on the world and indeed collaborate on a great deal, this cannot be said of Britain. People identify with a political party in a tribal way that many foreigners find difficult to comprehend, and while alliances of parties are necessary to make government function, there is deep-seated animosity directed against their opponents. 'Tories' versus 'Socialists', 'Nationals' versus 'Independents', 'Commies' versus 'Nazis' versus 'Kibbos'. Britain's divided multi-party system is violent, ideological and bitter.
In this essay, we will study the paramilitary arm of each major party, their history, their traditional alliances, and their tactics. We will also look into the impact these uniformed political battalions have had on their communities and on the discourse of British politics.