Too many regions

[Thande]

Oberdad is correct on the discussion page of the Regions page. I don't know what pillock decided to add 500 extra links for places where no-one lives, much less AH.commers, but could someone remove them?

[Jasen777]

Removed red links and tiny U.S islands.

[Thande]

Removed red links and tiny U.S islands.

Thankee, sir.

[Michael]

It's turning into a real 'pedia, some of those places have actual facts about them! True ones even!

[Analytical Engine]

It's turning into a real 'pedia, some of those places have actual facts about them! True ones even!

What! :eek::eek::eek::eek:

You'd think that we were trying to portray accurate material... :p

[Susano]

And Gbone continues to regionspam...

[Jasen777]

And use self-links for article titles. No one tell Thande.

[Emperor Qianlong]

Personally, I feel a good rule of thumb should be to create articles on countries/territories only if either members hail from there, or, if it is in one way or another of significance to history/alternate history or forum culture/trivia/jokes.

[Michael]

Exactly EQ, look at Washington DC, how is that related to AH? It's an interesting factoid, but it's pointless. I nominate that someone (else) goes through and merges any places without someone into a massive "other america" section. Most other countries have a member living there and are vaguely on topic because of that.

[Analytical Engine]

Exactly EQ, look at Washington DC, how is that related to AH? It's an interesting factoid, but it's pointless. I nominate that someone (else) goes through and merges any places without someone into a massive "other america" section. Most other countries have a member living there and are vaguely on topic because of that.

Or perhaps tack it onto the USA page...

[Michael]

Thanks for volunteering!